Houser says GTA film unlikely Related content
-
DigitalFoundry- GTA IV Time-lapse: 15 Days in Liberty City
-
Latest Grand Theft Auto IV screenshots
- Review Grand Theft Auto IV [121]
Order before 5.30pm and receive your order the next working day!
Houser says GTA film unlikely News
PC
Xbox 360
PlayStation 3
News
by
Oli Welsh
Rockstar boss Dan Houser has once more poured cold water on the idea of Grand Theft Auto being adapted to film in an interview with the Los Angeles Times.
"We don't believe that the Grand Theft Auto games, which are massive in scope and structurally complex, can be adequately compressed into a two-hour movie," Houser said.
As well as feeling the games' scale and depth could not be reflected in film, Houser was also concerned that Rockstar would have to retain creative control of the project in order to ensure it met the developer's standards of quality.
"It seems obvious to us that maintaining the long-term integrity of any entertainment property has been dependent on not making substandard spin-off products to people whose primary interest is making a quick buck," he said.
"If we ever decide to do a film, it will be because we have resolved our creative doubts, and while retaining enough control to ensure that if the movie is terrible, at least we will know we ruined the property ourselves."
Houser's comments come after the unveiling of Assassin's Creed and Halo short film series at last week's Comic-Con, as well as the announcement that Sam Raimi will direct a film based on Blizzard's World of Warcraft. Elsewhere in Hollywood, films based on game properties as cherished as Prince of Persia, BioShock and Shadow of the Colossus are in development.
Will any of these prove to be more than "substandard spin-off products"? We can but hope.
Are you excited about Grand Theft Auto IV on PlayStation 3/Xbox 360/PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games
Related Games
Grand Theft Auto IV
Latest Features
-
Grand Theft Auto IV Review [121]
-
Grand Theft Auto IV Hands On [43]
-
Grand Theft Auto IV Interview [44]
-
Grand Theft Auto IV Hands On [75]
-
Grand Theft Auto IV Review [941]
Latest Videos
DigitalFoundry- GTA IV Time-lapse: 15 Days in Liberty City [9] 4 November, 2009
Latest News
-
PC Lost and Damned Achievements seen [44]
-
Grand Theft Auto IV PC patched again [4]
-
Rockstar patches GTA IV for PC [30]
-
UK charts: World at War still raging [32]
-
Details of GTA IV PC patch emerge [10]
Latest Screenshots
16 October, 2009 [9]
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Comments: 1-26 of 26 in total
|
0
Probably, but the qeustion must be asked what exactly would a GTA film be like? A film set in a city, in present day or the 80's, about gangsters, hookers, fast cars, guns and drug dealers. I gots me a feeling that may have been done before.
No, no, I know! Let's make a movie about gaying your way up to level 80. That sounds much more appealing. Game & movie oligarch's need to get a fucking grip.
Edited 3 times,
most recently on 27/07/09 @ 11:12
|
|
AphoticCosmos
27/07/09 @ 08:17
+1
The criminal/gangster film is oversaturated with garbage these days. No matter how good any GTA film may or may not be, nobody would bother seeing it because virtually everything else in the genre is shite.
That said, if there was going to be a film, it should be of Vice City. Not enough 80s crime films around these days. |
|
commissar\'s_handgun
27/07/09 @ 08:18
0
Yeah the kind of things that are fun to do in GTA like exploring, driving around listening to the radio, randomly killing people etc would really not work in a film. The parts that would work- some missions, the cut scenes, would just make it a generic gangster film.
|
|
kangarootoo
27/07/09 @ 08:21
+1
I'm not sure a game like GTA is particularly interesting material on which to base a game. Its just a gangster story.
It might have been innnovative as a game, but as a film I can't really see what it would bring over any other well written, directed, acted and produced (all of which are more important than the initial pitch) crime drama. |
|
Vice.Destroyer
27/07/09 @ 08:22
+4
As much as I enjoyed GTA IV, isn't this feeling that "We don't believe that the Grand Theft Auto games, which are massive in scope and structurally complex, can be adequately compressed into a two-hour movie", just about the height of arrogance? Taken on a thematic level, we have a protagonist with baggage, a sympathetic jamaican drug dealer, italian-american gangsters, irish-american thieves, african-american gangsters, as a matter of fact, virtually every single ethnic cliche you care to mention is present and correct.
Throw in a kidnapping of the protagonists brother, a mata hari-type double agent, dodgy city official, in-fighting within the irish-american family and you have a film that I am sure that can and has been made before. One thing I agree with though, the film will likely not be any good. |
|
Moribundman
27/07/09 @ 09:23
+1
Yeah I was just going to say, didn't Ron Howard do this years ago? LOL.
I imagine that the use of cover art was a fully self-aware typical Rockstar/DMA pastiche. Also worth noting that film only got a decent DVD release off the back of GTAIII, and the cover art was more in line with the rest of the series in the US. Seriously I am pleased to see that Mr Houser has some artistic integrity and isn't letting the PT Andersons and Uwe Bolls of this world make some shitty version starring Jason Statham, Rhona Mitra and Mila Jojovich... |
|
0
I think Houser does have a point here. Unlike most games, the GTA series have been very much story driven with deep characters that you get to know over the course of the 20+ hours you play the game. I don't see how that could be translated into a movie really unless it was made as a mini-series and shown over 10 hours or something at least.
Are Hollywood so desperate for ideas that they want to make every game into a movie? I've just heard that Dead Space is being considered for a movie too and I'm sure there's dozens of others too. The thing is almost all of them haven't been very good, have they? The majority have been dire in fact. The best game-to-movie adaption I've seen was Silent Hill which captured the eerie atmosphere of the games superbly and was surprisingly enjoyable but even then it was far from perfect because characterisation was weak. |
|
metalangel
27/07/09 @ 09:52
0
Substandard cash ins? Like GTA London, GTA for the Game Boy Colour, and (controversial) Chinatown Wars, then? What's the point of a proper World of Warcraft movie when that porn series (Whorecraft?) exists in all its big breasted pointy eared glory?
|
|
rhubarbandcustard
27/07/09 @ 12:09
+2
You could tell the story of GTA4 in a 10 minute short film. There is nothing complex about it at all.
There has never been a complex, or particularly, intriguing story in any videogame. Ever. However, there have been several hundred quite brilliant videogames released over the last twenty years. GASP - videogames don't require good stories shocker. GTA4 was not a good story. Producer fellow - get over yourself. |
|
-2
I totally agree with Houser, and I find hilarious that most comments here seem to misunderstand "structurally complex" with "good story" - that's missing the point entirely.
And as far as the last question in the article - it's all too obvious that no good will come out from those flicks. Thanks Rockstar for not ruining your IP with quick bucks projects! |
|
kangarootoo
27/07/09 @ 15:49
+1
@Darren
I'm pretty sure film makers have managed to present deeper characters that any of those that appear in GTA4, well within a 2 hour film slot. We surely aren't suggesting that GTA has characters of a complexity that has yet to be captured on film, are we? The key difference is that in GTA the characters are "presented" over 10 hours because for most of those 10 hours they aren't actually being presented. The player is off doing game things for most of that time, with relatively little characterful interaction. The actual depth of the core GTA characters could probably be covered within 30 minutes of dedicated, tightly directed, non-interactive story... if there was no driving about and shooting things getting in the way and eating up time. |
|
frankfurter209
27/07/09 @ 15:56
-3
You guys couldn't have missed the point more if you tried. The GTA4-bored-me-to-tears idiot patrol is in full force this morning. The story and cutscenes are hardly the point of GTA, and certainly not why I loved GTA4. I'd like to see a film try to convey a realistic faux-New York and the thrill of exploration with dozens of fake cars and radio stations to go with it.
Go back to sucking Infinity Ward's cock
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 27/07/09 @ 16:58
|
|
kangarootoo
27/07/09 @ 16:15
-1
@Mappman
I think you maybe have a good point to make, but it is being hidden by your over-riding urge to spout fanboy dismissals. What do collect-and-deliver missions really have to do with whether the game plot would make a good film? Plenty of good films are chock full of cliche and parody. It doesn't harm them one bit. And I suspect that if GTA was made into a film, they wouldn't actually incolude game missions in the script... don't you think? You clearly don't like GTA4, but the bee is visible poking out from under your bonnet and the reason you are getting negative karma (when others making exactly the same point as you are getting positives) is because you can't seperate "I don't like this game" sentiment from the discussion at hand. |
|
kangarootoo
27/07/09 @ 16:17
0
@frankfurter209
Hehe, you seem to be the mirror image of Mappman. Does that make you a member of the GTA4-made-me-smile idiot patrol? |
Comments: 1-26 of 26 in total
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
