Gold sellers steal accounts - Blizzard
WOW operator explains hard-line stance.
Speaking to Nick Ryan for Eurogamer's Gold Trading Exposed feature series, a Blizzard spokesperson has explained the company's firm opposition to real money trading (RMT).
"Many people don't realise that the companies selling services for World of Warcraft often target the players they've sold their services to," said the spokesperson.
"Once these companies have access to an account, they will often turn around and sell the equipment and gold on the account or the actual account itself – if not immediately, then at some point down the line. In effect, players actually end up purchasing gold, items, or entire accounts stolen from other players."
Blizzard also argued that the negative effect of the gold trade could be seen in the drain on its own customer service and development resources which could otherwise be concentrated directly on the game.
"Beyond the direct impact that these companies can have on individual players, their actions end up affecting everyone who plays World of Warcraft in that the time and effort we have to put into assistance, education and our various countermeasures ends up taking time away from our normal development and customer service efforts," the spokesperson said.
Elsewhere in this week's final instalment of Gold Trading Exposed, it's revealed that RuneScape developer Jagex lost a considerable proportion of its membership when it chose to ban all accounts involved in gold selling.
"They lost 10 per cent of their membership, and still haven't recovered in terms of numbers since they did it two years ago," an anonymous ex-Jagex source told Ryan.
"Even though they have almost stopped gold selling in RuneScape, it has cost them two million active accounts; i.e. there were four million players, there are now two million players, of which less than one million actually subscribe," he said.
Ryan finds that companies like Jagex, CCP and Sony Online Entertainment are now seeking alternative ways to thwart gold selling - rather than the straightforward banning approach of Blizzard and Warhammer Online's Mythic.
Jagex has rebalanced RuneScape's economy and trading system, CCP has introduced an exchange of game time for currency in EVE Online, and SOE has tried authorised real money auction houses on some EverQuest II servers.
Previous chapters of Gold Trading Exposed have dealt with the players and the sellers themselves, as well as offering an overview of the trade.
You may also like...
-
EA evaluating FIFA Street features for FIFA 13
-
Epic's Sweeney on graphics tech: "the limit really is in sight"
-
Sony admits "dropping the ball" with Demon's Souls
-
CD Projekt: Witcher 2 intro cinematic "the most expensive asset we ever created"
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 now live for Xbox 360
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 performance tip: make a new manual save
-
Valve admits hackers accessed Steam transaction log
-
Skyrim gets high-res PC texture pack
-
Next Xbox has tablet-like touch-screen controller - rumour
-
Double Fine Adventure passes Day of the Tentacle budget
-
English language Cannon Fodder 3 hits GamersGate
-
Blizzard legally opposes Valve's Dota trademark application
-
Sony: The Last Guardian is making "slow progress"
-
Diablo 3 release date narrowed
-
Five new Mass Effect 3 gameplay trailers
-
Amnesia: The Dark Descent follow-up teased
-
Cheapest places to buy Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning
-
Namco Bandai to publish new Star Trek title
-
EA announces starry Syndicate voice cast
-
Final Fantasy 13-2 "to be continued" ending explained
-
Sony showcases Vita's Discovery Apps
-
Skyrim makers create dragon riding, Kinect shouts, new skill trees
-
David Braben discusses consumer Raspberry Pi release
-
EA outlines Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning House of Valor day-one DLC/Online Pass
-
Bethesda: Skyrim update 1.4 should hit Xbox 360 tomorrow









Comments (13) Latest comment 3 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
When you buy Gold, they get your char name and thats it.
Granted, power leveling services know your account name and pass and that may come and bite you in the ass later on if you dont change up (like Avon Barksdale yo).
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Anyone who does this is clearly asking for it. People who claim to have had their account "hacked" more than likely either done the above or installed a dodgy addon from a dodgy site. Both practices are pretty damn stupid and easily avoided.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Gold selling though, Benno's right - they just get your character name and any details used in the ordering process.
That last part is the scary bit.
I've bought gold twice in the last few months, and now not only does my character get a spam mail /in/ World of Warcraft every now and then banging on about discounts and special offers (which is incredibly strange,) but recently a mysterious person tried to add me on MSN messenger... I had no idea who so I dug round and found their profile - which mentioned that they were from one of the gold seller companies. I never actually gave them my e-mail address, so they'd have gotten my e-mail address from my Paypal details and decided to see what messengers I was using, presumably to spam me there.
A bit weird... Knowing what these companies can be like I removed all my e-mails stored in that account and have changed the password to a very strong one.
My advice to buyers is try and make it as anonymous as you can - don't even use a Paypal account linked to an e-mail address which would cause you a lot of grief if the account were hijacked. Make a new character to receive the gold if you don't want the in-game spam, only pay via Paypal, and send them as little information via that as possible (change your Paypal account to use a specific Paypal only e-mail address for example.)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Or don't do at all would be safer, but then people always want the quick fix.
On another note, this is just info pulled from nicks article, this seems to happen allot on eurogamer, is this normal? I mean you just quoted someone from your own webiste who quoted someone else. It seems a strange thing to do but then I don't run a professional enthusiasm website. Does it help break the article up into nice easy to find chuck packed with salient facts?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I couldn't be arsed to read the main article, but these derivitave items nicely summarise the more interesting points and maybe pique my interest enough to read the whole thing.
Some people always want the quick fix.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
-- the author (of the main articles)
w: [link url=http://www.nickryan.net< br /> ]http://www.nickryan.net< br /> [/link]
e: http://www.ryansrants.com< /a>
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Hmm fair enough, never give much thought before but I kinda figured thats how it went.
Slighly confused when you used derivative and interesting in the same sentence, derivative is used so negativly in games journalism I'd almost for got it wasn't a negative word
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
It has absolutely everything to do with gold selling if these companies take shortcuts to "earn" ingame money to sell by hacking other players' accounts. Which they do...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Blizzard should get off their high horse and instead try to facilitate it in the best way possible.