F.E.A.R. The Future

Hands-on with the 360 port and PC expansion.

There may be shades of Championship Manager about the split between Monolith and Vivendi over F.E.A.R., but the lack of rancour means Vivendi's having no trouble colouring in the F.E.A.R. shaped holes on its 2006 release schedule.

Quite how a true F.E.A.R. sequel will work without Monolith's slow-motion guiding hand is something best left to Vivendi's bloody manifestations, but certainly this year fans of the original game will notice no let-up - with Day 1 Studios set to turn out an Xbox 360 adaptation of the PC original featuring new content, and TimeGate busily putting the finishing touches on PC expansion pack Extraction Point, which picks up where the first game left off. Both are due out this autumn.

Naturally, neither developer is moving too far away from what made F.E.A.R. work - a storyline tainted by the paranormal, and a succession of increasingly bloody, detailed first-person gun battles pitting slow-motion sharpshooting against startlingly adaptive enemies.

Then again you certainly wouldn't expect to see a change from the Xbox 360 port. What you might worry about is how even the mighty Xbox 360 will cope with the game's lofty graphical demands - it really was the prima donna of last year's first-person crop, downing GPU cycles like Kristal from the bottle. And there might be cause for concern if you merely glanced at the 360 version at this year's E3, because while it clearly resembles the PC version it can't claim to take maximum advantage of all its assets. Not yet anyway - but Vivendi was keen to let anybody in earshot know that the full game will use all the PC's content at the highest quality graphical settings. So there.

'F.E.A.R. The Future' Screenshot sitdown

F.E.A.R. on Xbox 360: now with enemies that sit down.

Setting that aside, the 360 demo gave us an idea of what Vivendi was talking about when it mentioned new single-player content in its original announcement. Apart from a myriad of tweaks (word is that regeneration of the slow-motion meter is quicker, and analogue control felt almost-right with functions sensibly dotted around the 360's excellent pad), there's a new "Instant Action" mode, absent from the PC game, where the idea is to go through a level taking on huge numbers of enemies with as much speed, efficiency and lethality as possible. The level we played was split into identikit sections, with a yard full of grunts followed by a corridor of mechanised walker [the best kind of corridor - John].

It's not just for kicks though - the better you do, the better your end-of-level or post-death stats, which you're given on an analysis screen afterward. Not only that, but the game computes a final score for you and uploads it to Xbox Live leaderboards, which ought to encourage a bit of competition. Vivendi's also talked about "brand new multiplayer content created to fully utilise Xbox Live" so it's a fair bet Live will be employed for more than boards, too - although whether F.E.A.R. 360 will make use of the content recently added to the PC version, including new Control game-modes, is something Vivendi hasn't got anything to say about right now. More to come, presumably.

'F.E.A.R. The Future' Screenshot dancing

F.E.A.R. on PC: now with dancing.

Quite what Extraction Point will do with the PC multiplayer is another question, but for now the focus is firmly on new single-player content - much as you'd expect from an expansion, really. And, indeed, the level shown off at E3 was very much what you'd expect from a F.E.A.R. expansion penned by outsiders. No disrespect to TimeGate, whose level played out perfectly acceptably, but don't expect much more than much more of the same. Indeed - and it's impossible to go much further without spoiling what happened at the end of F.E.A.R., so duck out now etc. - you shouldn't even expect to escape the explosion that wrapped things up in the first place.

As you'll recall, the first game concluded in horror-cliffhanger style, with the faceless hero scrambling out of the way of a game-ending explosion that ripped the entire world to shreds, and making off in a chopper - only for little Alma to rear her Sadako-inspired head in time for the screen to rock to black in frightening fashion. We pick up seconds later, as you emerge from the wreckage of the downed chopper and find yourself imperilled by a similar range of enemies, environments and slow-motion all-the-above-clichés.

'F.E.A.R. The Future' Screenshot bastard

And this bastard.

What follows is distinctly F.E.A.R. - dark but detailed environments, the odd turn-the-valve puzzle, enemies fighting you in enclosed spaces, and the odd radio-fuzzing manifestation to mess with your head. Think doors stretching away into depths of blurry gore and other jumpy behaviour.

The standout bit came a bit further on, as we made our way into a room apparently vacated by decorators, disinclined to take their paint pots and scaffold, and rubble-strewn by the effects of the last game's conclusion. About then, you get hold of a new weapon - a fearsome mini-gun - and come into contact with a range of unhelpfully transparent, fast-moving enemies who like nothing better than to stalk you, staining the air with their presence only intermittently, leaving you to spread lead instinctively like something out of Predator. This quickly reduces the room to tatters, and it certainly felt edgy and awkward. It'll be interesting to see how else TimeGate varies its approach - the E3 demo was more of the same, certainly, but we still left it reluctantly, suggesting that we still have a bit of F.E.A.R. in our hearts. VOOO-oomp.

F.E.A.R. on Xbox 360 and F.E.A.R. Extraction Point for PC are both due out this autumn.

Comments (26) Latest comment 8 months ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Razz #1 6 years ago

    Wow! Sounds promising :)
  • trav #2 6 years ago

    But will the 360 version included the expanison pack levels to make it a whole nicely rounded package?
  • morriss #3 6 years ago

  • Have_to_Speak_Up #4 6 years ago

  • Talha #5 6 years ago

    What, Monolith aren't involved? I don't know - Viv & Co would do well to give us more of the same, let alone taking things forward. What is it with ground-breaking shooters and publisher/developer disputes?

    It is odd that X360 version doesn't meet or exceed the PC version's graphical splendour - you'd think it would be easy.
  • El_MUERkO #6 6 years ago

    mini-gun battles with predator like stealth beasties cant be a bad thing, sure fear isnt ground breaking in terms of gameplay but that doesnt stop it being fun \o/
  • #7 6 years ago

    Talha,
    What part of "but Vivendi was keen to let anybody in earshot know that the full game will use all the PC's content at the highest quality graphical settings. " did you miss? :)
  • space_ace #8 6 years ago

    but where is the mac version, ifear?
  • Wrestlevania #9 6 years ago

    Talha: "It is odd that X360 version doesn't meet or exceed the PC version's graphical splendour - you'd think it would be easy."

    There's this little detail known as 'cost' and The Suits like it to be as small as possible...

    Anyway, it'll still be brilliant on Xbox 360; the graphics are already highly impressive and not at all as light-weight in comparison to the Xbox 360 as your comment implies. You need some seriously powerful PC kit to get the most, graphically, out of F.E.A.R. What a direct PC-to-X360 port should (hopefully) amount to is you flash lot will get even higher frame rates.
    Edited by 1 at 02/06/06 @ 12:14
  • Lost_in_Darkness #10 6 years ago

    Vivendi are a shitty company. They drove away Valve and Monolith. I wouldn't wanna support them and their products just because they carry on the FEAR name.
    What Monolith is working on next is far more worthy of my money than any cash-in games that Vivendi and their third rate developers piss out.
  • Bi50N Verified Head of Global Communications, THQ #11 6 years ago

    "What you might worry about is how even the mighty Xbox 360 will cope with the game's lofty graphical demands"

    troll ;¬)
  • Have_to_Speak_Up #12 6 years ago

    LOL Lost in Darkeness

    What's your issue with Vivendi? What makes you think they drove away Valve? And considering Monolith are owned by Warner Brothers I reckon it would be unlikely that there would be a lasting partnership there anyway. A one shot deal was far more likely.
  • Talha #13 6 years ago

    @Jamesphilip & all: First, it is not ME who is implying the lack of PC's graphical splendour in X360's version, it is the article itself. Why jump on me? I haven't seen the demo, I was merely commenting on the article.

    Second...er - there was only the one thing to say.

    @Wrestlevania: 100% agreed. Even if the 360 can run it to 80-90% of the PC spec, it would be amazing.
    Edited by 1 at 02/06/06 @ 12:59
  • Hicksy #14 6 years ago

    One of my favourite games of last year!

    Very much looking forward to the expansion pack!

    :o)
  • oceanmotion #15 6 years ago

    Condemed on the 360 uses the exact same engine as F.E.A.R. It will have no problem. Max everything and maybe some AA if they put some effort in.
  • #16 6 years ago

    Talha,
    It is odd that X360 version doesn't meet or exceed the PC version's graphical splendour - you'd think it would be easy.

    First, it is not ME who is implying the lack of PC's graphical splendour in X360's version, it is the article itself.

    The first comment is not implication it is a statement. Something like "It is odd that the article implies that this demo version doesn't seem to meet the PC version's graphical spleandour - you'd think it would be easy.." would actually be a comment on the article's implication.

    Sorry for being so anal
    /hang head in shame.
    :(
    Edited by 3 at 02/06/06 @ 15:01
  • Artemus #17 6 years ago

    So is the expansion just more dark corridors? Or are they going to put in some more exciting locations? Biggest problem with the original was the lack of variety.
    Edited by 1 at 02/06/06 @ 15:22
  • Talha #18 6 years ago

    @jamesphilp: NNNRRRRGGhhhh...Come ON! Anyway, I think just adding the word 'apparently' would do the trick instead of adding 'the article implies'. Why? Because the FACT itself is odd, not the act of the article implying it, which your version would...imply.

    Teach you to be so anal in future. Ha!
  • Lost_in_Darkness #19 6 years ago

    Have_to_Speak_Up says "What's your issue with Vivendi? What makes you think they drove away Valve?"

    Uhm, the lawsuits against them by Valve maybe.
  • Walshicus #20 6 years ago

    I think what they're saying is that at this stage, they've not optimised the game enough to have it running at the 100% max settings the PC version offers. Clearly as development continues, this will change.
  • Schwabing #21 6 years ago

    "downing GPU cycles like Kristal from the bottle"

    that's Cristal btw.

    :-P
  • thinktank #22 6 years ago

    Who the hell has a rig that can run F.E.A.R. on 100% max settings,

    and if they do i bet it woundn't cost £280

    Surely that is the point, as most of us wont a machine nearly as powerful as the one sites like this use to reveiw pc games.

    Hell £280 probably wouldn't be enough for the deposite on such a rig.
    Edited by 1 at 05/06/06 @ 01:20
  • YourMessageHere #23 6 years ago

    Got to say, I'm getting a bit sick of seeing great FPS games made for PC ported to consoles and given extra bits and bobs, given that FPS games are largely wasted on consoles; first Far Cry and now F.E.A.R. Note that we PC people don't get many lauded console FPSs like Black or Perfect Dark ported over and given supplementary bells and whistles. Dare I speculate that they'd seem a lot less laudable if given keyboard and mouse controls? Still, an expansion pack is good news, but by my reckoning it really ought to have the Instant Action mode to be properly worthwhile.
  • bloodflowers #24 6 years ago

    "Not yet anyway - but Vivendi was keen to let anybody in earshot know that the full game will use all the PC's content at the highest quality graphical settings. So there."

    I wonder if we'll have enough time for a quick cup of tea between frame updates?

    Oh, and that comment above. Stop it with the kb&mouse whining. It's better for some things, worse for others.
  • miiiguel #25 6 years ago

    I found most odd that people that for sure don't own a 360 keep saying PC is best to play. IMO:
    1. I work in fornt of a PC 10 hours a day, I don't want to spend my ludic times in an office-desk looking to a 19 inch LCD.
    2. PC's are "open boxes" at my home, where I use but a Linux box with a cheap video card, even "Hearts" performe better in my 360. So don't imply that there's a box called PC that's better that a one called 360.

    My ludic times are spent in my living room laid back on the couch playing in a 42" HDTV, and it is much, much better than "office gaming". Just insert the DVD...
  • MurfPD #26 8 months ago

    F.E.A.R is one great game even though it could be hard to play in a max settings but still the game play is pretty nice and the multilayer in PC look promising hope to have some friends to play with this game. The x360 game versions i still haven't seen it but i guess it would also be promising like in the PC in which it really does look great. Murfreesboro Pediatric Dentist