Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Enemy Territory: Quake Wars Review

PC PlayStation 3 Review by Rob Fahey

28 September, 2007

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

It's a good week for those who enjoy taking care of Alien Scum. Unless you've been living under an especially soundproof rock, you can't fail to have noticed that the Master Chief has returned to Earth this week to splatter some Covenant types all over the ruins of East Africa - but it's not just Xbox 360 owners who will be finishing the fight this weekend.

There's alien killin' to be done on the PC as well, it seems - with another venerable franchise, Quake, bringing the fight back to Earth for a teamplay-focused rumble between the human forces and everyone's favourite biomechanical horrors, the Strogg.

We shouldn't really imply that there's much correlation between Enemy Territory: Quake Wars and Halo 3, though. In fact, if anything, this pair ably demonstrates just how un-alike two FPS games that are essentially about space marines fighting space aliens can be - and yes, we're saying that without a hint of sarcasm. Honest guv.

For the Makron!

Enemy Territory: Quake Wars is English developer Splash Damage's follow-up to the popular Enemy Territory freeware title, which was based on another id Software game, Return to Castle Wolfenstein. Around four years in the making, this second instalment in the Enemy Territory series has transposed the action to the science fiction universe of Quake II and Quake 4 - and somewhere along the way, seems to have swapped some DNA with Digital Illusions' celebrated Battlefield series.

In fact, it would be fair to say that ET:QW has far more in common with Battlefield's wide open spaces and vehicular focus than it does with Quake's tight corridors and twitchy firefights. Anyone who has played the Wolfenstein version of the game will know that teamwork and mission objectives are the order of the day here, not frags - but Quake Wars takes that ethos a step further.

Each of the game's 12 levels - which are spread across four distinct "Campaigns", each ostensibly highlighting a major battle in the Strogg invasion of Earth - has one defending team and one attacking team. The plot explanations regarding what you're defending and attacking are almost meaningless; once the timer counts down, all you know is that you have to blow something up, hack something or capture something, or prevent the enemy team from doing one of the above.

'Enemy Territory: Quake Wars' Screenshot 1

The game progresses according to a lengthy timer; most servers seem to set this at around 20 minutes, although we're writing this on the evening of launch so it's likely that settings will be played with in the coming days. Within that timescale, the attacking team has to achieve a number of objectives - for example, knocking down a barricade so you can bring your mobile command centre through, escorting said command centre to a deployment point, taking out a nearby shield generator, stealing a key object and then making it back to an evacuation point with said object.

The objectives flow in a logical progression from one to the next, and the attacking team can only win by completing the full sequence. On many maps, this actually means that the game gets harder as you near the end; with only one final objective to go, vital seconds are ticking away, and the full enemy squad is defending just one room or one entrance. More than once we've seen an attacking squad make it all the way to the last objective, only to be held there in a bloody stalemate for ten minutes - although that's nothing a bit more coordinated team-work couldn't solve.

Unlike similar games like Team Fortress, though, Quake Wars doesn't allow for an ebb and flow across the battlefield. Certain things - remote points where your reinforcements spawn, say, or various turrets and defensive buildings - can of course be destroyed or recaptured by the enemy, but the major level objectives are one-way only. Once the defending squad is down to its last objective, there's no way to push the attacking squad back or retake the initiative; painted into a corner, it's time to defend or die.

To spice things up, the game also offers a host of smaller "missions", which you can cycle through by pressing M on the keyboard. Some of these are dynamic - such as keeping track of which vehicles and emplacements are damaged, and allowing engineers to select their repair as a mission. Others are static, such as capturing helpful spawn points that aren't included in the main set of objectives. Your present objective is always listed in the top-left corner - although we were a bit miffed that selecting a mission doesn't give you a nice obvious waypoint marker to guide you there.

Covering Fire

'Enemy Territory: Quake Wars' Screenshot 2

Actually, that's a bit of a problem with the game as a whole; it's got a learning curve reminiscent of the Matterhorn, with only the faintest nod given to the idea of comprehensive in-game information. Information on your map and HUD is densely packed, but only makes sense once you actually know the layout of the level. You'll spend a lot of time wandering around in your first few days playing the game, which a decent and clear objective marking system could have avoided.

The game's determination to cast you as a clueless newbie for your first few matches continues in the equipment load-out. As you select each weapon and tool from your arsenal, you get a brief description in a window at the top of the screen; helpful as this is, it'll still be a long time before you instinctively know which of the bewildering items you need in each given situation. This is especially notable on the Strogg side; the humans, at least, get sensible weapons like shotguns and sniper rifles. The Strogg equivalent items will take quite a bit of experimentation to get your head around.

Once you've stopped wandering around the maps like a tourist looking for a cashpoint in the West End, and have worked out which way around each of the guns goes, Quake Wars seriously starts to come into its own.

The vehicles in the game - both terrestrial and aerial - are great fun, ranging from conventional tanks and choppers to more outlandish types like the Strogg's slow but devastating bipedal Cyclops. As in Battlefield, we expect that aerial combat experts will emerge quickly; there's a steep learning curve to controlling the choppers, but taking out ground targets with them is both a great tactic, and a deeply satisfying experience.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Enemy Territory: Quake Wars on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 55 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Pedrolot
28/09/07 @ 10:31
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And another fight worth starting by the looks of it!
Dizzy
28/09/07 @ 10:33
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was tempted by this... but I am afraid that the Orange Box will be my choice of FPS for the next half year (together with Halo 3 and CoD4 ofc). Those 3 should keep me happy for a LONG time.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 28/09/07 @ 11:33
foamy
28/09/07 @ 10:35
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I played the Beta and I only managed to play as Strogg, which are shit.
Destria
28/09/07 @ 10:35
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"These are Hostile Waters..."

Now that was a great game...
bdc
28/09/07 @ 10:41
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Not bad, but not the second coming of Christ that many Quake fans had been hoping for.
espy
28/09/07 @ 10:51
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Was hoping for a nine, but the competition is rather fierce. I loved the betas, but now TF2 is preventing me from playing the QW-Demo :/ Grr.

Will be getting this anyway, at the very least it will be a way of thanking Splash Damage for years of unparalleled online fun with the original Enemy Territory.
Katsumoto
28/09/07 @ 10:52
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
absolutely loving this myself, playing it just as much tf2. As the review says, it provides a completely different experience and they compliment each other well. Considering how much fun and playtime i've been getting out of the single map in the demo, I can't wait for 11 more.
wonton
28/09/07 @ 10:58
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
looking forward to this only because its the first game in a long to to run on linux natively once they have released the binaries
AbyssUK
28/09/07 @ 11:04
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No rocket jumping.... this isn't quake its battlefield 2543
El_MUERkO
28/09/07 @ 11:05
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Warhawk is better :P
marilena
28/09/07 @ 11:12
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What's with Rob reviewing everything these days? Has he become some sort of bionic review overlord?
Maximilian
28/09/07 @ 11:17
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Personal taste seems to be a big factor with this game. Personally, I think this is the best online shooter I've ever played since the Q1/Q2 days. Some others hate it. To each, their own I guess.

I also much prefer Strogg weapons to the GDF ones.
kali_mist
28/09/07 @ 11:20
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Thats a fair review. I would encourage folks to try the strogg engineer in the demo.
I played a few hours and found the class to be great fun. Lots to do setting up emplacements etc.
Magic Panda
28/09/07 @ 11:28
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"These are Hostile Waters..."

Now that was a great game...
Fitzmogwai
28/09/07 @ 11:41
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Tom Baker FTW
Raiten
28/09/07 @ 11:49
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I haven't yet touched the full game, tho i intend to do so but from just playing the demo i can say this is quite an addicting game.
It's not without faults, like when you start this game it somewhat doesn't feel all that good untill you get the hang of it, once that hapens the game gets surpsingly fun.

Being an old quake veteran, i find it bit weird that Rob missed the quakeish features this game has, most notable being that this game is realy fast phaced at it's best wich is something quite incommon with each quake game.

ps. is it just me or does it seem that not many realy like playing medics?
Salaman
28/09/07 @ 11:51
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No mention of the strogg medic's ability to create spawnpoints from the corpses of dead GDF?

/tuts

It's a great game mechanic!
Clive Dunn
28/09/07 @ 11:51
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Avon from Blakes 7 ftw as well.

We want Hostile Waters 2 now.

/starts pointless internet petition.
Trane
28/09/07 @ 11:55
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So many games, so little time =/
Katsumoto
28/09/07 @ 11:59
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I love playing the medic as the GDF especially thanks to the hilarious buggies - driving around, jumping off, reviving, jumping back on, driving to the next guy. Great stuff. As strogg I prefer playing constructor or.. whatever the class that uses artillery is called.

I agree with the guy who said you only really "click" with the game once you've been at it for a few hours. At first I was decidely "meh" but I stuck at it and now I love it.
BobsUncle
28/09/07 @ 12:04
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"The review read like a -12/10 to me. Eurogamer bought by ID, must be a fix."


HA HA HA !

Funny as fuck! :-)
mk-1601
28/09/07 @ 12:15
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Your present objective is always listed in the top-left corner - although we were a bit miffed that selecting a mission doesn't give you a nice obvious waypoint marker to guide you there."

Erm, I'm pretty sure that it *does* do this. I'd be getting lost all the time otherwise...
Katsumoto
28/09/07 @ 12:22
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah, it does. Random
Shinji [mod]
28/09/07 @ 12:24
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It does, yeah, but I found that the objective marker got lost in the clutter of the HUD. I'm used to it now, but I spent a LOT of time running around like a headless chicken to begin with - and given that I've played loads of ET, BF1942, Tribes etc, I don't /think/ that's entirely down to me being shit.

Although that's probably a factor. I'm not denying that.
ViralNinja
28/09/07 @ 12:26
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"the game goes out of its way to let your enemies know the second you use your disguise ability, and will drop the disguise at the slightest provocation (and the most awkward moments)."

Well duh, looks like osmeone didn't realise that you can backstab people without losing your disguise.

Top review though, it's good to see you talked a lot baout how it's like quake, but not once about how it's like Enemy Territory, douche
karstux
28/09/07 @ 12:29
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've been playing the demo for a bit now (only offline), and can't really get to grips with it. I think it's the pacing. Someone in this thread said it's fast; I say it's feckin' hectic. The combat moves fast, the gunfights are fast, you die fast.

Too fast for me. Or am I getting old..?
Shinji [mod]
28/09/07 @ 12:30
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ViralNinja, do you kiss your mother with that mouth?*

Anyway, the comparisons with Quake are relatively restrained in the review - and I didn't want to compare it too heavily with ET because I'll wager that the majority of our readers have never actually played ET. I'd prefer to describe the new game from first principles and let it stand on its own merits.



*(I bet you do. With tongues.)

Edited 1 times, most recently on 28/09/07 @ 13:31
Fitzmogwai
28/09/07 @ 12:39
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And Glynis Barber. Hmmm... Anyway, how could there be a Hostile Waters 2 when the Anteus was


*** SPOILER! ***





Destroyed at the end, and there aren't any more adaptive cruisers?


/Signs petition anyway.
Pike
28/09/07 @ 12:40
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I played the demo for a few hours, and I can't say it grabbed me, despite not experiencing any of the broken gameplay people have complained about.

It seemed like a slick game with some nice ideas to me, so I can't disagree with the score here, it was just something that didn't click with me when I played it.
Ronan_Crawford
28/09/07 @ 12:54
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Really was tempted to buy this today. But not really played Quake. I had no knowledge on the background. So I think that I'll leave this for awhile.
Enjoy it.
asphaltcowboy
28/09/07 @ 13:03
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Mines been posted! Shame I don't have my PC here with me in Amsterdam :(
Drpwnage
28/09/07 @ 13:47
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I played the Beta as I enjoyed both RTCW and ET online, it is a different game as the review states with vehicles taking the starring role overall and I really disliked the feel and akwardness of the vehicle controls using a Kb/mouse.
insane_cobra
28/09/07 @ 13:47
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Fitzmogwai

Well, Antaeus was in pretty much the same state at the start of the first game, wasn't it?

Not that I would care much for a sequel. It was a good game and I finished it, but a number of drastic improvements would have to be made to get me interested again.
ViralNinja
28/09/07 @ 13:57
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Shinji, i'd love to respond properly to you but would mean dignifying your patronisation of your readership.
Mentalist(air)
28/09/07 @ 14:27
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
When I played the demo, it seemed to me to be just like battlefield 2, but not as good.

That's not a comparison that's made specifically, in the review. I was wondering how it stacked up directly.
smoison
28/09/07 @ 14:30
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
When I played the demo, it seemed to me to be like battlefield 2, but way better and ACTULLY FINISHED!

I can't believe they can make a game like this without any of the bugs the DICE games have.
Destria
28/09/07 @ 15:09
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought the end of Hostile Waters pretty much tried to set up a sequel.
CouldntResist
28/09/07 @ 15:12
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Eh...so it's basically battlefield. BF2 is already good enough for me. I think i'll buy Orange Box/Crysis instead.

Oh and the next UT.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 28/09/07 @ 16:12
Maximilian
28/09/07 @ 16:08
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmmm. Shinji I wonder are you one and the same Shinji who played Q2 back in the quake.ie heyday....
projectmayhem
28/09/07 @ 16:39
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i was hyped up for this until TF2 crossed my path. i want a fast-paced FPS to keep me satisfied, and Quake Wars would be a natural candidate, except it's not that fast paced at all. plus with UT3 looming, QW would probably be shelved pretty quickly.

i'll stick to TF2 and BF2142 when i need some of that "frontline warfare" stuff.
Ryuken
28/09/07 @ 17:30
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Decent game if you take time to get into it and preferably have a group of friends willing to play it with you.
Varsity
28/09/07 @ 17:35
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Hmmm... Anyway, how could there be a Hostile Waters 2 when the Anteus was


*** SPOILER! ***





Destroyed at the end, and there aren't any more adaptive cruisers?"


There was another one on the seabed that wouldn't reactivate. It's mentioned in passing in the intro.

Not that I'd want a sequel of the story. A remake though, that would be good. I loved that game.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 28/09/07 @ 18:35
decibel
29/09/07 @ 13:01
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I hated this after playing it for a bit the other day. Soo plain and standard.

It's not Quake, and it certainly isn't Enemy Territory. Its title is such a lie :(

Plus..

NO GIBS?
jakswan
29/09/07 @ 23:19
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was looking forward to this, it's not quite Battlefield and not quite quake, kind of the worst of both.

Then Team Fortress 2 came out, got Counterstrike and Quake players raving about it.
Kirly_Wombat
30/09/07 @ 13:58
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looks like a cool game. I did see a review on tv where the guy walked through building turrets etc. Still wont make me run out and buy it though. The only Quake Ive liked was the first one for some reason, which is unusual for me as I usually like the latest and greatest of things.
Flickjax
01/10/07 @ 07:29
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The game is great fun especially if you have a good team. It is very similar to ET and moch better than BF2 in my humble opinion.
YourMessageHere
01/10/07 @ 07:37
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Thankyou for confirming a suspicion, Eurogamer. Yet another "73%, if you like this sort of thing, this is the sort of thing you'll like!!!!" review, and I'm now fairly certain you've lost all credibility. There's no way this should get so positive a review, it's dull, generic, extremely confusing and plays like a naff BF2 mod. Spawning in waves!?!? Not seen that since...DoD, and every other team wargame since; scraping the barrel for good things to talk up, perhaps. Alongside totally screwing over EGTV, you really do seem to be buggering yourselves rather effectively in the last month or so.
Furfoot
01/10/07 @ 09:54
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I played the beta of this and much prefer TF2. TF2 is shaping up to be the bridge which unites all kinds of FPS gamers from ye olde Quakeworld gamers up to the CS:S crowd. It has pace, great balance and an amazingly scaleable graphics engine.
symmetry
01/10/07 @ 16:28
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
HOSTILE WATERS 2!

Yes bloody please.
figgis
02/10/07 @ 08:51
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@YourMessageHere

Why not take the time to learn the game before dissing it. Yes its confusing for a newbie but all the information displayed on the screen has some use. Comparing it to a naff BF2 mod is taking the mickey a bit. The balance of the teams and the shared objectives make the game much deeper than BF2.

Comments: 1-50 of 55 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Metaboli

X View gallery