Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Call of Duty Classic Review

Xbox 360 PlayStation 3 Review by Dan Whitehead

7 December, 2009

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

It's strange to think that a game which came out six years ago is now considered a retro release, but that's the situation Call of Duty finds itself in for this celebratory digital airing of the first game in the series. Showered with slobbery kisses back in 2003, and squashed under a ton of Game of the Year awards, it arrives in 2009 looking surprisingly outdated for a game so young - though no less entertaining for its premature ageing.

What's most apparent is how little the Call of Duty series has actually changed over its five subsequent iterations. Almost every element is already in place here, from the fondness for bombastic set-pieces to the rather pompous quotes propping up the loading screens. This is not a game of great narrative depth or insight, only really a few beats away from the daft run-and-gun action of Wolfenstein, so these snatches of war-related wisdom from Churchill, Hemingway and Voltaire seem even more incongruous.

There are three tales, following US, British and Soviet forces, but these play out one after another rather than being shuffled up like later titles in the series. As always, these stories are little more than an excuse to drop you into short, sharp encounters with numerous enemies. It's lighter on the first-person situational gimmickry than we're now used to - there are no sections where you have to shoot enemies with a crossbow while riding on a jet-ski inside a blimp that's crashing into a volcano, for instance.

'Call of Duty Classic' Screenshot 1

The hunt for Vladimir's lost contact lens provided a welcome distraction from the brutality of war.

But it's easy to see why it so bowled people over six years ago. An early car chase is exhilarating (if hampered by the way your soldier can still rotate through a complete circle while leaning out of the window - perhaps he's just a torso on a turntable) while story sections use the first-person view to put you in high-concept scenarios like a glider crash-landing behind enemy lines or bluffing your way aboard a German battleship.

The giddy core of the game is right there from the start. This isn't a series that evolved into a blockbuster - it was born with explosions and blood and oh my god that plane crashed right next to me; thrill-seeking already thrashing around in its DNA. The upside to this is that Call of Duty Classic is still an absolute blast to play, albeit one with a lot more rough edges than you might expect.

It's nothing special graphically, and often looks downright ugly. Character models are bloaty and unconvincing, and the rudimentary AI is even more transparent than in its current ancestors. Race ahead of the game's crude signposting and you can find NPCs standing rigidly waiting to be activated by the presence of someone else or, worse, find empty areas that magically fill with enemies when the correct trigger point is hit.

In the first real story level, for example, you can dash across the first field without waiting for your fellow paratroopers to land. Do this, and you can reach the house at the end and lob grenades through the window before the German machine-gunners even exist, let alone get a chance to shoot you.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Call of Duty Classic on Xbox 360/PlayStation 3?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 62 Next →

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
harzo
07/12/09 @ 07:48
#1
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I have been waiting on a review of this - 800 points and it would have been a must buy but I am still quite tempted!
Vertical Stand
07/12/09 @ 08:07
#2
+16
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So basically Call of Duty is crap, but its a classic, even though its crap, but its a...
Darren
07/12/09 @ 08:15
#3
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Vertical Stand - No, Call of Duty is NOT crap, the review text and that 7/10 score clearly contradict that claim (since an EG 7 is a GOOD score). No, Call of Duty is a classic alright, it's just a bit dated that's all.
Vertical Stand
07/12/09 @ 08:21
#4
+15
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Darren relax, was just having a bit of a dig at how torn the reviewer is at times over the game before giving it a 7, thought it was an EG injoke people would get.
HuggyAtHome
07/12/09 @ 08:27
#5
+9
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Not sure I can justify the spend on something already compleetd when the backlog of recent titles to finish is so long. Also, just got hold of Crackdown for a similar price and for me that is money far better spent.

Smacks a little of blatant cash-in really.
swissorc
07/12/09 @ 08:31
#6
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
PLayed the demo on live and unless you sit in a pitch black room you can't see jack in the level following the tutorial so I gave up.
siro
07/12/09 @ 08:36
#7
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmm, I played the demo and was quite surprised how badly this has aged.

I love retro games, but just having finished MW2 the day before (first of the modern CODs for me) this was just to bad. Worst aspect were the controls (would have been ok with a mouse I guess).

4/10

Swissorc: You need to fix your monitor settings.
squarejawhero
07/12/09 @ 08:42
#8
+12
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I loved this back in the day. What's more suprising is how much the core gameplay and mechanics haven't changed and that people are gobbling up exactly the same title in new clothes, and less charm, six years on.
djed
07/12/09 @ 08:51
#9
+8
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Unlike in MW, where something like suddenly losing control over your playing character to endure another pointless "look mom, im blinking" scripted event is not noticeable at all. This game is the real carnival, every iteration after has been the distorted memories of a bunch of old blokes reminiscing about THE GOOD OLD DAYS.

Also, is there a reason for this receiving a score and also not being in the retro section?
matrim83
07/12/09 @ 08:58
#10
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's strange to think that a game which came out six years ago is now considered a retro release

If you consider sequels as a frame of time instead of time itself CoD1 might as well be an SNES game. :P
dai_bonehead
07/12/09 @ 09:08
#11
+22
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Shurely some mishtake?"

This is the score that MW2 should have had. I think the word "iteration" sums up COD - it is the same old stuff time, but with a new gloss of paint. I've played through COD 1, 2 4, and 6 (skipped World at War, and purchased but never played 3) and the series just bores me now. Time to put this series to bed and come up with something less scripted, less Bruckheimeresque.

Then again, maybe it is not the COD series that is in need of a revolution - I've been playing the same game for years now; all FPSes seem the same to me these days, and all meld into one. The only titles that really stand out for me are Duke 3D, Quake, and Halo. Duke 3D had a great, cheesy setting and storyline and didn't take itself too seriously. Quake was just awesome. And Halo was the best console shooter that money can still buy - its just a pity that the rest of the series never equalled the experience of the first.
tossetaz
07/12/09 @ 09:23
#12
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@dai_bonehead I would like to think a couple of other fps' were as great as those you mention. The half-life series comes to mind - and if the talk is on being different I think far cry 2 should be mentioned for doing a decent job at that.

On the topic of MW2 I have nothing to add, your absolutely right.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 07/12/09 @ 09:23
metallicorphan
07/12/09 @ 09:24
#13
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i played the trial....needs a sprint button,i kept on pressing down on the analogue stick expecting to start running,instead he just took his sweet time :(
DFawkes
07/12/09 @ 09:40
#14
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm quite enjoying the campaign mode, it's every bit as good as I remember. It's the leap back to having a health bar that took me by surprise most, and the treks back to health kits when I make stupid mistakes. Forgot how useful the lean is too - it's still quite sweet peaking out and lining up a good old headshot before peaking back in.

Not a big fan of the multiplayer, but mostly because I'm super awful at it and it has no deathstreak bonuses :P
Crez
07/12/09 @ 09:43
#15
+9
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@dai_bonehead.
Spot on re the rehashing of FPS ideas. Played through Quantum of Solace yesterday - a £4 bargain from Game. The predictablilty was disheartening, but after six hours of play, on finishing the game I had to admit it was a lot of fun. Enough variety for me and, importantly - top notch guns! I wonder sometimes in looking for innovation everywhere we sometimes simply forget to gauge a game on whether it's fun or not. Cookie cutter it may be, but QoS was a blast yesterday.
paketep
07/12/09 @ 09:49
#16
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Snifff. To think that IW used to make fantastic games..
kipper
07/12/09 @ 10:25
#17
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Is the game in HD?
Yes, but the graphics are identical to the original version.

& does it have achivements / throphies?
Yes

..Also, Is CoD a 7/10 or a 9/10 then?
7/10 in 2009, 9/10 in 2003.
retrend
07/12/09 @ 10:43
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
so you recommend this over the saboteur?
Whizzo
07/12/09 @ 11:00
#19
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
tbh the first COD was neither grounbreaking or very polished in 2003

The original CoD was, and still is, great. I'm disappointed with the console port though, it does seem to be rather dark in places and considering the graphics capabilities of the modern console why it's not got tons of anti-aliasing to help it out (the barbed wire you crawl under in training is a perfect example) is a bit strange.
quolema
07/12/09 @ 11:04
#20
-2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So... worse than Halo?
uglygamer
07/12/09 @ 11:08
#21
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Is anyone else bored of Modern Warfare 2 already?
D_arkTrooper
07/12/09 @ 11:09
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And the lack of rumble in the PS3 version is.....well......
Benno
07/12/09 @ 11:09
#23
-2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Better than MW2
Mongoose
07/12/09 @ 11:10
#24
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Got this for the multiplayer but the fact that it's only 8 players (though still hard to find full games) and the lobby system is useless (you get kicked at the end of every game; come on this is 2009!) means I would not recommend that side of it. Buy the PC version again I would suggest!
Skurmedel
07/12/09 @ 11:23
#25
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The first Call of Duty is the one that is good, but I think it's at its best on the Eastern Front, which actually felt like large battle in the game. The US campaign is sometimes a carbon copy of Saving Private Ryan, it's not quite as original.

I think MP in this one is horrible though, with the moving spawnpoints in team deathmatch, it allows for some pretty ridiculous kills when a enemy just spawns in front of you. Then again, I think MP in CoD 4 was pretty shit as well.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 07/12/09 @ 11:26
DUFFKING
07/12/09 @ 11:25
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The MP is still my favourite of the CoD games. So much more tactical and skill-based than the most recent iterations.

I don't recommend this though, the controls are horrible. Something just feels completely wrong with the aiming.
sneetch
07/12/09 @ 11:58
#27
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Skurmedel
The first Call of Duty is the one that is good, but I think it's at its best on the Eastern Front, which actually felt like large battle in the game. The US campaign is sometimes a carbon copy of Saving Private Ryan, it's not quite as original.

Yeah, the Soviet campaign is the best (although in turn a lot of it is a straight knock off of Enemy at the Gates). Loved the sniping. Still love this game, first game I played where it felt as if you were part of a team and it wasn't just you as Joe "Ironballs" McDeathski going to go shove his boot so far up Hitler's ass that he'll taste American leather (or whatever).

Plus I love the ping noise when a Garand clip ejects.
Monkey_Puncher
07/12/09 @ 12:07
#28
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Part of me would like to see Infinity Ward go back to World War 2. I know I'm most definitely in the minority when I say this, but there's just something about the bolt action rifles and the historical settings that I find more appealing to tactical nukes and machine guns.

Give me CoD 2 multiplayer with perks and online match making and I'd be a very happy bunny! (please don't suggest that tosh by Treyarch)
Edited 1 times, most recently on 07/12/09 @ 12:07
marcgiu
07/12/09 @ 12:20
#29
-2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
has it become fashionable already to start slating MW2 ?
makeamazing
07/12/09 @ 12:46
#30
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
has it become fashionable already to start slating MW2 ?

Well I will slate it because MW2 was abysmal not because of it being apparently fashionable.. its only the second game Ive brought that I have traded in.. the other was Resistance 2 which was also dire.

The Call of Duty classic games may be graphically poor by todays standards, but the story and the way the levels were put together were just brilliant...Something that is sadly missing from MW2.
ignatiusjreilly
07/12/09 @ 12:46
#31
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Why is it so many people can see the problems with MW/MW2, but I've yet to find a reviewer who even mentions them?

It's like GTAIV and Spore, gets mixed reviews in public but there seems to be total agreement among the official reviews.
Tetsuo_Shima
07/12/09 @ 12:48
#32
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What! I played CoD1 multi on the PC last night, and I have to say that it hasn't aged one single itty bit. If anything, going back to the old way - where firing guns fully automatic would have you staring at the sky, having no hit indicators to show you hitting people through walls/smoke, no shoddy heartbeat sensors or claymores or any of that bumff - shows up MW2 for the nub friendly point-and-click adventure it really is. It doesn't even look that bad!
Don't get me wrong, MW2 is great in it's own little techno-terrorism way, but CoD1 is nothing but an absolute classic. Absolute! They havent had to change the aiming mechanics at all over the course of 4 sequels because it was so damn flawless the first time around. A complete gem.
SpaceMidget75
07/12/09 @ 13:06
#33
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Another 1200 game. :(

When you look at some of the games you can get on Steam for a tenner it boggles the mind that MS/Publishers are getting away with this.

Some games are clearly worth 1200 points though (BF1943, Shadow Complex etc)
sneetch
07/12/09 @ 14:06
#34
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ignatiusjreilly
Why is it so many people can see the problems with MW/MW2, but I've yet to find a reviewer who even mentions them?

It's like GTAIV and Spore, gets mixed reviews in public but there seems to be total agreement among the official reviews.


It's odd alright. I disliked GTAIV, I was completely sold by the rave reviews and was hugely disappointed. I tried to like it, I went back a few times to try to see what I was missing but I just don't like it.

The irony is that in the past I've been accused of jumping on some "hater" bandwagon because I didn't like it, surely the "lover" bandwagon is just obvious?
neems
07/12/09 @ 14:07
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'll always remember this for the opening Russian level (battle of Stalingrad I guess?), first the boat trip and then you get given a clip of bullets and are told to follow the guy with the rifle.

It was awesome at the time, although the multiplayer could never distract me from Day of Defeat.
beemoh
07/12/09 @ 14:11
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
>perhaps he's just a torso on a turntable

Maybe that's what DJ Hero was missing?
FooAtari
07/12/09 @ 14:35
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Can get CoD and the Expansion on the PC for £4. Controls better as well. Seems this has been poorly ported.
Sarlix
07/12/09 @ 14:42
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Are they talking about the PC or console version? because original COD for the PC had some of the best multi-player maps ever. Last time I played it the servers were still going strong, which suggests it has something going for it.

tesodosbichos
07/12/09 @ 14:52
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I love how it is now the vogue thing for faux gamers to criticise MW2, IW and now, by extension, the original COD. They think it makes them look like gaming connoisseurs to go against the grain. The reality of the situation is a lot more tragic. As for this port it is poorly done and does not do the original PC game justice. If anyone wants to revisit it or see where it all began then get the PC version. It is not only better but cheaper. I am not surprised by the review score because practically every game will drop a notch or two when you return to it particularly considering the length of time and number of sequels in this case. It was great in its time but is now dated and the genre has moved on.
dingo75
07/12/09 @ 14:58
#40
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I started to play COD + expansion shortly before MW2 came out.
The Russian missions were really intense and enjoyable.
After having played MW2 I think COD was made me feeling much more "insecure" than MW2 covering and hoping no grenades would fly my way. The "Duck and recover health" is making this too easy nowadays.

Game was fine for me and I had no problems with the aged and yes at time pretty ugly graphics.
It crashed a few times on my system though.
Currently I'm stuck at the "Kursk" level in the expansion on highest difficulty and it's nearly impossible to do.
ignatiusjreilly
07/12/09 @ 16:39
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
has it become fashionable already to start slating MW2 ?

I love how it is now the vogue thing for faux gamers to criticise MW2

Question: do you really think that MW2 is so good that any criticism is impossible? If not, then what you are saying is no different than me saying you only pretend to like the game because you got sucked in by the advertising.
twinberettas
07/12/09 @ 16:43
#42
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"you have to shoot enemies with a crossbow while riding on a jet-ski inside a blimp that's crashing into a volcano"

If only there were more games like this.
retrend
07/12/09 @ 16:51
#43
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
lol@the idea of people jumping on a MW2 hate bandwagon all of a sudden. there was petitions against the shitness of the game before its release.

if anything, the bandwagon jumpers are the reviewers who gave it 9s and 10s despite it obviously being hugely flawed, and by far and away the worst call of duty game ever released.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 07/12/09 @ 16:51
iago71
07/12/09 @ 17:40
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I would have to agree with the people saying theyd like a return to WW2. Also, for the record I do like MW 1/2 though admittedly am shit at the MP ( regardless of whether I enjoy it).

It'd be great to see a return to something more historical. But taking all the stuff that theyve added since and refining it into a new title with all the perks and so on.

What about WW1 ? Thats not really been covered as far as I can remember. I guess it would just be lots of whistles blowing and people running over the top into a barrage of enemy lead!!!! Maybe it wouldnt work. :(
monkeywithnoeyes
07/12/09 @ 17:57
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
strange how they dont mention the terrible framerate..which is enough to denie me being able to recommend this to even the most servere bored.

A lazy rushed port of a game thats a classic and could of been well suited amongst the arcade games
man.the.king
07/12/09 @ 18:29
#46
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I look forward to 2015 when Dan Whitehead gives a 7/10 retro-review to Modern Warfare 2 for appearing dated compared to the latest FPS blockbuster of the time.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 07/12/09 @ 18:39
davisorle
07/12/09 @ 19:02
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I just find it odd reviewing old games. Its not remade or anything so it should keep a score that it would have gotten when it was made. CoD was awesome back in the days but so outdated that even if I own it I know for a fact I wont be able to play it all over again now. I just cant play somethign that looks "nasty" anymore even if I found badasss back then.
Goatboy
07/12/09 @ 19:32
#48
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm not buying another Call of Duty until they do one in the Falklands...

"Achievement Unlocked: Sniped 100 penguins"

Sharzam
07/12/09 @ 19:35
#49
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Dumb question, why not get the PC version ? It surely will work on majority of modern pcs and laptops i bet. By sounds of the review and these comments its a sloppy port anyway.
arcam
07/12/09 @ 19:37
#50
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Has anyone actually checked the original CoD review? 7/10. http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/r_call...

I know opinion is opinion, but I think giving a 7 to Call of Duty in 2003 and a 9 to MW2 in 2009 might actually be a criminal offence.

Edited 2 times, most recently on 07/12/09 @ 19:38

Comments: 1-50 of 62 Next →

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery