Advertisement

Activision: WOW could become "obsolete" News

MMO PC News by Robert Purchese

3 March, 2010

Activision has made a worrying risk assessment of World of Warcraft, claiming the MMO giant could be toppled - rendered "obsolete" - by the emerging social gaming scene.

"We also compete with other forms of interactive entertainment," said Activision in its 10-K annual report, "such as casual games like iPhone applications and other mobile phone games, and games developed for use by consumers on social networking sites.

"Future increased consumer acceptance and increases in the availability of such games or other online games, or technological advances in online game software or the Internet, could result in a decline in platform-based software and negatively impact sales of our console and hand-held products.

"Newer technological advances in online game software may also render products such as World of Warcraft obsolete."

Call of Duty, Guitar Hero and World of Warcraft made up 68 per cent of Activision's net revenues in 2009, apparently.

"A substantial portion of our revenue and profitability will depend on the subscription-based massively multiplayer online role-playing game category. If we do not maintain our leadership position in this category, our financial results could suffer," added the publisher.

Maintaining leadership involves staying ahead of competitors, the publisher said. And there are plenty of would-be threats ready to steal the crown.

"A number of software publishers have developed and commercialised - or are currently developing - online games for use by consumers over the Internet, which pose a threat to the popularity of World of Warcraft and we expect new competitors to continue to emerge in the MMORPG category," Activision offered.

"If consumer demand for World of Warcraft games declines and we have not introduced new MMORPG or other products that replace World of Warcraft's potentially decreasing revenue, or added other sources of revenue, our financial condition could suffer.

"Additionally, if new technologies are developed that replace MMORPG games, consumer preferences trend away from MMORPG games or new business models emerge that offer online subscriptions for free or at a substantial discount to current MMORPG subscription fees, our revenue and profitability may decline," the report added.

World of Warcraft growth has plateaued at 11.5 million users worldwide. The potential vulnerability of the MMO that has lead the genre for over five years may raise some eyebrows.

However, World of Warcraft expansion Cataclysm may revitalise consumer enthusiasm when released sometime this year, and Activision's 10-K form is designed to air as many potential risks as possible, so take it with a pinch of salt.

Activision dominated headlines yesterday by sacking two Infinity Ward bosses for rumoured "insubordination" - being in talks with other publishers, sources claimed. Should the Infinity Ward team follow their leaders, Activision could find itself without its flagship Call of Duty team.

That doesn't appear to have dampened Activision's plans for Call of Duty, however.

Still, given the circumstances, it's ironic that one of Activision's risk assessments outlines attracting and retaining "key personnel".

"Our success depends to a significant extent on our ability to identify, hire, and retain skilled personnel, particularly personnel with the specialized skills needed to create the high-quality 'hit' titles upon which our business is substantially dependent," the report continued.

"The software industry is characterised by a high level of employee mobility and aggressive recruiting among competitors for personnel with technical, marketing, sales, product development, and management skills.

"We may have difficulties in attracting and retaining skilled personnel or may incur significant costs in order to do so. If we are unable to attract additional qualified employees or retain the services of key personnel, our business and financial results could be negatively impacted."

Advertisement
Comments

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 60 Next →

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Xeopuppy
03/03/10 @ 15:32
#1
+41
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Activision SHOULD become obsolete
frankfurter209
03/03/10 @ 15:32
#2
+36
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Congratulations Activision on being worse than EA ever was. You've earned it.
Mkwone
03/03/10 @ 15:34
#3
+16
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Next they'll be defending Hitler.
crazyhorse174
03/03/10 @ 15:35
#4
+13
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Its surprising how out of touch Activision actually are.

Oh wait - no its not.
SAMagic
03/03/10 @ 15:37
#5
+8
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Take it with a pinch of salt, I suppose. At least they're not arrogantly hailing their franchises as being invulnerable?
octavedoctor
03/03/10 @ 15:39
#6
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Translated as 'WOW is going to cost too much for us to run soon,because we've ballooned and it'll be way too expensive to make a replacement, so be prepared for us stopping it in the next year or two'

...and yes Activision do seem to have become the new EA..... ironic considering their business practices reflect those of Atari back in the day that forced the original guys to leave and form Acti in the first place...
Mentalist(air)
03/03/10 @ 15:41
#7
+19
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Boby Kotick: "Noses to become obsolete. See how I've cut mine off to spite my face".
kangarootoo
03/03/10 @ 15:43
#8
+18
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh christ.

Activision is looking at World of Warcraft, possibly the most profitable game ever made, and are thinking "its still not making enough money, what can we meddle with to make it even more profitable".

If that isn't the beginning of the end for WoW I don't know what is. Nothing will kill a good product faster than people up the management tree meddling directly with the controls of a machine they don't really understand.

"If we build it they will come. And if we f*ck about with it, they will leave again".
optimusprym8
03/03/10 @ 15:44
#9
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
we can only hope
geeza2020
03/03/10 @ 15:45
#10
+16
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
When will activision just fuck off? They dont give a shit about games or gamers, or the people who actually make games. What the fuck are they doing in this business? Kotick can suck my dick.

/looks up anger management classes
spatss
03/03/10 @ 15:47
#11
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
they're sabotaging their own business? Am I missing something or are they just plain stupid?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 03/03/10 @ 15:47
tossetaz
03/03/10 @ 15:47
#12
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What games will be published by Activision/Blizzard in the comming months?

Vote with your wallet and don't buy any of them, there's plenty of non activision games coming out to ensure you'll be having fun!
Edited 2 times, most recently on 03/03/10 @ 15:48
Murton
03/03/10 @ 15:49
#14
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So translating this into one line bullet-points:

If gamers find that they prefer another game, then WoW will fall.
If another company makes a better MMORPG, then WoW will fall.
If enough companies pop up that offer lower or even free subs, then WoW will fall.

There appears to be a complete absence of excrement Mr Holmes. Seems to me that Activision are waking up not only to the existence of competition but also the threat that this competition represents to their rather stale products and business models. The real question is, what are Activision going to do about any of this?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 03/03/10 @ 15:50
Sunyavadin
03/03/10 @ 15:49
#15
+7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Next they'll be defending Hitler."

In the next CoD you'll play an SS officer, with bonus achievments for finding every Jew hidden in each level...
Yargh
03/03/10 @ 15:50
#16
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm not quite sure how a policy of generating fear in your employees is compatible with one of retaining key talent...
tossetaz
03/03/10 @ 15:50
#17
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
#13 I think your being a bit too generalizing about wow-players, plenty of people (by far the largest part) play it in a relaxed casual fashion with irl friends.
MiniAmin
03/03/10 @ 15:51
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If only Activision's creativity matched their stupidity.

When will they learn that whilst you can yield short term profits from existing IPs, once they become tarnished, gamers are very reluctant to ever return to them. The way consumers perceive your company will eventually catch up with your finances.
Raiten
03/03/10 @ 15:51
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@kangarootoo, luckily i doubt blizzard would ever let activision meddle with their own game.. even tho strangely enough activision seems to tout WoW as a succes story they've made, or they're just butthurt jealous to blizzard over the fact that, none of the mmorpgs acti has for offer are any good.
In other news, i think blizzard office should have a emergency sirens sounding off right about now, it sounds like a good moment to leave acti on their own.
anomagnus
03/03/10 @ 15:53
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
well, i do hate activision, but people need to remain a bit rational. Examine the details of the Activision Blizzard deal, and you'll see activision have fuck all power over blizzard. Even the name remains a clue, as its activision blizzard, and not just activision. If the shit ever hits the fan, blizz will walk away, and probably have been smart enough to cover themselves legally while doing it.

Its my belief that MMO's will fracture in the next few years, developing two types of mmo. FIrstly, a really good 'casual' thing that can be played anywhere by anyone (think free realms, with a less childish focus), and a much more involved, personal and deep mmo (eve, with more depth and focus on character)
Gurgeh
03/03/10 @ 15:55
#21
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@kangarootoo

"Activision is looking at World of Warcraft, possibly the most profitable game ever made, and are thinking "its still not making enough money, what can we meddle with to make it even more profitable". "

Thats what they've already done. Many of the changes in Cataclysm are made to make the development of future content cheaper. I can also easily see Activision wanting weapons, equipment. hard modes or even whole instances as microtransactions. The thin end of the wedge:

http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread...

Stupid_Fat_Hobbit
03/03/10 @ 15:59
#22
+7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wow. Every word that spews out of that corporate nozzle serves to further illuminate a world view that's so far beyond the bounds of my comprehension I can't even identify it as human.
NorUraeus
03/03/10 @ 16:02
#24
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah, if I made a game that seemed to level of at 11.5 million subscribers I would be really worried too...errr...wait a minute :)

Seriously though such statements in an annual report are very usual, they are legally required to be very clear on any potential threat, no matter how little they actually worry about it, so reading a lot into those statements is wrong.
devo
03/03/10 @ 16:08
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I hope Blizzard will pay for allowing Activision to survive.
they were one of the few developers big enough to stay independent, one of the last big PC devs, yet they chose to feed the beast and keep it alive.

Blizzard is as guilty as Activision in my eyes.
JahB
03/03/10 @ 16:08
#26
-9
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@tossetaz

i've met about 40-50 wow players, out of which only a single one fell into the category you're describing. the rest were die hards that refused to go to out with reasons like "i have a raid tonight". i know it may not be a fair representation of the entire user base, but it's the personal impression i got.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 03/03/10 @ 16:08
munki83
03/03/10 @ 16:09
#27
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
.....wow this is a bad week for Activision. Its a shame the general public don't know as I'm sure it would affect their sales.
miiiguel
03/03/10 @ 16:10
#28
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Activision is realy a distrustfull company. What I basicaly understood from this, is that they are willing to kill a franchise which is loved by millions if somehow they loose the leadership.
kangarootoo
03/03/10 @ 16:11
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was going to add, though I had problems posting for a while there...

More seriously, being aware of the future weaknesses of your product is of course a good idea. I just worry about what WoW will end up being (and I don't even play it) if competing with iPhone apps is on their list of concerns.
masterson
03/03/10 @ 16:12
#30
+7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
For fucks sake, will people please stop comparing business people with Hitler....
Edited 1 times, most recently on 03/03/10 @ 16:12
andywilkie35
03/03/10 @ 16:15
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'd love it if the Infinity Ward team all followed the other two chaps out the door and formed a new studio. Clearly they're very talented guys and I'd love to see them associated with someone other than Activision.
kangarootoo
03/03/10 @ 16:16
#32
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@JahB

Insulting WoW players does't really help the discussion.

Regardless, your point about "not gonna happen. facebook is for people with a social life, WoW is for people who don't" seems to assume that Activision see existing WoW players as the target audience for WoW for all time.

As I see it, the suggestion in the article is that Activision want to start flogging WoW to all the people that DO use facebook and so on.

I am pretty sure that you and tossetaz can both agree that if Acty change the WoW profoundly in an effort to appeal to the sort of audience that play Farm Presents Plus (made up name) on Facebook, the existing WoW fans (however much of a social life they have) aren't going to be happy with the result. WoW may not die, and it might even make more money for Activision, but it won't be the same game it is now (which even as a non-player I can say would be a real shame, as diversity in games is important for all gamers).
Edited 1 times, most recently on 03/03/10 @ 16:17
sesskie
03/03/10 @ 16:18
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Youd think after coming to the realization that their company is reliant on 3 products alone, they would try to, like, dunno, make some new ips, or branch into other possible NEW franchises rather than flogging the ones they already got to death. Theyve successfully killed Tony Hawks, GH is on its way down and it looks like CoD is next ot be milked to death. Some idiots never learn.
Dizzy
03/03/10 @ 16:20
#34
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Off topic but it has to be said:
Fuck Activision.
Vyggo
03/03/10 @ 16:24
#35
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think some of you are reading something into this that just isn't there, or at least I don't see it. It could be the title that is provocative because I opened it with the same reaction. The article is just a risk assesment of the dangers that face the future of WoW. Every company should do that at least once a year. They realize they have a succesful franchise and they are looking ahead in the future (as they should) at what kind of factors could influence the succes in a negative way.

The whole IW thing is a whole different beast, but we do not know enough yet to know who is the bad guy. The way it is handled out in the open is probably not that smart though.
LFace
03/03/10 @ 16:28
#36
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Regarding the whole "WoW players are anti social no lifers" I have to give my two penneth worth.

I was a wow player for 3 years up until last week when I cancelled my sub due to being bored of the game (can only run the same 5-mans and 10-mans so much before boredom kicks in). Both me and my wife played the game during this time (although my wife only the last 2 years-ish) and also a couple of our friends.

An old schoolfriend of my wife who she began speaking to also turned out to be a hardcore wow fan on a pvp server but also spends time away from the game going to the regular house parties and the like. He also got a girlfriend around a year ago and she also plays the game. Does this sound anti social? Is this different from the people who are classed as "normal" who spend hours each night on COD:MW2 ? Or people who go out living up to their ASBO status each friday night or hanging around with fellow cap wearing chavs on street corners drinking their special brew?

Every hobby has saddo's who spend all day doing what they like, just WoW has the perception of being like this unjustly.

Edited 1 times, most recently on 03/03/10 @ 16:30
Moz
03/03/10 @ 16:29
#37
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
shocking headlines and extremist responses strike again!!

At times I really wish these shareholder reports weren't public knowledge people read way too much into them.

He's talking worst case scenarios here being up front an honest with the shareholders (yes shocking for ActiBliz I know).

What he's saying is that can't rest back and watch the cash role in off existing products and franchises, they're known to be working on a new MMO and from this speach it sounds like they realise that they can't just churn out WOW in a different setting, that they may have to consider using a free to play with micro transactions and advertising model (especially is Old republic online follows that model)

We also already know that Cataclysm is the last big boxed update for WOW with a more incremental approach being adopted after it's release which will help keep WOW fresh.

Plus there are large numbers of WOW players who can't face the thought of leaving their chars behind they have no desire to start a new and it's going to taking something very special to get them to leave WOW.

JahB
03/03/10 @ 16:34
#38
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Kang

you're like EG's very own UN, that gets you a +1 ;)
Seoh
03/03/10 @ 16:55
#39
-2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
NEWSFLASH Activision cancel WoW cos it is no longer growing in number!!

Seriously what is with activision at the moment they seem to be ruled by complete muppets, the blizzard guys must be getting worried
Stop-gap
03/03/10 @ 16:55
#40
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
WoW has been going for how long now, 5 years? After all that time it still retains about 10 million paying subscribers last time I bothered to look. What goes up must come down and all that, but those are some impressive innings no matter how I look at it.
Blizzard would be mad to think it would last for ever, a game becoming obsolete is far form news, never mind being "news worthy".
Naturally Blizz will have been tinkering away for ages on the nuts and bolts of a successor for when the time finally comes to pull the plug. I haven't played WoW in years, but I think I'd resubscribe for an end of the world (of warcraft) event and see my characters one last time :)
SwitchBladeUK
03/03/10 @ 17:13
#41
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Blizzard should have stayed on it's own. Also i'm noticing alot of valid comments getting -1's, is kotick around here? :P
kangarootoo
03/03/10 @ 17:38
#42
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@SwitchBladeUK

Someone probably just doesn't like WoW with a passion, and the only way their brain can vent that anger is to -1 every post on a related thread. Better than murdering prostitutes I guess.
MaxiSleep
03/03/10 @ 17:40
#43
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This is reading way way way to much into a 10k filing. They pretty much cover all contingencies to avoid sharehloder suits down the line
Spekingur
03/03/10 @ 17:57
#44
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
#30: Stop comparing (Activision) business people (sense) to Hitler? Why? Is it an insult to Hitler?
Ryboy
03/03/10 @ 17:59
#45
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
THIS ISN'T NEWS. FUCK OFF!
rprince
03/03/10 @ 18:41
#46
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
By this do they mean WOW might be run into the ground, asset stripped and all the talent sacked in the aim of being as frifty as possible?
sarcasmoidosis
03/03/10 @ 18:47
#47
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So, if Farmville makes a ton of money, that makes WoW obsolete. That's stupid.

"Call of Duty, Guitar Hero and World of Warcraft made up 68 per cent of Activision's net revenues in 2009"

What the hell brought them the rest?
Merlinho
03/03/10 @ 18:56
#48
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Company does annual risk assessment and publishes in its shareholder report.
EG publishes as news with sensationalist headline.
Trolls get fed.

Why don't you publish your own risk assessment EG?
Eurogamer: website could become "obsolete" News
rollmop
03/03/10 @ 19:27
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ Merlinho - quite and you beat me to it. Your bit at the end about EG was funnier though.

Shame on you EG for turning this into news. Have you never read a company report before? Never heard of a risk assessment or options appraisal?

Also, C&VG were reporting this yesterday. Not only are you behind them, but you've stooped to their level of journalism. Grats.
Veracity
03/03/10 @ 19:47
#50
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
kangarootoo wrote:
being aware of the future weaknesses of your product is of course a good idea

In this instance, it's the law - it's a bleeding SEC filing. A load of that is more or less boilerplate - see if you can find one that doesn't witter about "attracting and retaining key personnel".

But, as others have said, EG in selective quoting for sensationalist headline shocker. Predictable commentard frothing ensues. To be fair, wander round ft.com or summat for a bit if you want disabusing of the idea "real" business journalism is less silly. And Activision is worse than Hitler - EG could probably save resources at the moment by just typing up "Activision" into a headline and letting the comments take it from there.

Veracity grouses about obvious, refers to self in third person, gets coat.

Comments: 1-50 of 60 Next →

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery