Rate the last film you watched out of 100 Page 2247

  • Page

    of 3091 First / Last

  • HarryPalmer 13 Jun 2013 10:37:04 4,014 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    He made The Way Back, which I havent seen, but looked decent.

    @Khaz

    Edited by HarryPalmer at 10:37:28 13-06-2013
  • repairmanjack 13 Jun 2013 11:23:30 6,109 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    The Hurt Locker.

    It's alright. But I'm not seeing anything worthy of an Oscar here.
  • Deleted user 13 June 2013 11:28:13
    Worth is just for giving Cameron the middle finger. Amazing trolling by the Academy there.
  • Gartt 14 Jun 2013 13:16:47 1,900 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Mama - 6/10

    Enjoyable and pretty atmospheric, thought the ending let the film down though, it was like they didn't really know how to finish it. Worth a look for genre fans.
  • Deleted user 14 June 2013 13:45:10
    HarryPalmer wrote:
    He made The Way Back, which I havent seen, but looked decent.
    It's not an engaging film. The story is a bit weak, and was made weaker by allegations that the whole story had been made up. The performances are good, but it's hard to emphasise with any of the characters expect Ronan's. I'd been looking forward to it, given the time since Master and Commander, but it didn't really deliver. I think it bombed at the box office too.
  • Deleted user 14 June 2013 14:42:02
    @CharlieStCloud

    She liked After Earth end of story.

    For what its worth I liked it too having now seen it.

    Sure its not a 10/10 but its not deserving of the kicking its getting.

    I preferred it to the latest Star trek which I hate more and more the more I think about it.

    Edited by espibara at 14:48:01 14-06-2013
  • ronuds 14 Jun 2013 14:57:47 21,786 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    You also said Superman was good.

    Bottom line: You can't be trusted.
  • Deleted user 14 June 2013 15:08:30
    You must be mistaken if you think I give a shit.

    I'm no pro film reviewer.

    And I will still say that After Earth is not that bad.

    Just like John Carter last year which wasn't that bad.

    Oh yeah and superman is good you will find that out soon enough

    Edited by espibara at 15:09:30 14-06-2013
  • nickthegun 14 Jun 2013 15:13:58 64,502 posts
    Seen 45 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    How is your 'Box Office Predictor' wife still in work when she, apparently, likes shit films?

    After Earth! Its amazing! Guaranteed bank!

    *weeks later*

    Sharon, I would like a word about your optimistic numbers for After Earth. And John Carter.
  • BinaryBob101 14 Jun 2013 15:56:26 25,736 posts
    Seen 17 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Whoa. People who work in the film industry get things wrong - colour me shocked!

    Edited by BinaryBob101 at 15:56:39 14-06-2013
  • CharlieStCloud 14 Jun 2013 17:00:03 5,820 posts
    Seen 6 months ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    nickthegun wrote:
    How is your 'Box Office Predictor' wife still in work when she, apparently, likes shit films?
    Precisely.

    I don't trust him a jot anymore.

    ... the only thing he got right is Prometheus, which he says will divide opinions on a large scale, and it most certainly did.

    You know what I am worried about?

    He says Pacific Rim is incredible, AMAZING, the 'film of the summer', etc. and that gives me nothing but a feeling of worrisome concern. His wife is a lucky lady to be working in an industry in which After Earth is deemed 'a very good film'.
  • BinaryBob101 14 Jun 2013 17:03:33 25,736 posts
    Seen 17 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Seems a little harsh.
  • nickthegun 14 Jun 2013 17:04:36 64,502 posts
    Seen 45 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    You should see the shade of angry pink he had in mind.
  • ronuds 14 Jun 2013 17:10:09 21,786 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    espibara wrote:
    Just like John Carter last year which wasn't that bad
    Now I know you're insane! :p
  • BinaryBob101 14 Jun 2013 17:13:38 25,736 posts
    Seen 17 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    I thought it was ok, just a little dull, it probably rates a 6 for me.
  • ronuds 14 Jun 2013 17:14:08 21,786 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    You're also colouring people cunts -- I'd assume with crayons -- so I'm not sure your opinion matters.
  • BinaryBob101 14 Jun 2013 17:17:50 25,736 posts
    Seen 17 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    I'm not colouring any people cunts.
  • Deleted user 14 June 2013 17:18:47
    Man of Steel. If you want a very actiony and humourless Superman then 7 or 8/10. If you want more like the originals then you'll be very disappointed.

    It's like an ADHD version where they've not held back. They've done a good job of making Superman et al feel as powerful as they should be, there's just 1 or 2 action scenes too many and they do feel overlong in places.

    No slo mo and I can't actually think of any other director that would have gone with this style and more or less pulled it off.
  • ronuds 14 Jun 2013 17:21:25 21,786 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    graysonavich wrote:
    Was John Carter easier to follow compared to Game of Thrones?
    :p
  • beastmaster 14 Jun 2013 17:21:25 13,286 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Apparently Zod's super-bitch is meant to be very good.
  • Deleted user 14 June 2013 17:43:16
    beastmaster wrote:
    Apparently Zod's super-bitch is meant to be very good.
    Assuming you mean acting, she's nothing special.

    Costner is very good though.
  • nickthegun 14 Jun 2013 17:44:38 64,502 posts
    Seen 45 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Aargh. wrote:
    Man of Steel. If you want a very actiony and humourless Superman then 7 or 8/10. If you want more like the originals then you'll be very disappointed.

    It's like an ADHD version where they've not held back. They've done a good job of making Superman et al feel as powerful as they should be, there's just 1 or 2 action scenes too many and they do feel overlong in places.

    No slo mo and I can't actually think of any other director that would have gone with this style and more or less pulled it off.
    Thats possibly the least enthusiastic review ive ever read!
  • Deleted user 14 June 2013 17:53:42
    It just needed to be 20 minutes shorter. If I was 15 then it would be the greatest film ever.
  • BinaryBob101 14 Jun 2013 17:54:58 25,736 posts
    Seen 17 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    What's your score then Aargh?
  • CosmicFuzz 14 Jun 2013 18:02:05 29,062 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Aargh. wrote:
    beastmaster wrote:
    Apparently Zod's super-bitch is meant to be very good.
    Assuming you mean acting, she's nothing special.

    Costner is very good though.
    I'd like to see them mix it up with the next one and do a Vice Versa. Costner gets powers and supes becomes the father figure. Costner then joins the justice league and teams up with batman, played by Alfred Molina.
  • Deleted user 14 June 2013 18:08:30
    I'm going to go with an 8 for now.
  • Page

    of 3091 First / Last

Log in or register to reply