The Hobbit Page 25

  • Page

    of 52 First / Last

  • localnotail 25 Nov 2012 00:10:14 23,093 posts
    Seen 9 months ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Kong was not good, too self-indulgent. I quite liked The Lovely Bones. I just want him to hurry up and make The Chrysalids.

    Edited by localnotail at 00:11:03 25-11-2012

    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

  • Mola_Ram 25 Nov 2012 00:10:52 8,006 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 2 years ago
    So, er, The Lovely Bones is pap? You could have just said that!
  • AaronTurner 25 Nov 2012 00:16:19 7,857 posts
    Seen 56 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    No, everything from kong onwards is pap.
  • AaronTurner 25 Nov 2012 00:18:06 7,857 posts
    Seen 56 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Oh, I just realised the lord of the rings was before Kong, count them too.
  • ltbobby 25 Nov 2012 00:39:19 318 posts
    Seen 22 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Just been to john lewis and bought a lovely set of tumblers.
  • Ged42 26 Nov 2012 22:42:36 7,776 posts
    Seen 46 minutes ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    Last Development Diary



    Sounds completely manic over there, as much as I would love to work on the Hobbit, but i'm not envious of all that stress.

    Looks good though, liked the look of 3 trolls.
  • superdelphinus 26 Nov 2012 22:51:02 8,125 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Are they still doing it at 48 fps or whatever it was?
  • Deckard1 26 Nov 2012 22:57:04 29,209 posts
    Seen 1 minute ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    The lovely bones may be my most hated film ever. I was angry for days after watching. This looks worryingly shit as well to be honest.

    Fish fingers and chips pretty straight forward.

  • HoriZon 28 Nov 2012 01:06:14 13,593 posts
    Seen 55 minutes ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    It will be way to long of a film again.

    I used to be a gamer like you, then I took an arrow in the knee.

  • robthehermit 28 Nov 2012 01:28:11 4,265 posts
    Seen 50 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    HoriZon wrote:
    It will be way to long of a film again.
    Impossible.

    GT: robthehermit

    Velim esset mundus iustus futuis procul et mori.

  • Nanocrystal 28 Nov 2012 02:20:56 1,097 posts
    Seen 10 hours ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    TLB was a terrible book to begin with. Jackson did an admirable job with such dreadful source material.

    As much as I love the LotR movies, I'm finding it hard to get enthusiastic for these new ones. Anyways, my other half happened to be in Wellington yesterday and the place is apparently going Hobbit nuts.
  • the_dudefather 1 Dec 2012 14:30:16 9,400 posts
    Seen 4 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    This is amazing

    [youtube] KRqbdpbDwVo[/youtube]

    (ง ͠ ͟ʖ ͡)

  • Lukus 1 Dec 2012 14:37:47 19,369 posts
    Seen 23 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    I like how Oakenshield takes the opportunity to feel up the princess.

    Paintings & Photographs

  • mrpon 1 Dec 2012 23:31:42 29,432 posts
    Seen 53 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    You slaaaag!

    Give yourself 5 or gig, you're worth it.

  • localnotail 2 Dec 2012 00:13:33 23,093 posts
    Seen 9 months ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Giant Screen is showing extended editions of LOTR Trilogy from Thursday

    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

  • Trafford 2 Dec 2012 01:49:11 5,935 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    I saw the trailer for the fist time tonight. this is going to be good (I hope). I'm a little miffed the film is in 3 parts, 2 yes, 3 I'm not sure.

    Last Christmas I introduced the kids to LotR, they love it and are going nuts for this.
  • teamHAM 2 Dec 2012 01:54:54 3,117 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    Trafford wrote:
    I'm a little miffed the film is in 3 parts, 2 yes, 3 I'm not sure.
    Compared to the original LotR books The Hobbit is a pamphlet. Making three movies out of it is shameless milking to the extreme.

    XBox Live, Origin, PSN and Steam: teamHAM

  • Khanivor 2 Dec 2012 01:55:44 41,125 posts
    Seen 3 minutes ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    I wonder how long the adaptation of this 300 page book will be. Once the extended editions have come out. 6-7 hours? 9? Will it take longer to watch the movie than actually read the fucking book? Shit, the regular versions pretty much will take longer.
  • Trafford 2 Dec 2012 02:37:45 5,935 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    Aye, 24 months from now we'll be getting sold the box set.
    Yes please!
  • Toonster 4 Dec 2012 05:40:43 6,845 posts
    Seen 13 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Reviews have slowly been trickling in. Basically, the first half is slow, picks up in the second half, and the 48 fps bollocks is pants.

    3DS: 0361-6951-2609 (Tom)

  • GuiltySpark 4 Dec 2012 06:54:59 6,461 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    The first part of Fellowship was extremely slow from what I can remember. 'Slow' I can live with, tbh.

    Get bent.

  • GuiltySpark 4 Dec 2012 06:57:38 6,461 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Anyone else doing an LOTR marathon beforehand?

    /dirty student

    Get bent.

  • SClaw 4 Dec 2012 08:40:56 826 posts
    Seen 9 months ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    I haven't seen anyone call the 48FPS pants, just weird. Too "real" as well (how is that a bad thing?). Not that anywhere near me is showing the bastard, so I'll never know.
  • GuiltySpark 4 Dec 2012 08:45:41 6,461 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    SClaw wrote:
    I haven't seen anyone call the 48FPS pants, just weird. Too "real" as well (how is that a bad thing?). Not that anywhere near me is showing the bastard, so I'll never know.
    Real is not a good thing when you're a fantasy movie with vigorous amounts of CGI. We're used to seeing 24FPS, 48FPS makes things look like they're filmed with a documentary style from what I can gather.

    Film is all about hiding what is real, not bringing it to the forefront.

    Get bent.

  • Toonster 4 Dec 2012 08:45:59 6,845 posts
    Seen 13 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    'Pants' was a strong word, but the impressions still don't dispel my fears of The Hobbit being turned into a soap opera.

    But I have my ticket booked... seeing it opening midnight, IMAX 3D 48 fps. So we'll see how things go.

    3DS: 0361-6951-2609 (Tom)

  • El_MUERkO 4 Dec 2012 08:55:03 17,126 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Read a blog about 48fps the other day, it gives the image too much clarity and the viewer can spot all the flaws in the set, costume, makeup and lighting. A similar thing happened to some shows when they started filming in 1080p and it's why movie and tv producers are concerned about 4k & 8k screens.

    A common solution to 1080p naffness is to make the scene darker, it hides flaws and focuses the viewers eye but that can also piss people off.

    Curious to see the first 8k, 48fps movie, the budget is going to be insane :)
  • Youthist 4 Dec 2012 09:10:13 10,057 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Didn't even realise this was a 3 parter until just reading this thread. WTF? How are they stretching that out? LOTR was stretched, and that was 10,000 pages (or whatever). The Hobbit is a childs throw-away magazine in comparison.

    "Good chess players think one move ahead. Great chess players think two or three moves ahead."

  • Deleted user 4 December 2012 09:25:30
    Thank god they didn't make LotR into nine films.

    I've got a ticket booked just to see it at the Everyman, can't be arsed with the chavvy Imax. Struggling to get excited about it though which is odd as I really liked LotR. Just doesn't feel like it has the integrity of the other films - really does give the impression of being a money making exercise.
  • Widge Moderator 4 Dec 2012 09:29:06 13,728 posts
    Seen 9 hours ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    Youthist wrote:
    Didn't even realise this was a 3 parter until just reading this thread. WTF? How are they stretching that out? LOTR was stretched, and that was 10,000 pages (or whatever). The Hobbit is a childs throw-away magazine in comparison.
    By using the appendices that later tell the full story of what is going on at that moment in time. In The Hobbit, Gandalf pisses off for the second half... LOTR eventually details how he and the five wizards end up fighting Sauron in Gul Dulgur and flushing him out to Mordor. It's why the Mirkwood is so twisted and nasty when the little party turn up there, and the reason for the sudden appearance of a huge nasty enemy horde for the finale.

    So you'll be getting the Hobbit story as the backbone of the film, but there will be a lot of LOTR relevant stuff going on too.

    _ _ _

    www.inverted-audio.com

  • Blotto 4 Dec 2012 09:36:17 2,777 posts
    Seen 1 week ago
    Registered 4 years ago
    GuiltySpark wrote:
    Anyone else doing an LOTR marathon beforehand?

    /dirty student
    Yep.

    /also student, pretty clean though
  • Page

    of 52 First / Last

Log in or register to reply