New Star Trek Page 137

  • Page

    of 179 First / Last

  • Deleted user 30 May 2012 14:51:05
    Booooooooooooooring :D
  • varsas 30 May 2012 20:16:00 2,403 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    This reboot was one of the few films in recent years where I came out of the cinema on a high. As a Star Trek fan I could nitpick but it was too much fun.
  • RichieTenenbaum 30 May 2012 20:47:13 2,226 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 4 years ago
    I don't give a shit about Khan.

    Khan is not about Khan.

    It's about growing old and loss.
  • CosmicFuzz 30 May 2012 20:52:00 25,299 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    varsas wrote:
    This reboot was one of the few films in recent years where I came out of the cinema on a high. As a Star Trek fan I could nitpick but it was too much fun.
    This is pretty much how I feel. As a Trek nerd I can pick holes in it and compare it to classic Trek, but as a great fun film that kicked Trek in the arse and back into the mainstream, fuckin' A.

    How patches are ruining the future of gaming My thoughts.

  • BinaryBob101 9 Jul 2012 17:16:19 24,039 posts
    Seen 20 minutes ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Gary Fucking Mitchell!

    www.TheGrumpyVaper.com

  • CosmicFuzz 9 Jul 2012 17:26:48 25,299 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Link?! Awesome if true!

    How patches are ruining the future of gaming My thoughts.

  • CosmicFuzz 9 Jul 2012 17:34:44 25,299 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Star-Trek-2-Villain-Revealed-Last-31774.html

    How patches are ruining the future of gaming My thoughts.

  • BinaryBob101 9 Jul 2012 17:44:51 24,039 posts
    Seen 20 minutes ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Cumberbatch is fucking perfect for this.

    www.TheGrumpyVaper.com

  • DFawkes 9 Jul 2012 20:14:21 23,721 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Didn't someone call that? One of the people I play STO with. I think I want to say Petrarch.

    Good news anyway, and should make for a good story if true. Even if it's not him, all the evidence suggests the story will be in the same area. A cadet that has learned things from Kirk but surpasses him later on - sometimes having an enemy that's a mirror to the hero can be a bit boring, but it should be okay here.

    However, it really wouldn't surprise me if it was a ruse, given the nature of the thing and it covering ground that has already been covered in some form.

    Edited by DFawkes at 22:48:56 09-07-2012

    Oh for goodness sake, I've caught my scrotum in my zip again - Margaret Thatcher, 1986

  • CosmicFuzz 8 Sep 2012 14:54:58 25,299 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Title confirmed?

    Star Trek Into Darkness

    Note the lack of colon. Not sure how I feel, I like the idea of working Star Trek into a sentence, but hope this doesn't mean it's too dark and gritty. The humour was one of the best things about the reboot.

    http://trekmovie.com/2012/09/07/exclusive-star-trek-sequel-title-confirmed/

    How patches are ruining the future of gaming My thoughts.

  • Deckard1 8 Sep 2012 15:06:52 29,115 posts
    Seen 2 minutes ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    I dunno how to feel. I'm a pretty big fan of colons.

    Fish fingers and chips pretty straight forward.

  • BinaryBob101 8 Sep 2012 15:08:56 24,039 posts
    Seen 20 minutes ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Read an interview with Chris Pine a few days back, though I can't remember where. He was basically saying that the sequel would be nowhere near the tone of something like The Dark Knight films and would still be pretty funny.

    I assume Cumberbatch will be a better and deeper villain than Eric Bana, which would explain the darker tone.

    www.TheGrumpyVaper.com

  • CosmicFuzz 8 Sep 2012 15:53:12 25,299 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    I wonder if it's a riff on Heart of Darkness, with the Enterprise being sent to get Gary Mitchell back, who's went rogue in deep space somewhere. Probably not. Although that was basically the original pitch for Insurrection.

    And Deckard :D

    How patches are ruining the future of gaming My thoughts.

  • beastmaster 15 Nov 2012 08:27:32 11,789 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Interesting. Looks as though the first 9 mins are going to shown before The Hobbit in IMAX.

    http://www.slashfilm.com/nine-minute-star-trek-into-darkness-prologue-to-hit-with-the-hobbit-an-unexpected-journey-in-imax-3d/

    Edited by beastmaster at 08:30:33 15-11-2012

    The Resident Evil films. I'm one of the reasons they keep making them.

  • Scurrminator 15 Nov 2012 09:09:50 8,454 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    HOLY SHITBALLS YES!

    You dare to strike Scurrcules!?

  • kalel 15 Nov 2012 09:22:57 89,142 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Honestly don't get this whole "show the beginning of a film" thing. I'd rather see a trailer. It's not enjoyable to see the beginning of a film and not the rest, and then when I do finally see the film, I've already seen the beginning and it's lost its impact.
  • BinaryBob101 15 Nov 2012 15:58:43 24,039 posts
    Seen 20 minutes ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Actually, if I'd seen the first nine minutes of Star Trek as a long trailer, I would have been pretty psyched up to watch the rest whenever it came out. It also resonates with me a little more every time I see it. It set the tone excellently for the first film and could have been s great IMAX trailer for those lucky enough to see it. If the nine minutes for ...Into Darkness are half as good, we're in for a bit of a treat.

    www.TheGrumpyVaper.com

  • CosmicFuzz 15 Nov 2012 16:02:04 25,299 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Is it confirmed for the UK yet?

    How patches are ruining the future of gaming My thoughts.

  • Armoured_Bear 15 Nov 2012 16:11:10 11,652 posts
    Seen 49 minutes ago
    Registered 3 years ago
    It probably would be better than modern trailers where they try and show you as much of the film as they possibly can, they drive me batshit.

    XBL : ecosse011172
    PSN : ecosse_011172
    NNID : armoured_bear

  • LeoliansBro 15 Nov 2012 16:19:57 44,722 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    I can see why they do it:

    It seems to be for films with a prologue adventure, in the James Bond mould. So it's a mini example of what's to come.

    It saves recutting for yet another trailer.

    It gives a feel for the pace and tone of the film, which always seems lost in trailers.

    It avoids spoilers.

    LB, you really are a massive geek.

  • Steve_Perry 15 Nov 2012 16:21:08 4,935 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 2 years ago
    Particularly annoying in skyfall which had a trailer/product advert of skyfall before the film. Fuck off.

    VIVA STEFANSEN

  • Gambit1977 15 Nov 2012 16:22:47 10,382 posts
    Seen 14 hours ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    I remember them doing this for Serenity. Hopefully this one will 'leak' onto the Internet too.
  • CosmicFuzz 15 Nov 2012 17:50:25 25,299 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Knowing my luck the local cineworld Imax won't be the right size and they won't show it. Just like with batman and mission impossible 3.

    How patches are ruining the future of gaming My thoughts.

  • Scurrminator 16 Nov 2012 09:52:53 8,454 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Well sir, you are mistaken!

    UK cinemas currently confirmed for the footage include Cineworld sites in Dublin, Nottingham, Enfield, Crawley, Sheffield, Edinburgh, Ipswich and Birmingham, with more to be announced.

    You dare to strike Scurrcules!?

  • CosmicFuzz 16 Nov 2012 10:10:24 25,299 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Yes! !!!!!!!

    How patches are ruining the future of gaming My thoughts.

  • mcmonkeyplc 16 Nov 2012 10:13:37 39,508 posts
    Seen 11 hours ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    What?! No London?! WHERE IS LONDON?!

    Come and get it cumslingers!

  • fletch7100 27 Nov 2012 05:37:06 7,432 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 4 years ago
    Paramount has issued the first official plot synopsis for Star Trek Into Darkness.

    "In Summer 2013, pioneering director J.J. Abrams will deliver an explosive action thriller that takes Star Trek Into Darkness. When the crew of the Enterprise is called back home, they find an unstoppable force of terror from within their own organization has detonated the fleet and everything it stands for, leaving our world in a state of crisis. With a personal score to settle, Captain Kirk leads a manhunt to a war-zone world to capture a one man weapon of mass destruction. As our heroes are propelled into an epic chess game of life and death, love will be challenged, friendships will be torn apart, and sacrifices must be made for the only family Kirk has left: his crew."
  • Nanocrystal 27 Nov 2012 05:50:31 1,095 posts
    Seen 10 hours ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    Wow that's horribly written. "Epic chess game of life and death"???
  • CosmicFuzz 27 Nov 2012 06:20:55 25,299 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    What's wrong with that? I look forward to kirk punching a bishop to death then shagging the queen.

    How patches are ruining the future of gaming My thoughts.

  • spamdangled 27 Nov 2012 06:46:55 27,421 posts
    Seen 8 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Nanocrystal wrote:
    Wow that's horribly written. "Epic chess game of life and death"???
    http://www.realisten.se/wp-content/uploads/antonius_block_och_doden.jpg

    3DS: 4055-2781-2855 Xbox: spamdangled PSN: dark_morgan Wii U: Spamdangle Steam: spamdangled

  • Page

    of 179 First / Last

Log in or register to reply