Another Random Musings Thread Page 516

  • Page

    of 568 First / Last

  • Mr-Brett 12 Dec 2012 12:10:44 12,989 posts
    Seen 16 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    billythekid wrote:
    Liz Hurley has happened to him.
    I dunno, even she looks embarrassed to be seen with him:

    Level 37 Social Justice Warrior

  • JuanKerr 12 Dec 2012 12:14:15 36,526 posts
    Seen 14 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Shane 'Madame Tassauds' Warne.
  • King_Edward 12 Dec 2012 12:55:26 11,471 posts
    Seen 2 weeks ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    Deckard1 wrote:
    He looks like an off duty drag queen. The lengths a man will go to to shag Liz Hurley.
    It sounds worth it when you put it like that.
  • mrpon 12 Dec 2012 13:00:27 29,816 posts
    Seen 17 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Lizs pubes clearly working their magic here.

    Give me 5 I'm worth it.

  • localnotail 12 Dec 2012 23:26:39 23,093 posts
    Seen 11 months ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Watching the League Cup show on BBC1. Team idents read "BRA - ARS". Teehee.

    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

  • localnotail 13 Dec 2012 23:04:44 23,093 posts
    Seen 11 months ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    What's that Mum? "How do you say cumin in Arabic"? Let me Google that for you (NSFW)

    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

  • ronuds 13 Dec 2012 23:44:20 21,788 posts
    Seen 1 year ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Well, what'd you expect?
  • Syrette 13 Dec 2012 23:49:35 44,541 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    local, where do you get your cumin?

  • mrpon 13 Dec 2012 23:58:18 29,816 posts
    Seen 17 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    From her sugar bowl. Left out in the open.

    Give me 5 I'm worth it.

  • localnotail 14 Dec 2012 00:06:41 23,093 posts
    Seen 11 months ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    From a local shop.

    My sugar bowl brings all the ants to the yard.

    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

  • localnotail 14 Dec 2012 00:08:17 23,093 posts
    Seen 11 months ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Strictly speaking, is what Mumford & Sons doing any more offensive than what the Rolling Stones did? In terms of appropriation of another culture's music?

    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

  • BillMurray 14 Dec 2012 00:11:40 7,989 posts
    Seen 12 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Yes. Probably. I dunno, I just know they're rubbish bastards who ripped off Beirut a bit.
  • localnotail 14 Dec 2012 00:16:01 23,093 posts
    Seen 11 months ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    People love them though, they love a good rousing jig of a song - and why not? They certainly have the craft to hit their marks. I'm sure they are great fun live.


    But... but... but.... arrrrgghhhhh!

    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

  • BillMurray 14 Dec 2012 00:22:19 7,989 posts
    Seen 12 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    I thought it was a bit mental they were nominated for a million Grammys. Dunno what that's all about.
  • Deleted user 14 December 2012 00:26:50
    The grammy's are shit?
  • RobTheBuilder 14 Dec 2012 00:31:57 6,521 posts
    Seen 1 year ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    @Aargh. "Wow an award! Ohh, it's a Grammy." *throws away*
  • BillMurray 14 Dec 2012 00:33:30 7,989 posts
    Seen 12 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    @Aargh. Yeah, pretty much bang on.
  • mikeck 14 Dec 2012 10:15:54 1,936 posts
    Seen 17 hours ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    @localnotail They are great live (seen them twice).

    I know it's cool to hate Mumford these days, but I really like them, and have liked alt-folk music and similar sub-genres for ages (Beruit, Devotchka, Bonnie 'Prince' Billy...).

    Yes they're trying to make it cool, but fuck it, let somebody do it ;)
  • Jeepers 14 Dec 2012 10:20:18 13,378 posts
    Seen 25 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Oirish foot-stomping banjo-wanking for people who don't like music.

    Or:

    Second-rate faux-fi Bono-wannabees.

    Or:

    Coldplay without the doe-eyes and lighter-waving.

    Or:

    BUMford & Sons - amirite?
  • Jeepers 14 Dec 2012 10:29:52 13,378 posts
    Seen 25 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Enabler.
  • GuiltySpark 14 Dec 2012 10:36:20 6,519 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    It's a band than normos can like that sounds different to their Rihanna, therefore enabling them to dress like CUNTS and shop in Topman.

    Get bent.

  • Lukus 14 Dec 2012 10:36:32 19,524 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    I don't trust any band who put on stupid voices/accents that clearly aren't theirs when they sing.

    Paintings & Photographs

  • warlockuk 14 Dec 2012 11:39:59 19,259 posts
    Seen 3 days ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    That applies to most punk bands.

    I'm a grumpy bastard.

  • mikeck 14 Dec 2012 11:51:47 1,936 posts
    Seen 17 hours ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    @LeoliansBro Ooh, good find, will have to check that out ;)
  • localnotail 14 Dec 2012 12:00:48 23,093 posts
    Seen 11 months ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Lukus wrote:
    I don't trust any band who put on stupid voices/accents that clearly aren't theirs when they sing.
    This is my problem, really. They write lovely inoffensive songs, and are obviously skilled musicians, but somehow they stick in my ears as inauthentic and wrong. As if Ralph had stolen Ted's clothes and left the Hall pretending to be him.

    I can think of numerous examples beyond the Stones of bands who have taken music from other cultures and made it their own, accents as well - most of British Hip Hop styles with an American accent after all. So why does Mumford & Sons bother me?

    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

  • Page

    of 568 First / Last

Log in or register to reply