Kolmar wrote:I'm not entirely sure, but I didn't think the law actually banned them. It was just the muzzling thing?Lutz wrote:But... "dangerous" dogs already are banned as pets, surely all you're asking is do we need to reclassify a few breeds?
Things like this occur quite frequently.
Question: Should we still have "dangerous" dogs as pets?
OK, the dog in question isn't officially classed as a dangerous dog, but having seen first hand, twice, what they can do they should be IMO.
#810183, By QuickBen Dangerous dogs.
-
QuickBen 113 posts
Seen 44 years ago
Registered 9 years ago
