Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Retrospective: Zak McKracken and the Alien Mindbenders Article

PC Article by John Walker

7 March, 2010

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

I wonder if I'm getting stupider. Zak McKracken and the Alien Mindbenders came out in 1988, when I was 11 years old. It seems impossible to believe that at the age of 32 I can have become worse at games. And yet while my memories of playing Zak Mak when it first came out are extremely hazy, I certainly don't remember getting stuck quite as often. What I do remember is that I really enjoyed it. I've since been told by those who should know that this cannot possibly have been true. So I've gone back to find out.

LucasArts is much heralded as the company that refined the point-and-click adventure into something more coherent and fair than those of its rivals at Sierra Online, Westwood, and so on. However, while this may have eventually become true, it certainly wasn't in 1988. It's hard to believe that much of Zak McKracken came from the same studio that went on to create Monkey Island, and of course the greatest of them all, Day of the Tentacle.

And yet so much else feels like a prototype for those games to come. Alongside random deaths, the ability to play yourself into a dead end, and some extremely primitive storytelling, are also multiple-character puzzles, an elaborate plot, and a great deal of familiar daftness.

Worrying about stupidity is particularly apposite here. Aliens have invaded Earth, taking over telephone companies, and are broadcasting a signal that is making humanity increasingly stupid. Zak is a reporter for an American newspaper, based in San Francisco, who is asked to file a report on reputed sightings of a two-headed squirrel in Seattle. He is not pleased by this.

'Retrospective: Zak McKracken and the Alien Mindbenders' Screenshot 1

Got my fishbowl on, I'm ready for anything.

And so it begins in extremely familiar adventuring style. This is from the era of LucasArts games with the verb system at the bottom of the screen (see the screenshots), so you built instructions by clicking on words and objects in the world. "USE" "butter knife" "squirrel", for instance. Although it lacks the option to "LOOK AT" something, which makes for a strange time in an adventure world. (Maniac Mansion made the same decision.)

Despite not being able to look at anything, Zak can pick up anything that isn't glued down and add it to a really quite enormous inventory. The first stages are about getting to Seattle, which involves discovering aliens running the phone company. And waking a bus driver up with a kazoo. And psychically knowing to use a yellow crayon on a scrap of wallpaper to write down the contents of a dream. Indeed, even the reasonably good opening section is riddled with problems. And disappointingly this just gets worse.

It's packed with some really splendid ideas, but Zak McKracken turns out to be a blot - nay, a blight - on LucasArts' fantastic adventure CV. So why on Earth did I remember it being so brilliant?

I would never have gotten through this globe-trotting, multi-route, multi-character cacophony without using the mighty GameFAQs, and every other minute at that, because Zak McKracken is structured in a fascinating way. It could have been something extraordinary in a better game - you can travel to about eight different countries, in any order you choose, playing as four different characters (two of whom are on Mars), solving some puzzles in a variety of different ways - but it's such a pain to play that these wonderful elements only create further obfuscation.

'Retrospective: Zak McKracken and the Alien Mindbenders' Screenshot 2

Every game in the eighties featured the Bermuda Triangle at one point. It was a law.

The game is huge. Twice as long as most adventures of the era. It even has a complex money system. Zak (and indeed Annie) must pay their way, purchasing items from the pawn shop, and more frequently buying tickets for flights. While you start with a generous $12,000, head to the wrong country (which you've not been told about, nor told why you might need to go there, nor warned that you'll need to go there in order to fly somewhere else that can only be reached from there...) and you'll have wasted a thousand bucks.

So how do you make more? Well, you could always find your way to an alien base (proving your friendship with the alien leader by showing him the fan club membership card you have, because you filled out a membership form in the phone company offices and then posted it by, er, putting it in your own letterbox), and then use their lottery-predicting machine. Go back to San Fran, buy a ticket, pick the right numbers, and you'll soon get a bonus $10,000 in your account. Novel, but beyond insane.

By the time you're worrying about maintaining the oxygen levels for two characters on Mars, whether Annie's got enough money to travel to Cairo, or whether Zak picked up the lighter from the aeroplane that's going to be extremely necessary for playing any further, there's far too much going on to let you struggle with clicking everything on everything to get past the latest berserk situation.

Advertisement
Comments

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-36 of 36

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Retroid moderator
07/03/10 @ 09:44
#1
+13
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Later that night, Zak was in bed.

Alone.

Again.
OnlyMe
07/03/10 @ 09:45
#2
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You bring up so many excellent points about the game, then hammers it for being too hard and vague. It sounded more like you actually love the game, but desperately wanted to hate on the game for the readers' sake. It's hard, got a few design desicions that I wouldn't defend for my life, but overall it's a great game. I'd hate to see how a retrospective of Sierra titles would be like. Some of your complaints are completely unfair (yeah, the last paragraph about the goldfish bowl and the duct tape. Yeah, it's realistic, and a brilliant puzzle. It only seemed unfair because you didn't expect such realism in an adventure game. Also, Larry says; "save early, save often". :)
Soul_man
07/03/10 @ 10:01
#3
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I also have many fond memories about this game. Yes, it's probably way too hard, but weren't all adventure games back then?

Maniac Mansion was harder, though. I think you could actually choose starting characters that made it impossible to finish the game...?
Thirith
07/03/10 @ 10:14
#4
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
After Monkey Island 2, Zak McKracken is the LucasGames adventure I have the fondest memories of. However, now I'm kind of scared to replay it, because I don't want my fond memories to be destroyed by actually playing the game again after all these years.
madjim
07/03/10 @ 10:22
#5
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It was 1990 when I played Zak I think. Though I was an adventure game maniac, I never made it to the end. Now that I recall those memories, the game's paranoia is equal only to Silent Hill's! Only that it seems it's easier to escape a demonic town than save the world from stupidity! :)
Epilogue
07/03/10 @ 10:27
#6
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ahh the good old Zak. In my memories it was a supereme game. But I don't know if everything that we played in our childhood is beeing glorified by us. Except Monkey Island, which is one of the best games ever, even today. Bring on Simon The Sorcerer.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 07/03/10 @ 10:27
Retroid moderator
07/03/10 @ 10:28
#7
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bought this on C64 5 1/4" disk, still have it boxed somewhere with the newspaper and shiny-printed-on-matt-paper code sheet.

^_____^
sesskie
07/03/10 @ 10:35
#8
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This was the game that got me into adventure games, and man was it tough. Back then we had no FAQs and no interwebs and only our wit and circle of gaming friends to help each other out. Zak was tough, but damnit, I loved every part of it, even the goddamn martian maze when I sat down with paper and pencil and mapped that whole damn place out.
JohnnyWashnGo
07/03/10 @ 10:54
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I used to love this game.
brainbird
07/03/10 @ 11:12
#10
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Take fuel for chainsaw.
Zak: "No, it's for another game."

Instant win.
space ace
07/03/10 @ 11:12
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
the bermuda triangle is not in nepal
Cappy
07/03/10 @ 11:17
#12
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I definitely completed the game without the help of the internet, or Ted. The newspaper was the key I think, reading the articles gave you a lot of hints.

See ya!
Retroid moderator
07/03/10 @ 11:19
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
\o/

Although looking at that now, I can't help but think it wants to be running on an NTSC C64 as I doubt it was optimised in any way.
OrgasmicMutton
07/03/10 @ 11:42
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good read that.

Funnily enough while I was playing all the Lucas Arts adventures a few years back Zac and Maniac mansion were the two that just didn't click with me. I never got particularly far in either - and reading this I'm kind of glad, it sounds like they suffer from the kind of frustrations which have led me to completely avoid Sierra adventure games and to cry out in frustration when I tried to play Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
dalleck
07/03/10 @ 11:49
#15
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Loved this game.

As Cappy said, I think the newspaper which was included with the game (apart from being quite a good read) helped out with some of the most obtuse puzzles. Many of the adventure games of the era did similar pack-ins (especially Infocom games), which is a pretty alien concept today.

I think in some ways the ease which solutions can be obtained is part of the reason why adventure games struggled to leave the 90's. Anyone remember the Sierra solution books which used a 'special' pen to reveal the answers? Ahh fond memories.
Daikon
07/03/10 @ 11:53
#16
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't remember many of the quirks mentioned in the article and I just remember thinking it was one of the coolest game ever, having completed it both on C64 and Amiga.
Now I'm scared to replay it.
Maybe the handholding of recent games has made us soft and beloved classics such as Zak and Maniac Mansion are now too hardcore...
InfiniteFury
07/03/10 @ 12:32
#17
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
YEAHHHHHH! Man I loved this game and had forgotten all about it, what a nice Sunday read.
Vyse
07/03/10 @ 13:19
#18
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I played this game during the mid ninties whilst at Uni. I remember nipping into Waterstones on more than few occasions to leaf through the various game tips books that they had to get past the (many) sections that had me stumped.

Still really enjoyed the game though.
fluff_the_tiger
07/03/10 @ 14:55
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm in the same camp as Thirith - loved the game, but I don't want to spoil my delicious memories.

I remember there were Zak McKraken comic strips at the time - they were great too.
Nuada
07/03/10 @ 16:09
#20
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Zak was probably my favourite lucasarts game after Monkey Island, yeah, above MI2 and it's 78 disks (pick up wrench, insert disk 3, insert disk 64, insert disk 12, insert disk 59, you have picked up the wrench!) I really don't remember it being so difficult or nonsensical. Maybe I was insane as a child?
geemaan
07/03/10 @ 17:22
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
thank you.
FooAtari
07/03/10 @ 17:30
#22
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Now this a proper retrospective. I want to read about real retro titles that I might have missed and forgotten about or know little of. Not read about something released in the last few years when I can find a thousand reviews and articles about them on every games site, big and small
Hecktar
07/03/10 @ 17:35
#23
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Fascinating article, and quite entertaining.

I tried to play Zak multiple times in my late teens. And each time I found my self giving up. People around me sang praises about it, but It just didn't click with me. I'm not one to shy away from adventure games, but I never got out of Zak's street.

Maniac Mansion is not that hard. And is rather short once you get the hang of it (which I admit takes some time). You quickly learn what you can do, what you shouldn't do and where are the safe rooms in the house. All that's left is careful experimentation.
itamae
07/03/10 @ 18:05
#24
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Zak McKracken would be my favourite Lucasfilm game (that honour goes to Maniac Mansion) if it wasn't for those bloody mazes and the fact that you can run out of money halfway through. Yes some of the puzzles can be a bit obscure (the secret code for the Martian pyramid had me stuck for ages), but pretty much all of the problems can be solved with a solid dose of out-of-the-box thinking and a bit of trial-and-error.

The lack of a "look at" command doesn't bother me at all, either. Remember that the game came out at a time when people had grown up with text adventures, in which you spent half of the time typing "l/x {item}" to feel around the game world. Maniac Mansion was one of the first games to place everything you needed to know right there in front of you, on the screen. So in that regard being able to examine things would have been a step backwards. I know Lucasfilm used the item descriptions mostly for additional gags, but personally I prefer the WYSIWYG approach of their first adventures, and the pure situation comedy that arose from using objects in unexpected ways.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 07/03/10 @ 18:07
Kanjin
07/03/10 @ 23:06
#25
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds like Myst on acid.

I want it!
thefinn
07/03/10 @ 23:53
#26
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I remember playing Zak with my friend on his Amiga. We had a lot of fun, but I don't think we ever made it farther than the two-headed squirrel. What I remember as being the thing I loved about the game was that you could do so many completely off the wall things, and the game would react believably. Zak spoiled me for adventure games for quite some time because of that. The thing with the goldfish in the garbage disposal is a case in point. Never mind that guru who tells you off for it (I never met him anyway), most other adventure games of the time would have had your character say "I don't think that's a good idea" and refuse to do it.

And of course, I didn't know at the time that there's ever any reason to wear a goldfish bowl on your head, so I just thought it was awesome that you *could*, for no other reason than that it was there.
ohcomeon
08/03/10 @ 00:08
#27
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I started to play this proper about a year or so ago. I remember seeing it at a friend's house back when I was 10 or 11 and I found it absolutely hilarious you could walk around, even go on an airplane, wearing a diving suit and those Groucho Marx glasses. I actually tracked the game down using just that memory.

Obviously, it's not quite as funny when you're older but I still took delight in the silliness. It's nice to see a few more games embracing that style as of late and maybe someday I'll get round to actually finishing it...
tolworthy
08/03/10 @ 01:10
#28
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
As others have said, you need the newspaper. The puzzles are a lot easier with it. I run Zak-site.com and you can print off a copy there. Zak is the greatest game I ever played, and inspired me to become a game developer. Regarding specific complaints: (1) deaths are not random: you have to do something extremely foolhardy like not refilling your oxygen despite repeated warnings. (2) The storytelling has a lot more depth than other LucasArts games (it's all based on the real world, real ethics and and real people). The things you complain of - e.g. suffocating Zak - are more evidence of this. If you tape someone's head inside a fish bowl without any oxygen, what do you expect? :) (3) Yes, you can 'lookAt' stuff - it's called 'what is.' (4) When Zak says "I should make a copy of that map I saw" and there is paper and a crayon are nearby, how is that "riddled with problems"? (5) you don't need to restart the game after being trapped in the prison. Just wait and the aliens will set you free. You can then get your stuff from their cupboard: there are at least two ways to sneak past them. (6) The mazes are not identical - each has unique characteristics so you never need to get lost if you pay attention. E.g. different colored objects, different numbers of doors, different symbols over doors, etc. (7) The mazes aren't pitch black if you turn on a torch. My recommendation is for anyone playing the game to get a hold of the original newspaper, with all the clues - or be prepared for some lateral thinking. :)
Retroid moderator
08/03/10 @ 02:14
#29
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
PDF of the original newspaper.

Yeah, the must say the mazes weren't identical and my 11-year-old self worked out how to get light in the mazes :)

/Fondly remembers making that map with crayon and torn wallpaper
4thVariety
08/03/10 @ 07:41
#30
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This was one of those adventures, you could sink time into. By comparison, the modern adventure stuff is bland unimaginative and too formulaic.
CaptainBinky
08/03/10 @ 10:37
#31
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The thing is, is back when this came out it was literally the most edge-cutting thing ever. So all that confusion about how on Earth you could be arsed to play it as a kid needs to take into account what else there was to play, and what your expectations were. In this age of refined (arguably) gameplay and whatnot, these horrible decisions sound like THE WORST THING EVER by compaarison. Back then, it was just "the way things were". Not a lot around better.

Plus the theme tune rules. 10/10, so there.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 08/03/10 @ 10:51
Retroid moderator
08/03/10 @ 14:08
#32
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/Gets stale french bread from the bakers
android123
08/03/10 @ 14:38
#33
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was a big fan of this back in its day on the amiga.

I spent hours playing it, certainly it was one of the best point n clickers back then.
It doesn't quite match day of the tenticle(my all time favourite), but it was a lot of fun.

I have it on scummVM as well but haven't got around to replaying it yet. It's the FM towns version i have in scummVM of all things.
Better graphics and audio than the amiga version for sure.
black2
08/03/10 @ 17:10
#34
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was sick with jealousy at not owning a floppy drive for my C64 when Zzap! ran it's super-positive review on this.
karstux
09/03/10 @ 11:27
#35
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"But certainly I had not remembered the game's obsession with "mazes", endlessly forcing you to wander blindly, madly, through identical corridors, through indistinguishable doors, hoping to eventually stumble into an important location by nothing other than miserable luck."

Obviously it never occurred to you to draw a map! The mazes are perfectly (topo-)logically correct, you can draw them on squared paper and find your way around. Even in the darkness with a torch.

The game can't have been as hard as the article suggests. I played it in my early teens with no help and got through, and I have very, very fond memories of it.

Maniac Mansion on the other hand... never completed that.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 09/03/10 @ 11:28
stevenothing
09/03/10 @ 22:57
#36
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Zak McKracken was the game that got me started on a life-long graphic adventure addiction. As the game was so hard, I got through most of it with the aid of a premium rate help-line, that may have been advertised in the back of a computer magazine, or possibly in a bit of paper in the box.

Unfortunately, my parents got the phone bill before I'd completed it, so I didn't get to see the end until a few years back, when I decided to re-play it without cheating. I managed to complete it, having found out that the puzzle I was stuck on all those years ago would be solved with a bobby pin. I had no idea what a bobby pin even was back then!

And the music. Such fantastic music. I can still hum it to this day. I had it as a ringtone on my phone at one point.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 09/03/10 @ 22:58

Comments: 1-36 of 36

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery