Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning
Well, this is orkward.
I was watching my housemate, also an on-off WAR player, creating yet another character. "What's the point in choosing a face for him," he asked, "when they all look the same?" On-screen, a parade of only faintly distinguishable Dark Elf visages cycled around and around. In truth, I couldn't tell at what point we returned to the first face in the roster, but nonetheless I unconvincingly offered "yeah, but you can change the colour of your outfit at any point". My housemate remained silent. Meanwhile, the near-identical faces continued their eerie dance.
Warhammer Online's argument is that this kind of thing simply isn't important. Only war is important. Haircuts and clothes and personality - these things only get in the way of the war without end, the only cause that matters. This steely-jawed, flinty-eyed determination doesn't just deny aesthetic elements, either. You don't need to worry about buying new inventory space, recharging health doesn't require sitting down and having a protracted snack, mounts are available very quickly, the exact location of your quest targets is highlighted on the map, player-versus-player battlegrounds can be travelled to instantly, a poor build choice can be undone cheaply, common XP is earned from both PvE and PvP, and everyone has essentially the same gear as anyone else of the same level and class. If it slows things down, if it gets in the way of fighting, fighting, fighting, WAR has thrown it out.
It's a noble sentiment, and one intended to directly address, even bust, many of the more ridiculous and irritating stereotypes or compromises of the oft-cynical MMORPG genre. Mythic's developers don't want you to waste your time saving up money for a bigger rucksack. They just want to you to fight - ideally, to fight other players. The game's greatest triumph is a largely seamless blend between punching NPCs and punching real people - no need for different skill sets or alternative armour. The enemy is the enemy. That row of number keys and a few team-mates, be they anonymous or known chums, are all you need.

Stuff! Things! Stuff and things everywhere!
The sad side-effect of such single-mindedness is a glaring loss of personality. With everything so distilled to pure mechanics, WAR slaps you around the face with its sheer gameyness. This isn't a world. This isn't a place. It's simply combat systems with sometimes spectacular and sometimes dreary fantasy graphics painted over the top. Look at its UI, for instance - so many pointers and bars and numbers and icons. You can't pretend for one second you're controlling a person, least of all one in largely technology-free, war-torn fantasy world.
Is this what we want MMOs to be? Is this why we play them? The pursuit of a funny hat is certainly anathema to a certain breed of player, to whom striving to be the best is the only challenge worth undertaking. Certainly, WAR offers a wealth of opportunities to feel good about yourself in such a fashion - from the loot rolls which better reward the most effective players come the conclusion of a public quest, to the scoreboard at the close of a PvP scenario, to the bragging rights page of the character screen…. Such achievements are genuinely thrilling, especially because they're always preceded by an adrenal pile-on, an almighty punch-up between dozens of characters that relies as much on enthusiastic button-mashing as it does on careful tactics. More than anything, WAR is a competition, even a sport - and I can't help but feel that, had it been clearer about that instead of pretending to be a believable, functioning online world, its servers mightn't be as distressingly empty as they are today.
Who honestly wanted another World of Warcraft rival? Really, we wanted something else, something palpably different - and Warhammer truly does offer that. But in its marketing, in its visual styling, in its setting, even in its name (and trust me, I'm fully aware of the debt Warcraft owes to Warhammer) it appeared to be something it wasn't. Its fans famously spurn any suggestion of commonality with WOW, and in a great many ways they're right to do so. This isn't a WOW clone, much as it superficially appears to be so: its major purpose is to get dozens of players fighting each other at any given time, almost more akin to something like Modern Warfare. But to claim that either publisher EA or developer Mythic knowingly piggy-backed the appeal and success of Blizzard's online goliath hardly seems like false logic.
Had WAR been clearer about what it was, and had it even thrown out some of the strangely tokenistic world-building (its crafting system, for instance, is so unenthusiastically implemented it's almost funny) in favour of something tighter and more determinedly its own, it might have attracted a more relevant crowd in the first place. As it is, the bored hordes looking for a break from WOW have long since departed WAR's shores - and either returned to their more relaxed home, or given up on the entire genre for now.
Sure, there are definite hotspots in WAR, certain zones in constant contention, flipping back and forth between ownership by the monstrous forces of Destruction or the more Tolkienesque Order. Tier 4, the collection of top-level zones that ultimately lead to the two realms' capital cities, is always busy enough to find something to do, and someone to fight who isn't a respawning, half-witted NPC. The new Land of the Dead area, the biggest free content update yet, is currently drawing the bulk of the crowds, and is certainly the place where the game's at its most visually and thematically ambitious.

Graphically it's no powerhouse, but it can certainly turn out some good-looking architecture.
The game's architects have been able to indulge themselves hugely with the Egyptian-themed Land of the Dead, and the character designers able to play around with stuff like mummified vultures that fly hapless players off to their nests. However, its goals are still the pursuit of numbers and icons, clearly marked out on the map and HUD. It's not a place, it's a collection of systems. The NPCs stand stock-still, the monsters wander around clearly-delineated killing fields, and accessing the set-piece fights requires the collection of specific glyphs earned by repeating specific public quests. There's still no "look at that, look at what I did, look what I found!" You just do what the UI tells you to do.
The tragedy is that it would be twice the game it is if the player-base had stayed as mighty as it was in that first month. Public quests remain a splendid innovation - open-world missions anyone can roll up to, pitch in, and be rewarded by without having to specifically join a party or find someone wanting to do exactly the same quest. But even an update that lowered the number of recommended players for many to a meagre two or three hasn't helped - the vast bulk remain abandoned. There simply aren't enough people, and as a result this great idea, a significant slice of the game, is essentially redundant. Is that the fault of the game, the MMO market, the players? A little of each, I'd guess.

The Land of the Dead's a little more imaginative in terms of set-pieces – this carrion bird's carrying me off to its nest, requiring me to fight my way back down to ground.
The same pox affects the PvP scenarios, instanced battlegrounds containing often imaginative variants of capture-the-flag and point defence. Multiple server merges, the option to simultaneously queue for all scenarios and improved team balancing mean the horrific queues of launch month are now a thing of the past, but in most zones it's rare to find a full warband of players on each side. The open-world keep sieges are more spectacular, and feel more like a fight with purpose, but they tend to be sporadic surges rather than constant push-and-pull between two armies.
WAR successfully transformed PvP from a presumptive, often frustrating experience aimed only at relatively hardcore gamers into an open-to-all-comers fairgound. It deserves respect for that, and with a big crowd it would function perfectly as a game you drop into for a month or so here and there, one in which you can find an honestly satisfying fight at any time of day. Without a big crowd, though, that fairground's ferris wheels are left to wobble in the wind, and the bumper cars stand rusting. Then you realise that there isn't even anywhere to go sit and have a drink and a chat whenever the rides aren't working. So you just go punch someone you don't like the look of, because there's nothing else to do.
Still: getting towards a year on from launch, there are just enough players to ensure most of the game's systems do work, and those systems certainly offer a good time, even if they don't allow you to stamp any meaningful imprint of your own upon them. It's not beyond imagination that a patch or expansion can lure some of the crowds back, and watching that ferris wheel start to spin again, the lights on those dodgems flicker back into life, would be a marvellous, thrilling time.
For sure, Warhammer Online remains an incredibly accessible MMO - there's no fear of getting lost, little worry about getting stranded on the other side of the continent to your chums, and you're not rendered useless because you're not clad in ultra-loot you spent 400 hours grinding for. It wants anyone and everyone to come right on in and have fun with the minimum of effort. Big guilds take it that much more seriously, and are those chiefly responsible for the tug-of-war zone ownership, but at the same time my housemate plays the game almost like Diablo - flailing and clicking wildly at anything in sight, and getting away it often enough to feel he's some sort of powerhouse.

I only really feel like me once I've dyed my hat a lurid shade of green
What I'm trying to say, but pussyfooting around for fear he'll read this, is that he's a bit rubbish at games. To WAR's eternal credit, this doesn't matter. Other MMOs seem to do anything they can to make you feel humble and puny, but WAR never fails to make you feel like a warrior.
Such a shame, then, that the game's sense of place and atmosphere doesn't extend beyond some impressive vistas. Players are never more than templates, and the hugely welcome addition of four extra classes since launch hasn't reduced the dread sense of seeing the same faces again and again and again. Oh, hey, it's Dwarf With A Shield again, and there goes Chaos Bloke With The Funny Arm. Again.
When you don't feel as though you're in the shoes of anyone in particular, this in turn affects the ultimate purpose, the endless realm-versus-realm conflict that WAR is built upon. There isn't much sense of fighting for anything but better statistics, and so people will continue to drift away. If the crowds were to dwindle any further, so would the score below, however strong the design, or consistent the updates.
WAR might well have the best PvP structures any fantasy MMO has to offer, but without more meaning and without more bodies, it can only fade. Only war isn't enough after all.
7 / 10
You may also like...
-
Tera: beta dates and pre-order bonuses
-
SWTOR patch 1.1.2: notes, on test realm
-
Russia and CIS regions blocked from Tera's European servers
-
Gotham City Impostors Review
-
Who Killed Rare?
-
King Arthur 2 Review
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 now live for Xbox 360
-
Street Fighter X Tekken Preview: Year of the Dragon Punch?
-
Skyrim makers create dragon riding, Kinect shouts, new skill trees
-
Itagaki: Tecmo tricked me into releasing unfinished Dead or Alive 2
-
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning Review
-
World of Warcraft universe recreated in Minecraft
-
Apple to reveal iPad 3 in first week of March - report
-
Activision promises "meaningful innovation" in next Call of Duty
-
UKIE lobbies to make crowd funding legal in the UK
-
Arkham City developer laments health of UK games industry
-
Diablo 3 release date narrowed
-
Psychonauts developer Double Fine making fan-funded adventure game
-
PlayStation Vita trailer demos PS3 cross-play
-
The Darkness 2 Review
-
Modern Warfare 3 has 12% more online gamers than Black Ops
-
App of the Day: Off the Leash
-
Square cuts back on Final Fantasy 14 servers
-
Spec Ops: The Line lets you shoot "unarmed civilians", "angry mobs"
-
Double Fine Adventure raises $1m in less than 24 hours









Comments (40) Latest comment 3 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Not particularly valid criticism when you consider WoW has an almost identical UI.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I wouldn't say that WAR's "pvp structure" is anywhere near the best either, with both Guild Wars and WoW doing it plain better in most respects.
Not unless the open world stuff has really come on leaps and bounds in the interim since release.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I've never had problems with the populations on the areas I've been in, but it is admittedly very focused on keeping each class focused - one White Lion will be very similar to any other, despite any choices made about play styles etc. Not that it's totally a bad thing, but it can feel like your freedom is restricted, even if my weapon can ignore more armour than another equal level one. I do like the UI though, I always like the UIs of MMOs.
I still love the PvP battlegrounds though, intergrated into the landscape itself. It's probably my personal favourite PvP, though I also really enjoy GW PvP.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Pretty much everyone who is bored of WoW! The market still has a shortage of straight forward polished theme park MMORPGs of WoW's quality. Aion will do quite well simply because it gets the basics right. In fact, it's WAR's overdesign, the developer's obsession over being different, that has lead it up a lot of dead ends. And the fact that it simply doesn't have the polish, immersion and attention to detail of it's leading competitor.
I'd be first in the queue for an mmorpg that's genuinely different, a forward looking sandbox style MMO is top of my want list. But the genre is so young, and the task of getting things right so big, that there is still plenty room for more WoW style games of the right quality.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Fun for a quick go at, but not my bag.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
[link url=http: //www.eurogamer.net/archive.php?author=162
]http://ww w.eurogamer.net/archive.php?aut...[/link]
He's done over 50 articles here, plus he's one of the editors of RPS and a long-time writer for PCG, EDGE etc.. So now you know
Comment below viewing threshold Show
He's done a few bits.
http://ww w.eurogamer.net/archive.php?aut...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Maybe I'm just too nostalgic towards DAoC but it was my perfect mmo experience and one that suited me completely. I would love to have that feeling back again.
That said, I think I'm one of the few here that actually currently enjoys playing WAR despite it's flaws.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'll play it again when its free.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Anyway, I won't be picking this up. Never been a PVP kinda guy, and WH40k spits in the face of WHF in my opinion.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
He doesn't cry or is as rubbish at games as John Walker.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"Not particularly valid criticism when you consider WoW has an almost identical UI."
Maybe I've not understood something here. Are we saying that if something is also present in WoW, it must inherently be ok?
I'm struggling to see why comparison to WoW makes a critisism of WAR any more or less valid. WAR is surely judged on its own merits first and foremost.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I did have some incredible sieges - I remember a fight that went on for hours when I was playing my Bright Wizard. The ebb and flow of the battle was great.
I also recall running around the RvR for hours with different rag tag bunches of people looking for a fight that never materialised.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The game was nothing but battleground grinding and got boring fast. I lasted a month before quitting.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
edit: battle strewn typo
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The game's performance during large-scale RvR is very poor, and the high-level PvE encounters buggy. Lost Vale was a joke at times.
Once you stand back and look at it, the game has a surprisingly limited scope for an MMO. There's just not enough variety in there to keep you engaged, and Mythic seem reluctant to really address the fundamental issues of the game, they'd rather wave new trinkets in the direction of the player base.
It's a 6 for me, possibly with an extra demerit for Mythic for selling such a good license short. I wanted to like it, but in the end it was too shallow.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I played from launch day until 2 weeks after Land of the Dead came out. When LotD came and I saw the promises shattered again, I quit. But the good moments were really really good. A 7 is about right.
PS: Damn you Gamebryo Engine
Comment below viewing threshold Show
AoC toyed with the idea but never fully went through with it. The closest we currently see it in MMOs is diffirent starting areas for diffirent races.
Also, DAoC was great pre-Atlantis expansion. Even with Shivering Isles Mythic started on their journey to basically make most crafting obsolete. Spell-crafting and potion-making (alchemy or whatever it was called) stood stronger so I guess that is why WAR only have two crafting professions - which are basically spellcrafting and potionmaking.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
But ultimately the PvP started to become just a bit boring. Fundamentally you need a good world to support it.
And there was so many little things wrong with the interface. (bit laggy, speed of update. etc) All of this builds to game breaking proportions after a while
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"Maybe I've not understood something here. Are we saying that if something is also present in WoW, it must inherently be ok?
I'm struggling to see why comparison to WoW makes a critisism of WAR any more or less valid. WAR is surely judged on its own merits first and foremost."
I think the point he's making is that WoW never seems to get that sort of criticism whenever it is reviewed, even though it has pretty much exactly the same type of interface.
In my experience WoW is nearly always praised for creating an immersive world, rather than "This isn't a world. This isn't a place. It's simply combat systems with sometimes spectacular and sometimes dreary fantasy graphics painted over the top"
I'm not saying the reviewer wouldn't have the same things to say about WoW, but really, what is the difference if we ignore that particular remark?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Personally I find WoW simply far better fleshed out and a far richer world than Warhammer (without the 40k) - yes, yes, I know Warhammer was first and Blizzard copied heavily from it (and Warhammer in turn from those who have come before), but Warcraft made more out of the scenario.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If i want a straight up combat game i would play a FPS or the like this is not a MMO other than there is 'alot' of people.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
They could fix this. When they release the expansion go back over with some redesigns and stop it being such a creaky levels and systems world. Maybe they could have a bit of playful story explaining the contrived arcadey game mechanics as curses etc.
They've got war down to a fine art, but it's meaningless without context. Soldiers won't fight without a country they believe in.
You'd have given it a better review if it's audience was PVP players after all this time innit? That's interesting right there
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Exactly. I'd say that somewhere along the line, they messed up their priorities.
While initially focusing on RvR, it's rather obvious that they attempted to copy some of the WoW-formula. For me - and I believe for a lot others - the end result just fails to play on the strengths of either format.
Had they really made a proper RvR-game, I would've likely still been playing.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
the Warhammer IP + Mythic, how could WAR fail so badly?! (fyi, its the bad game engine + ****ed PVP system + bad chat/community tools)
'its a casual pvp game' a.k.a. if you play it too much you can see its obvious flaws
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"I think the point he's making is that WoW never seems to get that sort of criticism whenever it is reviewed, even though it has pretty much exactly the same type of interface."
Well in that case it IS a valid critisism, and SHOULD also be mentioned in WoW reviews. Not the other way around.
Comment below viewing threshold Show