Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Rolando 2 Review

iPhone Review by Simon Parkin

14 July, 2009

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

Rolando 2's world is without blemish. Every cloud, tree and roly-poly blob of a character is piped in perfect Pantone, as if someone took away all of Jackson Pollock's flick brushes and instead made him squeeze paint like icing in steady dollops onto the page. It's still pure LocoRoco, of course, but somehow LocoRoco with the contrast turned up: French mustard yellows becoming brilliant suns and petit-pois hills turned deep evergreen.

This near-sterile sort of flawlessness is mirrored too in the game's systems, which, while narrow in scope and ambition, are self-assured. The Rolandos roll smooth and true as you shepherd them toward each level's exit with sometimes-careful and sometimes-exaggerated tilts of the iPhone. The touch-screen controls are economic: tap the screen to advance dialogue, draw boxes over groups or individual Rolandos to select them RTS-style and make jerky upward flicks to jump obstacles. Everything works as it should do, the game excelling in the sort of effortless, intuitive function that comes from a Nintendo-esque attention to interaction.

Of course, it's the game's context that makes you want to applaud these modest triumphs. iTunes may have democratised game publishing but when you open your platform to the world, expectations of what might be possible are soon lowered by a hundred thousand fart apps, Bejeweled clones and two-minute sub-Flash game novelties. The first Rolando was a gemstone in the rubble, a simple, clean game that mightn't have drawn much attention if it appeared on a more traditional handheld, but which, in the context of iPhone's library of mixed amateurism, shone like the greatest game ever made, or, at very least, the most professionally-crafted one.

But in truth it was neither. While Rolando displayed ngmoco and HandCircus's unrivalled appreciation of the iPhone and iPod Touch's unique abilities, it was defined as much by restraint as by ambition. The short, snappy levels were ideal for gaming on the go, but their length made every play session feel like snacking, something exacerbated by the slightly pedestrian level design that prided muted consideration over raw spectacle.

'Rolando 2' Screenshot 1

Golden idols are scattered through the world, each one allowing you to skip a level that you're finding too hard.

Rolando 2 is, on almost all of these counts, an improvement. Levels are, if anything, more tightly wound and precise than before, the volley of 45 stages coming fast and frequent towards the determined player. But they are, in general, better thought out and executed than before, the designers more clear on what they wanted to achieve with each and, for that reason, the learning curve is a distinguished one, leading players old and new by the hand into the deep end.

This time around, the game's cushioned into a cute story, a quest to save an island's royal Rolandos from a ravaging sickness. The only cure for the Kilogorean flu, as the islanders know it, is a rare golden orchid, which you roll off in search of through a variety of south-sea hot locations. As well as the stock flick-to-jump move your fingers must be employed to activate numerous contraptions to move them towards each level's exit. The swipe-controlled yellow lifts and springboards from the first game make a more refined return, as does the explosive fruit, which must be tapped from a tree's branches and used to blast through walls and enemies.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Rolando 2: Quest for the Golden Orchid on iPhone?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-25 of 25 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
paul_haine
14/07/09 @ 06:58
#1
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A year on and I've still barely touched the original Rolando. Don't know why - I enjoy it when I do play it, but just find I can never be bothered. Bit like Soul Bubbles on the DS in that respect. Hm.
brof
14/07/09 @ 07:23
#2
+7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't get it why I should pay for an firmware update (I am an IPod touch user)... so no Rolando 2 for me at the moment...
Beek4257
14/07/09 @ 07:55
#3
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@brof

I know! I own both iPhone and Touch and after updating the phone (which is free), I thought I'd do the same for the Pod.
€ 8! Ridiculous! I even thought I was doin' something wrong or it was a fault in the Appstore.
I don't say this very often, but seriously: Apple ... WTF!
(sorry mom)
leftlion
14/07/09 @ 08:07
#4
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah totally agree about the iTouch update fee. Most of the stuff in the update is for iphone only anyway e.g. MMS, so paying this as an iTouch user is silly. Could do with the copy and paste though.

On topic i've played the demo of Rolando 1 but it doesn't seem to have lasting appeal to me. So I won't be buying the new one.
MyPointIs
14/07/09 @ 08:27
#5
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Agree about Rolando/Soulbubbles in that they are a bit over-rated in my opinion. More novelty than hook. Yes, they play very nice, the idea is good, but I just don't return to them for more than 1 minute every seven months or so ;)
septimus
14/07/09 @ 08:39
#6
-2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Great little game... but it shows the weakness in the just released Worms more than anything. Far more detail, but utterly smooth on a 3G, where as worms is a jerky mess. Only played this on a friends 3G, but wish I had bought it instead now.
ChrisOTR
14/07/09 @ 08:42
#7
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Rolando 2's world is without blemish

...but it's certainly tarnished, by virtue of being the most shameless copy of someone else's game I've seen in a long time.
iago71
14/07/09 @ 08:43
#8
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Might pick this up.... I havent really gone in for iphone games after being sorely dissappointed with monkey ball. Still not sure that the phone will ever really replace my DS or PSP but I guess thats not really the point!
poopmonster
14/07/09 @ 09:26
#9
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I asked someone at Apple about the iPod fee back when the first OS update came out (2.1?), and was told by a rep it's because they're legally obliged to charge for the extra functionality, which at the time was e-mail and a few other bits and bobs. The issue was that it was sold as a 'music player', as regards to export tax & duty.

What a load of tosh. The 2G iPods have email, where's the trick?
jamhead
14/07/09 @ 09:37
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I played the whole way through the first Rolando and really enjoyed it. The concept was solid (if plagiarised) and the production levels were very high.

For £6 quid or whatever it's going for, this is a definite purchase for me. Having said that, I love the fact that the App Store has so quickly changed my attitude that £6 now feels expensive for a game. My DS is collecting dust - not becuase I don't think there are any good games for it - purely because I can't bring myself to part with £20 quid for a game for a handheld anymore (not when there is soooo much goodness to be found on the App Store for as little as 59p).
Beek4257
14/07/09 @ 10:26
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@twinberrettas
Just to be clear: you don't pay for the update (which isn't strictly firmware btw) on iPhone. But if you want the (basically identical) update for your iPod Touch you do.
Which is puzzling ...

Rolando (1 and 2) = quality entertainment, as is loads of other ngmoco stuff. imho.
MrED209
14/07/09 @ 11:25
#13
-4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I asked someone at Apple about the iPod fee back when the first OS update came out (2.1?), and was told by a rep it's because they're legally obliged to charge for the extra functionality, which at the time was e-mail and a few other bits and bobs. The issue was that it was sold as a 'music player', as regards to export tax & duty.

What a load of tosh. The 2G iPods have email, where's the trick?


No, 2G ipods with the email OS update built in account for the update in their original selling price. Anyone without the email updat eon their 2G iPod still had to pay for it. Furthermore, when the update was released, all iPod touches that were in Apple retail stores that hadn't come with the update already included were marked down in price to the tune of whatever the update was being sold for.

It's simple laws of economics, and when I say laws, I mean actual legal laws. Because of the different ways in which the iPhone and the iPod are accounted for - one being essentially subscription based, the other a one time payment - Apple can't legally provide iPod touch users with a whole new OS update for free. I don't understand the law but if you Google for it, it's there and it's legit.

If you object that strongly to paying a few quid for the OS and all the other under-the-hood improvements it makes above and beyond the headline grabbing stuff, I'm sure there's somewhere on the web you can download the update for free and manually (and perfectly safely) apply it to your iPod. Otherwise man up and pay the fiver.

Also, I did have to wonder at the child above who said he's not looked at iPhone games since he found Monkey Ball disappointing. That was over a year ago. Do you avoid console games for a year just because you didn't like one of them?
Edited 2 times, most recently on 14/07/09 @ 12:27
MrED209
14/07/09 @ 11:33
#14
-3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Differences between iPhone and iPod touch updates explained here.

The obvious counter-argument is that we get software updates for their Mac OSX or Windows OS for free all the time, but these are generally bug fixes and optimisation etc, not entire new feature sets etc.

The pricing, on the other hand, is Apple's call.
MrED209
14/07/09 @ 11:36
#15
-3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Rolando 2's world is without blemish

...but it's certainly tarnished, by virtue of being the most shameless copy of someone else's game I've seen in a long time.


Obviously you never bothered to look at the first game then. :P
Hendo
14/07/09 @ 11:44
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Indeed.
For the last feekin' time, it plays nothing like LocoRoco.
Nithron
14/07/09 @ 13:04
#17
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
About the whole ipod update thing: The latest OS update for the ipod touch still costs money. And it doesn't add anything that Apple could possibly be legally obliged to pay for.

So what they said before is just bollocks, you're just getting ripped off.
Fodder
14/07/09 @ 13:27
#18
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If it's a legal requirement, how come firmware updates for other devices - PSP, say - don't cost anything despite adding new features?
MrED209
14/07/09 @ 13:37
#19
-4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I have no idea, dude. Out of interest, what new features? And is there absolutely no element of paying any sort of subscription connected to those new features?
MrED209
14/07/09 @ 13:40
#20
-4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
About the whole ipod update thing: The latest OS update for the ipod touch still costs money. And it doesn't add anything that Apple could possibly be legally obliged to pay for.

So what they said before is just bollocks, you're just getting ripped off.


Hello? Hello? Did you read what I posted above?

iPhone: subscription based, therefore apparently they can provide radical new feature sets etc with updates for free.

iPod touch: not subscription based, therefore apparently such updates must be charged for, for some reason.

I don't see how this warrants your response. It seems pretty clear to me - the new iPod touch update adds significant new features and must be charged for. Apparently. I don't claim to fully understand the law, just present the law as it's been reported all over the web.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/07/09 @ 14:40
poopmonster
14/07/09 @ 14:05
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@MrEd209
Thanks, that's rather clearer than the explanation I got before.

Not too bothered myself as I have an iPhone, but it's clearly a barrier to some. That said, the cost is no more than several cheap apps - and in general I think only app-buyers would be interested in it anyway. Ce la vie.
Fodder
14/07/09 @ 14:11
#22
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
There's been loads of stuff added for free since the PSP's launch. It didn't even have a web browser at launch, for example. Plus there's stuff like Skype, PS3 remote play, the PSN store, internet radio, and a load of AV playback features.
poopmonster
14/07/09 @ 15:03
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Fodder

Very true. I'm sure the day will come someone will try to sue them over it.

Not because that's the right thing to do mind you. Apple just seem to attract class action lawsuits the way Benny Hill attracts bare-clad women...:)

Ok... it has a name: Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002

http://www.sarbanes-oxley-forum.com/inde...

In summary it aims to prevent fraud & corruption and has a lot to do with recognising and accounting for revenue. There's a lot of facets - I can't follow half of them at a glance, but one of these appears to discourage (or outlaw) adding value to products after they've been sold - value-added features to an iPod Touch would be an example. Another would be paying $1 or whatever it was to update the firmware in 802.1n wifi cards (seem to recall that story from ages ago). I guess the problem is that it's well-meaning, as it prevents people underselling for illicit reasons, but it also hits the consumer by costing them more in the long-run.

To be honest I think it's a pile of crap, and Apple are riding it as an easy way of getting a few extra bucks. I could be wrong of course, but there's plenty precedent (such as PSP firmware) for people not having to pay for upgrades. Try operating systems for starters.
Edited 3 times, most recently on 14/07/09 @ 16:23
poopmonster
14/07/09 @ 15:39
#24
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
meh mispost
Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/07/09 @ 16:41
MrED209
14/07/09 @ 18:44
#25
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I could be wrong of course, but there's plenty precedent (such as PSP firmware) for people not having to pay for upgrades. Try operating systems for starters.

I can't speak about the PSP as I don't own one and don't know the score there but there must be something that gets round the law. Is there anything in it that requires additional subscription to other services in order to function? If so, there's your loophole.

As for your Operating System as an example of free updates, as stated above, free OS updates tend not to add significant added functionality or features. It's usually optimisation and bug fixes. If you can tell me a major OS which requires an initial outlay (ie, free Linux setups don't count) and then provides it's users with major upgrades for free, you've got me.

Comments: 1-25 of 25 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery