Shining Soul Review

GBA RPGs are more interesting since the SP launched, but this one is dull anyway

Version tested: GameBoy Advance

RPGs. I get excited about RPGs. I steal them away into my bag and race home, boarding up my doors and arranging elaborate traps and puzzles to withstand intruders. However after an hour or so with Shining Soul I switched off the electrified cattle grid, tied up the swinging tree trunks with attached knives, and took the ten-pound note out of the mousetrap. It's really not worth the bother.

Here be Dragons

'Shining Soul' Screenshot 1

No. Sod off.

It says "RPG" in the genre box, but it's really not. Role-playing games are renowned for their engaging (or at least expansive) plotlines, diverse characters and locations, progressive combat and intricacy. Shining Soul is notable because it singularly fails to live up to anything that's come before it. There was a time when RPGs were a bit like this, but even then they proved vaguely entertaining - however else did they inspire titles like Final Fantasy VI and Chrono Trigger?

That said, Shining Soul does at least dispense with random battles, opting instead for a real-time combat system, and a very seat-of-your-pants, no pausing, you're in this until you're dead or victorious method of level design. You take control of one of four characters (warrior, archer, wizard or the close-combat favouring Dragonute), and traipse through various dungeon-type stages, each endowed with a multitude of similarly ineffectual nasties. You slash them with A, backing off between blows to avoid being hit yourself, and pocket the spoils (herbs, scrolls, weapons, etc) for use or sale later on.

Between levels, you pop back to Prontis, where the various other members of the Shining Fleet are assembled, waiting for you to prove yourself so you can all take on the nasty Dragon which holds the land in a vicelike grip of pure evil. But if you're looking for a plot, then we've just spoilt the entire thing. Apart from a few passing mentions from the end-of-level bosses, a brief intro cinematic is all that's made of the plot, so the entirety of the game is spent buying and selling junk in the village, struggling through a dungeon, beating a boss and then doing it all over again. Or dying and losing any cash not stored in the village, then doing it all over again.

We felt guilty about giving up on games like Breath of Fire II before the best bits of the story made themselves evident. We felt positively cheated for every minute we wasted on Shining Soul.

Don't be a Square? No! Do!

'Shining Soul' Screenshot 2

A lot of the game looks like this. Isometric and dull.

If we're completely honest, there are nice things and OK things to be said about it, but barely any of them concern the mainstay - the game's simplistic combat mechanics. The graphics are quite nice, certainly on a par with most 16-bit conversions/updates we've seen, but the character models are fairly poorly animated - particularly the enemies and weapon-swinging actions of the main characters, which regularly expose a dearth of frames. The levels, too, are all fluffy bushes, pale greenery, rocky dungeons and so on, in a style that Squaresoft well and truly licked a decade ago.

On the plus side, the levelling and inventory systems are quite good, the former giving you the option of spending your experience points as you like, and the latter giving you simple control over your character's weapons, armour and so on, but there are too many shop vendors to worry about, and it's sometimes tricky to work out why you can't equip a certain weapon or item. The good bit, actually, is the ability to bind up to three weapons/items to each arm and then have them cycled via shoulder buttons and used with A or B.

But you can hardly sell a game on the strength of its inventory system, and apparently that's what Shining Soul aims to do. Otherwise it's left relying on its combat (ironically even more repetitive than turn-based random battles), its storyline (what storyline?), its visuals/audio (come on now), its multiplayer (which would be fun if it wasn't a multi-cartridge job - nobody is going to buy this, let alone twice), and its longevity (20 hours is only 20 hours with no mid-level saves and hundreds of spawn-out-of-nowhere enemies).

Soulless

On the whole we're deeply disappointed with Shining Soul, and pity anybody who trusted the peculiar 5-7s out of 10 we've seen awarded, which all seemed eager to sing its praises just because it's got a Sega logo on the box and looks like an RPG. Hardcore? Don't be fooled, chaps. Maybe, somewhere, deep within the bowels of the hardcore gamer there's a desire to play endless, sprawling, repetitive games which offer no motivation to continue, but really, if you're looking for a hardcore RPG status symbol, then pick up Breath of Fire II or Golden Sun - or buy Zelda, because that's a real-time RPG done right.

4 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (15) Latest comment 9 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Blerk #1 9 years ago

    I'm really disappointed with this one! The screenies looked great and I was expecting a 'proper' RPG. But this appears to be more like a weird isometric version of Gauntlet instead.

    Mmm... Gauntlet. Don't get me started on that again!
  • Nemesis #2 9 years ago

    Now there's a cart they should do. The original Gauntlet mind, not the new crap stuff.

  • otto #3 9 years ago

    Yeah, big disappointment this one. :(
  • Blerk #4 9 years ago

    Now there's a cart they should do. The original Gauntlet mind, not the new crap stuff.

    A double game cart - Gauntlet and Gauntlet 2. Slightly enhanced graphics, same gameplay and mazes, 4 player link-up. Bloody marvellous, that'd be.
  • Nemesis #5 9 years ago

    But where would feed the endless supply of 10p coins?

    /speaks into an empty cup/ Red Elf Shot the Food!
  • Nemesis #6 9 years ago

  • Blerk #7 9 years ago

    Surely Infogrames own the rights to Gauntlet now? Ah, who am I kidding? They'll just do another stupid 3D version instead and completely ruin it.
  • Cyhwuhx #8 9 years ago

    .::: Shining Soul = Phantasy Star Offline Advance

    Expect ANYTHING more and you WILL be dissapointed.

    [edit] BTW each game has eight save slots instead of four. ;)
    Does anyone know how to get more of those photon bast/summons? I'm getting fed up with my giant chicken falling from the sky. :)
    Edited by 1 at 24/04/03 @ 11:26
  • Eldritch #9 9 years ago

    Let's hope they don't fuck up Shining in the Darkness. If they ever plan to release it for the GBA.
  • gunark #10 9 years ago

    Wasn't Shining the Holy Ark on Saturn crap too? Seems the Shining dev team need socks pulled up! Mind you, I found PSO piss boring too coz 1) If you wanted to go online you have to have a relatively exp'd character or you were toast and 2) The 1 player game was really poor and so couldn't be arsed to build up character for on line.
  • Cyhwuhx #11 9 years ago

    .::: The original Shining Dev. team was last seen producing Golden Sun: The Lost Age....

    But Camelot did say they were working on a new RPG, so who knows? You might get lucky...
  • gunark #12 9 years ago

    Ah, now Golden Sun, that was great. Even thru a telly with VGBA it looked better than my old SNES rpgs!
  • otto #13 9 years ago

    Yup! And my copy of Golden Sun 2 may be waiting on my doormat at home as we speak...

    *rubs hands with anticipation*
  • Machiavel #14 9 years ago

    Shining the Holy Ark (with its Hairy Arse) was quite good fun. Retro memories ahoy with its mazey dungeons.
  • #15 9 years ago

    I like this game. I like it a lot.
  • deepmenace #16 9 years ago

    whats it like in 4 player though?

    Gauntlet in one player is a big ol' bag o' sh*te