Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Shellshock: Nam '67 Review

PlayStation 2 PC Xbox Review by Eurogamer staff

8 September, 2004

One of the first action sequences in Platoon chronicles Private Chris Taylor's first night in the bush. Oliver Stone shows his squad locking and loading and slides them into a mosquito hole with bulbous eyes and dripping skin. Taylor blames stinking heat and insects for his inability to sleep while the others watch. Claymores hang in the trees and the dark. And they all drift away in the end, soaked and exhausted. When Taylor wakes the rain is ceased and yellow mist drapes languidly over crystal moonlight, leaves and twigs and solid silence rolled with water drops. Then he sees the straw hats, the VC in the milky atmosphere, ghosts in the trees. Taylor hits a Claymore and begins one of film's most appalling, enthralling war scenes. Tracer in the jungle makes for horrific viewing. With the battle "won", the team desperately tries to revive the LMG gunner who's been shot in the gut, screaming at him, beating his chest, hissing at him to "take the pain". Medivac hovers, and he dies. Charlie Sheen's face in the final shot looks like child who's seen a ghost. Anyone who's seen Platoon will remember this scene for the atmosphere alone.

Because the atmosphere in Vietnam was severely rubbish, to be blunt. In the rubbish stakes, Vietnam was the world's biggest landfill, a hugely tragic, pointless war bred from paranoia and filled with blind insanity and pure horror. Truly great filmmakers like Oliver Stone, Francis Ford Coppola and Stanley Kubrick have all presented absolute classics on the Vietnam war, with films such as Platoon, Casualties of War, Full Metal Jacket and Apocalypse Now showing point blank the pure, terrifying waste and unending fear involved in the conflict in a notoriously unflinching manner.

Kill Kill Overkill

'Shellshock: Nam '67' Screenshot 1

In recent times, game makers have tried to do the same. Following what has been nothing short of overkill (if you'll excuse the pun) in the WWII genre, the me-toos of shooterdom have, in the last 18 months, run headlong into providing their definitive take on the bloody Vietnam conflict. First we had Illusion Softworks' underrated Vietcong, Atari's fairly rubbish Line Of Sight, and now the 18-rated Shellshock: Nam '67, a game likely cause genuine offence. Parts of Shellshock will have Daily Mail readers' hair standing on end. Little Jimmy and his little friends had better be in bed before you whack this on.

Vietnam, for the Vietnam movies addict, is all about that chilling suspense and heavyweight action in the Platoon scene. Guerrilla (the team that worked on Shellshock is actually different from the Killzone unit - as seems obvious once you see the two games side by side) obviously realised this early on. The game could have gone either way. There's the "family friendly" EA-style route, a sanitised shooter of the like of Battlefield: Vietnam where people run around shooting each other in what is supposed to be a thrilling depiction of the war. Battlefield: Vietnam kind of ignores the side of the conflict that included rape, Agent Orange and huge American men gunning down farmers with M60s from Huey gun bays. The second route, obviously, is to bring on the crazy men wailing, "Come get some!" through a veil of lead; the kind that Illusion did so well with last year (and one that console owners will get to sample in a few weeks). Guess which one Shellshock picked?

From the off, Shellshock is like being kicked in the face with a size 10 Commie boot. What story is included involves a vicious Vietcong general given to massacre and not much else and your missions against his forces. It's shot in the third-person, has more death that a 15th Century plague party and lets you go as mental as you like with very big guns. You can shoot civilians, pigs (squeal little hog!), team-mates (although they always get up again, as seems to be the law in war-based games) and run around dungeons full of corpses in citadels with "welcome to hell" scrawled on the wall in the blood. It has heads on sticks, excreta-covered sticks flying out of trees into legs and sticks in pits. It has brutal suicide and in-your-face prostitution. It has swearing. It has a questionable control system and often does some fairly stupid things, but what it does very well is engender the Vietnam "atmosphere" you'd expect from a movie. Most importantly, it has mist in the jungle.

"Me so horny, GI!"

'Shellshock: Nam '67' Screenshot 2

At first, the somewhat grainy graphical style appears out of kilter with the clean look of most current generation games. Like a sort of jungle-based Silent Hill, the gritty, misty look - far from being a cop out - actually allows Guerrilla more room to pack the levels with flora and fauna detail, and the dense, heavy environment often feels oppressive - more so with an array of excellent debris-laden explosive effects. We're not entirely sure or convinced whether this was deliberate or a happy accident, but the effect works for the most part, one way or another.

From one tense sequence to the next, everything about Shellshock evidently appears designed to jolt the player to the max. The atmosphere positively oozes from the game at times, with the unnervingly subtle jungle audio ambience wherever you go, but it's normally the precursor to some unseen horror. In one section you walk into a cave that you just happen to find when you're sneaking around. Inside the cave is a VC soldier surrounded by GIs willing him to put the gun down. In a cut-scene he screams his defiance of his US aggressors and shoots himself through the jaw in full view of the camera. Then the game switches back to real-time, you leave the cave and continue the mission. The only point is to unnerve you.

Later, once you've accumulated enough 'Chits' (the game's currency gained from picking up 'soldier stars' from the corpses of enemies, that, for once, don't simply vanish into the ether) you're allowed to have sex with Vietnamese prostitutes who tell you they're "so horny", the action taking place in huts, behind closed doors. And in the shooting itself - obviously the bulk of the game - the whole fear and run-and-gun aspect you'd hope would be included is on full display. Heads explode in a shower of gore, people scream in Vietnamese, civilians run for cover and beg not to be hurt. The film references are heavy; with most characters instantly recognisable to Vietnam popcorn addicts (you'll spot Bunny and Elias almost instantly). It's well constructed but harsh. It's really not nice. Like, really. It certainly forces you to pay attention.

But there are some places Eidos obviously wasn't comfortable going. Even though Shellshock carries an 18 certificate, the VC are always called "Charlie", as opposed to the "Gook" racial slur omnipresent in Vietnam films, and liberally used in Vietcong. Charlie is an equally racist terms as well, so we're not sure why this made it in but the other didn't. And there are no drugs (apart from a very cool late 60's soundtrack that positively reeks of narcotics). Why? It's inconsistent. How far is too far?

The Last Chopper Out

'Shellshock: Nam '67' Screenshot 3

Other aspects of Shellshock rankle too. The controls and the use of a third-person perspective are chief among the questionable gameplay problems and design choices. For a game that plays like any other run-and-gun FPS, it's odd not to be able to switch to a more familiar and workable first-person mode. The constant need to wrestle with the targeting reticule to get your shots on target sullies the atmosphere, as does seeing your GI running around in backwards circles; quite why he's not allowed to jump is beyond us. This, along with a generally sluggish sense of movement and targeting frustrates, and conspires to dirty the ambience, but begins to pale into insignificance once it becomes all-too evident that Guerrilla endorses the laziest gameplay mechanic of them all; the endlessly respawning enemy.

Until you realise that the name of the game is to reach a set of arbitrary checkpoints, you can waste ages just killing dozens of respawning enemies (and run out of ammo as a result). Move forward a few paces and, presto, they stop their evil respawning ways. Why oh why, Mr games designer? What did we do to deserve such evil? Another strange decision was to implement a health system that really has no place in a war game - a kind of Halo-esque recharge system whereby your Terminator GI can take literally hundreds of bullets over the course of a level, but so long as you make sure you retreat behind cover, you'll always be able to survive any shots or explosions you take. Yes, that's right, including booby trap explosions, which in Shellshock you can survive every single time.

As if the basic mechanics weren't flawed enough, the enemy AI is also conspicuous by its absence. If the VCs aren't charging headlong in one continuous, mincing respawning parade of death, they're standing still awaiting their turn to be shot. Occasionally one might decide to duck down, but you never get the impression that they're remotely fearful for their lives, which bursts the atmospheric bubble entirely. On top of that, some of the levels are less than inspiring, most of them settling into a linear, predictable pattern of "kill everything, find the prisoner, blow up a boat" type scenarios. There are some noticeable exceptions, including a heavy weapons op in a Huey and the panic-stricken defence of a crumbling fortress that turns into a relentless galling bloodbath, but it's fair to say there could have been more invention in the missions. There's an awful lot of repetition to endure to get to the highlights.

Shell Out?

Where Shellshock succeeds is when it resolutely refuses to pull punches in its general content, and when it hits the spot it's briefly thrilling. But for those occasional flourishes it's simply weighed down by being an average shooter, albeit one that's boosted by contentious context and some well-realised attempts at atmosphere building. You might get occasionally frustrated with clunky controls and respawning enemy, but its saving grace is that it's never boring and, actually, the challenge towards the climax becomes severe. You begin to care for your character, and wince when his head disappears in a red mist.

At best, some of Shellshock's heavier action sequences and cut-scenes are truly memorable; sure, it's nowhere near movie standard - and like any war game is a trivial representation of a bloody conflict for our personal entertainment - but any game that can inspire that pit of the stomach feeling of the senselessness of it all is to be commended. Given that most games are all too happy to occupy that bland, sanitised landscape of kid safe sterility, the fact that Shellshock even bothers to try and venture into the murky raw realities of this sickening conflict mean we're more than happy to stick our thumbs up at Guerrilla's admirable ambition. Not too far, though. We don't want Private Taylor blowing them off.

6/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Shellshock: Nam '67 on PlayStation 2/Xbox?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-24 of 24 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
BLACKSHEEP
08/09/04 @ 09:24
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bad omen for Killzone???
pauleyc
08/09/04 @ 09:49
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Very good review, well written.

Still , I can not comprehend the urge to develop video games based on real conflicts in which grandfathers and fathers of the current gaming generation fought and died.

/scratches head
/realizes it's a mad, mad, mad world after all
el_pollo_diablo
08/09/04 @ 09:55
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I had no idea Vietcong was coming out on the ps2.

I think I'll wait for the review of that before I rush to the shops...
valli
08/09/04 @ 10:03
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bad omen for Killzone???

Probably not, the review mentions that there were different teams working on them. According to a Swedish site, the preview of Killzone they got to test was very, very good. They also gave Shellshock 4/10.
pjmaybe
08/09/04 @ 10:16
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good review, pretty much confirms what I thought about it when I had a brief play.

Peej
space ace
08/09/04 @ 10:22
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
fair review. i'm very surprised i didn't enjoy it, but that's reality.

there is some more hidden fun, for an acid trip type inapurplehaze in the main menu (on pc obviously)

the speaking gets slow and everything is purple and yellow!
krudster [mod]
08/09/04 @ 10:25
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Killzone is totally different. Playing it now - will have a preview up tomorrow most likely.
BravoGolf
08/09/04 @ 10:40
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh well, not getting that then :)
jaywalker2309
08/09/04 @ 10:44
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
There are drugs in the game. Not sure how you missed them :)

You guys review retail code dont you?

krudster [mod]
08/09/04 @ 10:47
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yes the drugs are in the game - Pat's made a mistake.
jaywalker2309
08/09/04 @ 10:51
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
hehe no worries..
urban
08/09/04 @ 11:03
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
if you guys think this is such a average shooter why the HELL have you got not one not two but THREE shellshock ad's swamping your website.

shameful guys...i love this site but thats just dumb.
perilikid
08/09/04 @ 11:06
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No, urban - dumb would've been giving a great score to an average game because they're bankrolling your website.

But then, how would we have known, either way? Hang on...
IronGiant
08/09/04 @ 11:17
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ahh look forward to hearing about Killzone then.. about time someone actually got to play the thing.
MBar
08/09/04 @ 11:29
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
if you guys think this is such a average shooter why the HELL have you got not one not two but THREE shellshock ad's swamping your website.

shameful guys...i love this site but thats just dumb.


better than giving it a "generous" score of 8 or 9, based on that most important of game play mechanics, "how much they paid us to say its great!".
Nause
08/09/04 @ 11:31
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
only 11 missions..... i finished it 1and half day..... felt bit... dissapointed
Xinch
08/09/04 @ 12:43
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Mincing.
Haha.
krudster [mod]
08/09/04 @ 13:16
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
God, isn't it shameful, all this advertising? Anyone would think we actually *needed* money. Cuh.
deathgibbon
08/09/04 @ 13:42
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Just read my post in Conflict: Vietnam. I can't be bothered posting it twice. Shameful...
Feanor
08/09/04 @ 14:59
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm getting more than a bit annoyed with people moaning that games based on Vietnam are somehow more offensive than other war games. You don't think that there was rape, torture, and murder of innocent civillians in WWII? Sure, the Allies had a good cause for WWII, and America had nothing of the sort for the Vietnam War. But that doesn't mean that the bombing of Dresden wasn't a war-crime, or that the Russians didn't rape their way thru Germany when they got the chance.

I guess the review itself didn't do this, but I'm sure there's going to be someone reading this thread who thinks that way.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 08/09/04 @ 16:04
el_pollo_diablo
08/09/04 @ 15:05
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Feanor - I agree.

I think though that the phrase 'in living memory' is perhaps what explains the fact that the Vietnam war, and the creation of games based on it, is what makes it such a contentious issue for some.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 08/09/04 @ 16:06
el_pollo_diablo
08/09/04 @ 17:07
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah sure,

But not too many left now - at least those who are up to date with video games.
Dynamize
08/09/04 @ 17:53
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Market's being swamped with 'Nam games, and the only one I've really enjoyed so far has been Vietcong, and the Fist Alpha add-on.
Somehow, even with all the progress in graphics, design options and all, no-one's managed to top SEAL Team in my eyes.
Good review, though I'm unsure of the statement that the conflict was pointless, regardless of America's fear of the Domino Effect and general rabid anti-communism, they WERE assisting a country that was being invaded, and it wasn't too much fun for the South Vietnamese when all the Americans left and the Camére Rouge and the VC wandered in.
Uh-oh.
/me scrambles to put lid back on wormcan
Still, that's not the point. Might pick this up fer me PC, god knows there ain't much else new to choose from at the moment.
Thorbar
09/09/04 @ 00:15
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Anyone who's seen Platoon will remember this scene for the atmosphere alone.


Erm I'm guessing its been a while since you last saw Platoon. You've described about 4 or 5 different parts of the movie not the first scene.

Comments: 1-24 of 24 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery