Colin McRae DIRT Review

A fitting finale.

Version tested: PlayStation 3

It's fair to say that being a PlayStation 3 owner has, to date, demanded the sort of patience that would test even the most hardened Sony apologist. If the European launch delay wasn't enough of a bitter pill to swallow, this year has seen all manner of top-tier titles launch weeks - if not months - later on PS3. By the time games like GRAW 2, FEAR, Rainbow Six Vegas, Splinter Cell: Double Agent and Oblivion turned up on the Sony system, they were already old news. And the trend has continued recently, with a succession of irritating delays to highly regarded titles like The Darkness, Skate, Stranglehold, Medal of Honor Airborne, and Colin McRae DIRT.

We've taken the unusual step of re-reviewing the latter title for a few reasons. Firstly, PS3 owners might not necessarily appreciate just how good this game is - by their very nature, tardy ports tend to go under the radar, with hard-pressed publications likely to prioritise new stuff ahead of a conversion that's likely to be functionally identical. But DIRT deserves an extra push, partly because it's largely excellent, but also because it got unfairly overlooked when it was originally released on Xbox 360 June. Unfathomably released alongside the juggernaut that was Forza Motorsport 2, it didn't quite get the attention it perhaps deserved.

Aside from all the scheduling recriminations, it's a game which deserves to be hailed as one of the best racing games of the year on PS3, and certainly up there - if not better than - Motorstorm in many respects. Needless to say, Colin McRae's untimely passing the day after its release on PS3 also grants it a special significance. His enthusiastic input, inspiration and influence on this excellent series is something worth celebrating.

Insert 'Midnight TOCA' gag here

'Colin McRae DIRT' Screenshot 1

A variety of internal and external views let you play the game exactly how you want to. For us, it's bumper cam all the way.

As you may know from its release on PC and 360, it's a long way from the Colin McRae Rally titles of old. Taking several cues from Codemasters' hugely admired TOCA Race Driver series, it's a driving game packed with variety - most of which comes off extremely well, and a small proportion which definitely does not, but more of that later.

Without needlessly trawling through a long list of features (all of which are more than adequately tackled in our original review) the general gist is you find yourself racing in a variety of off-road disciplines. Sure, traditional point-to-point Rally's in there, and is as authentic and exciting as it's ever been, but the whole thing's embellished and fleshed out with all sorts of other racing styles that contribute towards making DIRT such a great all-round package. For a start, there are a few rally spin-offs, such as Crossover events (where you race head-to-head in a two-lane circuit) Rallycross (again, circuit-based, but combining off road and on-road elements), Rally Raid (off-road circuits, US-style), CORR (Championship Off-Road Racing, throwing buggies and Pro-4 trucks into the mix), and "the most extreme discipline" Hill Climb.

In the game's main Career mode, you're presented with a tiered pyramid of events, with the eventual aim to earn enough points in each race to unlock the next one - not to mention enough prize money to buy progressively better vehicles to aid you in your quest. The order in which you race them is relatively loose, giving you a degree of freedom over how you approach the game, and as long as you meet the point requirements, you could feasibly skip entire events if you have a particular aversion to one or more of the racing disciplines.

Like totally stoked

'Colin McRae DIRT' Screenshot 2

We've come a long way since Buggy Boy.

But the most striking thing about the game initially isn't necessarily the freshness and variety, but the terrifyingly irritating input of Travis Pastrana. Not since the Americanisation of Burnout 3 has a game benefited least from the supposedly 'cool' lingo heaped upon the early part of Colin McRae DIRT. Within seconds of starting the career mode, Pastrana comes out with such gems as 'sweet', 'gnarly', 'wicked' and the kind of cringeworthy 'pumped' utterances more befitting a 'totally stoked' skateboarding title. We can only assume it's some kind of cynical attempt to break the all-important North American market, but, to our poor fragile English ears (regularly subjected to more jock speak than we can take) it's the sound of serrated fingernails down blackboards. Mercifully, most of the really nauseating stuff is crammed into the intro, so you can mostly just get on with the racing, but now and then such eye-rollers as "Smooth and steady - I'm Mr Smooth and you're Mr Steady" come at you just when you think you're safe from a prescription from Dr. Cheese. That said, even the main game has some vocal irritations too, with the pace notes read by a Yank. It simply doesn't feel 'right' that the notes are no longer read by Nicky Grist. That was always an integral part of a McRae game's appeal. Couldn't Codies have, you know, localised it properly?

Aside from these rather petty moans, DIRT basically combines the best bits of the Rally games with the Race Driver titles, throws the whole thing into a spanking new engine and comes up with something quite special. It's been said enough times before, but the visuals are such a gigantic leap up from Codies rather underwhelming efforts with the last generation of CMR titles that it totally scratches off the main complaints we used to have. As you many recall, top-notch visuals were the missing link of the previous three Colin McRae titles, so to see the three year break put to such stunning use is genuinely heart-warming. Previously, the handling, damage model and driving physics were up there with the very best, and for all that good work to be retained and refined alongside stunningly detailed tracks, glorious particle and lighting effect and beautifully rendered vehicles is the sign of a studio really pulling out all the stops and listening to feedback.

Codies has also been careful not to stray too far towards arcade or simulation. Just as it has managed so expertly with the three TOCA Race Driver titles, it manages to straddle both areas perfectly, offering authenticity without making it inaccessible to mere mortals. Yet if you poke around in the menus, the ability to tweak set-ups still lurks for anyone who wants to tinker, so the option remains there if you believe you can eke a little bit extra performance out of your ride.

Just truck off

But in the same way as certain elements of Race Driver games don't quite come off, the same holds true for DIRT. For whatever reason, Codies decided to shoehorn truck racing into this game as well, and they stick out like a particularly sore thumb. Racing in bouncy 4x4s isn't the best fun, either, but these unwieldy monstrosities are nothing compared to the lumbering, oafish trucks which are about as fun to race in as caravans. Not a single person I've ever met who has played this game has had fun with them, and, at worst, you may end up being forced to play these events just unlock later sections of the game. Admittedly, the bite-sized nature of the races means they don't outstay their welcome to any great degree, but after enduring two or three of these events, you really won't relish having to play any more of them.

'Colin McRae DIRT' Screenshot 3

It's not dirty, it's bloody filthy.

Another point (which went unchallenged in the original review) is the slightly borked online implementation. The claim of 100 player online mode all sounds incredibly promising, doesn't it, but the truth of the matter is far from that. All the '100' figure actually means is up to 100 people can all vote on and race the same Rally or Hill Climb stage, with the 'winner' being the one to post the fastest time. You don't actually race against them in the manner you might expect - as in they don't physically appear on your screen. It's just a dynamic leaderboard system, and a bit of a fudge by Codemasters, if we're being blunt. Having recently enjoyed the true online racing in SEGA Rally, this really is no substitute in that respect. (And while we're talking about SEGA Rally, this game's crying out for track deformation - but maybe next time, eh?)

In terms of the obvious 360 to PS3 comparisons, this fares as well as can be expected. The colour palette appears slightly warmer on PS3, and the visuals are, in general, just slightly softer than the 360 version we were battle hardened by. But in terms of how it ran, the differences were nigh on imperceptible, with the same solid, breakneck sense of speed that makes bumper cam racing such an essential part of playing DIRT. On a point of preference, the lack of rumble was a tad jarring, but, then again, DIRT doesn't make especially innovative use of rumble anyway, generally kicking into life during gear changes rather than reflecting every nuance of the track in the way SEGA Rally does on 360. If anything, it's the gigantic PS3 triggers that we still have trouble getting used to, but that's possibly down to not having played too many racing games on the platform to date than anything.

All round, Colin McRae DIRT is fine game which mixes just the right amount of depth with the kind of accessibility that should open up the brand to the kind of audience it always deserved. Sure, some of Codies tactics in 'going mainstream' are a tad irksome, but in the main the game succeeds by not only being exceptionally good fun to play, but being unquestionably one of the finest looking racing games on the market too. With only an undercooked online element and pointless truck racing detracting from the package, it more than makes up for these aberrations elsewhere. Codemasters did Colin proud.

8 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (60) Latest comment 4 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • lambtron #1 4 years ago

    "If anything, it's the gigantic PS3 triggers that we still have trouble getting used to, but that's possibly down to not having played too many racing games on the platform to date than anything."

    The triggers are fairly horrible tbh - this seems to be the general consensus at least among the people I know (both casual and hardcore).
  • Les #2 4 years ago

    "If anything, it's the gigantic PS3 triggers that we still have trouble getting used to, but that's possibly down to not having played too many racing games on the platform to date than anything."

    Yeah triggers are terrible, can't understand why all of a sudden every PS3 driving game (bar GT HD) thinks it necessary to utilise them since ever since PS2 the face buttons have been analog and worked fine. Hope there is the option to revert to the much more comfortable GT control scheme.
  • Rash' #3 4 years ago

    Yep. The triggers are shite and need a serious rethink.
  • Beano #4 4 years ago

    "But in terms of how it ran, the differences were nigh on imperceptible..."

    Kristan needs glasses!

    I have compared the two versions and the PS3 version runs far smoother than the 360 version (which is terrible!). Less tearing too. But the PS3 version seems a tad aliased though.
    Edited by 2 at 03/10/07 @ 14:13
  • Rash' #5 4 years ago

    "I have compared the two versions and the PS3 version runs far smoother than the 360 version. Less tearing too. But the PS3 version seems is a tad aliased."

    PS3 version was the lead platform, right? That would explain a lot.
  • TONYgr #6 4 years ago

    SEGA RALLY easily for me!
  • Beano #7 4 years ago

    "PS3 version was the lead platform, right? That would explain a lot."

    Dunno... Maybe it's just because the developers took the extra time for the PS3 version. The 360 version seems sloppy developed to me and both versions should have been identical.
  • zuljin #8 4 years ago

    I like the triggers, not as much as the N64 pad, but I've no problem with it.

    Then again I do have freakishly long fingers in comparison to my palms...
  • Xerx3s #9 4 years ago

    Worse than Halo 2 and 3 but just as good as Halo 1 then.


    What? ;)
  • Beano #10 4 years ago

    "SEGA RALLY easily for me! "

    I agree... SR is pure fun while DIRT seems very "meh" to me. Codemasters should not have dumbed down the CMR series to attact the American audience. A shame!
  • sandys #11 4 years ago

    There is a lot less slow down on PS3 than 360 too though its not entirely eliminated, I'm suprised the review never picked up on this.
  • onyxbox #12 4 years ago

    The PS3 triggers aren't a patch on 360's (for the record:this doesn't mean I hate Sony).
  • Beano #13 4 years ago

    Well I have compared the two versions (both final builds) myself on the same HDTV and can say the difference is big. But many seems to be blind to framerate- and tearing issues - the reviewer must be one of them.
    Edited by 2 at 03/10/07 @ 14:33
  • krudster #14 4 years ago

    Call me blind all you like, but I sat down with the 360 version for 15 or so hours and did not notice any tearing issues at all. There was some minor slowdown here and there, but nothing that affected the enjoyment of the game. Maybe to a small extent it's down to the differences in TVs, as these arguments have raged throughout the lifespan of the 360, with some people ranting on about perceived v-sync horrors and others swearing blind they're not there.
    Edited by 1 at 03/10/07 @ 14:37
  • tonynibbles #15 4 years ago

    Bah MotorStorm > Dirt
  • Machiavellian #16 4 years ago

    Well Beano I also have compared the two final games and there isn't anything big about the difference between the two. I am not sure if you need to blow out your 360 cache but the two games pretty much ran the same. I will give the edge to the PS3 because it did feel more consistant but on my 56HDTV there was no big difference in the performance of the two games.
  • JonFE #17 4 years ago

    Did someone mention "tearing"? Where's Darren when you need him...


    ;-)
    Edited by 1 at 03/10/07 @ 14:44
  • Twincoil #18 4 years ago

    "Colin McRae's untimely passing the day after its release on PS3 also grants it a special significance"

    Right. I suppose THAT's the PS3's fault as well?
  • Arwin #19 4 years ago

    Krudster, hows this game with the wheel? What wheel support is there, and how's the force feedback in that? I have both the PS3 and 360, but the PS3 has typically had so much better wheel support that this is a hugely important thing for me. Using the controller I thought that the driving model was incredibly meh, but if the feedback on the wheel is good that might help, and often there's a slightly different engine behind the game when you use a wheel anyway.

    I'd also like to know if there are sixaxis steering controls as well. In Motorstorm these worked great, and so far I still like that game better. But who knows I might change my mind on Dirt if I try the full game.
    Edited by 1 at 03/10/07 @ 15:05
  • AlpTighen #20 4 years ago

    "For us, it's bumper cam all the way"

    Bonnet owns bumper every time.

    You heathens.
  • septimus #21 4 years ago

    Don't mind using the triggers myself, not as comfortable as the 360 ones, but still more than usable.

    As mentioned, the PS3 version is actually smoother for me to. The only real artefact's you get graphically are on the main menu where you can see some jaggies on the text.

    Edit: Wheel support on the 360 is one of the worst implementations yet, as it lacks any cohesion between the what you see and what you end up feeling. Though not as bad as Sega Rally... wtf were they thinking [too see what I mean, drive on smooth tarmac without touching the wheel, and accelerate slowly and steadily, the wheel just goes nuts flying left to right].
    Edited by 2 at 03/10/07 @ 15:12
  • sandys #22 4 years ago

    Yup this game is supposed to support Logitech G25 on PS3 and I'd really like to buy the G25 but untill I know there is enough support for one I am a bit weary for spending £130, I already have a wheel for my PC that I could replace but only want to if it can be used on PS3 like G25.

    Any chnace you have a G25 lying around Eurogamer to test it.

    I didn't noticed tearing on 360 or PS3 but I definately noticed the chugging moreso on 360. PS3 triggers aren't as good as 360 but you do get used to them.
    Edited by 1 at 03/10/07 @ 15:14
  • Apologie #23 4 years ago

    So, the Ps3 version is better... at least that.

    Personally i prefer Motorstorm.
  • etyek #24 4 years ago

    Your link to the original review seems to be via the admin.eurogamer sub-domain. What's your password, Kristan? :)
  • Triggerhappytel #25 4 years ago

    Rash - "PS3 version was the lead platform, right? That would explain a lot."

    I would expect so. I'm not 100% on the details, but as far as I know the Neon engine which this is built from (and the next Toca/Operation Flashpoint games) was created by Codies for Sony. Not sure if Codies have exclusive rights to develop using it, or if we'll see in first-party Sony games in the future, or what.

    One thing I do know is that a codition of Codemasters creating the Neon engine was that it was to be compatible in cross-platform development, hence DiRT being on 360.
  • Darren #26 4 years ago

    krudster - "Call me blind all you like, but I sat down with the 360 version for 15 or so hours and did not notice any tearing issues at all."

    Sorry but you did ask... you're blind! ;) LOL

    Seriously unless you were playing this game on a 14" portable from 12 feet away, you cannot fail to notice the tearing as the game doesn't go ten seconds without tearing. It's one of the worst offenders on the Xbox 360 in my opinion along with Splinter Cell: Double Agent and the pre-patched Saints Row. Doesn't alter the fact that those games are great obviously but the visuals are marred somewhat by the "wobbly" look. The PS3 version is much improved in this area and if you play from the internal view, you'll hardly see any at all unlike the 360 version.
  • Darren #27 4 years ago

    P.S. I hope JonFE's happy now? :p
  • Rev.StuartCampbell #28 4 years ago

    Fuck me! An in-game screenshot!
  • krudster #29 4 years ago

    Heh, not quite, this is a 50" 1080i Panasonic Plasma, and I'm pretty well versed in what V-Sync tearing looks like. Like I said, maybe it's down to the TV. We've been down this road before...
  • oreillymj #30 4 years ago

    I'd agree that the American bits (voice-over and CORR races) are shite.

    I also think that the cars are a bit "floaty", and the tarmac stuff, cross over events are better fun and more realistic then the gravel events.


    Sony really lost an opportunity with the DualShock3 to fix the L2/R2 triggers. They should be convex rather than concave and have a rubberised finish like the tips of the analogue sticks.
  • monkie_king #31 4 years ago

    @les: "ever since PS2 the face buttons have been analog and worked fine."

    Hmm, apart from the fact there's absolutely no physical feedback to tell you how much force you're applying -- hence the laughable need for a guage on screen in the likes of GT4.

    Everybody else has managed to get triggers right since the Dreamcast. How can Sony still be making a bodge of it 9 years later?
  • magnemar #32 4 years ago

    Neon is based on PSSG tech (which is a Sony format) but was developed first for 360 then moved over to ps3. The reason the performance will be better on PS3 is that it has been released months after the 360 version so the niggly performance bugs will have been ironed out...
  • JonFE #33 4 years ago

  • TrickyTreeUK #34 4 years ago

    Dirt 8/10 and Sega Rally 9/10 *rollseyes*

    30fps on an arcade racer. Sega, what have you been doing for the last ten years? Remember the Dreamcast? Crazi Taxi? 60fps. So you got your ten mile draw distance so you can get a nice picture up on IGN, got your car with bits of obligatory mud on the bumper, got your stupid rutted race course which makes not a stuff of difference given the lame handling engine, and what are you left with? A clumsy heffer of a game which splutters out an unconvincing 30fps. You also made the mistake of running the front end at 60fps, something those folks at Codemasters, who have similarly little mastery of the system, avoided with the flawed CMR Dirt giving a solid but pathetic 30fps performance.

    I am tempted to get rid of every game that runs at anything less than 60fps. There's no excuse when you have games like GT5 Prologue, Gaiden and RR7 providing a true next gen experience. I can let Oblivion off the hook. But not Heavenly Sword. 30fps on a fast moving slasher is a travesty.

    Why do 90% of PS2 games run at 60fps when only a meagre handful of 360/PS3 games can manage it? Gimmicks, that's why. Complex, CPU frazzling real physics engines such as Havok, real time lighting and over complicated reflections, track deformation, damage.

    I can understand that FPSs and RPGs don't need 60, but racers and slashers do and I will be boycotting any future releases in these genres which opt for page splashing gimmickry at the expense of a smooth, slick HD experience.

    You might have picked up that I also really wanted to like this game!

    Who in their right mind thinks: OK, let's update this old arcade classic, you know the one that's still there in Gatwick airport and any number of rusting seaside slot rooms, and always has a few kids with backpacks stuffing coins in it; and give it a next gen facelift - oh and let's fill it full of gimmicks so it can only run at 30fps, nobody will care...

    It's an arcade game ferpetesakes and have you ever seen an arcade game run at anything less than 50fps? Nope. Only us poor old souls with expensive hardware at home have to put up with that!

    For me the joy of arcade racers IS the framerate...there's nothing like a well modelled palm passing smoothly through your peripheral vision while an approaching vista - jaggies and all- can be seen approaching from the horizon. Outrun 2 had it. Ridge Racer lives by it. GT5 redefines it.


    Rant over!
  • El_MUERkO #35 4 years ago

    Maybe I'm just being grumpy but I cant help but think by adding unnecessary extras they're diluting the game, if they didn’t spend the time developing buggies couldn’t we have had a more detailed damage model, if they didn’t add trucks couldn’t we have had much longer courses, a selection of co drivers, deformable terrain ...etc ...etc.

    In my opinion Codemasters changed how they went about making a racing game after the releases of TOCA2 and CMR2 and not for the better.
  • Les #36 4 years ago

    "Why do 90% of PS2 games run at 60fps when only a meagre handful of 360/PS3 games can manage it? Gimmicks, that's why. Complex, CPU frazzling real physics engines such as Havok, real time lighting and over complicated reflections, track deformation, damage."

    360 and PS3 were released way too soon and are seriously underpowered to deliver smooth HD graphics coupled with more complex game worlds. Lost generation, this...
  • lambtron #37 4 years ago

    "real physics engines such as Havok,"

    Sorry to disappoint you old chap, but even Havok is a very, very rough approximation of "real" physics. The fact of the matter is we're unlikely to have anything powerful enough to do anything other than an approximation for quite some time yet.

    Also I'm certain that 90% of the PS2 games I own don't run at 60hz. In fact the only one I can think of offhand is GT4.
  • samk #38 4 years ago

    "Maybe I'm just being grumpy but I cant help but think by adding unnecessary extras they're diluting the game, if they didn’t spend the time developing buggies couldn’t we have had a more detailed damage model, if they didn’t add trucks couldn’t we have had much longer courses, a selection of co drivers, deformable terrain ...etc ...etc."

    I completely agree with this. By adding loads of extra types of vehicles, Dirt is trying to be all things to all people. The phrase "jack of all trades, master of none" is very appropriate imo.

    I only liked the Rally and Hillclimb events in the 360 version of Dirt. About halfway through career mode I got fed up with the dull Yank shite like rigs, trucks and buggies, and I actually put those races on the lowest skill level just so I'd only have to do them once.
  • zuljin #39 4 years ago

    @lambtron
    "Sorry to disappoint you old chap, but even Havok is a very, very rough approximation of "real" physics. The fact of the matter is we're unlikely to have anything powerful enough to do anything other than an approximation for quite some time yet."

    Have a read through the Havok docs. You'd be amazed how much effort is put into their engine to make calculations as accurate as possible. Ultimately, ofcourse yes it is an approximation.

    Games = smoke and mirrors. People seem to forget that.
  • BBIAJ #40 4 years ago

    Nice to see EG keeping bang up to date as always by using 2005's artwork in their header...
  • Lov3 #41 4 years ago

    "Why do 90% of PS2 games run at 60fps when only a meagre handful of 360/PS3 games can manage it?"

    Actually, I believe 90% of PS2 games *didn't* run at 60 fps. If you're looking for games on the console with that kind of frame rate, check out the 2d capcom fighters, games like guilty gear, and a few games released very early in the consoles life time. Every other game will skip frames like a bitch, especially newer games, as developers push the PS2 hardware to it's absolute limit.

    The only reason no-one notices is because playing games on a tv makes everything look terrible.

    EDIT: someone already wrote this exact comment, heh :). Note to self - read all the comments next time.
    Edited by 1 at 03/10/07 @ 17:23
  • monkie_king #42 4 years ago

    ... and arcadey racers such as Outrun C2C, Burnout ...

    (and plenty of other PS2 stuff ran in a frame, such as sundry Namco and Sega fighters, God of War etc. etc. It's horses for courses obviously - Shadow of the Colossus was a slideshow at times, for example, but the tradeoff in that case was worth it.

    However, I'm strongly in the camp that believes 60fps is synonymous, and inseparably so, from that slick arcade "feel". There's a reason all those classic Model 2 and 3 games didn't trade away framerate for graphical extravagance. I reserve judgement on Sega Rally, however, not having played it.)
    Edited by 1 at 03/10/07 @ 17:59
  • Feanor #43 4 years ago

    Odin Sphere on the PS2 runs at 6 fps more than it runs at 60. :)
  • Pulsar_t #44 4 years ago

    These tired franchises (yes, including the beloved SR) bring so little with each iteration. Perhaps it's about time to enhance the experience physically and not just, you know, virtually.. =/
  • Pulsar_t #45 4 years ago

    The PS2 didn't have to output a "clean" VGA resolution picture, it's interlaced let's not forget. And the thing skips frames too as mentioned previously.
  • jebus #46 4 years ago

    From the review "It simply doesn't feel 'right' that the notes are no longer read by a dour Scotsman"

    Nicky Grist is actually Welsh and having met him dour is not a word that can be used to describe him. He's one of the nicest happy go lucky people you could ever wish to meet.
  • secombe #47 4 years ago

    I'm struggling to see the point of this review, considering something like FIFA 08 on Wii and DS are completely different titles to the usual 360 'multi-format title' review reviewed, but have yet to get a mention on here.
  • Scimarad #48 4 years ago

    I'd definitely say the PS3 version is superior judging by the 2 demos - Then again when I played 360 version I was reeling in horror from how americanised it was compared to previous titles. Playing the PS3 version later on, the voices didn't bother me at all as I knew who the guy was...
  • ResidentKnievel #49 4 years ago

    I don't know what V-sync tearing is and can hardly tell the difference between 30fps and 60fps, but somehow I think its better that way.
  • murphy245 #50 4 years ago

    the graphics are gorgeous and the damage is impressive,but thats as far as it goes,i found it got boring quickly.

    gameplay>graphics which is why i would recomend sega rally over dirt.
  • TrickyTreeUK #51 4 years ago

    If you can't tell the difference between 30fps and 60fps put on the demo's of Dirt (30fps) and Sega Rally (30fps) and Ridge Racer 7 (60fps) and GTHD (60fps) and tell me that you can't tell the difference.



  • tufty #52 4 years ago

    What does "jock speak" mean?
  • Pulsar_t #53 4 years ago

  • UncleLou #54 4 years ago

    A potentially great game, ruined by the most ridiculous braking behaviour. :-/
  • benster80 #55 4 years ago

    I own the 360 version (never played the PS3 one) got to say there is no tearing in my game quite a bit of slowdown but no tearing.
  • lance.carter #56 4 years ago

    well said that EvilFoxHound.

    Even on the demo you can have four options for button config plus the 'custom' option. So many people readily comment on something as fact when they clearly haven't a clue. Pff.
  • m0thr4 #57 4 years ago

    "The triggers are fine for racing games, FPS? not so much. I've no problem with them. "

    +1
  • m0thr4 #58 4 years ago

    " "For us, it's bumper cam all the way"

    Bonnet owns bumper every time.

    You heathens."

    I've always found 'bumper cams' and 'chase cams' rather weird and surreal, as they don't represent a view you would ever have in real life while driving the vehicle yourself.
  • m0thr4 #59 4 years ago

    "If you can't tell the difference between 30fps and 60fps put on the demo's of Dirt (30fps) and Sega Rally (30fps) and Ridge Racer 7 (60fps) and GTHD (60fps) and tell me that you can't tell the difference."

    The graphics in the first two games seems somehow more natural and realistic (particularly in Dirt), whereas the graphics in Ridge Racer and GTHD look very fake and computer-game-ish.

    Is that a product of the doubled framerate? Cos if it is, I'd rather stick with 30fps...
  • TrickyTreeUK #60 4 years ago

    Says an XBox360 fanboy.
    Graphics...er mate I am talking about the speed/movement in this context. Graphics are irrelevant, look at Forza 2 (60fps) for an example.

    Oh and by the way look at the newest GTPrologue Gameplay movie on PSN, and tell me again that Dirt and Sega Rally look more realistic!

    Please read my post again * Rolleyes *
    Edited by 2 at 04/10/07 @ 21:20