Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Dragonball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi Review

PlayStation 2 Review by Martin Coxall

14 November, 2005

Let's get the rock on down with this game! It's totally cool and awesome! It has lots of the fighting with modes and totally cool enemies! It will make you want to be totally challenge! It's so with the fighting, and the dashing and the fireballs and the flying! It soooo good!

Arf.

My head hurts. This game wants to be in your face and map out with its digital tendrils certain buried channels deep within the mind. Alas, I'm not sure I'm up to it. I mean, how to fairly score a game that my limited three-of-space, one-of-time perceptual pathways can barely understand, let alone control or play? Maybe it's that this game requires a child's brain in order to avoid neural blowback, or maybe it's just that Japanese gaming, as a glorious whole, is beautifully and incomprehensibly mental to a resident of a country that doesn't have nightclubs where you can go and pretend to frot in a synthesised crowded Underground train. Perhaps.

Jingoism nothwithstanding, this game embodies every cliché I tend to associate with Japanese gaming: Gratuitous! Use! Of! Exclamation! Marks!!! Superlative abuse, in a way which is just so totally awesome and cool! Man it is so awesome! Voice acting that causes my ears to shrivel up and bury themselves in my mid-torso, where the triangle-waved vocal screechings can't hurt them. Twisted Engrish translations that are almost it, but not the quite, don't make any no nonsense. Garish colour schemes that make my TV's sync-on-green cry like a Japanese businessman at a Shampoo concert. Strange eyes, hair, and alarming movements from character models that are both malicious and paedophilic at the same time. Kid Rawk music that makes me want to bury my head beneath enough Tempur memory-foam that I can't feel those filthy beats. Unwieldy controls, too much information, nonsensical plotting...

'Dragonball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi' Screenshot bobble

Super Bobble Hat Power: Unleashed

You know the score. In fact, you probably love all these things in games, and totally beat the previous games in an awesome way! In which case, pretend you haven't read the final score already, and go and play this game. For me, however, in my comfy, challenged-by-the-unfamiliar domesticity, my mind is neither able, nor wishes to, keep up with the insanity happening six feet beyond my control at an alarmingly close proximity.

Maybe it's just that my brain is wired incorrectly, or perhaps even correctly, but the game's control system was utterly fuddling. Start in the default mode, an assault of colour and sound washes over you, press a few buttons, nothing happens.

Dead. Game Over. Bum.

So, back it is to the title screen. See tutorial, breathe sigh. Engage tutorial one. Gape in bizarre incomprehension that characters don't so much move as... float and drift, like some demonically possessed nun. Okay. Tutorial two. You can press the dash button to dash towards the enemy to which you are locked unless you are floating, in which case you can 'undash' and float backwards and diagonal if you have enough Ki. Hmm. Tutorial three: You can hold L1 to slowly build up a lock-on, and then if you have enough lock on, you can unlock, press the float button to float up, float down and then dash into...

That sound is the sound of a cerebellum cracking. By three tutorials I am utterly confused. By five I'm feeling as if my life isn't worth living. By the end, when I'm supposed to feel as if I'm ready to play the game, the dreadful assault of buttons, dashes, power-fire-dragon-dashes has made me forget how to use my own limbs.

'Dragonball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi' Screenshot leopard

Fear the wrath of Effeminate Leopard Man.

So I fire up the main game mode again, and this time I die even more quickly. I have no idea how to play this game, and have even less skill than before I watched the tutorials. This is a genuinely new gaming experience for me; a game I have literally no idea how to or capacity for play.

Bandai has demonstrated, year-on-year, a capacity with each successive release in the Dragonball series to make the games faster, harder, more intense, screechy and irritating with each release, culminating in this masterpiece of the incomprehensible that only the deranged or pre-teen could truly love. The direction these games have been developing have presumably consistently been the one that fans want; but try as I might, my synapses and my fingers are unable to offer the reactivity needed to make much headway.

But since you love this sort of thing, you'll be delighted that this year continues the trend of faster, harder, better with the fourth fighter in a row to follow Goku and friends looking for mythical Dragon's Balls, with a wafer thin plot of nothing more than that as distraction.

Graphically, as already mentioned, and as seen in the previous games and many other Japanimation-derived titles, it's garish, childlike and an unpleasant assault on all that is good an decent in colour palettes; it will no doubt encourage any Ritalin-stunted ADHD teenager back to heightened states of problematicness after limited exposure.

As indeed will the sound. From the incredible range of offensive, over-eager, off-kilter and downright appalling voices that seek to patronise and irritate at every turn through the non-existent plot about fighting to open gates, to the off-key, Asiatic teen-rock that bedevils the soundtrack and compounds the sensory overload.

'Dragonball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi' Screenshot migraleve

Migraleve on Standby.

Yet, for all that the senses are distressed by the son-et-lumiere, the root of this game's problem is the AI. The devious algorithms that stalk the electrons is a ruthless, merciless killer. A bastard that offers no respite and no let up. It's just too ruddy hard. Please, won't somebody have mercy on me? No? Ah. No matter what I try, I will die. Quickly. Even on the 'easy' levels. I don't even remember how to do what he's doing to me. Was it hold R1 and R2, Release R2 whilst pressing X then dash back and forward whilst holding L3 to lock on and build Ki and then Dash forward? Maybe, maybe not. Aaaaaaaaargh.

In fact, the best way to enjoy this game, and in my case the only way in my manually incompetent way, was two-player. By sticking in a second controller, and finding a friend who definitely is not susceptible to seizures, I was able to win a battle occasionally, play the game and have some fun. Thank heavens for two-player versus mode.

It's difficult for me to make a reasonable assessment of this game, overall. Given its level of difficulty, and general synaesthetic terrorism, my mind and body were woefully unequipped to deal with what Bandai had unleashed on me. If you have the stomach and the tolerance for this kind of thing, this game may well be the most super cool Dragonball Z ever! But for me, I feel the need to go and have a lie down in a darkened room, and listen to soothing music.

Score? I have no idea. Awesome!/10!

Since I have to:

4/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi on PlayStation 2?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 103 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Kon
14/11/05 @ 12:08
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/reads score
...
...
...

(Ô_Ô)
*surprise/disbelief in equal measure*

i'm going to read this very carefully and i'll get back to you soon...
bootsy_NL_30
14/11/05 @ 12:10
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
cool review!

I feel the same way about the cartoon....turn it up and go into another room and you'd swear you were listening to a 3 month constipated rhino being poked by whiney american kids with sticks and ridden by a man with a very large adams apple randomly screaming japanese words like " kami yami yeha"
CyberClaw
14/11/05 @ 12:11
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Aaaah this review bogles my mind. It's like putting a guy that hates sports games reviewing the latest PES... What is new to this game? I dunno. From the review I understood it's a fighting game, based arround Dragon ball, and it has a single player and 2 player mode. Oh and a tuturial.

Very very unprofessional review.
ecureuil
14/11/05 @ 12:12
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Love this review. Nice one.
President Weasel
14/11/05 @ 12:19
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
let's face it, those who were planning to buy this game anyway won't have been swayed by this review, and those who weren't planning to wouldn't have been persuaded even by a glowing review and an 8/10.
That said, it seems odd to give this review to someone who manifestly doesn't like the games, can't play them, and doesn't enjoy the TV series.
Did you piss someone off? was reviewing this your punishment?
Rubzo
14/11/05 @ 12:23
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Fancy seeing you here, Ben.
Hmm, bad choice on the reviewer here... nice writing, though.
ralphwolfenstein
14/11/05 @ 12:27
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
great review - thoroughly subjective, a proper 'grown up' critique

more of that please, game reviews need it...

pity you had to score it, one of the best arguments for removing the score TBH

Cyhwuhx
14/11/05 @ 12:28
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
.::: The game's awfully crippled by the guard break (learn it and watch the game crumble before you). So it should get the score based on that. :)
karlidog
14/11/05 @ 12:32
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So the writer's inability to cope with new things is the whole review, right?

There's *NEW GAMES JOURNALISM* and there's pages of self-indulgent bollocks.
Talha
14/11/05 @ 12:32
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The review gets a 10/10, if only at how well it conveys the absolute boggledness and befuddlement one not used to such games, feels when exposed.

Then again, sounds a tad unfair - the teenager mentioned in the review should have reviewed the game!!
CyberClaw
14/11/05 @ 12:37
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ralphwolfenstein, this was not a review, it was a general opinion. It did not mention anything of the game at all, and not because the game was unplayable, but because the reviewer was unable to play the game. There were no arguments besides texts like this:
"I don't like the style, I don't like the game, I don't even know how to play it, quite in fact everything anime makes me want to kill myself, like my cat mr.wiskers did when he jumped out of my window, when I had gone out to buy some milk. Because the milk I had gone bad. I suspect it was the bad music of the game that was responsible, although I'm not entirely sure."

It is entirely pointless, and a waste of time for everyone. People who didn't like dragon ball find the review amuzing, people who were remotely interested in the game, find the review a waste of time they could have wasted in another site with a more serious review. Despite the quality of the game, the review should touch the game itself, not just mock it, and the inability of the reviewer to play the game.
PearOfAnguish
14/11/05 @ 12:48
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think the Dragonball fans are upset.

Not that it'll matter, wait five minutes and they'll have forgotten all about it.
Dizzy
14/11/05 @ 12:54
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought it was a good review. I was interested in the game but now I am not going to bother. Weird button combos? Not for me thank you. Maybe in the 80s
Hog-lumps
14/11/05 @ 12:55
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
this was not a review, it was a general opinion

Cyberclaw, ALL reviews ARE opinions.

As a reader, you have to assess the relevance of the review to yourself. If you are someone who doesnt like complicated controls then you will find this review very apt.............

If not, then simply try reading another review...........

Rociel
14/11/05 @ 12:56
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Poor choice of reviewer. Poor review.

I haven't watched the anime in years and I can still find this entertaining. Unlike a lot of fighters, it's not just memorising button presses.
Genji
14/11/05 @ 12:56
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ROFL @ Pear.

How is this review unprofessional? He found the fighting system needlessly confusing, and the game too hard to play even on the easiest difficulty. This constitutes a review, yes?
GordonJ@work
14/11/05 @ 12:58
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"..Not that it'll matter, wait five minutes and they'll have forgotten all about it..."

Nah, these dragonball fans have a huge attention span, have to really when all the draqgonball fights seem to last ten episodes
DDevil
14/11/05 @ 12:58
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Best. Review. Ever.

A bad game is a bad game. It doesn't matter if the reviewer has never heard of, or likes the subject matter. After all, if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands.
Genji
14/11/05 @ 13:02
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The best fighting games have systems that are easy to learn, yet difficult to master. Seems like these guys forgot the "easy to learn" bit.
Talha
14/11/05 @ 13:05
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
But what if you are not a bird person at all? In that case, you could conclude anything that looks and quacks like a duck to be... erm, I don't know, an owl?

/ducks behind the desk
freedumb
14/11/05 @ 13:08
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/928096.asp

This is a stupid review. It might be his opinion, but its still too biased (a bit of bias is par for the course, but this is OTT) lacks any objectivity whatsoever. It sounds like one of those reader reviews on gamefaqs that just rant on about how I REALLY HATE THIS GAME!

He's come to it with pre-concieved assumptions and prejudices against the subject matter, it would be like getting a Pro-Evo hater but Fifa lover, to review pro evo, and vice versa.
Edited 3 times, most recently on 14/11/05 @ 13:06
volb
14/11/05 @ 13:11
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
this was not a review, it was a general opinion.
This is a stupid review. Biased and not objective.

Which makes it worthwhile, rather than a back-of-the-box fact list.

Reviews that aren't opinions tend to overrate boring games on account of their expected average score on gamerankings (expectations based on hype and technical polish). I played a bunch of so-so games consistently rated 8 or above because of these reviews, so I don't like them very much at all.

On the opposite corner, there are reviews that do not attempt to earn the likeness of a science by averaging the graphics and sound score.

I like to see diversity in the opinions I gather from the interweb of the world.
Genji
14/11/05 @ 13:15
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"It sounds like one of those reader reviews on gamefaqs that just rant on about how I REALLY HATE THIS GAME!"

Well, it is significantly better-written than most gamefaqs reviews. And if you hate a game, surely it's better to be honest about it, and give reasons why you hate it? Right?
freedumb
14/11/05 @ 13:17
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
But was he right to review it in the first place? We know that whatever tha game's like, he's bound to not like it beacuse he dislikes DBZ fervently, and it seems this sort of fighting game that doesn't go for the complexity of say, Virtua Fighter 4.

I could review a strategy game like say, Total War, and I know it would get a maximum of 3/10. Because I can't stand strategy games, and I'm rubbish at playing them.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/11/05 @ 13:11
freedumb
14/11/05 @ 13:21
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
When you've got stereotypical introductory comments like this:

the 'this game embodies every cliché I tend to associate with Japanese gaming' paragraph

before he's even got down to reviewiing the game, then I know I can't take this review too seriously
Edited 2 times, most recently on 14/11/05 @ 13:17
tengu
14/11/05 @ 13:24
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've heard just about everywhere this is worse than Budokai 3. Budokai 3 was utter crap. Can't see this game being too good somehow.
Talha
14/11/05 @ 13:27
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@freedumb: I hereby quote my own golden words: the review is a tad unfair. You are right - the reviewer sounds prejudiced from the start, is not willing to forgive the basic facts such as Japanese is a language DIFFERENT from English, Japanese folk have Japanese as their primary language, and you tend to lose much in translation.

So you can well forget an objective evaluation of the game.
Genji
14/11/05 @ 13:28
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
His dislike for DBZ didn't seem to have anything to do with the score. Nor should it.

As for the VF4 comparison... well, that one could be beaten on the easiest difficulty without much skill. It allowed you to gradually improve at a steady pace. Easy to learn, tough to master. A game with confusing tutorials and difficult AI on even the easiest setting is not easy to learn. That's what this sounds like.

Anyway, shouldn't you play the game to see if his criticisms are true or not? You know, before you question his integrity as a fair, "objective" reviewer?
Hog-lumps
14/11/05 @ 13:30
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well to me personally, the review seems frank and honest. Not whitewashed or trying to please everybody at the same time....
Carrybagma
14/11/05 @ 13:31
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Brilliant! Review! ROCK!

I don't give a toss about the game. I am missing a 'bizarre Japanese anime' gene, which means I get woosy and have difficulty concentrating within minutes of playing (or just seeing) games like this. Sight goes; coma ensues.

But, a review about a game I don't give a toss about, which makes me read it the whole way through and then go back to pick out favourite bits, is a brilliant review.

More crap games with brilliant reviews please.
darkphoenix
14/11/05 @ 13:33
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Totally unfair review, clearly coming from someone who dislikes the show and everything related with it.

Really unprofessonial work, and the worst review ever on Eurogamer.

I´ve been playing Tenkaichi and I find it better than Budokai 3 in almost everything.
Genji
14/11/05 @ 13:34
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I like a review that has personality behind it. That's what I come here for. It's a nice change from the soulless feature-listing reviews that you get on many of the American review sites.
freedumb
14/11/05 @ 13:38
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Genji, I will of course play the game. I'm only speaking of what the review sounds like.

'Well to me personally, the review seems frank and honest. Not whitewashed or trying to please everybody at the same time....'

So something like IGN's 8.2 review would pesumably be whitewashed, not frank and dishonest, beacause, erm, they like it? Theirs seems like a more reasonable review, me having played budokai games in the past. IGN also properly state the flaws of the game, rather than paint it as a completely awful, unplayable mess. A review doesn't have to outrageous or "different" to have personality.

Of course once I've played the game, and if I do find it to be awful, I'll take back anything I've said.
Edited 5 times, most recently on 14/11/05 @ 13:36
Carrybagma
14/11/05 @ 13:42
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh've I've just read through it again for the joy!
Awesome!/10! - best score ever!
Hahahahahahahaha!
Please, please, please have this guy review Halo3 when it comes out.
!

EDIT: !
Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/11/05 @ 13:35
Genji
14/11/05 @ 13:46
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
But this reviewer thinks that it IS an unplayable mess! The fact that you disagree with him does not alter the quality of the review. He has his opinions, and he stated them quite clearly. You don't even have grounds to disagree with him until you play the game. If you can't tolerate a wide range of opinion, then look for reviewers on other sites that share your own.
wolfen
14/11/05 @ 13:46
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Tastes are tastes, but I've bet put a bit off by the two edges a couple of reviews at EG touched lately. Either you assign all games to people who are experts with the gam/genre (à là PES review, while I agree with the score the review seemed a wee too fanboyish) or just give assign them randomly, like what appears to be this particular case. That's why I believe all top sellers should be reviewed by three or four different reviewers.

Now, not that I'm saying this game is any good - the only half-decent game from the Dragonball franchise were the GBA ones released a couple of years ago, all others were indeed 4/10 material, mind.
Hog-lumps
14/11/05 @ 13:48
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So something like IGN's 8.2 review would presumably be whitewashed, not frank and dishonest?

Oh for god’s sake, when on earth did I say IGN was corrupt?!

What I actually stated earlier was that each and every review is an OPINION. I like the fact that the reviewer was honest in his review and gave their own truthful experience of playing the game.

They didn't feel the need soften the review to cater for DBZ nuts like yourself, who get easily offended by opinions different to their own.

I'm not saying this review is better than IGN's, all I wanted to say is I respected their honesty.

(Edited for grammar and spelling)
Edited 2 times, most recently on 14/11/05 @ 13:49
Feanor
14/11/05 @ 13:52
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Next Eurogamer review should be someone who hates all FPSs reviewing Call of Duty on the 360 and giving it 5/10 cause "there's too much shooting and violence". Think of the extra traffic the site will get.
freedumb
14/11/05 @ 13:52
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Genji, Its not the fact that I disagree with him that alters the review quality! Its the fact that the review doesn't feel like a review. Someone who hates a game before he's even played it, the japanese quirkiness of it, the show that its based on, who before the review gets going clearly points this out, how am i supposed to take it seriously as a review? It might be "opinion", but its not an opinionated review, but an opinionated rant, with the flaws greatly exaggerated to prove his point.

Since I will be playing this game myself shows that I can appreciate different opinions, because I want to see if the game is what he's said it is, or what the good reviews have said its like. I've already stated that I'd take back what I've said if i find it to be the case!

AAAARRRRGGGGHHHHHH!!!!
Edited 4 times, most recently on 14/11/05 @ 13:59
karlidog
14/11/05 @ 13:59
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I agree that, for the most part, EG's reviews are infinitely better than the generic feature-lists most US magazines pass off as opinion. The thing is, if you're going to call it a review, surely there should be some concession made to people who're reading it in the hope of finding out whether the game is worth buying.

From the assumptions and generalisations in the first couple of paragraphs, i come to the conclusion that this man is an arse. Man makes ridiculous, unfair assumptions about the entertainment output of an entire nation. News at ten. All we get is 'this is Japanese and I can't cope with Japanese things'. I'm sure it's very interesting to know, assuming you give the tiniest little shit about this man and his preferences, but it doesn't make this a useful review. Hell, I could write a review of the next PES or Winning Eleven that essentially said 'I can't cope with football, it's full of idiot testosterone-packed gorillas loping up and down a field. I hate it. 4 out of 10.' It'd be full of that lovely New Games Journalism personal-experience-uber-alles goodness, but it wouldn't tell anyone anything. Nobody cares whether I like football. If they're considering buying the game, *they* like football, and they understand that even for someone who likes football, there exist good and bad football games. Well hey, for those of us who can cope with Japanese games, there are good and bad ones. This review doesn't even begin to talk about which this game is.
freedumb
14/11/05 @ 14:01
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The bottom line is that people have different tastes. That's why they buy certain games that appeal to them. Thats why a pro evo nut would review pro evo, beacuse he has enjoyed the pevious versions, and he wants to see if the next lives up to the hype and the previous quality. From a professional journalistic standpoint, he wouldn't gush about it in an OTT way ignoring its flaws, but would tell it like it is, the audinece being gamers who also hanker for football sports titles, and who would know if an OTT stellar review was nonsense beacuse they'd be playing the game and would know of its flaws. The fans or genre fans would be the first to be up in arms if that was the case.

So Why would you get someone who hates pro evo in the first place to review it. Would he be reviewing it for the fans of Pro EVo, or for the non fans, to say, haha, the game we hate has been released again, lets all point and laugh.

I'm guessing this was the reviewer's essay plan:

Come my fellow dragonaball haters, i know you'll hate this game, as I'll do before and after I've played it, I'll now write an "honest" opinion about why I hate it, and of course the flaws will take centreplace, beacuse, well, they have to, don't they!
Edited 3 times, most recently on 14/11/05 @ 13:58
jellyhead
14/11/05 @ 14:09
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
write your own reader review and submit it to gametards if you disagree with the review EG have put up.
Job done.
Hog-lumps
14/11/05 @ 14:20
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So let me get this straight;

You should only give a game to someone to review if they like a similar game already or are a fan of the genre?

That argument doesn’t hold water. You could argue that if the reviewer is a fan already, then he shouldn’t be reviewing he game either, because he's obviously biased……….

Where do you draw the line? Perhaps we should only give games to reviewers who are genetically engineered to not have previous opinions of their own?!! Would that work better?
jellyhead
14/11/05 @ 14:33
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
We should *beat* them everytime they express an opinion in a review.
*beat* them to within an inch of their lives if necessary!
No opinions in reviews imho!
;)
freedumb
14/11/05 @ 14:34
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
'You should only give a game to someone to review if they like a similar game already or are a fan of the genre?'

Well, yes, as I've said, I could give all strategy games a 3/10, beacuse I don't like strategy games. What would be the value of my reviews on strategy games?

You misunbderstand me, I've already explained with the Pro Evo illustration that a fan of this sort of game would be alert to its flaws and try and give a balanced review, if he was a true fan, or a professional journalist. But the extreme of hating a game before you've even played it, you really think thats its a fir position to do a "review" of a game, instead of a rant?

'Where do you draw the line? Perhaps we should only give games to reviewers who are genetically engineered to not have previous opinions of their own?!! Would that work better?'

You should draw the line when the previous opinions render a review of a new title meaningless, since the confirm an already pre-conceived judgement on the game.
Edited 4 times, most recently on 14/11/05 @ 14:29
karlidog
14/11/05 @ 14:35
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I guess you draw the line at the point where the reviewer's seething hatred for/ecstatic love of (delete as applicable) the game, the genre or the country that produced the game makes the review useless as an estimate of the game's quality, for people who don't share the reviewer's bias. Of course there'll be positive or negative bias in reviews, but this is bias taken to a ludicrous extreme, and it makes the piece pointless. He doesn't review this particular game at all - he reviews Japanese games as a whole, and tells us he can't cope with them. What use is that to someone who's considering buying the game, but happens not to loathe all things Japanese at first sight?
Hog-lumps
14/11/05 @ 14:48
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
karlidog & Freedumb.
So what you're both after is objective (or neutral) journalism. I think you're very naive if you belive such a thing exists.............


freedumb
14/11/05 @ 14:50
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Thats not what we said. I've already mentioned that every review contains bias, and is essentially the reviewers opinion, but this review is so extreme that its hard to call it a "review". I think you're the naive one if you can't see from the opening paragraphs alone (and beyond) that factors outside the game have already influenced it, whatever the game is like.

To the people who may like the game, he deposits patronising comments. The assumptions, generalisitions and subject matter dislike mean that you'll of course have to exaggerate the flaws to back yourself up in a review like this.
Edited 8 times, most recently on 14/11/05 @ 15:06
karlidog
14/11/05 @ 14:54
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I probably didn't explain that very well. Okay, here are a bunch of EG reviews I picked randomly-ish, then had a re-read of.

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=61403
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=61343
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=61666
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=61282

All of 'em display reviewer bias, all of them include the personal experiences and squishy human feelings that go quite a way toward making this one of the best games sites on the 'net. All the reviewers have also managed to talk about tangible good and bad points in the game itself. The reader can go 'ooh, that reviewer's clearly a fan of this sort of game, so maybe they're overstating the good bits slightly' or 'hmm, they say the story's crap but I think it sounds fun, maybe it isn't as bad as they think...' or whatever. The best reviews actually give the reader something to work with, as well as being entertaining and personal and everything, 'cause they're written by people who remember that first and foremost, the review's about the game, not themselves.
Carrybagma
14/11/05 @ 15:05
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ban!All!DragonBall!Z!Fans!

The review is good entertainment and throughly suited people who don't like or will probably never buy games like that. I doubt many people rely solely on EG for guidence on what games to play, and those that do are probably perfectly happy. Of course, if you want a nice 'safe' review, go elsewhere.

Comments: 1-50 of 103 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery