Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 3 Next

Advertisement

Final Fantasy XIII Review

PlayStation 3 Xbox 360 Review by Oli Welsh

5 March, 2010

Page 1 of 3. Page 2 ->

It's tempting to portray Final Fantasy at a crossroads: stumbling, after three unusually long years, into an unfamiliar landscape of multi-platform releases and a weak Japanese gaming industry, and onto a generation of console hardware that was already middle-aged by the time the great series showed up. Role-playing games have been scattered to the four winds of American sci-fi, pocket monster hunting, genre crossover and MMOs, and you might assume that Final Fantasy needed to do something to redefine itself.

But the truth is, it was ever thus. The first Final Fantasy, made as the young Square faced bankruptcy, was born and named in a desperation that was only ironic after the fact. Since then, despite its gargantuan success, the series has treated every moment like it was its last. Every Final Fantasy - especially since its arrival on disc and in 3D with the seventh game in 1997 - has been a reinvention, telling the same old story with new characters, new worlds, new tools, new systems, and ever-greater helpings of spectacle and sentimentality. They've always been a contradiction.

In that sense, Final Fantasy XIII is no different. On one hand, it sticks closer to the strict formal rhythms and linear underpinnings of the Japanese RPG than not just the divisive Final Fantasy XII, but even many of its predecessors. But the thirteenth game is also far more innovative and forward-thinking than it's been given credit for. It's as bold and intractable, as rebellious and respectful as one of the series' angsty teen heroes.

But that's not quite the whole story. Final Fantasy XIII is different in one respect; it does have a manifesto for the strange new world it finds itself in. And it's one a lot of fans of the series might not like.

'Final Fantasy XIII' Screenshot 1

In-game cut-scenes mesh surprisingly well with Square's blockbuster CG. This is a stunning-looking game, especially the character models.

It is absolutely, ruthlessly, single-mindedly populist. It's stripped down, streamlined and simplified to the extreme. Its features are spoon-fed so slowly it's excruciating, even as the pace of the battles is amped up to be as fast and flashy as possible. It is a My First Final Fantasy, promoted with power ballads, and all that implies.

This agenda results in both awkward weaknesses and stunning strengths, but you have to respect the intention: to toss out all the decades-old clutter of the JRPG form, distil the Final Fantasy experience to its very core, and then make that as relevant, approachable and slickly modern as possible.

So, you don't get an overall character level and you don't have to wait for new skills; you just buy advancement from the menu when you see fit. Health is instantly replenished after every battle and there's no mana or other resource to worry about. Equipment slots are few, options limited, depth sparing and mostly optional.

You don't get direct control of more than one character at a time and input, if you want to, can be automated to the extent that it's more like tapping out morse code on the action button than selecting from menus. There's no downtime in towns for trading and tinkering, with functional services - shopping and a rather undernourished system of equipment upgrades - available from the very frequent save points.

'Final Fantasy XIII' Screenshot 2

Every single Paradigm permutation has a pithy, memorable title. This is a great localisation job.

Until halfway through the story - and that's some 20 or 25 hours in, treble the length of many of the action blockbusters Final Fantasy XIII has modelled itself on - you don't even get to choose the composition of your party, or where you go and what you do next. There's no world map, and for the first half there's no element of choice or exploration at all. There is absolutely nothing to distract you from whatever the game wants to throw at you next - the next lush, twinkling vista, melodramatic cut-scene or punchy scrap. It's the RPG equivalent of a corridor shooter.

Does that sound like a nightmare to you? It's worth pointing out that this one-way crawl punctuated with battles has always been the meat of Final Fantasy, with the world map acting as an elaborate but limited graphical menu in most games - Final Fantasy XII was the closest to being open-world, and even then just barely. It's the illusion of choice and exploration that's been removed - although that is an important illusion, and XIII has lost a measure of excitement and romance as a result.

Advertisement
Comments

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 188 Next →

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
JohnnyWashnGo
05/03/10 @ 00:01
#1
-7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I get a 404 error : (
the_dudefather
05/03/10 @ 00:02
#2
+22
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Can you ride ©H0©080S?
crwoody
05/03/10 @ 00:04
#3
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sweet
mowgli
05/03/10 @ 00:08
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
\o/ Can't wait.
mowgli
05/03/10 @ 00:19
#6
+26
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'll be buying the PS3 version for the simple fact that I'm so used to the PS controller when it comes to Final Fantasy.


Because it hasn't changed in 13 fucking years!
curtlikesmeat
05/03/10 @ 00:20
#7
+7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Interesting, I wasn't looking forward to it all that much, but I think going into it in the right frame of mind (as in what to expect) could allow me to get more out of it. Still, what with the fairly heavy games schedule at the moment it'll probably have to wait a month or two for me to get round to it.

I enjoyed the review as I think it does well in describing what to expect whilst trying to look for positives rather than spending too much time comparing it to what has gone before.
MasterNameless
05/03/10 @ 00:23
#8
+12
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh dear. The idiot ratio is already surprisingly high. /o\

Well, from the reading the intro and conclusion - I don't want to spoil any surprises - it sounds bloody good to me. I never had the pleasure of a PS2, so this will be my first Final Fantasy since PS1 days. I'm too impatient though, there must be an indie shop selling it today somewhere! :D
Edited 1 times, most recently on 05/03/10 @ 00:29
MasterNameless
05/03/10 @ 00:27
#9
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm going with the PS3 version too, mainly as I want all the high res loveliness for the cutscenes - which I assume is going to be the biggest difference between the two versions, and swapping a couple of disc in 40 to 60 hours of gameplay is a complete non-issue. I may be being a little optimistic for the 360 version, but I guess we'll find out from Digital Foundry pretty soon....
Setaro
05/03/10 @ 00:29
#10
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So basically FF in name only, just like FF12.

I guess us old-school fans have to stick to the PS1-era or Shin Megami Tensei games to play good ol' fashioned JPRGs.
Zoro
05/03/10 @ 00:32
#11
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Interesting.

Oddly, even though the scores it's getting are not quite as good as its predecessors, this is probably the FF game I'm more excited about in recent years. Heck, maybe it's the one I'm more excited about period. Being my favorite genre, I've played lots of RPGs and it's becoming increasingly difficult to find something that actually surprises me. So I began to pick up titles that weren't all that good but bent the rules a little, stuff like Ar Tonelico and Steambot Chronicles. And while those are far from being the best RPGs I've ever played, I'm really glad I did.

And it's with that mindset that I'll give this a try. Even if I don't find it all that remarkable, I'm sure I'll enjoy it. Nice review.
MasterNameless
05/03/10 @ 00:33
#12
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@SPAM

Oh yeah! Completely missed that in my excitement of seeing the review. Cheers!

Edit: And after reading only the first few paragraphs I already take back my earlier optimism! I know the odds were against the 360 with this game, but thought it'd come out better than that.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 05/03/10 @ 00:38
Physically_Insane
05/03/10 @ 00:39
#13
+12
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
HOW DARE YOU GIVE IT AN 8 YOU CUNTS! YOU ABSOLUTE FUCKING CUNTS!!! I HATE YOU. I HATE YOU SO FUCKING MUCH!!!!!11111!
Physically_Insane
05/03/10 @ 00:39
#14
-5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
whatever
Stuz359
05/03/10 @ 00:40
#15
+23
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Obviously when this was first revealed, I was hugely excited. The prospect of marrying FF gameplay with next gen visuals was a mouth watering prospect, probably THE RPG we had all been waiting for.

The disappointing thing is that the more I have heard about the game, the more annoyed I have become. It seems they have paired back all the things I enjoy about RPG's and removed/severely cut back on them. I like exploration, I like towns, I like talking to completely irrelavent NPC's, I like sidequests and I like to explore.

If anything, I would have preferred them to cut back on the battle system, because this is probably the least enjoyable aspect of a JRPG for me.
RobotRocker
05/03/10 @ 00:40
#16
+23
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Huh. Someone finally had the balls to give a fair mark to a FF game.

Good for them.
porkface
05/03/10 @ 00:45
#17
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Super review sir!
ChronoMizaki
05/03/10 @ 00:46
#18
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
That's a good score I'll agree with. Some choices they made were bad, some choices they made were good. Can't wait for ShopTo to deliver it =]

Got to complete Heavy Rain quickly before it comes.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 05/03/10 @ 00:46
tachikoma
05/03/10 @ 00:52
#19
-6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Why is everyone giving negatives to the "as good as Halo" man? He is right!
Instinct
05/03/10 @ 00:54
#20
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh noes, a linear game.

Oh wait, I love linear games :) Can't wait.
Retroid moderator
05/03/10 @ 00:55
#21
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So, good but not amazing.

I can live with that.
Rens11
05/03/10 @ 01:05
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
what was ever wrong with turn based action! all we want is an RPG was expecting a 7 from eurogamer so pleased with an 8 all the reviews so far seem a bit harsh hopefully the game lives up to its predeccesors
Edited 1 times, most recently on 05/03/10 @ 01:06
darkmorgado
05/03/10 @ 01:08
#24
+33
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ecureuil

You, sir, are a moron.

Just face the reality: Final Fantasy hasn't been the pinnacle of RPGs for years, and has ALWAYS been linear. If you think that the xbox can't handle non-linear, open-world games than please explain Borderlands, Fallout, Oblivion, GTA 4, Crackdown, etc etc etc.

Stop talking such utter shite.
darkmorgado
05/03/10 @ 01:10
#26
+10
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Zedux,

Stop being such a noob. Digital Foundry has already shown that the differences between the two are minimal. The only appreciable difference is that the cutscenes are in a slightly higher resolution on the PS3.

Oh, and for the morons saying it was crippled for DVD, please explain the fact that when you strip out the CGI, the actual game data is only 6gb?
MasterNameless
05/03/10 @ 01:17
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The difference is debatable. Some of those high motion 360 vids looked awful, bleh :/

If that sort of stuff doesn't bother you then I envy you, it jars me when I notice it and anything stopping me thinking about whats happening in the cutscene/plot is bad thing. Saying that though, if I didn't have both systems, it wouldn't stop me getting it for the 360!
Galathorn
05/03/10 @ 01:20
#30
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
7/10 no more. Try and you'll see.
Metalfish
05/03/10 @ 01:23
#31
+24
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Epic trolling in here.
Razzajazz
05/03/10 @ 01:27
#32
+20
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
All these idiots talking about the 360 holding it back or whatever, that's just foolish talk. Why do you think that they decided to go multi-platform? It was because at the time the PS3's install base wasn't looking very good, and they wanted to make sure that they recouped their development costs.

So you shouldn't be complaining, you should be happy! The fact that it's going to come out on 360 too means that it'll sell more copies, and SE will get to make more games! Or do you not understand the concept of business?

As for the game itself, just like many other people here have said, this one's gonna have to wait, I've got far too much on the go right now game-wise!
darkmorgado
05/03/10 @ 01:32
#33
+8
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh and to the idiots moaning that some slightly shinier graphics mean the PS3 version should have a better score...

It's the GAMEPLAY that counts, you noob. You can have the best graphics in the world, but unless you have interesting, original game mechanics to back them up, the end result simply won't be brilliant. And as the review points out, it takes over 25 hours before the game gets interesting, the character progression is shallow, the story is nonsense and by stripping out much of what makes RPGs interesting they have moved the genre backwards rather than forwards.
VandelayIndustries
05/03/10 @ 01:36
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ecureuil
You're trying too hard :p

The review has sold me on it, having never played a FF game before this shall be my first!
Bloodloss
05/03/10 @ 01:40
#36
+18
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So then... a dumbed down, worthless JRPG with terrible character design that removes all that was ever good about Final Fantasy and attempts to appeal to the lowest common denominator in every possible way. Final Fantasy is truly dead. Shame really.
Shakey_Jake33
05/03/10 @ 01:40
#37
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Zedux - What? The Digital Foundry article demonstrates the differences between the two versions for all to see, and is pretty damning about the quality of the 360 port. I am aware of no other website that does this kind of coverage, let alone offering different review scores for each version,

It seems pretty evident that it is still an 8/10 game regardless of which version you buy. The PS3 versions turns out to be the superior version, but they're both the same basic game, so it's an 8/10 all round. It seems pretty straightforward to me.

Honestly, if anyone wants to start throwing the blame about with regard to the quality of the port, throw it at SquareEnix.
Collymilad
05/03/10 @ 01:46
#38
+15
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Honestly, if anyone wants to start throwing the blame about with regard to the quality of the port, throw it at SquareEnix. "

Indeed. It's not the 360's fault that SE seem petrified of making "HD towns" (omg, no dev has managed that before eh?) and other stuff that could have brought this game above 8/10.

Blame MS and the 360 all you want, but basically, as we've seem with SE's other RPGs this gen (seriously, name me an awesome RPG this gen by SE?), it seems as if their skills were somewhat suited more to a time when we had more limited hardware, as sad as that may be.

I'll still be buying the PS3 version though, not because it's far superior to the 360 version, but it is FF ffs, seems almost like a duty :P

@ecureuil : look at the screens, you're a blatent fanboy - end of. Seems like you're one of those people that cried for 3 hours after MS did the reveal at E3.

Your opinion is rubbished by many open world games that the 360 was perfectly capable of running. Just face it, FF XIII is an 8/10 because SE don't really know how to develop for this gen anywhere near as well as they did for the last gen.

SE should go to a Bioware lecture about having a clue about developing environments for this gen, i know all the anime-lovers will flame the s**t out of me for saying that, but i really couldn't give a crap :|
Edited 6 times, most recently on 05/03/10 @ 02:04
darkmorgado
05/03/10 @ 01:47
#39
+13
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ecureuil

Are you seriously suggesting that the quality of a cutscene should have an impact on the overall score?

You truly are an utter noob. Aren't you up past your bedtime?
KeirGT
05/03/10 @ 01:48
#40
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'll still buy it. Felt like a 7/10 review with an 8/10 score, though.
FenderMaster
05/03/10 @ 01:52
#41
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Stuz359

Obviously when this was first revealed, I was hugely excited. The prospect of marrying FF gameplay with next gen visuals was a mouth watering prospect, probably THE RPG we had all been waiting for.

The disappointing thing is that the more I have heard about the game, the more annoyed I have become. It seems they have paired back all the things I enjoy about RPG's and removed/severely cut back on them. I like exploration, I like towns, I like talking to completely irrelavent NPC's, I like sidequests and I like to explore.

If anything, I would have preferred them to cut back on the battle system, because this is probably the least enjoyable aspect of a JRPG for me.


definitely agree with this, menu driven battles have always been my least favourite aspect of rpg's, i play for the story, the characters, the music, to immerse myself in the world, exploration, sidequests and all that jazz. The battles are just a necessary evil i need to grind (such an appropriate word) through to get back to the story...

I'm not saying battles should be cut out completely, but how about, instead of grinding, just have vahve big storyline battles, and better yet, make them as good as srpg's like Valkyria Chronicles or Fire Emblem, that way battles can be fun, and a challenge can still be maintained
Edited 1 times, most recently on 05/03/10 @ 02:18
TWIGishere
05/03/10 @ 01:52
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Kind of expected the score, but Im still bloody excited!... Moreso with confirmation that my Play order has been despatched!
Shabbaranks
05/03/10 @ 02:05
#43
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Gets a goodish review (i read a 7), but am sure like many others there are plenty of other games that take priority over this.

Possibly give it a go but don't want to waste 60 hours of my life hitting a few buttons to watch a pretty film unfold without any real input from me.
heyyo!
05/03/10 @ 02:30
#45
+7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ecureuil shut up, you're transparent and boring.
JeroenZM
05/03/10 @ 02:31
#46
+13
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What's wrong with an 8 nowadays? It seems people consider everything below an 9 as a disappointment.
JeroenZM
05/03/10 @ 02:31
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Can´t seem to delete this double post, strangely.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 05/03/10 @ 02:33
Harmonica
05/03/10 @ 02:43
#48
+9
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Can't even feign an interest in the game series anymore (SNES FF is more my era) - but this was a well written informative review that I enjoyed reading. Good detailed discussion of a lot of aspects without descending to picking over details and quibbling over them. Thanks.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 05/03/10 @ 02:45
Seabeast
05/03/10 @ 02:48
#49
-10
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Zedux said

Blu-ray x 3 DVDs
1080p x 560p (CGI)
720p x 560p (in game graphics)
just to name a few all deserve the same score yeh right!

Yet he probably plays on his 26 inch budget LCD his mummy and daddy got him for his bedroom that wont even support full 1080p :)

Yet i bet
Stepharneo
05/03/10 @ 02:48
#50
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think the depressing thing isn't so much fanboys who wanted this to get a 10/10, rather the fact that it's been in development for how long? it's cost how much? and all it gets is an 8.

Which translates as what, "very good"? Only "very good", what a waste.

Comments: 1-50 of 188 Next →

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery