Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 3 Next

Advertisement

Enemy Territory: Quake Wars Review

Xbox 360 PlayStation 3 Review by Kristan Reed

4 June, 2008

Page 1 of 3. Page 2 ->

Has a console conversion of a PC game ever ended up better than the source material? With so many compromises made in the graphics department, and various control, interface and gameplay tweaks for developers to take into account, you're onto a loser from the start, and sofa-bound gamers are often left with little more than an approximation of the original vision. Sadly that's more or less what we're dealing with here. Knowing full well the limitations it faced on the technical side, Nerve Software - developer of our Xbox 360 review copy - at least invested a fair amount of effort to make Enemy Territory: Quake Wars more approachable. The main failing is that Quake Wars simply doesn't have enough spark in the gameplay department to compete with the riches that have befallen the shooter genre in recent times.

The game's premise is a familiar one: it's a team-based, eight-on-eight, objective-orientated first-person shooter. Set over 12 medium-sized maps, you can choose to play either as the human GDI forces, or plump for those bio-mechanical, chain-smoking Barry White fans, the Strogg. Set against the clock (usually 20 minutes), one team is on the offensive, while the other seeks to thwart the three or four of their opponents' objectives. This usually involves trying to blow something up, hacking a piece of equipment, and maybe taking a data disk somewhere else to upload it to a lucky fellow elsewhere in the Quake universe. You win if you can achieve your objectives within the time limit, or, conversely, prevent your opponents doing their ugly deeds.

To add to the fun, each side has five classes of unit, and you can choose to respawn at any time as a soldier, medic, covert ops, engineer or field ops (the specific units on each side are given slightly different names, but essentially they fulfill the same roles). A slick interface makes it a simple process to see which unit can complete the current objective - by hitting 'back' on the pad, you can cycle through the five unit types, and a green tick indicates whether that particular unit is capable of doing the job, as well as letting you know how many of that specific unit are currently on the battlefield. With a couple of button presses, you're able to parachute back into the action at the spawn-point of your choice and get going.

'Enemy Territory: Quake Wars' Screenshot 1

That guy with the machine gun's about 0.5 seconds away from death, trust me.

In one of the more useful tweaks to the console versions, tasks such as bomb-planting, hacking and repairing are now context-sensitive actions, meaning that you can simply walk up to the item and press X rather than having to cycle through your inventory to find a specific tool as you had to on the PC. Elsewhere, the sub-missions that featured in the PC original (such as repairing emplacements and vehicles) have been dropped, allowing you to focus on the main objectives. These minor tweaks go a long way to making the game a lot slicker in the heat of battle, and, yes, more fun. The previous learning curve confusion has been further aided by the inclusion of a tutorial, too - although for some curious reason it only features on the 360 version.

Undoubtedly the most jarring aspect of Quake Wars is that the run-and-gun side of the combat never manages to feel like Quake in any way. Simple machinegun fire (or even pistol fire) is often enough to see off your opponents, even from a distance, and the process of transferring the combat to a battlefield has pushed it in a direction far removed from the brand's rocket-duelling origins.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Enemy Territory: Quake Wars on Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 54 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
stoopidgreg
04/06/08 @ 12:03
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
expected outcome.
kj66246
04/06/08 @ 12:09
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I will be sticking with Warhawk then...

May dip into the bargain bucket a little later in the year.
Mudo
04/06/08 @ 12:09
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I honestly don't understand why reviews need to be so long. There must be nearly 2000 words there. That's ridiculous for a review - for any game.
You could easily condense it to just one page.
strelok
04/06/08 @ 12:10
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
so who gives a shit about FPS's on consoles anyway? ^^
stoopidgreg
04/06/08 @ 12:12
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
mudo - you can cut the review drastically if you just skip to the score.
Mudo
04/06/08 @ 12:13
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yes, but I'm not massive fan of scores and it avoids the issue. :(
Xerx3s
04/06/08 @ 12:16
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Get frontlines instead. Much better game.
Darren
04/06/08 @ 12:18
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's much better on the PC... and cheaper! ;)

360 owners would be far better off waiting for Unreal Tournament III, which has more maps and game modes, plus a (kind of) single player campaign. It was also bloody marvellous on the PS3 so I'd guess at the 360 version being possibly slightly better (minus the mods).
UncleLou
04/06/08 @ 12:18
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hardly an "issue", more of a personal preference. I like longer reviews. It's not like there is a shortage of sites with short reviews (1Up, for example).
absolutezero
04/06/08 @ 12:19
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So will you ever be able to have a look at the PS3 version? According to a comparison on Gametrailers theres different interfaces for choosing troops and interior cockpit views that are'nt available in the 360 copy.
caligari
04/06/08 @ 12:20
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Not as good as UT 3, then.
Mudo
04/06/08 @ 12:20
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Fair enough UncleLou, you're right.
Eighthours
04/06/08 @ 12:22
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I honestly don't understand why reviews need to be so long. There must be nearly 2000 words there. That's ridiculous for a review - for any game.
You could easily condense it to just one page.


Give Kristan's mortgage a chance, fella!
SBfistfun
04/06/08 @ 12:23
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
bah was hoping it would be good, but online + dodgy framerates = forget it
vegard
04/06/08 @ 12:24
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
DYING FETUS!!!
bdc
04/06/08 @ 12:27
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Eurogamer is known for good indepth reviews, that's why its audience visits it.
Dogstar060763
04/06/08 @ 12:29
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Frontlines: Fuel of War is basically an identical game, but much better in just about every possible way. ET:QW is a real disappointment. I'll never understand how Nerve just couldn't get a handle on the game engine (it's based on an enhanced version of the Doom3 game engine, fer chrissakes, and that would make it well over 3 years old) and optimise it properly for 360. It's a bit of a mess and, imo, unacceptable.

Ah well. Time to wait for this to show up in the bargain bin...
DcP729UK
04/06/08 @ 12:33
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
whatever happend to Quake > UT?! o_O
Chufty
04/06/08 @ 12:41
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Just get it on the PC, where quake games belong.
strelok
04/06/08 @ 12:56
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
QW:ET on PC was the best multiplayer FPS game last year (yeah, > CoD4, > TF2 and > UT3).
'nuff said.
BiscuitBase
04/06/08 @ 13:02
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So not as bad as Haze then?
hahayou
04/06/08 @ 13:58
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Actions are context-sensitive on the (patched) PC version too, and it also has a tutorial.

It's a decent game but not nearly as fun as TF2. A game about the Earth being invaded by cyberzombaliens who want to blenderise and consume humanity also shouldn't be quite so bland... still, sneaking up on an enemy squad and going crazy with a shotgun can't go wrong.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/06/08 @ 15:03
MrMarc
04/06/08 @ 13:59
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What really annoys me is how in the review this keeps getting referred to as a Quake game, which it absolutely is not. I can imagine alot of people instantly badmouthing this because it's not a run and gun deathmatch game as they would (blindly) expect.

It's an Enemy Territory game. See how Wolfenstein: ET plays and then come back to this, Quake is merely the setting, there is minimal influence from any Quake game in this when it comes down to the nitty gritty. Fantastic game on the PC, would hope it's still just as enjoyable on the 360, may give it a bash sometime.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/06/08 @ 15:00
Bad Devotions
04/06/08 @ 14:06
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Pfft this is nowhere near the brownest game ever.

mmm brown


LOL +1

krudster [mod]
04/06/08 @ 14:21
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If it's not anything to do with Quake, don't use the brand name to sell it.
AtomicBanana
04/06/08 @ 14:23
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well said MrMarc,

While I agree with the overall score and the rest of the review, Its' not *meant* to be like quake 3 etc, and never, ever was supposed to be.
Moonprince
04/06/08 @ 14:29
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Eurogamer is known for good indepth reviews, that's why its audience visits it.

Joke post?
miiiguel
04/06/08 @ 14:35
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
nice review krudster. however it lacks a bit of charisma, which I think might be a result of the post-MGS loony attacks on EG. get back to personal aproaches and passion that you geneticaly have.
insane_cobra
04/06/08 @ 14:35
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"So will you ever be able to have a look at the PS3 version? According to a comparison on Gametrailers theres different interfaces for choosing troops and interior cockpit views that are'nt available in the 360 copy."

According to IGN, the PS3 version indeed has some features not found in the Xbox 360 game, but looks and runs even worse. Not that it matters much, both versions seem to be quite lousy ports.
Eraser
04/06/08 @ 14:36
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
so is this game rated based on how it stands on it's own, or how it compares to it's PC counterpart? The latter happends far too much. Games are given lower scores because they're exactly the same as they were on another system, 6 monhts ago. Shouldn't it work the other way around, like, when a game is re-released with extra's and additional content, that should only boost it's score, not give lower scores because it has the same content?

Not saying that's the case with this review here, but it's still a sore point IMO.
Laika
04/06/08 @ 14:40
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
GDI? I think you mean GDF...

Quake not C&C :P
Krelle
04/06/08 @ 15:13
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Krudster:

Thats a rather lame argument coming from you Krudster.
Halo Wars wont be an FPS.
Also, FFCC My life as a king aint got battles. More of a HarvestMoon-ish game.
They both DO use the setting of said IPs thou. Just a heads-up, man.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/06/08 @ 16:14
Carlo
04/06/08 @ 15:45
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Opps!
andromeda
04/06/08 @ 16:42
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
the guy in the illustration on the front page looks like nicholas cage
krudster [mod]
04/06/08 @ 16:56
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's a first person shooter using the Quake brand. I think it's only to be expected that the Quake 'feel' was present somewhere. I really didn't 'go on' about it during the review, merely pointed it out as a point of interest to any Quake fans expecting it to be similiar. If anything I defended it not being like Quake.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/06/08 @ 17:57
Krelle
04/06/08 @ 17:14
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@krudster
Yay! Better response, this.
Unlike the other one which you probably dont even agree with yourself. (How could you, its downright wrong (right).)

move along, now..
Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/06/08 @ 18:14
Machetazo
04/06/08 @ 17:33
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The review brings Conker: Live & Reloaded, multi over Xbox Live to mind, in comparison...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/06/08 @ 18:34
BrokenSymmetry
04/06/08 @ 17:47
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Although in this review the removal of the "side-missions" was called "streamlined", I though it was a loss to the game. When I first played the PC version, those side-missions felt like the biggest innovation of the game, in that they always gave each class a few clear objectives to do that work for the team as a whole.
Ryuken
04/06/08 @ 17:55
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"It's much better on the PC... and cheaper! ;) "

Aye, have seen it for €20 or so at retail shops, great bargain and a decent/well supported game if you liked Enemy Territory. It doesn't really try much to be as frenetic as other Quake-games idd , although I have to say this is still one of the most actiony classbased shooters out there.
suicida
04/06/08 @ 18:11
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've been playing this since Friday and think it's really good. Not interested in playing against randoms but me and my friends have been having a right laugh playing against the bots.
Ronan_Crawford
04/06/08 @ 19:16
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
had a go preferred. Its good fun along as your with the right group of people. I might have have to trade this in though for NG2.
Buran
04/06/08 @ 21:18
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
As some of the writers above says, this game in PC is one of the BEST mp fps EVEN developed, near to BF2 in enjoyment (at lest for me):

But in PS3 i like a lot more UT III: K+M support, better graphics and much better stability; also the gameplay and pace is 5 times faster in UT III.

Both games are great in PC, but in consoles UT III is much better choice.
wonton
05/06/08 @ 06:37
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ive put in about 50 hours into the PC version and reached Ensign rank. And my conclusion is that quake wars is good but will not have the legacy of Wolfenstein ET.

Don't get me wrong, ET:QW is a fun game to play on public servers but only if you spend the hours to find the intricacies. And thats the thing, the barrier to entry to enjoy this at its best (when other good players on the server, when teams are balanced, when you are competent yourself is quite high.) Although i have played this more than than TF2, i have to admit i found TF2 more fun.

The technical problems surrounding the console versions won't help (apparently the x360 version relies on p2p for online play). I personally found the graphics on the PC version unimpressive and the art style doesn't help. Like the review says, the environments are quite boring. There's alot of game play in each map but no wonder people want new maps when the stock maps visually bore you to tears. We need something exciting! Something out of the ordinary, not gritty realism in a game which sometimes boring (especially when none of the players are bothered to get organized).

Splash damage have done a good job with initial PC game and I hope as much as possible translates to the console versions. Nevertheless Splash Damage have released what is very likely to be the last patch for the PC version (1.5) and are most likely working on their next game, I hope for there next project they will learn some subtle lessons from this game and remind themselves of some of the incredible things they achieved the (gameplay wise and stylistically near-perfect) Wolf ET.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 05/06/08 @ 07:39
Br0ken_Engli5h
05/06/08 @ 10:13
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I want to love this game, but the absolutely appalling lag kills it for me.
It's TF2 syndrome all over again, but I'm not willing to hold on to it until it either gets patched or people start recognising their limits as far as hosting is concerned.

Such a shame
Lemming81
05/06/08 @ 10:17
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"If it's not anything to do with Quake, don't use the brand name to sell it."

It's got everything to do with Quake. It's set before Quake 2. It's the Strogg attack on Earth that kick starts the retaliation.

If on the other hand you are some die-hard Quake 1 fan, then tough shit - three quake games about the same storyline cancels out the one Lovecraftian oddity.
zippie151
05/06/08 @ 10:46
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How come PS3 versions are hardly ever reviewed?

On topic, was an expected outcome really, did anyone think this would actually be a great game??
strelok
05/06/08 @ 11:51
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
no, ofc. FPSs on the consoles are a joke.
still, it is an awesome game on the PC.
mk-1601
05/06/08 @ 11:56
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"In one of the more useful tweaks to the console versions, tasks such as bomb-planting, hacking and repairing are now context-sensitive actions, meaning that you can simply walk up to the item and press X rather than having to cycle through your inventory to find a specific tool as you had to on the PC."

No, the PC version has always had this. You got this wrong in the preview as well.

"Medium-sized maps"? They're what, a couple of kilometres across? I'm struggling to think of another multiplayer console FPS with maps of similar scale.

Once again we see the oh-so-hilarious "brown" comments, clearly something you can't help yourself from falling back on in a review of an Id game regardless of whether they're applicable. The environments frequently looked picture-postcard gorgeous on the PC version, so either they've downgraded the visuals massively for the consoles or this is just sneering.

The complaint about lack of gameplay variety is just as baffling. Twelve maps with a distinct set of strategic options for each team, for each objective. Even if you lack any imagination and just stick to the objective class and make a beeline for the target (which I love to do), the skill level and strategy of the opposing team introduces a wide variance even for the simpler objectives. I expect this is just a spin on the typical "you just shoot things...sigh" ennui with which EG reviews all FPS games rather than an criticism based on the content of the game itself.

I expect there is enough wrong with the console port to warrant the score, but these criticisms of the core game are grossly unfair if not flat-out wrong.
krudster [mod]
05/06/08 @ 13:10
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
- The PC version was patched to include context sensitive actions - something I wasn't aware of.

- It is exceptionally brown, get over it, and it's far from picture postcard gorgeous on 360.

- The maps really aren't that big or small. Hence 'medium'.

- The gameplay variety comment is based on the recycling of objectives between maps. It's the same three or four objectives recycled over 12 maps, with the odd one off thrown in.

- I mentioned variety based on switching classes, I don't get your point.

- If you think the criticisms are unfair based on the console port, go ahead and play it and find out. This isn't reviewing the PC game.
strelok
05/06/08 @ 13:20
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
so, just to make this point clear, does TF2 have gameplay variety?

Comments: 1-50 of 54 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery