Enemy Territory: Quake Wars Review

Lust in translation?

Version tested: Xbox 360

Has a console conversion of a PC game ever ended up better than the source material? With so many compromises made in the graphics department, and various control, interface and gameplay tweaks for developers to take into account, you're onto a loser from the start, and sofa-bound gamers are often left with little more than an approximation of the original vision. Sadly that's more or less what we're dealing with here. Knowing full well the limitations it faced on the technical side, Nerve Software - developer of our Xbox 360 review copy - at least invested a fair amount of effort to make Enemy Territory: Quake Wars more approachable. The main failing is that Quake Wars simply doesn't have enough spark in the gameplay department to compete with the riches that have befallen the shooter genre in recent times.

The game's premise is a familiar one: it's a team-based, eight-on-eight, objective-orientated first-person shooter. Set over 12 medium-sized maps, you can choose to play either as the human GDI forces, or plump for those bio-mechanical, chain-smoking Barry White fans, the Strogg. Set against the clock (usually 20 minutes), one team is on the offensive, while the other seeks to thwart the three or four of their opponents' objectives. This usually involves trying to blow something up, hacking a piece of equipment, and maybe taking a data disk somewhere else to upload it to a lucky fellow elsewhere in the Quake universe. You win if you can achieve your objectives within the time limit, or, conversely, prevent your opponents doing their ugly deeds.

To add to the fun, each side has five classes of unit, and you can choose to respawn at any time as a soldier, medic, covert ops, engineer or field ops (the specific units on each side are given slightly different names, but essentially they fulfill the same roles). A slick interface makes it a simple process to see which unit can complete the current objective - by hitting 'back' on the pad, you can cycle through the five unit types, and a green tick indicates whether that particular unit is capable of doing the job, as well as letting you know how many of that specific unit are currently on the battlefield. With a couple of button presses, you're able to parachute back into the action at the spawn-point of your choice and get going.

'Enemy Territory: Quake Wars' Screenshot 1

That guy with the machine gun's about 0.5 seconds away from death, trust me.

In one of the more useful tweaks to the console versions, tasks such as bomb-planting, hacking and repairing are now context-sensitive actions, meaning that you can simply walk up to the item and press X rather than having to cycle through your inventory to find a specific tool as you had to on the PC. Elsewhere, the sub-missions that featured in the PC original (such as repairing emplacements and vehicles) have been dropped, allowing you to focus on the main objectives. These minor tweaks go a long way to making the game a lot slicker in the heat of battle, and, yes, more fun. The previous learning curve confusion has been further aided by the inclusion of a tutorial, too - although for some curious reason it only features on the 360 version.

Undoubtedly the most jarring aspect of Quake Wars is that the run-and-gun side of the combat never manages to feel like Quake in any way. Simple machinegun fire (or even pistol fire) is often enough to see off your opponents, even from a distance, and the process of transferring the combat to a battlefield has pushed it in a direction far removed from the brand's rocket-duelling origins.

On the plus side, the game benefits from an array of excellent ground and air vehicles and static units that keep things interesting and enhance the overall strategic depth. GDI forces rely on more conventional tanks, APCs, and hover-copters, but the Strogg tech is altogether more exciting, with jetpack-style Icarus units soaring high into the air to bomb targets from a distance, and gigantic, clanking mech-walkers and insectoid Tormentor aerial attack craft raining death. Careful use of the various anti-air, anti-personnel and anti-vehicle units can often neutralise even the most determined assault with a bit of forethought.

Arguably, the most fun you have with Quake Wars is this process of experimentation as you work though each class and approach each map a slightly different way. With the game's inability to properly tutor you in its hidden depths an undoubted annoyance at first, the payback for sticking with the game is finding out all sorts of evil you can wreak upon your opponent once you explore what's available. It's not a game many people will appreciate in the first few days, but persistence reveals it to be a real slow-burner.

Inevitably, with so many shooters crowding out the console market, it will be the underwhelming first impressions that put many people off. Despite looking pretty solid, the muddy war of attrition isn't as eye-catching as it could be - and certainly compares unfavourably to a steroid-pumped PC game - but you could have guessed that without so much as glancing at a screenshot. The target was to get the 360 version to stand shoulder to shoulder with the 'recommended' PC spec, but fashioning the "Megatexture" tech to the 360's innards without major compromise appears to have been just out of Nerve's reach.

Initially, Quake Wars feels like a solid, regulation port. The controls, despite what you might have heard, feel great, and everything's been thoughtfully mapped for joypad play. But the more you play, the more the little glitches start to add up. Apart from the fact it's vying for the Brownest Game Ever award, you'll also notice a subtle abundance of scenery pop-in, with near-ground grass and bushes routinely appearing mere feet away from you, while often gigantic plumes of smoke suddenly appear from nowhere.

'Enemy Territory: Quake Wars' Screenshot 2

Quake Wars could really benefit from allowing your soldiers to make intelligent use of cover.

As nit-picky as this might sound, we'd probably forgive it if the action was silky smooth and the frame-rate consistent - but it's plainly not. When mass explosions are kicking off, smoke effects can drag the action down to single digits for several seconds. Offline against the bots this won't feel like a major issue, but if you're unlucky enough to fall foul of this online, then the action dips into slideshow territory and it becomes a lottery as to whether you'll stay alive or not.

There's no doubting that all 12 maps are well-designed, reasonably intricate and work perfectly within the relative confines of eight-on-eight multiplayer, but they're intensely boring to look at. Any tech that boasts Megatexture really needs to back such lofty claims with some hard evidence - such as wonderfully lit, stunningly detailed, and interestingly crafted environments that rival the very best out there. Instead, Quake Wars looks very much like everything else. Almost criminally (if you're a Quake fanboy, at least), it's not even sporting the same style as Quake, preferring an overly familiar ragged, gritty military look that a dozen other shooters have managed in the last year alone. That's not to say the game's especially deficient, either, but it's a tired look and feel that doesn't wow in any way.

Where the game fares better is the destructibility of all the vehicle units and deployable artillery, which have been lovingly rendered in a way that's at odds with their vanilla surroundings. These are not only varied in terms of utility, but blessed with a satisfying degree of destructibility, which goes a long way to adding to the game's chaotic ambience.

The biggest question mark we have though is whether there's enough variety to justify positioning this at full price. With just 12 medium-sized maps to flit through and precious little variety in them, the biggest fly in the ointment is a massive amount of repetition and a questionable lack of different modes and customisation options. Unlike so many multiplayer shooters, Quake Wars appears content to merely offer a single, objective-based gameplay mode, where you're either defending or attacking. The main problem is that you tend to find yourself performing the same old tasks, involving generators, bridges, mining lasers, and getting (or preventing) key vehicles reaching to their destination. Sure, the option to switch between the Strogg and GDI and explore the nuances of the unique abilities of the five different classes can put a different spin on the gameplay, but in no time the repetition of the tasks within the maps can't help but chip away at your enthusiasm.

It's always a risk for publishers to try and sell a game based entirely on its multiplayer mode when so many great single-player games ship with a fully fledged online component. If Quake Wars' online offering boasted a richly varied and well-realised experience, you wouldn't even comment on the absence of a convincing single-player mode - but that's plainly not the case. Calling a sequence of bot-matches over all the game's 12 levels a "Campaign" is optimistic, and smacks of "will this do?" To replicate the whole thing with limited customisation options and then call it "Instant Action" is worse. The third mode, Stopwatch, is, again, identical to the main objective-based Campaign mode, only you have to play as GDI in one round, and then play the same map from the Strogg perspective. That all three almost identical gameplay modes exist isn't so much the issue, as the baffling lack of imagination to do anything else with these maps.

'Enemy Territory: Quake Wars' Screenshot 3

Anyone fancy a Strogg fancy dress party? I want a suit like that.

It definitely helps that the game's bots are excellent, but that's no substitute for a compelling online experience. With frame-rate issues already dragging down the offline game at times, the moment the same thing happens online, it's lag central. Once in a while you can probably tolerate it, but when missions involve getting tanks from A to B, and you're being shelled to kingdom come, the whole thing nearly grinds to a halt. Not good. In simple terms, some of the objectives within each map just aren't optimised for online play, and for a game which relies almost entirely on its online prowess, that's a big no-no.

That said, Enemy Territory: Quake Wars is by no means a shoddy product. Despite struggling to make a good first impression, it's one of those games that you find yourself getting more out of the more you invest into it, and hides a surprising amount of depth. The biggest question mark is whether a big enough online community will spring up around it to allow it to fulfill its potential. Sadly, with a fair amount of optimisation issues rearing their heads early on, Quake Wars looks destined to line-up with the also-rans in the online shooter stakes.

6 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (50) Latest comment 4 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • stoopidgreg #1 4 years ago

  • KayJay #2 4 years ago

    I will be sticking with Warhawk then...

    May dip into the bargain bucket a little later in the year.
  • Mudo #3 4 years ago

    I honestly don't understand why reviews need to be so long. There must be nearly 2000 words there. That's ridiculous for a review - for any game.
    You could easily condense it to just one page.
  • strelok #4 4 years ago

    so who gives a shit about FPS's on consoles anyway? ^^
  • stoopidgreg #5 4 years ago

    mudo - you can cut the review drastically if you just skip to the score.
  • Mudo #6 4 years ago

    Yes, but I'm not massive fan of scores and it avoids the issue. :(
  • Xerx3s #7 4 years ago

    Get frontlines instead. Much better game.
  • Darren #8 4 years ago

    It's much better on the PC... and cheaper! ;)

    360 owners would be far better off waiting for Unreal Tournament III, which has more maps and game modes, plus a (kind of) single player campaign. It was also bloody marvellous on the PS3 so I'd guess at the 360 version being possibly slightly better (minus the mods).
  • UncleLou #9 4 years ago

    Hardly an "issue", more of a personal preference. I like longer reviews. It's not like there is a shortage of sites with short reviews (1Up, for example).
  • absolutezero #10 4 years ago

    So will you ever be able to have a look at the PS3 version? According to a comparison on Gametrailers theres different interfaces for choosing troops and interior cockpit views that are'nt available in the 360 copy.
  • caligari #11 4 years ago

    Not as good as UT 3, then.
  • Mudo #12 4 years ago

    Fair enough UncleLou, you're right.
  • Eighthours #13 4 years ago

    I honestly don't understand why reviews need to be so long. There must be nearly 2000 words there. That's ridiculous for a review - for any game.
    You could easily condense it to just one page.


    Give Kristan's mortgage a chance, fella!
  • SBfistfun #14 4 years ago

    bah was hoping it would be good, but online + dodgy framerates = forget it
  • vegard #15 4 years ago

  • bdc #16 4 years ago

    Eurogamer is known for good indepth reviews, that's why its audience visits it.
  • Dogstar060763 #17 4 years ago

    Frontlines: Fuel of War is basically an identical game, but much better in just about every possible way. ET:QW is a real disappointment. I'll never understand how Nerve just couldn't get a handle on the game engine (it's based on an enhanced version of the Doom3 game engine, fer chrissakes, and that would make it well over 3 years old) and optimise it properly for 360. It's a bit of a mess and, imo, unacceptable.

    Ah well. Time to wait for this to show up in the bargain bin...
  • Chufty #18 4 years ago

    Just get it on the PC, where quake games belong.
  • strelok #19 4 years ago

    QW:ET on PC was the best multiplayer FPS game last year (yeah, > CoD4, > TF2 and > UT3).
    'nuff said.
  • BiscuitBase #20 4 years ago

    So not as bad as Haze then?
  • hahayou #21 4 years ago

    Actions are context-sensitive on the (patched) PC version too, and it also has a tutorial.

    It's a decent game but not nearly as fun as TF2. A game about the Earth being invaded by cyberzombaliens who want to blenderise and consume humanity also shouldn't be quite so bland... still, sneaking up on an enemy squad and going crazy with a shotgun can't go wrong.
    Edited by 1 at 04/06/08 @ 15:03
  • BadDevotions #22 4 years ago

    Pfft this is nowhere near the brownest game ever.

    mmm brown


    LOL +1

  • krudster #23 4 years ago

    If it's not anything to do with Quake, don't use the brand name to sell it.
  • AtomicBanana #24 4 years ago

    Well said MrMarc,

    While I agree with the overall score and the rest of the review, Its' not *meant* to be like quake 3 etc, and never, ever was supposed to be.
  • Moonprince #25 4 years ago

    Eurogamer is known for good indepth reviews, that's why its audience visits it.

    Joke post?
  • miiiguel #26 4 years ago

    nice review krudster. however it lacks a bit of charisma, which I think might be a result of the post-MGS loony attacks on EG. get back to personal aproaches and passion that you geneticaly have.
  • Eraser #27 4 years ago

    so is this game rated based on how it stands on it's own, or how it compares to it's PC counterpart? The latter happends far too much. Games are given lower scores because they're exactly the same as they were on another system, 6 monhts ago. Shouldn't it work the other way around, like, when a game is re-released with extra's and additional content, that should only boost it's score, not give lower scores because it has the same content?

    Not saying that's the case with this review here, but it's still a sore point IMO.
  • Laika #28 4 years ago

    GDI? I think you mean GDF...

    Quake not C&C :p
  • Krelle #29 4 years ago

    @Krudster:

    Thats a rather lame argument coming from you Krudster.
    Halo Wars wont be an FPS.
    Also, FFCC My life as a king aint got battles. More of a HarvestMoon-ish game.
    They both DO use the setting of said IPs thou. Just a heads-up, man.
    Edited by 1 at 04/06/08 @ 16:14
  • Carlo #30 4 years ago

  • andromeda #31 4 years ago

    the guy in the illustration on the front page looks like nicholas cage
  • krudster #32 4 years ago

    It's a first person shooter using the Quake brand. I think it's only to be expected that the Quake 'feel' was present somewhere. I really didn't 'go on' about it during the review, merely pointed it out as a point of interest to any Quake fans expecting it to be similiar. If anything I defended it not being like Quake.
    Edited by 1 at 04/06/08 @ 17:57
  • Krelle #33 4 years ago

    @krudster
    Yay! Better response, this.
    Unlike the other one which you probably dont even agree with yourself. (How could you, its downright wrong (right).)

    move along, now..
    Edited by 1 at 04/06/08 @ 18:14
  • Machetazo #34 4 years ago

    The review brings Conker: Live & Reloaded, multi over Xbox Live to mind, in comparison...
    Edited by 1 at 04/06/08 @ 18:34
  • BrokenSymmetry #35 4 years ago

    Although in this review the removal of the "side-missions" was called "streamlined", I though it was a loss to the game. When I first played the PC version, those side-missions felt like the biggest innovation of the game, in that they always gave each class a few clear objectives to do that work for the team as a whole.
  • Ryuken #36 4 years ago

    "It's much better on the PC... and cheaper! ;) "

    Aye, have seen it for €20 or so at retail shops, great bargain and a decent/well supported game if you liked Enemy Territory. It doesn't really try much to be as frenetic as other Quake-games idd , although I have to say this is still one of the most actiony classbased shooters out there.
  • suicida #37 4 years ago

    I've been playing this since Friday and think it's really good. Not interested in playing against randoms but me and my friends have been having a right laugh playing against the bots.
  • Buran #38 4 years ago

    As some of the writers above says, this game in PC is one of the BEST mp fps EVEN developed, near to BF2 in enjoyment (at lest for me):

    But in PS3 i like a lot more UT III: K+M support, better graphics and much better stability; also the gameplay and pace is 5 times faster in UT III.

    Both games are great in PC, but in consoles UT III is much better choice.
  • wonton #39 4 years ago

    Ive put in about 50 hours into the PC version and reached Ensign rank. And my conclusion is that quake wars is good but will not have the legacy of Wolfenstein ET.

    Don't get me wrong, ET:QW is a fun game to play on public servers but only if you spend the hours to find the intricacies. And thats the thing, the barrier to entry to enjoy this at its best (when other good players on the server, when teams are balanced, when you are competent yourself is quite high.) Although i have played this more than than TF2, i have to admit i found TF2 more fun.

    The technical problems surrounding the console versions won't help (apparently the x360 version relies on p2p for online play). I personally found the graphics on the PC version unimpressive and the art style doesn't help. Like the review says, the environments are quite boring. There's alot of game play in each map but no wonder people want new maps when the stock maps visually bore you to tears. We need something exciting! Something out of the ordinary, not gritty realism in a game which sometimes boring (especially when none of the players are bothered to get organized).

    Splash damage have done a good job with initial PC game and I hope as much as possible translates to the console versions. Nevertheless Splash Damage have released what is very likely to be the last patch for the PC version (1.5) and are most likely working on their next game, I hope for there next project they will learn some subtle lessons from this game and remind themselves of some of the incredible things they achieved the (gameplay wise and stylistically near-perfect) Wolf ET.
    Edited by 1 at 05/06/08 @ 07:39
  • Br0ken_Engli5h #40 4 years ago

    I want to love this game, but the absolutely appalling lag kills it for me.
    It's TF2 syndrome all over again, but I'm not willing to hold on to it until it either gets patched or people start recognising their limits as far as hosting is concerned.

    Such a shame
  • Lemming81 #41 4 years ago

    "If it's not anything to do with Quake, don't use the brand name to sell it."

    It's got everything to do with Quake. It's set before Quake 2. It's the Strogg attack on Earth that kick starts the retaliation.

    If on the other hand you are some die-hard Quake 1 fan, then tough shit - three quake games about the same storyline cancels out the one Lovecraftian oddity.
  • zippie151 #42 4 years ago

    How come PS3 versions are hardly ever reviewed?

    On topic, was an expected outcome really, did anyone think this would actually be a great game??
  • strelok #43 4 years ago

    no, ofc. FPSs on the consoles are a joke.
    still, it is an awesome game on the PC.
  • mk-1601 #44 4 years ago

    "In one of the more useful tweaks to the console versions, tasks such as bomb-planting, hacking and repairing are now context-sensitive actions, meaning that you can simply walk up to the item and press X rather than having to cycle through your inventory to find a specific tool as you had to on the PC."

    No, the PC version has always had this. You got this wrong in the preview as well.

    "Medium-sized maps"? They're what, a couple of kilometres across? I'm struggling to think of another multiplayer console FPS with maps of similar scale.

    Once again we see the oh-so-hilarious "brown" comments, clearly something you can't help yourself from falling back on in a review of an Id game regardless of whether they're applicable. The environments frequently looked picture-postcard gorgeous on the PC version, so either they've downgraded the visuals massively for the consoles or this is just sneering.

    The complaint about lack of gameplay variety is just as baffling. Twelve maps with a distinct set of strategic options for each team, for each objective. Even if you lack any imagination and just stick to the objective class and make a beeline for the target (which I love to do), the skill level and strategy of the opposing team introduces a wide variance even for the simpler objectives. I expect this is just a spin on the typical "you just shoot things...sigh" ennui with which EG reviews all FPS games rather than an criticism based on the content of the game itself.

    I expect there is enough wrong with the console port to warrant the score, but these criticisms of the core game are grossly unfair if not flat-out wrong.
  • krudster #45 4 years ago

    - The PC version was patched to include context sensitive actions - something I wasn't aware of.

    - It is exceptionally brown, get over it, and it's far from picture postcard gorgeous on 360.

    - The maps really aren't that big or small. Hence 'medium'.

    - The gameplay variety comment is based on the recycling of objectives between maps. It's the same three or four objectives recycled over 12 maps, with the odd one off thrown in.

    - I mentioned variety based on switching classes, I don't get your point.

    - If you think the criticisms are unfair based on the console port, go ahead and play it and find out. This isn't reviewing the PC game.
  • strelok #46 4 years ago

    so, just to make this point clear, does TF2 have gameplay variety?
  • mk-1601 #47 4 years ago

    "The PC version was patched to include context sensitive actions - something I wasn't aware of."

    No, I'm pretty sure they've always been there.

    Also, are you *sure* that repairing has been cut? Or do you mean it doesn't come up on the missions list?
  • Krelle #48 4 years ago

    @ zippie151:

    EG said its mainly becouse they often get review-material for the 360 earlier then ps3 (or not for the ps3 at all?).
    Makes sense in my world.
  • Beek4257 #49 4 years ago

    According to popular belief on the forums (fora?) EG's reviewers are:
    A) xbots
    B) susceptible to bribes

    Factoring in that they reviewed the 360 version and the current heavy QW:ET banners, should the score actually be read as a 4?

    FTR: I'm just being ironic. Kinda like/trust EG reviews myself. Silly me.
  • xomg #50 4 years ago

    How can you claim that a game this brown is nothing like Quake? That was the first game to kick off the "everything is brown" trend.
    Edited by 1 at 07/06/08 @ 02:53