Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon Review

Waste of space.

Version tested: Xbox 360

It's always best to approach the game you're reviewing without prejudice, but it's not always easy. Sometimes alarm bells start to ring. Like when the game is the latest instalment in a mediocre franchise that's nearly four years old. DING. Or when the original developer abandoned the series and has had nothing to do with this instalment. DING DING.

Or when the studio which took on development duties was shut down a month before the game's launch. DING DING DING. Or when the publisher informs you that due to a mysterious set of circumstances, review copies will only be available from the day of release. DING DING DING DING DING DING DING DING.

But even if all of the above apply, as in the case of Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon, it's important to keep an open mind. Better to conduct a thorough playtest and judge game on its own merits. Who knows, perhaps it will confound your preconceived notions and turn out to be an an unexpected delight?

Or perhaps it will turn out to be a rotten, shuddering, shambolic fiasco of a game with less to recommend it than a weekend spent watching the Ocean Finance channel (Sky 888) while eating glue. Can you guess which category Path of the Furon fits into, readers?

The game sees our old friend Crypto the alien returning to Earth once again to complete a series of incomparably tedious tasks for reasons it's impossible to understand or care about. The storyline is absolute gibberish, with themes ranging from the Mafia to Buddhist meditation to anti-smoking laws. It's set in the seventies, as you can tell by the unending stream of entirely unamusing historical parody. Look, here's a pair of singers who look like Sonny and Cher - but their names are Sammy and Faire! Where do they get their ideas from. Probably Poundland.

'Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon' Screenshot 1

This is absolutely not from the version of the game we played, guaranteed.

Crypto sounds just like Jack Nicholson, or rather a Welsh person doing an impression of someone from Melbourne doing an impression of Jack Nicholson. At one point, Crypto invades the body of a movie star called Jack Trippleson. He makes some jokes about how he hates Jack Trippleson's voice and draws your attention to his "banana hammock". Well done everyone.

You get five small and appallingly rendered areas to explore as you complete dull story missions, ignore the even duller side-quests and pick up weapons which aren't as good as the default one. The range of mission objectives includes Blow That Thing Up, Move That Thing Over There, Shoot Those Baddies and Shoot Those Baddies Before They Shoot This Thing Here. And nothing else.

Sometimes you have to complete a different combination of those objectives in a different order, or the baddies might have blue jackets on, but otherwise there's no variety. There's no challenge either, as Crypto and his stupid sidekick Pox constantly yammer step-by-step instructions at you throughout the game.

'Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon' Screenshot 2

Again, we don't recall seeing anything of this visual quality in the 360 version.

Even the Blow That Thing Up missions are no fun at all. At the end of the first area, for example, you're told to get in your flying saucer and destroy all the skyscrapers. You do this by firing your laser beam at them, which smears the buildings with weird-looking stripes of brown that are presumably meant to be scorch marks. Eventually some flames emerge, but instead of exploding the buildings they just sort of melt into the ground. Something went wrong with the soundtrack synching at this point, so the buildings I destroyed crumbled and burned in total silence.

Piloting the saucer is no fun at all, by the way. You'd think aliens with technology advanced enough to create such a sophisticated flying machine would have worked out a way to set it down anywhere, but no. You're limited to the four or five specially designated landing pads dotted around each area. Which you have to unlock by completing unutterably mind-numbing side-quests.

There are some new weapons to play with, such as the seed-firing gun which lets you plant giant man-eating Venus fly traps. Except you can only plant one at a time. And only in specially designated areas. Many of the old weapons are back; turns out the Anal Probe is still not funny, even if you give it homing missile capabilities. You get new powers, such as the ability to stop time and read minds. None of them are particularly inventive or fun to use. One of the new powers lets you force enemies to do disco dancing while a glitterball spins above their head. Yes, just like in Ratchet & Clank PS3. Only less original or good.

The presentation is appalling. Environments are small, sparse and populated by about three character models each. There's endless pop-up and clipping. Characters continually get stuck on scenery and in animation loops. The colour palette is hideous, the textures are terrible and the lighting is just bizarre. Cut-scenes are worth watching only for some of the most hilarious lip-synching you've ever seen.

It's similarly rubbish during the conversations you're forced to have in-game. When talking to NPCs, they'll ask you a question or spout a meaningless unfunny statement and you get a choice of responses. Your answer doesn't affect how the story plays out or anything (what do you think this is, a 2005 Xbox 1 game?). All it means is that when the same list of responses is then offered to you again, the answer you just picked won't be there. You have to keep grinding through the responses, and hearing the same answers from the NPC, until you pick the response which kicks the conversation on to the next tedious cycle.

The multiplayer options are barely worth mentioning, not least because they barely exist. There's no online functionality and no co-op mode. There are three offline two-player mini-games. They're all ****.

'Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon' Screenshot 3

Maybe aliens beamed down and stole our memories. Or... Not.

So it turns out those alarm bells were right to ring. Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon is rubbish. Even THQ must know this, and that would explain why the game only carries an RRP of USD 39.99 in the US. But here in the UK they've got the audacity to slap a sticker saying GBP 39.99 on this raddled old excuse for a full-price game. Someone ought to phone Watchdog.

Almost a year ago, I was forced (i.e. paid) to review Destroy All Humans! Big Willy Unleashed for the Wii. "Even fans of the original Destroy All Humans games won't find anything to enjoy in this, the series' first Wii instalment in the series. And, if there's any justice, the last," I wrote (concluding the review with the brilliantly insightful reflection, "No, no, no, no, no, no, no.").

Here's hoping Path of the Furon will be the last instalment in the Destroy All Humans series, full stop. It's as if Pandemic's once shiny, happy puppy grew old and tired, as is the way of things, but then instead of being put down was handed over to a bunch of tramps. Who shaved all its hair off and fed it on Tesco Value Pilsner and let it get mange. It's time for THQ to get the shotgun.

2 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (43) Latest comment 3 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • BBIAJ #1 3 years ago

    Shame, had been looking forward to this since it was announced, but became wary after learning that Pandemic were nolonger handling it.
  • Widge #2 3 years ago

    "Last few copies! Hurry!"
  • SEVQA #3 3 years ago

  • muscleblade #4 3 years ago

    2/10 actually sounds fair. I wouldnt mind if you used 1/10 for this game either. No one should buy this, but many will.
  • Beek4257 #5 3 years ago

  • Halo.Jones #6 3 years ago

    Can I have your review copy please? :)
  • Sid-Nice #7 3 years ago

    Ellie gave the Wii equivalent 3/10.
  • robg #8 3 years ago

    Reads like an 8/10.
  • mkreku #9 3 years ago

    I thought the homing missile anal probe sounded kind of funny :p And scary.
  • neonemesis #10 3 years ago

    The original 2 were decent enough games. Loads of weak areas though so its disappointing to see that the power of a next-gen console has gone to waste when the sequel still has bland areas etc.
  • speedjack #11 3 years ago

    Yikes !

    Shame - I thought the first one was good. But the series seems to have gone downhill rapidly since then.
  • glottis0 #12 3 years ago

    To be honest this is genius. Let's face it, many of us skip to the end of a review to see the score, then go back and read it. In most cases, seeing < 6/10 makes you want to not bother with the game or the review. So essentially someone's sat through a bad game, and then no-one reads the review.

    Now we have Ellie, who's slagging off of bad games is consistently hilarious, without resorting to formulaic nonsense or shock-value like, for example, Zero Punctuation.

    So my point is that (especially since the 'serious' reviewing has got so schizo and reactive lately) Ellie's reviews are one of the few reasons I stay entertained by EG's content. Ellie I reckon you should do a Charlie Brooker and spin-off to bigger and better solo projects.
    Edited by 1 at 13/02/09 @ 11:38
  • Unclebenny #13 3 years ago

    Why does Ellie only review rubbish games? I really dont rmemebr her being given even a medicore game. Is she truly hated in the EG offices?
    Perhaps due to a soap style level of interconnected back stabbing and inbreeding (I'm looking at you Hollyoaks)?
  • glottis0 #14 3 years ago

    @Unclebenny - because she's funny, and funny isn't appropriate for the super-serious task of reviewing 'better than halo?' games... sigh
  • chessboxer #15 3 years ago

    PS3 owners have to do without this in the US. What a shame.
  • Acornhead! #16 3 years ago

    There seems to been a lot of harsh reviews going around lately, has someone upset you Eurogamer? :(
  • Entity #17 3 years ago

    "Someone ought to phone Watchdog."
    They said they'd be right on it after investigating Fable 2 as a misrepresentation of a finished game act, which requires all reviewers Not to lie for cash.

    Review on release day due to being gagged and bound by a bunch of S&M lawyers= No sale.

    Disclaimer: This is meant as a joke. I'm sure you don't enjoy S&M as much as I don't enjoy shopping at M&S. Please don't sue me.
    Edited by 1 at 13/02/09 @ 12:18
  • smernicki #18 3 years ago

    It's as if Pandemic's once shiny, happy puppy grew old and tired, as is the way of things, but then instead of being put down was handed over to a bunch of tramps. Who shaved all its hair off and fed it on Tesco Value Pilsner and let it get mange. It's time for THQ to get the shotgun

    brilliant. is there an address i can send ellie a valentines card to?
  • GamesConnoisseur #19 3 years ago

    Will EG do a feature on the lowest scoring game in EG? I think it could be an interesting read to find the top 10 worse of the worse!!!

    This may not get a bottom ten ranking though!
  • Darren #20 3 years ago

    Well we all knew this would be shite anyway as even the original game wasn't that great IMO. When I saw the trailer a year back, I just knew it wouldn't end well. I mean if a trailer looks shoddy then there's no hope for the game being any better, right?

    Kudos to Ellie for such an enjoyable and amusing review... I was chuckling throughout. She's rapidly becoming my favourite EG reviewer. Shame that she only seems to get the crap games to review though. I guess having a good sense of humour helps!
  • Unclebenny #21 3 years ago

    @glottis0- Yeah thats what first occured but then i thought, "No, surely a person who has worked hard to get qualified and then employed would eventually say "Look boys, the jokes over. I want to review an actual game not these free-on-a-box-of-frosties monstrosities you keep giving me"

    She must get slightly sick of only reviewing dire games. Like you were alluding to, its possible to write a good review and be funny at the same time.
  • Dave52 #22 3 years ago

    Reads just like the Killzone2 Review, yet that got a 9/10, are Eurogamer just trying to redress the balance in their scoring system...? Oh, wait - sorry - wrong thread... ;-)
  • Machetazo #23 3 years ago

    I'm disappointed in you, EG, for not uploading a raw gameplay clip to EGTV to fully convey the awfulness that's merely been hinted at in this review! :D
  • urban #24 3 years ago

    i've come to the conclusion that pandemic are AWFUL now
  • NorfolkNClue #25 3 years ago

    If Colin McRae had survived his helicopter crash, he would play this game - IGN.com
    Edited by 1 at 13/02/09 @ 12:55
  • PlugMonkey #26 3 years ago

    "Again, we don't recall seeing anything of this visual quality in the 360 version. "

    Could you not have stretched to taking a few of your own screenshots, rather than pasting up the fake ones?

    "i've come to the conclusion that pandemic are AWFUL now "

    That's a bit harsh if you have reached that conclusion based on a game they didn't make.
  • jimboton #27 3 years ago

  • Lawlost #28 3 years ago

    Does Ellie only get to review bad games or is it she scores low?
  • MENTAL1ST Verified Senior Software Engineer, Picsel UK Ltd. #29 3 years ago

  • Matfink #30 3 years ago

    Instead of slagging off the pre-fab screenies, why not take some that actually show us what it looks like?
  • FladgeMangle #31 3 years ago

    After reading the review in full I'm surprised it managed a lofty 2/10.
  • Rodchenko #32 3 years ago

    I second GamesConnoisseur's suggestion. Please do a 'worst of the worst' feature.
  • mikeck #33 3 years ago

    Best review I've ever read on here I think, the build up to that score was brilliant (I never look at the score until I've actually read the write-up). That sounds like a game I'd never wish on anybody, for shame.
  • asphaltcowboy #34 3 years ago

    Sounds amazing!

    "One of the new powers lets you force enemies to do disco dancing while a glitterball spins above their head. Yes, just like in Ratchet & Clank PS3. Only less original or good."

    lmao! I absolutely CANNOT believe they put that in there!
  • Mawich #35 3 years ago

    Reading minds isn't new! You could do that in the first one!

    This is a dreadful shame - playing the first Destroy All Humans! on Xbox Originals, it's fun but flawed in places (and some of the missions are super-tedious, especially when you die and have to repeat an enormous stealth segment before you get to the fighting bit in which you died), and I had really hoped that at some point somebody would make a sequel which had all the good bits and dealt with the less good bits and the tedious bits and made it into a fantastic game.

    But then, one day they might make a Grand Theft Auto game in which I don't want to feed the protagonist through a mincing machine and scatter the results on the surface of the sun...
  • Triggerhappytel #36 3 years ago

    I have to admit, I am losing faith in a lot of EG's higher-profile reviews, but Ellie is definitely the best thing on this site. Fantastic read, and very funny.
  • MyPointIs #37 3 years ago

    A developer is nothing more than the people actually working for them. If the talent moves somewhere else, that's it. I don't know why everyone makes the (wrong) assumption that developer talent stays 'fixed'. And then they only start to suspect than something might have gone wrong five years down the line. Because Rare is brilliant, isn't it?
  • djed #38 3 years ago

    Also, how about you fellas wrestle up some picture taking software? It's silly when the images accompanying the blog-entry are all from a press release and the subtext is busy slagging the pr-kit.

    also
    Characters continually get stuck on scenery and in animation loops.
    A bit like fallout 3, then?
  • sneetch #39 3 years ago

    @GamesConnoisseur
    Will EG do a feature on the lowest scoring game in EG? I think it could be an interesting read to find the top 10 worse of the worse!!!

    This may not get a bottom ten ranking though!


    I would like to, formally, second this. Formally. In a formal manner.

    I'd be very interested to see a bottom 10 feature. Preferably, one per platform but I wouldn't turn down an all formats one.
  • MyPointIs #40 3 years ago

    I second the motion too. You can call it Eurogamer's Pit, or Eurogamer's Hell of Fame.

    And while you are on it, put Halo and MGS on the list, to maximise you page hits.

    And Fable II, if you want to redeem yourselves.
  • Jimpanse #41 3 years ago

    i got the game, its very funny and entertaining... i would give it an 6/10...

  • Mr.Gordons #42 3 years ago

    The game is pretty darn awful and nothing like the previews they had.. although its unfair to say they stole the disco ball thing from R&C, They had the exact thing in destroy all humans 2, so you could say R&C stole it from them....just thought id point that out
  • SWJS #43 3 years ago

    BULL ****. Pure BULL ****. I bet this tightwad never even played the game. I've beaten it six times! This review credits the game as awful and not worth playing. That's a crap lie. All the things in the images YOU SEE IN THE GAME. The mission objectives are less repetative than GTA IV's "chase This Guy, Losse Wanted Level, Mission Comlplete" mission style. This game has more fun weapons than any of the other games dumb critics like this one worship, and the Saucer is more frikkin fun to pilot than a stupid car, and it has more firepower than a tank. The characters and voice acting are phenominal. The locations are NOT small. If you tried to cross one on foot, It'd take you about 30 minutes to go across half of it. There is also some challenge, there is plenty of variety, and Pox and Crypto don't "yammer" throughout the game. How are the "blow things up" missions not fun? This idiot has no sense of fun at all. The building DO explode. The anal probe IS funny. "Environments are small, sparse and populated by about three character models each.". Um, no. They are LARGE and populated by abour 300 characters at a time. "Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon is rubbish." No. This review is. This is the largest amount of fail I have ever seen on the internet that came from a supposed professional and not a n00b. Next time, get a critic that isn't on their frikkin period to review a game and review it right.

    This game at most a 7/10.

    This review is a waste of internet bandwith, and, I will never in my life, trust a Eurogamer review, ever. "No, no, no, no, no, no, no."