Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon Review

Xbox 360 PlayStation 3 Review by Ellie Gibson

13 February, 2009

Page 2 of 2. <- Page 1

Piloting the saucer is no fun at all, by the way. You'd think aliens with technology advanced enough to create such a sophisticated flying machine would have worked out a way to set it down anywhere, but no. You're limited to the four or five specially designated landing pads dotted around each area. Which you have to unlock by completing unutterably mind-numbing side-quests.

There are some new weapons to play with, such as the seed-firing gun which lets you plant giant man-eating Venus fly traps. Except you can only plant one at a time. And only in specially designated areas. Many of the old weapons are back; turns out the Anal Probe is still not funny, even if you give it homing missile capabilities. You get new powers, such as the ability to stop time and read minds. None of them are particularly inventive or fun to use. One of the new powers lets you force enemies to do disco dancing while a glitterball spins above their head. Yes, just like in Ratchet & Clank PS3. Only less original or good.

The presentation is appalling. Environments are small, sparse and populated by about three character models each. There's endless pop-up and clipping. Characters continually get stuck on scenery and in animation loops. The colour palette is hideous, the textures are terrible and the lighting is just bizarre. Cut-scenes are worth watching only for some of the most hilarious lip-synching you've ever seen.

It's similarly rubbish during the conversations you're forced to have in-game. When talking to NPCs, they'll ask you a question or spout a meaningless unfunny statement and you get a choice of responses. Your answer doesn't affect how the story plays out or anything (what do you think this is, a 2005 Xbox 1 game?). All it means is that when the same list of responses is then offered to you again, the answer you just picked won't be there. You have to keep grinding through the responses, and hearing the same answers from the NPC, until you pick the response which kicks the conversation on to the next tedious cycle.

The multiplayer options are barely worth mentioning, not least because they barely exist. There's no online functionality and no co-op mode. There are three offline two-player mini-games. They're all ****.

'Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon' Screenshot 3

Maybe aliens beamed down and stole our memories. Or... Not.

So it turns out those alarm bells were right to ring. Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon is rubbish. Even THQ must know this, and that would explain why the game only carries an RRP of USD 39.99 in the US. But here in the UK they've got the audacity to slap a sticker saying GBP 39.99 on this raddled old excuse for a full-price game. Someone ought to phone Watchdog.

Almost a year ago, I was forced (i.e. paid) to review Destroy All Humans! Big Willy Unleashed for the Wii. "Even fans of the original Destroy All Humans games won't find anything to enjoy in this, the series' first Wii instalment in the series. And, if there's any justice, the last," I wrote (concluding the review with the brilliantly insightful reflection, "No, no, no, no, no, no, no.").

Here's hoping Path of the Furon will be the last instalment in the Destroy All Humans series, full stop. It's as if Pandemic's once shiny, happy puppy grew old and tired, as is the way of things, but then instead of being put down was handed over to a bunch of tramps. Who shaved all its hair off and fed it on Tesco Value Pilsner and let it get mange. It's time for THQ to get the shotgun.

2/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Destroy All Humans! Path of Furon on PlayStation 3/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-46 of 46 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
BBIAJ
13/02/09 @ 11:25
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Shame, had been looking forward to this since it was announced, but became wary after learning that Pandemic were nolonger handling it.
Widge
13/02/09 @ 11:26
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Last few copies! Hurry!"
SEVQA
13/02/09 @ 11:26
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
2/10 LOL
muscleblade
13/02/09 @ 11:27
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
2/10 actually sounds fair. I wouldnt mind if you used 1/10 for this game either. No one should buy this, but many will.
Beek4257
13/02/09 @ 11:28
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Poor Ellie.
Halo Jones
13/02/09 @ 11:31
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Can I have your review copy please? :)
Sid Nice
13/02/09 @ 11:32
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ellie gave the Wii equivalent 3/10.
robg
13/02/09 @ 11:35
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Reads like an 8/10.
mkreku
13/02/09 @ 11:35
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought the homing missile anal probe sounded kind of funny :P And scary.
neonemesis
13/02/09 @ 11:36
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The original 2 were decent enough games. Loads of weak areas though so its disappointing to see that the power of a next-gen console has gone to waste when the sequel still has bland areas etc.
speedjack
13/02/09 @ 11:37
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yikes !

Shame - I thought the first one was good. But the series seems to have gone downhill rapidly since then.
glottis0
13/02/09 @ 11:37
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
To be honest this is genius. Let's face it, many of us skip to the end of a review to see the score, then go back and read it. In most cases, seeing < 6/10 makes you want to not bother with the game or the review. So essentially someone's sat through a bad game, and then no-one reads the review.

Now we have Ellie, who's slagging off of bad games is consistently hilarious, without resorting to formulaic nonsense or shock-value like, for example, Zero Punctuation.

So my point is that (especially since the 'serious' reviewing has got so schizo and reactive lately) Ellie's reviews are one of the few reasons I stay entertained by EG's content. Ellie I reckon you should do a Charlie Brooker and spin-off to bigger and better solo projects.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 13/02/09 @ 11:38
Unclebenny
13/02/09 @ 11:38
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Why does Ellie only review rubbish games? I really dont rmemebr her being given even a medicore game. Is she truly hated in the EG offices?
Perhaps due to a soap style level of interconnected back stabbing and inbreeding (I'm looking at you Hollyoaks)?
glottis0
13/02/09 @ 11:41
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Unclebenny - because she's funny, and funny isn't appropriate for the super-serious task of reviewing 'better than halo?' games... sigh
chessboxer
13/02/09 @ 11:41
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
PS3 owners have to do without this in the US. What a shame.
Acornhead!
13/02/09 @ 11:44
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
There seems to been a lot of harsh reviews going around lately, has someone upset you Eurogamer? :(
disc
13/02/09 @ 12:03
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's as if Pandemics nice game went to other less able developers.

(I believe only the first game was developed by Pandemic)
Entity
13/02/09 @ 12:07
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Someone ought to phone Watchdog."
They said they'd be right on it after investigating Fable 2 as a misrepresentation of a finished game act, which requires all reviewers Not to lie for cash.

Review on release day due to being gagged and bound by a bunch of S&M lawyers= No sale.

Disclaimer: This is meant as a joke. I'm sure you don't enjoy S&M as much as I don't enjoy shopping at M&S. Please don't sue me.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 13/02/09 @ 12:18
smernicki
13/02/09 @ 12:11
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's as if Pandemic's once shiny, happy puppy grew old and tired, as is the way of things, but then instead of being put down was handed over to a bunch of tramps. Who shaved all its hair off and fed it on Tesco Value Pilsner and let it get mange. It's time for THQ to get the shotgun

brilliant. is there an address i can send ellie a valentines card to?
GamesConnoisseur
13/02/09 @ 12:16
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Will EG do a feature on the lowest scoring game in EG? I think it could be an interesting read to find the top 10 worse of the worse!!!

This may not get a bottom ten ranking though!
Darren
13/02/09 @ 12:18
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well we all knew this would be shite anyway as even the original game wasn't that great IMO. When I saw the trailer a year back, I just knew it wouldn't end well. I mean if a trailer looks shoddy then there's no hope for the game being any better, right?

Kudos to Ellie for such an enjoyable and amusing review... I was chuckling throughout. She's rapidly becoming my favourite EG reviewer. Shame that she only seems to get the crap games to review though. I guess having a good sense of humour helps!
Unclebenny
13/02/09 @ 12:24
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@glottis0- Yeah thats what first occured but then i thought, "No, surely a person who has worked hard to get qualified and then employed would eventually say "Look boys, the jokes over. I want to review an actual game not these free-on-a-box-of-frosties monstrosities you keep giving me"

She must get slightly sick of only reviewing dire games. Like you were alluding to, its possible to write a good review and be funny at the same time.
Dave52
13/02/09 @ 12:25
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Reads just like the Killzone2 Review, yet that got a 9/10, are Eurogamer just trying to redress the balance in their scoring system...? Oh, wait - sorry - wrong thread... ;-)
Machetazo
13/02/09 @ 12:32
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm disappointed in you, EG, for not uploading a raw gameplay clip to EGTV to fully convey the awfulness that's merely been hinted at in this review! :D
urban
13/02/09 @ 12:43
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i've come to the conclusion that pandemic are AWFUL now
Norfolk'n'Clue
13/02/09 @ 12:54
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If Colin McRae had survived his helicopter crash, he would play this game - IGN.com
Edited 1 times, most recently on 13/02/09 @ 12:55
PlugMonkey
13/02/09 @ 12:57
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Again, we don't recall seeing anything of this visual quality in the 360 version. "

Could you not have stretched to taking a few of your own screenshots, rather than pasting up the fake ones?

"i've come to the conclusion that pandemic are AWFUL now "

That's a bit harsh if you have reached that conclusion based on a game they didn't make.
jimboton
13/02/09 @ 13:02
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@smernicki

I want that address too :)
Lawlost
13/02/09 @ 13:11
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Does Ellie only get to review bad games or is it she scores low?
Mentalist(air)
13/02/09 @ 13:30
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
http://www.eurogamer.net/archive.php?typ...

It would appear Ellie likes a bit of Boom Blox.
Matfink
13/02/09 @ 13:34
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Instead of slagging off the pre-fab screenies, why not take some that actually show us what it looks like?
FladgeMangle
13/02/09 @ 13:42
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
After reading the review in full I'm surprised it managed a lofty 2/10.
Rodchenko
13/02/09 @ 13:45
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I second GamesConnoisseur's suggestion. Please do a 'worst of the worst' feature.
mikeck
13/02/09 @ 13:53
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Best review I've ever read on here I think, the build up to that score was brilliant (I never look at the score until I've actually read the write-up). That sounds like a game I'd never wish on anybody, for shame.
asphaltcowboy
13/02/09 @ 14:39
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds amazing!

"One of the new powers lets you force enemies to do disco dancing while a glitterball spins above their head. Yes, just like in Ratchet & Clank PS3. Only less original or good."

lmao! I absolutely CANNOT believe they put that in there!
Mogs
13/02/09 @ 14:55
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Day one then.

Pre-ordered.
Mawich
13/02/09 @ 15:47
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Reading minds isn't new! You could do that in the first one!

This is a dreadful shame - playing the first Destroy All Humans! on Xbox Originals, it's fun but flawed in places (and some of the missions are super-tedious, especially when you die and have to repeat an enormous stealth segment before you get to the fighting bit in which you died), and I had really hoped that at some point somebody would make a sequel which had all the good bits and dealt with the less good bits and the tedious bits and made it into a fantastic game.

But then, one day they might make a Grand Theft Auto game in which I don't want to feed the protagonist through a mincing machine and scatter the results on the surface of the sun...
Triggerhappytel
13/02/09 @ 16:10
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I have to admit, I am losing faith in a lot of EG's higher-profile reviews, but Ellie is definitely the best thing on this site. Fantastic read, and very funny.
MyPointIs
13/02/09 @ 16:25
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A developer is nothing more than the people actually working for them. If the talent moves somewhere else, that's it. I don't know why everyone makes the (wrong) assumption that developer talent stays 'fixed'. And then they only start to suspect than something might have gone wrong five years down the line. Because Rare is brilliant, isn't it?
N@
13/02/09 @ 18:26
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
DING
djed
13/02/09 @ 22:08
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Also, how about you fellas wrestle up some picture taking software? It's silly when the images accompanying the blog-entry are all from a press release and the subtext is busy slagging the pr-kit.

also
Characters continually get stuck on scenery and in animation loops.
A bit like fallout 3, then?
sneetch
14/02/09 @ 02:15
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@GamesConnoisseur
Will EG do a feature on the lowest scoring game in EG? I think it could be an interesting read to find the top 10 worse of the worse!!!

This may not get a bottom ten ranking though!


I would like to, formally, second this. Formally. In a formal manner.

I'd be very interested to see a bottom 10 feature. Preferably, one per platform but I wouldn't turn down an all formats one.
MyPointIs
14/02/09 @ 08:27
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I second the motion too. You can call it Eurogamer's Pit, or Eurogamer's Hell of Fame.

And while you are on it, put Halo and MGS on the list, to maximise you page hits.

And Fable II, if you want to redeem yourselves.
Jimpanse
14/02/09 @ 10:05
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i got the game, its very funny and entertaining... i would give it an 6/10...

Mr.Gordons
14/02/09 @ 22:00
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The game is pretty darn awful and nothing like the previews they had.. although its unfair to say they stole the disco ball thing from R&C, They had the exact thing in destroy all humans 2, so you could say R&C stole it from them....just thought id point that out
SWJS
08/03/09 @ 08:17
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
BULL ****. Pure BULL ****. I bet this tightwad never even played the game. I've beaten it six times! This review credits the game as awful and not worth playing. That's a crap lie. All the things in the images YOU SEE IN THE GAME. The mission objectives are less repetative than GTA IV's "chase This Guy, Losse Wanted Level, Mission Comlplete" mission style. This game has more fun weapons than any of the other games dumb critics like this one worship, and the Saucer is more frikkin fun to pilot than a stupid car, and it has more firepower than a tank. The characters and voice acting are phenominal. The locations are NOT small. If you tried to cross one on foot, It'd take you about 30 minutes to go across half of it. There is also some challenge, there is plenty of variety, and Pox and Crypto don't "yammer" throughout the game. How are the "blow things up" missions not fun? This idiot has no sense of fun at all. The building DO explode. The anal probe IS funny. "Environments are small, sparse and populated by about three character models each.". Um, no. They are LARGE and populated by abour 300 characters at a time. "Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon is rubbish." No. This review is. This is the largest amount of fail I have ever seen on the internet that came from a supposed professional and not a n00b. Next time, get a critic that isn't on their frikkin period to review a game and review it right.

This game at most a 7/10.

This review is a waste of internet bandwith, and, I will never in my life, trust a Eurogamer review, ever. "No, no, no, no, no, no, no."

Comments: 1-46 of 46 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery