The case for WAR
BioWare Mythic on Warhammer, Real ID and the future.
Last month Mythic Entertainment quietly renamed itself as BioWare Mythic, and emerged as one of four BioWare studios currently hard at work making videogame magic happen.
But where does that leave massively multiplayer online role-playing game Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning? There was a time when the fantasy game was called a World of Warcraft killer. No longer.
Here, Eurogamer speaks to BioWare Mythic general manager Eugene Evans and Warhammer Online producer Carrie Gouskos to find out where Warhammer's at, where it's going, and competing with the behemoth that is World of Warcraft.
Eurogamer: Since you've taken over the running of Warhammer Online in Europe, what's changed for gamers?
Carrie Gouskos: It's our goal to keep the experience as mirrored as possible. Specifically, we're now making sure we're more conscious of the time we do various updates, which are now happening simultaneously in the Europe and the US, as opposed to on a time delay, even though it was just by a day. And making sure things are covered in multiple languages.
Personally, in terms of getting to have a little more direct interaction with our European players, that's been one of the big points for me and the team. Making sure we're meeting the needs of the European market, which I've found plays the game somewhat differently and has different perspectives. That's been interesting to engage at that direct level.
Eugene Evans: The short answer is we have a much more direct relationship with the players now.
Eurogamer: How do European players differ from North American players?
Carrie Gouskos: Aside from the language needs? I'm still learning. I keep live characters – obviously anonymously – that I play on our live servers, so I can integrate with the players and hear what they're saying directly about the game, as opposed to what they're willing to say in public forums.
I'm not fully integrated with the European communities yet. But one of the biggest examples is that European communities do tend to side towards the bomb group style of play.
They group up with certain specs. Bright Wizards all together, maybe six Bright Wizards in one group, or six Sorcerers, that are bomb specced. They do heavy amounts of AOE, running together – that kind of style of play.
They also play a lot more close quarters than North American players, for whatever reason. We're still trying to figure out a lot of that. But it means we pay attention to the different types of nuances of gameplay.
Warhammer Online - Land of the Dead trailer
Eurogamer: I'd love to know the psychologies behind that.
Eugene Evans: When we've figured it out we'll either let you know or we won't be telling anybody.
Eurogamer: How does Warhammer's current status tally with the expectations the team and EA had before it launched and soon after?
Carrie Gouskos: We've come a long way since the expectations of two years ago. For us it has been about centring the game on the players we have and growing that.
Warhammer is in an interesting place. We have a strong user base that loves the game. We get to interact with them in lots of interesting ways. The group now, I feel very comfortable going to and saying, 'Hey guys, I've got some ideas. What do you think?' and really engaging the player base directly and going, 'Help us to make this game the play space you want to enjoy.'
This year I've seen a lot of positive momentum in that area. The communication's been great. The interaction's been great. It's only going to get better with the European players – to be able to interact with devs specifically.
We go through several layers of iteration on features and a lot of it comes early to the players and they can give feedback. There are players who had meaningful impact on the game in that way.
Being able to expand to the European group as well is exciting for us. So for us it's about the growth in the year and how well the game is doing right now. I feel pumped about this game right now.
Eugene Evans: The important thing is, we're coming up to two years since the game was released. We're still running it. The game is profitable. We have a team that's engaged in it. We're seeing a great response from the community as they rediscover the game.
When we launched we were up against the biggest competitor in the business, and arguably one of the biggest franchises in our business, with World of Warcraft. That was a huge challenge.
We're far from giving up on the game. Here we are two years later, and despite all the naysayers we continue to improve the game.
These games are not defined by the product you have at launch. They're defined by what you do with the game and how you respond to the community.
Eurogamer: Was it unfair of players to compare the game to World of Warcraft at launch and subsequently?
Carrie Gouskos: No. It's not unfair. It's what they do.
Eugene Evans: The challenge with releasing any online game is the competitor has the advantage. You're not only up against the game they built and launched, but you're up against the game they ran for a number of years and have grown.
At some point you have to get out there with your product and you have to compete. We were offering a very distinct experience with realm versus realm play. People still love the experience and are coming back now.
People are always looking for the next game they want to play. We've focused on the core players that have discovered what it is that's unique and fun about Warhammer. And that word is getting out there.
Carrie Gouskos: Maybe we attempted too much early on, making sure the player versus environment experience was as meaningful as the RVR experience.
Right now, everything we're doing and where we're going and what the path of the game is is focused on RVR. We know that's our strength. That's what our players who are playing right now want. And that's something we have a pretty good handle on. We know our strengths and we're playing up to those as best we can.
Eurogamer: How many people are currently playing Warhammer?
Eugene Evans: We don't disclose that – the joys of being a public company.
More on Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning
-
Hands On: Warhammer Online: The Land of the Dead
WAR like an Egyptian.
Review: Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning
WAR counsel.
Hands On: Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning
Beta Report Part 1: The early levels.
-
Screenshots: Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning
Eurogamer: But you mentioned it's profitable, which in this economy is great. You must be delighted.
Eugene Evans: Yeah. The other reality was that we found ourselves releasing the game at the front of one of the biggest financial crises for a long time.
What's the challenge of any new MMO? Taking people away from a community they're enjoying playing with.
A new MMO comes along and they don't want to abandon their old community. They want to try a new experience. If that means they have to subscribe to a couple of games for a while, that's more difficult in this climate.
One of the biggest effects we had on our community was the release earlier this year of our endless trial, where we were able to present a new trial experience that gave people the time to discover what was great about the game. They weren't worried about trying to discover that in 10 or 14 days.
We're still getting tens of thousands of people a month coming through trying that experience.
Eurogamer: Will you go free-to-play?
Eugene Evans: The free-to-play model has huge advantages but my opinion is you either have to design a game from scratch to drive that free-to-play experience, or there is a significant amount of work to re-engineer your game to deliver something that can drive the same amount of revenue.
Carrie Gouskos: We've looked at free-to-play and how that works. One of the biggest problems we have is it's very difficult, especially in Western markets, to monetise RVR-based experiences.
You're basically saying, in order to make it meaningful, you've got to let people pay for power. That feels wrong. You want people to be able to earn it.
We've definitely looked at free-to-play long and hard, but at the moment we don't have a need to.
Eugene Evans: We're happy with the players we have and the level of engagement they have with the game.
Carrie Gouskos: You want to make sure you're not diminishing the value of what people have played and paid for this entire two year period. You want to make sure they feel that it's worth something.
Eurogamer: What did you think on Blizzard's effort to impose Real ID on its forums? Would you ever consider doing that in your forums?
Carrie Gouskos: No. Never. Never. No.
Eugene Evans: We wouldn't do it. I'm surprised they did it, and for a group that is so close to their community, it was amazing that they misread it that poorly.
I'm pleased to see them reacting to the community. We should all learn to listen to our communities.
Carrie Gouskos: I would fight that tooth and nail. I've had some very personal, really bad experiences in online communities with that. Personally, I'm against it.
Eurogamer: Blizzard argued it would improve the quality of their forums. Do you understand that point of view?
Eugene Evans: Their community made it very clear what the right answer is.
Eurogamer: You're running three games at the moment. What's next from BioWare Mythic?
Eugene Evans: We're not ready to talk about that but we will be very soon.
Eurogamer: How soon? gamescom?
Eugene Evans: Probably not gamescom. That's very, very soon.
Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning is out now.
You may also like...
-
Activision vs. Vince Zampella and Jason West: Inside the game industry trial of the decade 58
-
Gravity Rush Review 9
-
Skyrim gets mounted combat in new update 29
-
Dirt Showdown Review 86
-
Minecraft overtakes Black Ops on XBL activity chart 22
-
Amalur developer 38 Studios lays off all staff - report 34
-
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Review 131
-
The Cave Preview: Double Fine's New Game for Sega 19
-
Judge recommends US Xbox 360 ban 171
-
Going Hardcore in Diablo 3 92
-
First Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2 image spotted 25
-
Diablo 3 real money auction house delayed again, client side patch out next week 18
-
Diablo 3 Review 244
-
Mass Effect 3 Rebellion DLC release date announced 14
-
Dragon's Dogma Review 136




































































































































Comments (27) Latest comment 2 years ago
Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
And then i hit 40, and its hard to describe to someone that doesn't play MMO's, but i hit the brick wall hard. There was nothing to do. Nothing. Apart from RvR. Now, that woudl have been perfect, except at launch, RVR was difficult. Games were played at slide show speeds. Populations were dominated by Chaos forces, and the game descended into whack a mole type engagements. And i left.
Sadly though, i was a complete dick on this site, defending this game, and roaring about how great it would be. Only in the end did i realise what a fanboy i had been, and to many people, i should say sorry.
I'm still sad that the potential for the warhammer world will not be achieved. No disrespect to the Mythic team, but by focusing on RVR, you're passing by the abilty to delve into the rich history of the Warhammer world.
If you were on Karak 8 Peaks when it launched, i salute you sirs!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
There were loads of good things about it, but instead of feeling that an epic fortress sacking was taking place, it was just a goddamn slideshow!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I found the game very unpolished, I remember I couldn't even tab between targets properly when it launched.
Ive come back to it twice but still just cant get into it very well, all the "Questing" areas are more or less empty unless theres RVR going on at the time. If you are after RVR then its pretty good for it, If there isnt any RVR going on at the time there is always scenarios..but no guarantees ull get in one of those quick.
They have merged the servers before, maybe they should keep it 1 server per language. Just feels to dead for me
Shame really
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I love this line. I see it time and time again.
Fact is that WoW was infinitely better at launch than WAR was, is, and probably ever will be.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I tried getting back into it over the free period with the transition to mythic, but I never managed to get my old characters back and the customer service seemed quite poor. Shame cause I really was thinking of joining the game again.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Then the population started dropping, the public quests (easily the best thing in the game) became empty, RvR is theoretically great but practically flawed and the levelling process became a lonely slog.
So I went back to WOW. Like everyone else. Despite secretly thinking that this could and should be better than WOW if it had the player base.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
WoW in it's first year had about 10 content drops and re-wrote their entire PVP aspect. Players could see the game changing in front of them and improving. WAR had 1 content drop and all the bugs in launch are still there. Taking out 4 of the 6 starting zones has just cut content even more. The best thing is, they did PvE pretty damn well. Public Quests are the best idea in MMO's, I loved them till they died.
The biggest problem with MMO's is this notion that as it ships you should downsize to a live team. That's an insane idea. Full production should never stop. First two years should be content shotgun then after that start working on expansions. WAR was a good game ran by old ideas.
Such as shame.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
But I think this also highlights the biggest flaw of the game which was splitting each server into 3 relatively discrete zones that span all the levels. which thins the population more then normal, WOW had a similar issue with low level dungeons until they launched cross realm PUGs which sadly just isn't a possibility for the Public quests. Whilst it goes against the ethos of MMOs maybe NPC BOTS could be used to take up the slack in public quests
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
You’re not only up against the game they built and launched, but you’re up against the game they ran for a number of years and have grown.
I love this line. I see it time and time again.
Fact is that WoW was infinitely better at launch than WAR was, is, and probably ever will be.
Yeah and the amount of content they added to WoW in its first two years far far outstripped the content that has been added to WAR in the same time. In some areas WAR has actually lost content: they've largely "removed" the Tier one Orc/Dwarf and High Elf/Dark Elf zones after all, putting the players into the Empire/Chaos area (you can go back to them but they're ghost towns now, a pity as the Dwarf/Orc zone is the best I think).
Unless they fill out the PvE I can't see myself going back. People need something other than just RvR, I went back for the free week when they took over the servers but didn't see much of a change in the actual RvR in Tier 3; people still went out of their way to avoid fights due to imbalances in the numbers in RvR lakes (real or imagined imbalances, I don't know), still nothing to do except RvR, no-one PvEing, perhaps if I pushed my character to T4 it might be different but I found myself standing at the back healing boxes in Warbands again, I seem to recall (empty) promises that healers would be fighting rather than just spamming heals, my Archmage however didn't have the time to do anything but heal.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I also felt that Paul focused on so heavily on Disorder, that by comparison Order felt like a tack on. Like a movie where the villian becomes the star. Even the opening CGI had the orders forces on the ropes. And it showed in pop balances.
If Warhammer were to release a massive PVE content pack, i might come back, but i dont think they can ever fix the RVR aspect of it, without rebuilding the game from scratch
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Eugene Evans: We don't disclose that – the joys of being a public company.
LMAO, its so few that it would be utterly embarrassing.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
No MMO will disclose their figures. Blizzard is one of the biggest players on the block, and they won't tell you their figures. Its not because they're a loser. As a public traded company, their subscirber figures are confidential information. Nor is it limited to the games industry. Why don't you try and find out exactly how many active subscribers Sky has. You wont get that info.
While i've criticised the game, i attacked it on points it was fair to attack them on. Eugene Evans literally can't tell you the figures, so you might want to cut them some slack on that
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Heh, I was on Karak 8 peaks!
had a witchelf that I took to level 30 - something.
what killed it for me was that clusterfuck pvp scenario that had lots of narrow walkways surrounded by lava...
30 seconds or so of stealth < ability to punt me into the lava on every respawn.
I tired of that very quickly, but outside the scenarios the game was rather empty.
I did have a fair bit of fun around level 20 ish with some epic world pvp battles but that kind of tapered out as people discovered they could advance quicker by farming kills in the instanced pvp.
I only got to try a little bit of dungeon PVE and even being kind, it sucked mucho gonads.
Im happy for anyone still playing and still enjoying it, happy too for mythic that they are still in profit.
I doubt i'll try it again though if they are focusing on the RvR stuff.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The blizz figure was an approximate number of accounts, and bore no relation to active subscribers. Even then, Blizzard hasn't updated that figure up or down in two years, and i'll my shoes if they numbers havent moved in two years.
Also, a good portion of those accounts (more than half) are chinese accounts, which are not billed by credit card, and work on game time cards bought in web cafes, i think. People can correct me on that if they want. The point being though, its not a subscriber revenue, and therefore can't be counted on.
@actionfitz
I was a high elf sword master. Level 40, did some of the pve stuff, spent a lot of time on the RVR stuff, and had to leave it. Crying shame too.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Skaven haunt the rotting tunnels and catacombs which spread warren like beneath the great cities. In subterranean lairs demonologists practice their foul work, the ever abhorred necromancers creep through the night, haunting the cemeteries and crypts for raw materials.
This dark atmospheric world was somehow turned into part cartoon part game show, striped of all meaning and kidified in a futile attempt to go after the money wow was making. We know how this turns out and indeed how it should turn out. Whenever vision is diluted and lost to committee second guessing what people like best, then the game is about as far away from true artistic vision and truth as it is possible to be. The result is a game that offends no one, is vaguely pleasant and rather insipid, and bears absolutely no relation to the excellent source material that became successful enough for someone to decide to make an MMO of it in the 1st place.
It rather saddens me to see what has become of the excellent intellectual properties of Conan and Warhammer. This is a salient lesson on what happens when you try to chase success rather than chasing excellence, thus making it more likely the success will come to you.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
So they hyped Destruction and did it hard. Come launch day, a lot of the people that came in had no connection to the Warhammer lore so they just played a badass character, like a Chosen. Or a Black Orc. And then it all came crumbling down.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I thought that was the joy of a private company... ffs just be transparent at SOMETHING.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The PvE was ok but spaced too far appart meaning alot of time wasted when traveling, after the first few area's group quests were impossible to do.
I made it to Lv16 before i got bored and frustrated and just quit before even playing a month, I like most of the population returned to warcraft never to return to WaR.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
MMO makers love to use that as an excuse, but it is wrong. It is more ethical, and to the company more benefitial, to launch a solid game instead of the way many of these MMO companies do.
WAR is based on RVR and thus needed a healthy community more than anything, especially at launch. A weak launch such as this made for a shaky foundation from which the game is still trying to recover from. I think this is a shame for a game that has so much potential, and is so much fun.