Beijing 2008 Review

Olymping over the finishing line.

Version tested: Xbox 360

Some of us never tired of button-bashing with a bit of precision timing thrown in. Ever since Konami introduced the concept 25 years ago, I've been there, abusing my carpal tunnels to defeat improbable high scores. It's a curious addiction, and one faithfully re-enabled by SEGA and Eurocom's take on sport's age-old sub-genre. Timed to officially cash in on the impending arrival of the 2008 Beijing Olympics, SEGA's game is exhaustive. You take your pick of 38 sporting disciplines including track, field, aquatics, gymnastics, shooting, weightlifting, cycling, kayaking, judo and table tennis [and copying lists off the press release - Ed], and you can set up your own competition and play offline against up to three friends or online in a group of eight.

On the whole, Eurocom's take on the events occupies a logical middle-ground between Konami's button-mashing Track & Field/Hyper Sports approach and the considered, timing-based system favoured by Epyx's timeless mid-'80s classics Summer Games II and Winter Games. Beijing 2008 doesn't always throw out old-fashioned mechanics for the sake of it, however simple they may be, and at least a portion of the events remind us how much fun it is to look like a frothing lunatic in pursuit of computerised athletic glory.

Initial impressions are reasonably favourable. The presentation is slick, with a clean, uncluttered front-end, decent motion-capture and excellent facial detail. It's easy to get into whichever event you want, and intuitive to get a multiplayer competition going to your precise requirements - just as it should be. It's only when you have to press the 'skip' button four times to get beyond the drawn-out intro sequences that you start to arch a quizzical eyebrow.

'Beijing 2008' Screenshot 1

Attack of the clones: fortunately there's plenty of facial (and racial) variety. But no real-life licensed drug cheat athletes. Sorry.

Later on, you face the full force of ruinous new ideas. Take the track or swimming race events, for example. Eurocom asks players to build up a pre-race power meter while they're positioned on the blocks by pressing either of the shoulder buttons, and then do the usual mashing. Unfortunately, power builds up too quickly, meaning you have to work very hard not to false-start. Correctly gauging the precise time to press the shoulder button in advance of the pistol shot is almost impossible, and in reality, you'll almost always find yourself leaving the blocks late and playing catch-up. The 800m and 1500m where you start without the blocks bit are a lot more fun.

On the other extreme, familiar field events are handled with the minimum of interference and show off Beijing 2008 at its most enjoyable. Events like long-jump, triple-jump and javelin work well, allowing players to get on with building power, setting themselves and going for the good old 45-degree sweet-spot. On occasion, some of the events, such as high-jump and pole-vault, actually improve on any previous implementation by adding mechanics that work brilliantly in the context of the sport, demanding players button-match, Quick Time Event-style, and get the timing spot-on to determine the quality of the jump. Elsewhere, the initially-tricky shot-put, discus and hammer-throw introduce players to rotating either analogue-stick to gauge accuracy or 'wind up' power - a mechanic that works its way into numerous other events elsewhere.

'Beijing 2008' Screenshot 2

Invisible jet packs are brilliant inventions.

But as is inevitable with so many events, the mechanics don't always translate or just aren't implemented in a satisfyingly playable way. The diving events, for instance, show your athlete spinning around in slow-motion towards the pool, and in order to pull off the moves with high-scoring precision you must align and rotate your cursor at the designated point. It's a frustrating mess, and getting a decent score relies more on blind luck than anything.

If the diving events prove mildly irritating, though, they're works of genius next to the abhorrent ring event in the gymnastics, which has to be one of the most thumb-achingly awful mini-games ever concocted. Again based around matching rotational movements, this time you have to rotate both sticks at once - an evil feat of co-ordination that will have the left side of the brain screaming at the right for mercy. The button-matching floor exercise is pleasantly straightforward, but like much of the padding, it's fun on the first couple of attempts but quite dull thereafter. Other problems emerge chiefly through plain bad design, though. On the game's shooting events, enjoyment veers from almost zero in the appallingly inexact skeet event to the instantly appealing pistol events, while one of the surprise highlights of the package comes from an unlikely source: archery.

The remainder, however, is almost a complete write-off - a hotchpotch of unrelated disciplines with the developer perhaps spread too thin. Judo is just an absolute joke and completely unplayable (with unintentionally hilarious animation), kayak's controls are dense, and the rotational marathon that is cycling seems to be little more than an exercise in endurance than anything (surely the role of the actual marathon instead?). To test your stick-rotating hatred even further, weightlifting tasks you with rotating each stick around in opposite directions while patting your head, rubbing your tummy, hopping on one leg and crying. If you haven't had enough by that point, then an awkward, flimsy attempt at table tennis has been bolted on as well for good measure. It's not completely terrible, but it is a bit half-arsed, and is made no more enjoyable by ensuring that your player obscures the view of the ball for most of the game.

'Beijing 2008' Screenshot 3

No "breathe" speech bubble, I'm afraid.

Within the murky mire are a clutch of decent events which are a great deal of fun in multiplayer, which is where games like this have always held their appeal, but taking some of them online can be a real mess. The ones where you take it in turns - like javelin, long-jump and pole-vault - work just fine, although are a bit long-winded with eight players, but simultaneous contests like 100m sprint, or the swimming races, can be as glitchy as hell.

A special mention, as well, to the controls. As many veterans of the joystick-waggling scene will know, attempting to get good scores on a joypad is a dark art. Put simply, they're not designed for such games, and if you happen to be lucky enough to own a Fighting Stick (or similar) you'll stand a far greater chance of success than haplessly mashing a pad into submission.

Anyway, as much as I feel like setting fire to Beijing 2008 with its own Olympic torch, it's not an unmitigated disaster. At least a quarter of the 38 events available are mildly enjoyable, especially if you're a retro-head who actually gets excited at the prospect of going online and taking on like-minded buffoons in their 40s. Nine or ten enjoyable events isn't actually a bad return on the face of it, but in the context of the other 20-odd spirit-crushing non-entities, I'm inclined to slap a 5/10 on it and advise caution. Fortunately, by the time the Olympics kick off for real on 08/08/08, it'll already be in the bargain bins.

5 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (43) Latest comment 4 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Razz #1 4 years ago

  • ToAks #2 4 years ago

    5 out of 10??? , hmm i really enjoy this game and have been for several weeks now, my girlfriend loves i too and alot of the guys on my friends list do it too, its a competetive game and the stuff you said about diving is really a proof that you didnt bother to try the game properly. I suggest you guys do some training and competetive events before going for gold (olympic mode). 5/10 does sound really bad and in all honesty this is the best game in genere since Track And Field 1+2 on the PSone... and that game was the only one to even consider after California Games back on the Amiga/C64.
  • bad09 #3 4 years ago

    Oh dear! I was thinking of getting this I don't think I'll bother

    Come on Konami do us all a favour and release a new track and field (360/PS3).....
  • Razz #4 4 years ago

    I really wanted a decent Olympics game to play this summer too. :(

    I wish Eurogamer reviews had a list of similar games somewhere on the page so I can compare. Or a better than/worse than box like what some print game mags do.
  • ToAks #5 4 years ago

    @bad09 , just get the game as this review is plain bullshit, there is only 2 events that is really annoying if u ask me anyway (Weightlifting and kayaking) .. this is not a game you will get super good at after a few minutes, it requires that you train youself up and learn the mechanics, once you do, its really rewarding and fun. Online modes are the same as offline, there is 4 player local play and there is Full LAN support and there is internet support for up to 8 players. Go for i, you will enjoy it if youre into sport games like track and field etc.
  • Moonprince #6 4 years ago

    toaks did you work on this game? Is that why it's hurting?

    This is the worst game I've played this year. Thank fuck I didn't pay for it...
  • Trendyninja #7 4 years ago

    Reads like a 8/10 to me.
  • Killerbee #8 4 years ago

    I wonder if Mario & Sonic will get another boost now that the event has finally rolled around.

    Seems a lot better than this sounds, anyway...
  • chrisjm #9 4 years ago

    been playing it since release, not a 5 to me. more like a 7 or 8. its so hard but is fun.
  • Darren #10 4 years ago

    I got bored of these button-bashing sports games year ago when I realised that I wasn't actually having any fun playing them even with friends! Mind you, these games are at least mildly more entertaining than the dull real event they're based on... LOL
  • Lexx87 #11 4 years ago

    WaxBrazillian is the kind of person I wish would get killed in a horrible mining accident. That's right, DIE.
  • Shrui #12 4 years ago

    Last athletics game I played was Daley Thompson's Decathlon on the Atari 800. Went through several joysticks on that game and I've never had the inclination to go back to such mindlessness.

    20 odd years on this review has reminded me why.
  • Scrumhalf #13 4 years ago

    I have to agree with the sentiment on here - it is a far better game than a 5/10. I got it last week and have played it a number of times and I am really enjoying trying to get a bit better at the events. It is not amazing or going to redefine the gaming world, but it is not dreadful as this review implies.

    I would give it a good 7/10 or maybe a bit more if they had got the Kayaking right which I was looking forward to.
  • Rirekon #14 4 years ago

    Next article;
    "China blocks access to http://www.eurogamer.net"
  • muftak #15 4 years ago

    i did notice your screen shots were taken from a WiP version so did you review the final build?

    for me a mid 7 out of ten great fun.
  • DrR0b3rts #16 4 years ago

  • Masarin #17 4 years ago

  • krudster #18 4 years ago

    Reviewed from the boxed copy.
  • conners #19 4 years ago

    I have been amazed at how many reviewers have knocked this game because of comments like "it's tiring" or it has "difficult controls" whereas previous track and field games being marked down for having "simplistic" or "repetitive" controls!

    Mr Reviewer, could you tell us what control scheme would work for each event? We are all ears.

    The controls do work (if you actually take the time to bother learning them) and I found it to be an enjoyable game.

    The game is certainly not a classic, but it is the most comprehensive track and field game that's been released. It certainly has the longest lifespan (thanks to the online modes.)

    Please copy and paste this over Reed's effort - Its a solid 7 out of 10.

    Don't take Reed's word for it - Go rent it and see for yourselves.
  • warbo #20 4 years ago

    Way too harsh. Still, it’s nowhere near as good as the mighty Athlete Kings for Sega Saturn was.

    If you like these button masher games, you'll probably like this.
  • juck88 #21 4 years ago

    viva la revolution!
  • ToAks #22 4 years ago

    @moonprice , no i did not work on this game but i have been playing the game for more than 40 hours so far and its really annoying to see someone slam the game for something it ain't. @ALL , this is neither a button masher nor a waggle your heart out type of game, its something inbetween, you have events where you actually don't waggle or button mash at all, its clear that Eurogamer never gave the game a try and yes we are getting used to that by now. And i must add that its really annoying to see Eurogamer trying to prove their point (which no one agree's with i might add) by making mocking comments in the screenshots and so on. .. most reviews i have seen so far (of Beijing) seems to have not given the game any chance and some even managed to say stuff like, There will be a graveyard of broken controllers after playing this game and so on... HELLO? , try to play the game and do the turtorials.
  • krudster #23 4 years ago

    Did you even read the review?
  • guillom #24 4 years ago

    Well at least Mister Reed , put the latest screenshots from the game in your review ... 2 old VIds and few crap old pics yeahhh...
    and they call that journalist

    The game probably sucks big time but at least be objective...
  • ToAks #25 4 years ago

    @krudster , ofcourse it did, i would never have posted without that, keep in mind that the stuff where it says @all infront is to guys who jumped the gun. anyway i still think you did an extremely unfair review and you still failed to play the game as it should, for instance diving is not about getting lucky or whatever, you just have to find a rythem and for that you have to play it alot, if you still think that this game should like make you do world records in a blink of a second then i think you failed to understand the purpose of the game, training is the clue and such takes time and ofcourse some events are not as fun or whatever as the next one but still, the same thing applies, training and getting good at it.
  • CrumpetBoy #26 4 years ago

    It seems to me that some people like this, and roughly as many don't. It seems to me from reading the review that Mr Reed liked some of it, and disliked roughly as much. This all seems to chime quite well with 5/10, which is after all 50% in old money.
    Besides, it's just an opinion. All reviews are opinions, just with spellchecking and fewer exclamation marks.
  • krudster #27 4 years ago

    @ ToAks

    Punctuation is your friend.
  • cyber_nicco #28 4 years ago

    Olympics games have a long and storied history of sucking mightily.

    Note: I have not played this game.
  • Mike83 #29 4 years ago

    I'd say 5/10 is a little to high. The game really is no fun to play.
  • cnlfailure #30 4 years ago

    How does it compare to the official Athens game? Many evenings wasted on that while hammered despite it only being average.

    If it's more of the same then it's a sale...
  • forestguy #31 4 years ago

    No way is this a 5/10. I don't know why the game is getting slated and to be fair it's not just from Eurogamer (this time!). I think this is the best implementation of Olympics ever. I used to play Summer Games 1 and 2 and Winter Games to death when I was younger. I prefered that to track and field and Hypersports which incidently, I still loved.

    I've been playing it for a couple of weeks now. I'd give it an 8/10. It's great with friends and not bad online. I've got four dualshock pads which my friends/friends children love. It uses the Dual Shock pad really well. It's one of my best sports games on the PS3 along with Top Spin 3, Fight Night 3, Euro 2008.

    I see a pattern with Eurogamer if Edge give it a 5/10 Eurogamer give it a 5/10 *rolls eyes*. Come on now there are 38 events, the menu is easy on the eye. Multiplayerable. A party game. Graphics are very good. So I think 7 or 8 is a more reasonable score.

    Please dont' be put of with this score it's much better than a 5/10...
    Edited by 1 at 12/07/08 @ 01:23
  • MAX99 #32 4 years ago

    reviewer said.... "especially if you're a retro-head who actually gets excited at the prospect of going online and taking on like-minded buffoons in their 40s."

    how old is this idiotic reviewer? i'd say 16 tops.
  • LotusUK #33 4 years ago

    I'm surprised the diving got mentioned as a difficult event. I think it's one of the easiest to get a good score on, requiring little skill. Decent game, above average.
  • forestguy #34 4 years ago

    I think part of the problem is the reviewer expected all 38 events to play like they should if they were brought out as individual games! But come, on the table tennis event will never be as good as the single table tennis game by Rock Star games. I bet if there was Olympic boxing or Olympic football within the complement of the 38 Olympic we have here, the reviewer will be comparing both to Fight Night and Fifa!!!

    I am surprised and grateful that Sega brought this game out on time (i.e. when they said they would), because I really didn't know what to expect and it kinda came from nowhere without a fan fare like some of the games i can mention (Haze, Pro Evo 2008 etc.), but they delivered a very very playerable game IMO
  • makeamazing #35 4 years ago

    "especially if you're a retro-head who actually gets excited at the prospect of going online and taking on like-minded buffoons in their 40s." -

    As Max says thats a pretty strange thing to say... firstly its amazing how many games WITHOUT online options get slated and lose points in a review, and now apparently the online aspect is only for buffoons in their 40's.... not a very sensible quote to make.

    Ps I am under 40 :D.. but still lets not get all crappy on people who are over 40 and play games, i personally think that is cool and I hope to still be playing games when Im over 70... let's hope some reviewer doesnt start slating people for being too old to play games!
  • monkie_king #36 4 years ago

    Jesus, why is this such a controversial score?

    /checks to see if it's a PS3 exclusive
  • Rubakai #37 4 years ago

    This game is better than the 5/10 given without a doubt.

  • forestguy #38 4 years ago

    Exactly. The review really wasn't the greatest and the reasoning behind the score is very sketchy.

    I know it's all about opinions, subjectivity and all thatl, but if you give a 5/10 you've got to:-

    1) Review the game properly
    2) Give genuine reasons why this game falls THAT short and what improvements the developers should have made.

    For me it's defo a 8/10 no question.
  • 3william56 #39 4 years ago

    This is screaming out for a steroid "assist" button in multiplayer, with a set chance that you'll get found out and banned from online play for a month. Would be interesting to see how many would take the risk (like, everyone).

    Damn, there's some toys being thrown out of prams today. You disagree with the review, say so and why. No need to get snotty.
  • jonsaan #40 4 years ago

    erm, Kristan is actually rather old. Like me. Not far off 40 I believe. Which is probably why he wrote that comment, you know, tongue in cheek?
    Edited by 1 at 13/08/08 @ 12:19
  • benstarkie #41 4 years ago

    where are these bargain bins that are mentioned? 32 squid is cheapest I can find on Lovefilm. Game in Hammersmith doesn't even have it in preowned... Too many fellow armchair olympians striving for ugly british swimmer gold....!
  • superdelphinus #42 4 years ago

    i've had more fun having sex with the ground
  • mouse Verified Graphic designer, Eurogamer Network #43 4 years ago

    Just had a smash on this for a couple of hours. It's pretty average really. 5/10 seems spot on; some good moments, but mostly bad. Also had a fun bug when I was hosting a game on Live and just as a 100m race ended, the frame rate gradually slowed until it completely stood still, and I had to quit out to the dashboard with the guide; the game totally died on me. Quality.