Wanted: Weapons of Fate Review

What have you done lately?

Version tested: Xbox 360

While it may not have been quite the same cinematic calibre as Chris Nolan's Dark Knight, Timur Bekmambetov's adaptation of Mark Millar-J.G. Jones' Wanted comic book, released last June, was frequently just as inventive, and in any other year the Russian director's instinct for pace, escalation and stabs of dark humour might have found greater acclaim. And all this despite that bloke out of Atonment's American accent, and Morgan Freeman saying the F-word.

But of course, the inevitable videogame adaptation was a bleak prospect. As soon as James McAvoy's character started bending bullets around obstacles by learning to control his superhuman adrenaline, you could almost see the icons forming on the HUD, and wherever you looked, there was a quick time event waiting to happen. What's impressive about the actual game, developed by crafty Swedish outfit GRIN, is that it comes so close to working out well anyway.

First though, a bit of background. James McAvoy is Wesley Gibson, who discovers he's a master assassin in waiting. With a bit of help from Angelina Jolie and friends, he lives up to his genes and turns into a sort of Jedi version of Leon, capping executives as they lounge at conference tables by bending the flight of a bullet through a fifth-storey window as he speeds past on the roof of a train. The game picks up after the film - with Gibson trying to find out more about his mother as assassin group the Fraternity does its best to stop him - and gives you control of his father in alternate levels to help fill out the backstory.

It's a cover shooter in the same vein as Gears of War, with a few gimmicks. These include the obvious bullet-curving (and oh look, an adrenaline meter), performed by holding the right bumper to lock onto target and using the right analogue stick to arc a suitable trajectory, releasing the bumper when your enemy's icon goes white. With a bit of luck, he'll be down in one shot, and if the game's feeling particularly generous, the camera follows the bullet into his head with a satisfying crunch. Besides that, you lock onto cover, move left and right, and poke your head up or out with the left trigger to take shots with the right.

It's worth watching the film before playing the game. If you haven't, this is a bit of a spoiler, although there are none in the review.

Standard stuff, but there are some other tricks. Levels are set out so you can move from cover to cover quickly and frequently, without exposing yourself. By first blindfiring on your adversaries, you can change position before they notice and flank them, giving yourself a free shot. Later the adrenaline build-up allows you to move between positions with a slow-motion window of opportunity to fire a few rounds on the way. Unsticking yourself from cover and moving freely is clunky, but you soon realise that the point is you shouldn't have to; this is as close to kill.switch as the genre popularised by Gears of War has ever dared return.

Sensibly, GRIN also changes the pace occasionally with canned levels that rely on expanded quick time events. In one of the best examples, about a third of the way through, the player clambers through the interior of a nose-diving plane, pausing to fire off a few rounds every few seconds. The action may not be as elaborate and exotic as McAvoy's silver screen antics on a train or in the textile factory, but it hits the right balance between reaction-based gameplay and dynamic in-engine cut sequences.

Disappointingly, however, that's about it, and the run-time isn't that much longer than the film the game follows either. Short games can be marvellous (ICO! Braid!), but Wanted doesn't fill its few hours with enough variation to justify repeat play. Bullet-curving and flanking are nicely done, but there's no real escalation. Enemies never come up with anything special to try and stop you, and you're never forced to improvise or look beyond the most obvious interpretations of the mechanics.

What's more, they often behave badly by their own mediocre standards, refusing to take hits on limbs and extremities exposed to give away their positions, where you would expect a well-aimed shot to register at least a contributory blow. They're also slow on the uptake, often allowing you to race up to them when they're isolated and hit the melee button to attack with a blade. This is handy if you want a human shield, but rather disappointing if you want to be challenged.

And the game hits a few really bad notes as well. The sniper sections, including one where Gibson's dad protects his mum on a dash through a town and up some scaffolding, lack the invention evident elsewhere, even though they are engaging enough diversions, while turret gun sections can't even make the latter claim, and lack any sense of urgency. If there's someone left to kill, you just pop up a few times to pick the unmoving straggler out of the dazzling bloom and do the business.

The aeroplane level, also featuring James McAvoy's dad, includes movable cover, which also pops up a few times elsewhere. It's a shame more isn't made of it.

The story too, told through frequent cut-scenes, unsurprisingly lacks Bekmambetov's speed and eloquence, not to mention humour. Where the film's director realised he could only afford to linger upon exposition in search of a payoff, and to lower blood pressure between set-pieces in the process, the game's equivalents are more like what we expected: people saying things to vaguely justify whatever you're about to do with your hands. It's also noticeable that Gibson's whinging-nobody-turned-superhero is less sympathetic now he's basically just an amoral killing machine with a puzzle.

Among the lines of interesting code there still lurks plenty of potential - perhaps for a speed-based high-scores shooter in the same mould as The Club, or for more exotic tactics that call upon the destructive cover and explosive ornaments that occasionally brush against the rank-and-file run-and-gun. Or perhaps for something else entirely. GRIN clearly has the capacity to go beyond what it does in Wanted, and it's a shame that the game only aspires to be a competent, mildly inventive extension of the film.

6 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (37) Latest comment 4 months ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • handsome_coelacanth #1 3 years ago

    1st
    Edited by 1 at 02/04/09 @ 23:01
  • kwesleyb #2 3 years ago

  • messiahtj #3 3 years ago

    @handsome_coelacanth
    Come on, you commented in the review of this shitty game, don't be ashamed of yourself. No need to edit your post to change all you writed about the game =D
    Edited by 2 at 02/04/09 @ 23:05
  • lcmnick #4 3 years ago

    "What have you done lately?"

    The answer to that is particularly incriminating.
  • Benno #5 3 years ago

  • BBIAJ #6 3 years ago

    "...all you writed about the game"

    Dear God!
  • vegard #7 3 years ago

    after playing the demo i thought this was a 2 for sure:)
  • Krelle #8 3 years ago

    "1st, so?"
    lol, you lost
  • Krelle #9 3 years ago

    BBIAJ

    gtfo
    just how many languages do you speak, sir?
  • Darren #10 3 years ago

    Loved the movie, hated the demo sadly, obviously won't be buying the game.
  • ZuluHero #11 3 years ago

    From the demo I would have pegged this under EGs usual 3/10, Completely uninspired and boring. Sure the cover system is ok, but once you reach an enemy the whole control system falls down - less trained killer, more flailing arm monkey. This problem highlighted by the fact that ammo was always running out, adding to the exasperation.

    Plus the game was far too hard (even on "pussy";).

    Bullet curving was ok, but one cool mechanic can't save a below mediocre game...
  • Chufty #12 3 years ago

    Wtf. How did some people like this movie? It was atrocious. Do people have no taste in films any more?

    The game can be consigned to the same landfill site and the world can move on. Thanks.
  • Vanmunt #13 3 years ago

    'The Loom of Destony'..... wtf

    Jean, Its a turkey...
  • dr_faulk #14 3 years ago

    I saw the trailer for this last night and it was the first I heard of it. Looked like a decent PS2 game.
  • guernican #15 3 years ago

    "No need to edit your post to change all you writed about the game =D"

    I notice you went back and edited your post, and still left this in. Wunderbar.

    This isn't the first time I've read a review where the final couple of paragraphs mention that it would be nice to turn the game into a sort of high-speed multiplier-builder like The Club. Except The Club was shite.
  • Azazel #16 3 years ago

    Loom of Destiny... that's in Baldur's Gate 2 isn't it? heh
  • simiankid #17 3 years ago

    Ignore the game, bin the film - just read the comic. It's miles darker than the film, which only really covers the first 20 pages of the graphic novel and leaves out ALL the interesting parts that they couldn't afford to put on screen.
  • ryohazuki1983 #18 3 years ago

    Expected a low score after playing the demo, 6 sounds about right, I found the demo very boring, wasn't my type of game (cover shoot, cover shoot, over and over).
  • BillyBrush #19 3 years ago

    The Kleptomaniac scoring system continues...how can a game this turgid beat Monolith's latest?...on the internet....anything's possible
  • frostcircus #20 3 years ago

    Including kleptomania
  • dingo75 #21 3 years ago

    Wtf. How did some people like this movie? It was atrocious. Do people have no taste in films any more?
    Angelina Jolie!
    Nuff said. :)
  • dingo75 #22 3 years ago

    Wtf. How did some people like this movie? It was atrocious. Do people have no taste in films any more?

    Angelina Jolie!
    Nuff said :)
  • the_mtfr #23 3 years ago

    No, it is NOT recommended to watch the movie before this. It was a very stupid, stupid thing. Not to mention McAvoy, as brilliant and convincing actor he is, didn't change his fucking hairstyle one bit so he looks straight out of Atonement and Last King of Scotland. And there's that joke Angelina Jolie posing as an idol of deadly beauty, yet again...
  • RobotRocker #24 3 years ago

    @ simiankid

    Dark? Possibly be argued that. Even more juvenile than the film? Absolutley. The whole comic is Mark Millar saying "fuck you" to everyone in the vicinity and tittering that people think he's clever for doing it, particuarly with the last 5 pages of the last book.
  • muscleblade #25 3 years ago

    "That 15 min demo was enough to put me off it until its at least £20 or less"

    I dont get it. Why spend £20 or less if you hate the game. Why even play it for free if you dont like it. I mean what?
  • MikeN #26 3 years ago

    @RobotRocker
    +1

    Like much of Millar's writing the comic starts off with an interesting concept but then devolves into what he reckons 13 year olds think is 'kewl' and 'edgy'.
  • DanWhitehead #27 3 years ago

    A friend of mine once accurately described Wanted as a movie for people who came out of Fight Club thinking it'd be really cool to punch people. Horrible, stupid, ugly cinema.
    Edited by 1 at 03/04/09 @ 12:50
  • FortysixterUK #28 3 years ago

    The movie was ok apart from the magical loom.
    The comic was amazing, and didn't have a magical loom.
    Go buy the comic.
    Game can wait until its in the 2 for £30 quid section
  • glaeken #29 3 years ago

    So the game is very average and does not last any longer than the film? So it takes a couple of hours to complete? and there is no replay value according to the review. I am struggling to see how this scored a 6 in light of how tough Eurogamer are scoring some games.
  • muscleblade #30 3 years ago

    Well IGN gave it 73. They gave Assault on Dark Athena 74. Same reviewer too.

    I dont think this game is so bad.
  • glaeken #31 3 years ago

    I have not actually played the demo so no idea of the quality of the game but details of the specifics of the game mentioned in the review just don't square with the score as there has to be a big question about value if the game is as short as detailed and has no replayability.

    This site seems to review high profile gamers very toughly but is actually sometimes very generous with scores on titles that are clearly fairly average. They really need to try and be a little more consistent. Of course that is tricky with multiple reviewers but I cannot think of another site at the moment that seems to be so all over the place with their scores.
  • tomjoadsghost #32 3 years ago

    the demo did kind of feel and look like an early PS2 game, I'd suggest that they ported the thing to the wii but i'd guess with the talent that they have displayed this far it would kind of end up looking like a megadrive game.
  • Gearskin #33 3 years ago

    Since when was it crime to enjoy awesome action movies?

    Wanted ended up with a Metacritic rating of 68, which is bloody good for a mindless, generic genre flick.

    It may not have been smart, but it looks absolutely cool! The action scenes were incredible.
  • zarglu #34 3 years ago

    Judging by the demo, 6/10 is very generous.
    Visually, it's PS2 or Wii-class, and despite that, it isn't even smooth.
    The gameplay was like said in the review: you can't hit the limbs, so you're better off just running to the enemy. Melee kills are safer, faster, and no need for silly aiming, ammo management or tactics. Just run and click a single button.
  • Dezm0nd #35 3 years ago

    Rented this last night from Blockbuster and didn't play it til 10am today. At 1pm the game was over. Thats 3 hours of generic but good shoot 'em up. If you bought this at the RRP or any price you should be ashamed.

    Grin should be ashamed for making one quarter of a game.

    Universal should be ashamed for allowing it.

    I feel slightly ripped off renting it for £6.
    Edited by 1 at 04/04/09 @ 15:30
  • Dr.Mott #36 3 years ago

    "
    Wtf. How did some people like this movie? It was atrocious. Do people have no taste in films any more?
    Angelina Jolie!
    Nuff said. :) "

    I was going to say Morgan Freeman, but that probably tells you more about me.
  • ryan_2011 #37 4 months ago

    AWESOME GAME BEAT IT STILL LOVE IT