Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Supreme Commander: Forged Alliance First Impressions

PC First Impressions by Alec Meer

11 October, 2007

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

The jock versus geek war wages even on the most microscopic scale. There have been some accusations, for instance that Supreme Commander can feel a little soulless compared to one of its more accessible peers such as Company of Heroes or Command & Conquer 3 - the jocks of RTS, the cool, popular kids who look purrrretty fine to you even if they're not, strictly speaking, your type. SupCom, by contrast, is the geek - the quiet one with a mighty mind throbbing furiously away behind his acquired-taste looks, but whose questionable social skills make it hard for him to make friends. Standalone expansion pack Forged Alliance hopes to change that. The trouble is, it has negative preconceptions to fight.

Is it because SupCom's armies consist only of machines, the vast majority of which are entirely disposable? If that was your complaint, I'd argue that not being satisfied unless you know that's a living, irreplaceable thing spraying its internal organs onto the ground is more a reflection on your soul than SupCom's. Forged Alliance is a second chance to prove you're more than a bloodthirsty maniac.

Or is it because the game is so often played from the most zoomed-out perspective the camera can manage, encouraging aloof detachment from the carnage below? Indeed, developers Gas Powered Games joke about making a DS version while I'm visiting, one where the hundreds of on-screen units - joined in Forged Alliance by those of a fourth race, the alien Seraphim - never become more detailed than the dancing dot-patterns such maxi-zoom makes them. It's not aloof, it's charming - shaped masses of obedient minions cheerfully trooping off wherever you ask them too, like Fantasia with anti-aircraft guns.

Or is this because, for all its giant robots and cloaking fields, SupCom is a little more truthful about war than more traditional RTS games? One unit rarely makes a difference - though a player may occasionally lament "just five or ten more gunships and I'd have had 'im." This isn't about heroes. This is about managing a war.

'Supreme Commander: Forged Alliance' Screenshot 1

Hot Experimental on Experimental action - including the crab-like Megalith over on the right.

There's a sense that not everyone got this when SupCom made its first tour of duty. Total Annihilation players, already accustomed to tank death by the dozen, treated it like a favourite pair of old shoes, of course. Many others stared at the screenshots of impossibly large-scale future-war and quaked with terror. Forged Alliance, then, is a standalone add-on not purely because that's the current vogue for expansion packs, but also because it's a sort of Supreme Commander 1.5, a second chance to make its point to those who sneered or cowered first time around.

I played an early version of Forged Alliance at Gas Powered Games' sweetie-machine-filled office in Seattle, just around the corner from endless, anonymous-looking Microsoft outposts, and it confused me a little at the time. At first, I couldn't immediately tell what'd changed, though a nagging something at the back of my brain kept me aware things weren't quite as they were. I was playing Supreme Commander as I've always done, surely? It's not until I was back home and fired up SupCom vanilla that I really got a sense of how much more polished Forged Alliance is. It's like your girlfriend showing you pictures of herself from the 80s, all bubble-perm and shoulderpads. It may have seemed perfectly reasonable at the time but now evokes a grimace of affectionate embarrassment.

Of course, the girl underneath hasn't fundamentally changed, beyond being a little older and wiser, but in SupCom's case, a complete user interface overhaul makes a big difference. It sounds petty, I know. For instance though, the impact of now having the bars for your two resource types on top of each other, rather than at opposite ends of the screen is enormous in the heat of multiplay. It's entirely psychological - the eye now glances to a single place, the casual knowledge-is-power of a driver checking his speedometer, then returning his gaze to the road ahead, in a split-second and with minimal muscle usage. Commanding feels more supreme for it.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Supreme Commander: Forged Alliance on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-13 of 13 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Dizzy
11/10/07 @ 06:59
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I might have liked this game if it didn't run at 5FPS on my uber PC. Have they solved that problem????
Edited 1 times, most recently on 11/10/07 @ 07:59
Clive Dunn
11/10/07 @ 07:15
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Depends what your PC specs are I suppose. The original ran fine on my medium specced PC after a few patches.
DodgyPast
11/10/07 @ 07:40
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How do you mean this? Somehow I don't think you have an uber PC.

This does sound somewhat exciting, I just need to find some non-hardcore players to play against :(
Pirotic
11/10/07 @ 07:42
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The biggest problem with the original is that they released an unfinished game, the amount of serious bugs it had, and to some degree still has. renders it unplayable. I still can't play big skirmish maps because when it hits the 2gb ram limit, it crashs to desktop.

Any programmer knows about the limits, but either works around them or see's to it that they are never hit, just letting any game crash to desktop then saying it's a problem with the OS rather than the game is bullcrap.

The online play still has tons of glitchs which knocks matchs out of sync, the patcher is still buggy and often requires a complete fresh install of the game on Windows Vista.

Last time I looked on the official forum, the technicall support section had more threads than the 'general chat' section!

I loved what I could play of it between the crashs, but ended up uninstalling it because it was the software incarnate of everything that's holding PC gaming back. Now I see they are releasing the expansion as a stand-alone product, so the original was basically a prolonged beta test which we've all paid £30 to take part in, nice.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 11/10/07 @ 08:48
Dizzy
11/10/07 @ 08:37
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
>How do you mean this? Somehow I don't think you have an uber PC.

Dual core 2.4ghz, 4GB ram and a pretty fast ATI card.

Game runs like shit when I played the demo. Never touched it after that.
Lacero
11/10/07 @ 08:48
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
DodgyPast: the ladder games online are automatched to your skill level. Once you've played a few times you should be able to get a good game (assuming there are enough other people of your skill level playing).

Dizzy, your pc is better than mine and mine runs fine at 1920x1200. PC games are weird I guess :/

Pirotic: Finally a reason to run a 64bit OS! ;)

I loved this game, online was great. I was beating people many times better than me because they always forget about tactical missile launchers. Commander BOOM!
Lemming81
11/10/07 @ 11:25
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Dizzy, your pc is better than mine and mine runs fine at 1920x1200. PC games are weird I guess :/ "

That's amazing you can tell that when he didn't even mention his graphics card spec...
MrChuckles
11/10/07 @ 12:04
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Original game was dull single player campaign, but great multiplayer. Really wanted to play co-op vs the pc in skirmish, but even 3 of us vs 5 we whupped their arses, they just sent lvl 1 bots, most disappointed...
BobsUncle
11/10/07 @ 12:18
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"I was beating people many times better than me because they always forget about tactical missile launchers"

Well they're obviously not better than you, then.


I found this game tedious. To be fair, I only played for a bit but I thought every race was pretty much identical in unit types. And the Alien race with all the squidgy things all looked the same. Or one of them did anyway, I don't remember.

It ran fine on my PC though, 2.13ghz Core Duo, 2 gb RAM, ATI X1900 256mb running main screen at 1600x1200 and secondary map screen at 1024x768.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 11/10/07 @ 13:19
Lacero
11/10/07 @ 12:31
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Lemming81: er, yes he did

BobsUncle: Well fair enough, I can see your point. Let me explain.

I was being outplayed, they had more resources, more units, they got to Tech level 2 first, they won control of some important map areas, and then everything they had exploded because they didn't think to build one missile defence. They were better than me and they made a small mistake I exploited which allowed me to win. Just one example of how the combat model is complex enough to support deep meta gameplay.

The differences between t1 units for the races are very subtle, a small range increase for one side, area effect damage instead of armour piercing for another, top speed differences or turning speed differences. I think the game let itself down in this regard by not demonstrating these differences explicitly in the campaign. Unless you read about the game online you might not even notice that half your units died before even getting a shot off because the enemy units of the same type outrange them.

Looks like I'm the only fanboy in this thead so I'll leave you all to it. It's great though! :)
BobsUncle
11/10/07 @ 15:09
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@lamadude

Get an Nvidia 8600. Around 120 smackeroos. They even make one with the SupCom sticker on the cooler!
Personally I never bother with the top of the range cards, they're an absolute rip-off and they'll be less than half the price by the time a game comes out that can actually make full use of it!

My X1900 did a very respectable job on this game, you can get them not for not many squidlets at all. But an 8600 is DX10 compatible.
Ryuken
11/10/07 @ 17:35
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Pirotic: still playing that old 2.7 cracked beta version?:)

The serious problems of SupCom are the rather slow GPGnet, connection problems with some routers and that infamous 2GB cap yes. Though the latter only shows up in really huge games (be happy you can even try to play them and there isn't a stupid RAM-cap like in TA) and together with the other it is nothing Hamachi or some fanmade solutions can't fix. The state of SupCom at release >>> the state of TA back in late 1997. I can't wait to see how FA will add to the experience.
PinkSpider
11/10/07 @ 21:52
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Love Supreme Commander but wish it wouldnt randomly crash on my pc (which is an alright dual core amd 64 pc with 2gig of DDR2 ram and an overclocked 7600GS card). :(

Comments: 1-13 of 13 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Metaboli

X View gallery