Jump to navigation
Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Rise & Fall: Civilizations At War Review

PC Review by Kieron Gillen

19 June, 2006

While Playing Rise and Fall I find myself thinking about the poetry of Shelley, and not just because I'm an irremediable ponce. You see, this is Empire-Earth creators Stainless Steel Games swansong, having closed down before its release. Well before. Several months before its release, meaning it's only a swansong because someone's holding the bird's neck up, moving its jaw up and down and doing a little ventriloquism. Whatever state the game was in when Stainless Steel went down, it was passed over to Midway itself who finished it off.

This makes the whole thing bring to mind Shelley's famous Ozymandius, with the image of the last fragment of a statue of an emperor in the shifting, endless sands. Stainless Steel may have thought it was making its lasting testament, but what's left... yeah, you can tell the review isn't going to end well. For its fair array of positive traits, it has such fundamental flaws which will mean it'll only appeal to the smallest demographic. Possibly including ex-members of Stainless Steel interested in seeing how the game actually turned out.

At its core it's a basic ancients-style RTS, a la Age of Empires. Resources are gathered and transformed into troops in your settlements and so on. There's a few tweaks to the dynamic, such as a combat boost being related to the size of the unit and the resource "Glory" gained by doing assorted glorious things (e.g. Getting Stuck in, Building big statues saying how ace you are), but there's nothing core which will throw a devotee. Except one thing. The game's Very Special Feature. And it's not a bad Very Special Feature when it just remains a Very Special Feature, but we'll get to that.

As you progress, your hero gains a resource called stamina. You can then, at a button press, move into a direct control mode and run around like in Spartan: Total Warrior or Dynasty Warriors, in a mass killing spree. Your attacks will use up the stamina (normal slash a little, special powers a lot), as well as ticking down when you're hammered by your foes. Limited army controls are available here, such as getting everyone to follow you, and you also have ranged attacks, but it's not particularly sophisticated. It doesn't really need to be - it adds something of a climax to a level as your massively powerful avatar leads your forces to victory, and a careful consideration when to apply it adding to multiplayer (i.e. Do you use your stamina now or save it? When will your opponent use theirs?).

'Rise & Fall: Civilizations At War' Screenshot noah

Noah's two-by-two system went completely awry. Poor, lonely Elephant.

The problems really occur in the campaign game. Now, the campaign game isn't really going that well anyway. It's got some pretty terrible writing, unlikeable characters (Please, don't get me started on crop-topped Cleopatra) and some really iffy design which doesn't show the mechanics off particularly well. There's a mixture of there being an obvious solution which you then just follow at some times and giving you insufficient guidance at others. But it goes entirely to whack when they go into the Action Missions, when the Special Feature gets ideas above its station, rises up and claims total dominance above all. This really simple action mechanic attempts to become the game.

It's just not good enough to support its delusions of grandeur.

Let's take one of the levels, where you're thrown into an arena to fight several waves of massed opponents, while under fire from arrow-troopers in towers. You progress from attacking soldiers, to elephants and end up facing a particularly vicious Minotaur. While in the main game you go in, hack and slay until your stamina bar runs out, when you're booted back to the main RTS game, here - where there is no other RTS mode - the bar running dry means just death. But since there's no block or any way to really dodge anyone who wants to hit you, you perpetually lose stamina in a floaty, aimless, completely unsatisfactory manner. A designer seems to have realised this, so they drop magical amphora which top up the bar. Later, they appear pretty much randomly around the arena, so when you're fighting your only real task is to spin the camera around constantly while trying to locate the next one, and run to it before your stamina runs out. By the time you get to the Minotaur, he's able to run slightly faster than you and when HIS energy is low you get to fight him in close-combat. You hack him. He hacks you. You have no way to stop him hurting you, so it's a competition to see whose energy runs out. To actually win it, you have to keep the camera spinning to see where the next energy-top up appears, and then back up to it while still fighting (as you can't block or outrun him, remember). And since they appear randomly, it could be on the other side of the arena, meaning you'll never make it and so die and have to try again."

'Rise & Fall: Civilizations At War' Screenshot fair

Fair? No.

What a soul-destroying retrograde brain-hemorrhaging gut-clenching lunatic design decision.

That's the particular nadir, but the action levels never reaches any heights. At best, it's a novelty. More generally, it's just a tedious fourth-rate action you'd never want to play in any normal situations. The idea that anyone who makes their way through a handful of RTS-with-splash-of-the-new levels now wants to have several levels of this is utterly bizarre. You see, it's not even just a single level to clear the point and click palette. It's a string of ‘em. Their inclusion essentially renders the campaign modes a complete waste for everyone. Anyone who comes for the RTS will find themselves confused. Anyone who wants action won't get that far into the game, due to the thick strategy-hymen they have to penetrate. And the rare, beautiful multi-genre loving folk won't want to play an eighth-rate Dynasty Warriors clone anyway.

But an RTS isn't just the campaign mode and Rise and Fall isn't all bad. After Act of War: Direct Action not bothering to program AI for its ships and the hilarious sight of the mega-budget Battle for Middle Earth 2's vessels twitching spasmodically as they tried to work out how to get onto the beach while the troops stand on the sands, placidly queuing while being slaughtered by anyone who cares to fire an arrow in their direction, Rise and Fall manages oceanic battles better than anyone else. They take a robust approach to the presumably difficult land/sea interface issue by having a specific place where the ship can beach, effectively like placing a building. In this firm position, the troops pile on, and then you can retract onto the waters. It's as easy as this operation should be.

'Rise & Fall: Civilizations At War' Screenshot action

What a marvelous action sequence. Not this one - I was thinking of another game.

But its basic utilitarianism isn't enough - it's actually got a lot of style too. Have sailors on board, and they can throw grappling hooks and pull opposing vessels adjacent to yours. Then the gangplanks lower and your troops pile on, with the winners taking possession of both ships. Get a drummer and it's time to build up to ramming speed and take them apart. In fact, generally speaking, Rise and Fall does the large engines of Ancient-destruction well. For example, walls often have cranes mounted on them which are used to grab hold of incoming siege-implements and crash them against the wall, something which hasn't shown up in games nearly as much as it should. They even use the physics, by having enormous boulders which are propelled down hills to break up formations.

In fact, when you start dwelling on the many good bits you start feeling a little reticent of slating Rise and Fall. It doesn't have the sheer polish or design coherence of something like this month's other Rise-TS, Rise of Legends, but there's lots to like. Until you remember the campaign mode again at which point you just find yourself wishing the developers to go bust, until you remember they have and you start feeling bad again. As a skirmish and multiplayer game, I'd give this a six. As a single-player campaign game, it'd score about three. Which means overall, this hastily reanimated remains of an RTS manages to fall somewhere between. It's a possibly interesting curio for someone in the future who'll be wandering the future desert of the budget shelves, only to find a strange package emblazoned with a curious epitaph.

  • My name is Stainless Steel Games, Videogame Developer,
  • Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!

5/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Rise & Fall: Civilizations At War on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-15 of 15 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
delbert
19/06/06 @ 16:26
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Glad I avoided the impulse purchase at lunch time then!!
UncleLou
19/06/06 @ 16:31
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looked interesting on paper, but the demo put me off for good already.

My name is Stainless Steel Games, Videogame Developer,
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!


Someone has played too much Civ IV. :)
Shanucore
19/06/06 @ 17:09
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Or perhaps someone has spent too much time reading Shelley, as is pointed out in the opening paragraph of the review. :P
Nikanoru
19/06/06 @ 18:00
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Great, the game sucks. Now can we remove the annoying as fuck flashing ad about it?

I mean, why in fucks name does that roman guy brightly flash twice in rapid succession? It gives me a headache when every few seconds the corner of my eye sees a rapid bright blinking from the ad that's covering half the page.

Oh, of course we know why. It's exactly because it's irritating that they made it do that. Doesn't make it any more pleasant though, especially when every fucking huge flash ad you see here has the exact same blinking twice fast thing, often several times in a row, no matter if the subject of the ad itself blinking makes absolutely no sense. They just want to scream at you like "look at me motherfucker! I'm blinking and shaking! Blinkblink! Shake! Blinkink! Yeah I know I'm annoying the fuck out of you, now look at me, because I need you to buy this shit game! Come on you consumer sheep, I don't care what you're doing, your life doesn't mean shit, only your money! Redirect your attention to the right half of the page that the ad is covering (we'd cover more area but we at least have to pretend there's some website content) and then forget about any annoyances like the good little slave you are, just click!"
UncleLou
19/06/06 @ 18:27
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Or perhaps someone has spent too much time reading Shelley, as is pointed out in the opening paragraph of the review. :P

I saw that, but find my explanation more likely. ;p
Stickman
19/06/06 @ 19:15
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"thick strategy-hymen they have to penetrate"

Sometimes you're a genius!
wonton
19/06/06 @ 20:00
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Nikanoru
Download something to block that. Eurogamer's always had rediculously massive annoying flash ads, so i blocked them along time ago (btw im using firefox with the flashblock extension.
3william56
20/06/06 @ 05:12
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Pfft - Shelly indeed.
We all know you cribbed it from a wrinkled copy of Watchmen...
Darkedge
20/06/06 @ 08:15
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Watchmen is better than Shelly anyway.
Much rather read Moore.
BremXJones
20/06/06 @ 11:17
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's one of the most famous poems ever, gents. It's hardly bloody obscure.

KG
Collie
20/06/06 @ 14:18
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought this must be a KG review with that kind of criticism in it.

Don't think I'll be getting this then, a shame as I was hoping the battles would be a bit more fun than RTW's bigger but not really great battles. As soon as I saw Midway were involved, I thought this project is buggered, if the fact Stainless Steel went under hadn't already set off the warning alarms.
Smugglarn
20/06/06 @ 17:09
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oy, Kieron!

Did you try the middle mouse button?

...
maximate
20/06/06 @ 18:38
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A surprisingly low score given all the good things the reviewer says about the game. I have to disagree with some of his sentiment though. You -can- block using the spacebar or middle mouse button which is highly effective against arrows. I'm not surprised the reviewer had difficulty with the arena without knowing how to block. I liked the hero action better than dynasty warriors becuase it is more epic, the moves are less silly, and you get to fight in wider variety of places (cities that you built yourself, ship decks, ect), hardly fourth rate. If you dont like the hero action only scenarios (probably about 20% of them) you can type in the chat cheatcode "iwin" to move on to the next chapter.
Mechstra
22/06/06 @ 08:18
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I agree far more with Kieron than Tim Stone here. Funny, as I usually find the man Stone to be right on the money, but R&F is just mediocre to the bone. With a terribly bland action element stuck in.

I feel less heroic in Rise and Fall while cutting down 60 archers in 3 seconds and therefore winning the battle than I do in Mount & Blade cutting down 2 enemies in a minute and breaking the enemy's line so that I can attack from the rear.

Which is incredibly wrong.

Also: 'iwin'? Hmph. Back in the day we had amusingly creative RTS cheatcode. Rick Goodman obviously forgot his 'homerun' days...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 22/06/06 @ 09:20
gregorious
24/06/06 @ 15:58
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh ffs, i just went out and bought this game. This better be a poor review.

Comments: 1-15 of 15 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Metaboli

X View gallery