Spider-Man 3: The Game Review

Not a magic number.

Version tested: Xbox 360

Every now and then a game comes along that shatters the long-held notion that movie-based titles are generally a bit of a cash-in waste of time. Sadly, Spider-Man 3 is not that game.

But calling Treyarch's latest stab at at Spidey movie game "a cash-in" or a "waste of time" is a pretty harsh way to kick off a review. It's neither, actually, but nor is it a game that fulfils the oceanic potential of the brand. Just like 2004's Spider-Man 2, it's an admirable game for a decent chunk of it, but one that's beset by the kind of horrible camera issues and rage-inducing difficulty spikes that leave the average gamer utterly exasperated.

One thing the game does boast this time around is an awful lot more content than the last effort. Spanning 42 missions, the more expansive campaign encompasses 10 storylines (including the movie's plot, which we don't know about, not having seen it yet of course), and gone are the stupidly irrelevant pizza-delivery missions and balloon-collecting. As a superhero game, it very much plays things by the book, but by and large it follows the same fast-paced New York web-slinging premise that it did last time.

Forever lost

'Spider-Man 3: The Game' Screenshot 1

Remember the rule of screenshots, kids. Jaunty angle = super maximum 9/10 fun.

That's to say that missions appear on the 3D city map, you choose one, web-sling your Lycra-clad behind over to it, find the little spinning icon and get set for some button-mashing, perp-bashing action. Having just played God of War 2 extensively, it shares more than a little common ground with Sony's epic hackandslash. Most obviously, Treyarch has laced key moments of the game with the now obligatory interactive cut-scenes (also know as 'quicktime events', seen in everything from Shenmue to Resident Evil 4) where you must quickly match the HUGE BUTTON PROMPTS as they appear on the screen. Sometimes they're in there to spice up a few spectacular cut-scenes, while on other occasions it's a means of providing a fittingly stunning climax to a boss encounter. You know the drill by now.

You could also argue that the flailing, button-mashing combat is pitched at a similar audience too, where repeatedly hammering either X or Y yields instant reward and sends our friendly neighbourhood crime-fighting dude into a pirouetting frenzy of balletic violence. In other words, it looks amazing, but you never have to work too hard to pull off the spectacular. For a bit of extra combat depth you can mix in some web attacks with B, or jump first with A and hammer out some cartoon violence as you see fit - but at no stage does Treyarch give the impression it's going for anyone but the mass market. Which is kind of the point of a game like this, after all.

Elsewhere, you can usefully slow down time for a brief period by holding down LB, or throw in a super-powerful enemy-clearing attack (once your meter's charged up) by pressing RB and X, Y or B. But the real fun isn't so much in how the combat feels (it's pretty basic, to be frank) but how it translates the action onto the screen. Even more so than before, Treyarch has created a seemingly unending procession of jaw-dropping comedy combos that give Spidey the ability to humiliate his foes as much as possible. Such examples include pinballing Spider-Man between foes in the blink of an eye, stopping only to whack them in the chops, or kicking an opponent repeatedly in the face in mid-air as if running up an imaginary flight of stairs. Later you even get to play as Spidey's dark alter-ego, but apart from his powerful rage mode (activated with RB) he feels identical to play.

Don't give up the fight

'Spider-Man 3: The Game' Screenshot 2

45 degrees? 9/10!

The way the controls have been set up leave no doubt that Treyarch wants even modestly skilled players to pull off outrageous moves as often as possible. For example, pummelling X and Y as quickly as possible (i.e. Track & Field fast) sends a similar blizzard of punches to anyone in range, while others send you windmilling around with little more effort required than pressing X very quickly five times in a row. There's little room for subtlety, put it that way, but that's part of its charm.

That's not to say the game's easy. Admittedly, about half the missions won't trouble even modestly skilled players so long as your RSI-ravaged wrists can handle a bit of button-pummelling for extended periods, but there are some absolutely brutal challenges to overcome before you'll clear the game. There's nothing quite as maddeningly ridiculous as some of the missions that cropped up in Spider-Man 2, but nevertheless, you'd better prepare a smattering of cushions to punch when things (repeatedly) go wrong. Something that takes a bit of getting used to is the counter system. For instance, a yellow icon appears at the top of an enemy's head when they're about to strike, giving you the opportunity to hit LB to 'auto dodge', with an X prompt allowing you to whack them where it hurts in response.

For a fair way into the game, you don't really have to worry too much about countering at all, and then you'll hit a horrible, inexplicable brick wall where you'll go from being the all-powerful superhero to the crumpled chump on the floor with a trickle of bloody drool dribbling out of his beaten chops. And then some of the combat 'depth' starts to play a part, where you'll realise that you can't just wade into certain enemies, and that taking extra care and forming a proper strategy is important. Even so, for the most part, it's still the absolute king of button-mashing games. Just watch someone play the game, and focus on their right hand. It's bizarre.

Which way to happy?

Similar to the previous Spidey movie game, most of the game's main missions take place indoors, underground, in and around some secret nefarious lab, and, as such, this ensures that most of the action is focused purely around the combat - and for good reason. With Spidey able to cling to every surface, there's always the chance that you'll utterly confuse the camera if you try to be over-ambitious - and as a result, most missions appear to be deliberately designed so that you're fighting in largely open areas where this can't become too much of a problem. Even so, there are many times when you'll find yourself cursing the camera's erratic behaviour, and inability to give the player a sensible view of what's going on. Call it a necessary quirk of the way the game allows you to stick to every surface, or just call it badly implemented - either way, there's never a convincing sense of it being the most graceful approach.

Somehow, Treyarch even manages to cock up the use of quick-time events by putting ludicrous time constraints on players towards the climax of the game, and making them a mandatory part of the climax of boss encounters. And what's worse is that failure during a button-matching sequence often results in the game needlessly replenishing a portion of the boss' health (presumably as some sort of punishment). Not only is this massively unfair (and not something other games do), it wastes a vast amount of time as you tirelessly chip away at the last dregs of their health bar to get to the quick-time event point again. Having already proven to the game that you can punish your foe relentlessly, why does it imagine that it's acceptable to make you do even a small portion of it again? It's neither fun, nor particularly challenging, and ends up being a grind-fest memory game.

Needless to say, when the game does decide to cut the player loose and give you web-swinging missions, it can all go horribly wrong. Unfortunately the NDA we've signed doesn't give us much room to talk about specifics (to save us giving away any plot details, obviously), but there's one mission unrelated to the movie plot where you're sent out to take pictures for The Daily Bugle of a Spider-Man imposter. The idea is to follow a chopper through the New York skyline, find a decent spot to take pictures and snap away at the chubby imposter busily performing acrobatics underneath it. Except, accurate swinging is pretty tough to pull off, and landing upright requires more luck than skill - leaving you stuck to the side of a building, utterly disorientated and tasked with taking a snap within a ten-second window.

What's the news Mary-Jane?

'Spider-Man 3: The Game' Screenshot 3

A mere 15-degree incline on this one. 5/10.

Another frankly ludicrous set of web-swinging missions has you trying to give Mary Jane a 'thrill ride', which loosely entails flying fast, high or low at her command ("This is so fun." Not for me, Missy). This wouldn't be too much of a problem if the game's web-swinging controls were as straightforward as the combat controls, but the truth is that it's one of those where you'll have to play over and over again. Not because the tasks are enormously difficult to pull off with a bit of practice, but because the time limits can be especially taxing when you have to pull off high-altitude swinging. Put simply, there's too big a margin for error, and any number of things can go wrong when you don't quite have a handle on what it is you're swinging from. Pressing the right trigger sends out a webline to grab hold of the nearest building, but you have to rely on the game doing that for you as you can almost never actually see which skyscraper is the best one. It's too random a process to feel like you're in control, and as such any mission requiring sky-bound precision quickly descends into frustration. When you're just merrily zipping around New York under no particular pressure, though, it's a great deal of fun, just as it was last time around in fact.

As we touched on earlier, Spider-Man 3's certainly a bigger game in terms of missions - but is that a good thing? And are they really proper missions or just filler fodder to convince people they're getting more value for money? The claim of there being ten storylines to play might be true, but they include the tiresome gang missions. Whether you're fighting the Apocalypse Punks (late '70s era mohican sporting Punks at that), the giant hammer wielding Arsenic Candy posse or the kung-fu Dragon Tail gang, there's absolutely no substance to any of these missions at all. It's simply a case of the game spamming regenerating waves of enemies at you until they eventually sod off. Pretty much every encounter is the same, requiring diligent use of the slo-mo ability, hammering everyone senseless while they're all wading through treacle, and repeating the whole shebang for a few minutes. And in total these identikit missions represent probably a quarter of the content padding the game.

Outside of the main missions, there's also a whole ton of crime-fighting, racing, bomb defusal and other miscellaneous missions to dip into whenever you fancy. Trouble is, all of them feel a bit lightweight and unnecessary and can be completely ignored without feeling like you're missing anything at all. In truth, all these missions represent is more of the same - stuff you've already done in the main missions cut and paste onto the map, without any real context and precious little incentive either. It's typical openworld fodder that adds a theoretical amount of extra gameplay, but is for absolute obsessives only.

Stand your ground

'Spider-Man 3: The Game' Screenshot 4

We're back in business! 9/10 jaunt!

Having had such a blast in Crackdown recently, it really hammers home the point of how old Spider-Man 3 feels at its core. It's stuck with last-gen game design, and hasn't really moved with the times. If you were hoping for some next generation superhero action, then Real-Time Worlds' efforts are where it's at. This just feels like a mostly clumsy, lightweight attempt to build on what Treyarch did three years back without thinking too hard about what next generation hardware can offer. Sure, it has all the voice-over contributions that any fan will demand, and better likenesses than previously, but it's never quite the full package.

And if the button-mashing, combat-heavy missions aren't underwhelming enough, or the under-use of web swinging doesn't deliver enough disappointment, then the often-iffy technical side of the game rounds off a less-than-stellar package. As discussed, the fact that the game's beset with often-horrendous camera problems from start to finish isn't good, but you'll also quickly acknowledge how unimpressive some of the character models are, and how the dreadful lighting gives all the human likenesses that same ghoulish look that we saw in several games when the Xbox 360 first launched. Even flying around the generally impressive confines of New York has a few winceworthy moments where textures suddenly pop in (for tea, we'd like to think) - things that we thought would be eliminated from major, big-budget games by now. On the plus side, Spidey himself looks fantastic, and many of the familiar foes have been lavished with a pleasing degree of care and attention, giving some of the more memorable boss encounters a sense of genuine cinematic excitement.

But these contrasting feelings of thrilling excitement are nearly always compounded by rank disappointment elsewhere. If only Treyarch had polished the game properly, we could have been reflecting on one of the best superhero games ever - and if you were to cut together a movie of the best bits you'd almost certainly want to buy it on the strength of that. As it stands, the total lack of consistency in what the game offers in terms of entertainment gives it the whiff of a game produced under pressure, and one developed around an unrealistic deadline so it could come out day and date with the movie. Whatever the truth of the situation of Spider-Man 3, here we are, yet again, complaining ruefully about 'missed opportunities', 'a lack of consistency' and 'unfulfilled potential'. For something as thrilling yet as disappointing as this, perhaps a rental's the smartest plan.

6 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (66) Latest comment 5 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • foamy #1 5 years ago

  • DUFFMAN5 #2 5 years ago

    Arse-biscuits!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • morriss #3 5 years ago

  • miiiguel #4 5 years ago

    better buy it anyway..., you know... just in case you didn't feel like showing up... Live.
  • EmiliasHorse #5 5 years ago

    Good review thanks. Saved me £40.

  • dsmx #6 5 years ago

    The trend of bad movie to games continues if people stopped buying these half arsed games we might actually start seeing decent ones.
  • Feanor #7 5 years ago

    Never cease to amaze me how devs seem to go out of their way to include needlessly frustrating bits in their games. Good job pointing them out.
  • t8yman #8 5 years ago

    shit, if I had been asked to write this review, that is exactly what I would have said. and thats after about 90 minutes play. refund time for me. might even swap it for lost planet.
  • dudefella #9 5 years ago

    aaargh it's such a shame. Spider-Man 2 rocked, but felt slightly undercooked. Given a few more months this could have been stellar. Damn deadlines...
  • Lonestar #10 5 years ago

    \...|.../
    -MEH!!-
    /''''|''''\

    \......|....../
    -PFFFFFFT-
    /''''''''|''''''''\

    \....|..../
    -BORT!-
    /'''''|'''''\
  • Derblington #11 5 years ago

    From what I've played of this so far it's improved on 2 in pretty much every way...

    I'll play for a few more hours and then have a proper read of teh review and see if I agree.
  • Darren #12 5 years ago

    Sadly I bought this game expecting great things from it being on the 360 (yeah, yeah I know!!!) but it's a disappointment. Looks and feels more like an upscaled Xbox game that a true 360 one and the best part of the whole game is swinging through the city at speed, which is always thrilling, but that alone doesn't make a good game.

    And am I the only one who thinks this game looks dreadfully rough even at 720p; the game has more jagged edges that a warehouse full of serrated knives and would make a PS2 blush!!! What happened to the "free" anti-aliasing or is this another lazy 600p-to-720p upscaled 360 game? :?
  • smelly #13 5 years ago

    >Predictable.

    Not really.. the first two were good.
  • Introspectre #14 5 years ago

  • rock27gr #15 5 years ago

    Will there be a Wii review comming soon?
  • absolutezero #16 5 years ago

    I have'nt enjoyed any of the Spiderman games since the Playstation ones.
  • dudefella #17 5 years ago

    "Treyarch are shit."

    Yeah I'm sure you'd know. Don't be so quick to say shit like that. More likely it's down to the team not being given enough time to meet the movie's deadline. Last year at E3 they had nothing but a tech demo. They've probably had like a year to develop the actual game's content. This stuff needs to stop, if necessary release the game 6 months later. Miyamoto said it best: A delayed game can be great, a bad game is bad forever (paraphrased)
  • Darren #18 5 years ago

    "A delayed game can be great, a bad game is bad forever (paraphrased)"

    Bugger, I knew I should have gone for the PS3 version which had its release date pushed back to the 18th! LOL
  • paul_haine #19 5 years ago

    I quite enjoyed the screenshot captions here.
  • paul_haine #20 5 years ago

    What's with all this 'Currently 19 Comment on this article.PLEASE' gubbins?
  • DocTep #21 5 years ago

    Oh well. I was hoping for something better from this game, but at least it saves me having to argue with myself about being sensible and not paying for the insanely overpriced Collectors Edition (I'm a sucker for Collectors/Limited Editions, but this Spider-Man 3, Game exclusive is such a blatant rip off that even I couldn't justify it to myself).

    I'm really getting tired of these QTE's being forced into every game these days too. I'm playing through God of War 2 right now, and despite it being a beautiful game I find myself needlessly repeating things over and over again, getting more and more frustrated. Not only can a badly placed QTE ruin the flow of a game, but it also results in you paying so much attention to the button prompts that you hardly get to see the beautiful visuals being triggered in the background. I'd honestly rather just sit there and watch the gorgeous cutscene thank you very much - I don't need some fake Simon Says style barrier being put in the way. It's such a lazy trend.

    The thing is, God of War 2 gets away with it due to being so good in other areas and the fact you know you'll see something jaw dropping afterwards. By the sound of it, Spider-Man 3 would make me just give up. I have my old copy of Spider-Man 2 if I suddenly feel the urge to take a swing through New York.
  • Carrybagma #22 5 years ago

    Maybe they should have set the NDA to run until next month, so that people would have to spend their money in order to find out what the game is like.
  • dr_faulk #23 5 years ago

    Am I the only one that's gaining a distrust of Treyarch? They fluffed up CoD3 - (buggiest game on the 360) and they haven't won themselves favours here. Wonder what they're developing next...
  • spookyzombie #24 5 years ago

    He's right on the money with his 6/10 score.

    This could have been good too : (
  • thefilthandthefury #25 5 years ago

    "Am I the only one that's gaining a distrust of Treyarch? They fluffed up CoD3"

    I would say the opposite. I'd say they made the best multiplayer console game of all time, but there you go.
  • pjmaybe #26 5 years ago

    Cor just think of all that extra time before the PS3 version launches and how they can suddenly make it such a better game.

    Er...

    Peej
  • Goban #27 5 years ago

    Is the Wii version not a different developer? Are We going to get an additional review of that?
  • Derblington #28 5 years ago

    While I agree with the facts review, I completely disagree with the opinion of them and teh score is too low. It improves on Spider-man 2 in every area though never strays too far from it's formula. I'm really enjoying the game. I've been stuck twice but perseverance with the combat system has seen me through (it is a button basher at it's most basic level but does *require* certain "tactics";) and teh webswinging is a joy as ever. If you liked 2 you'll enjoy 3, it's that simple.

    And it's a solid 7 (a low 8 if you're not affected so badly as Krudster with it's flaws).
  • Darth_Flibble #29 5 years ago

    "Am I the only one that's gaining a distrust of Treyarch? They fluffed up CoD3 - "

    you are not the only one, CoD3 single player was below average most of the time and the new ideas were terrible. I've read a few comments from other gamers and the comments didn't speak highly of spiderman 3
  • Vin #30 5 years ago

    Shame.

    One for the sales, then.
  • ProtoformX #31 5 years ago

    "A delayed game can be great. A bad game is bad forever."

    Good lord, imagine what Superman Returns would have been like if it were released at the same time the movie was.
  • agparrot #32 5 years ago

    It is a shame that game developers, who are operating in an industry that is fairly powerful in its own right, don't stand up for themselves when it comes to things like release dates.

    Maybe... just maybe, if Treyarch had said "No - we're bringing it out in December 2007 because it is Our name that people will be talking smack about on game sites, and we want it to be Quality" then we gamers wouldn't have to put up with a game that is less than it could have been. Especially given the aptly-pointed out comparisons with the feel of Crack.down

    I suppose my fear translates slightly towards GTAIV - where the developers are also potentially operating withing the confines of a last-gen mentality because of the success of the format, when what the franchise really needs is to get back to its roots - by defying fashion in favour of gameplay. And all that only because the Spidey 3 buildings looked the same in the screenshots as the GTAIV ones!

    Top captions!
  • Clive_Dunn #33 5 years ago

    "It is a shame that game developers, who are operating in an industry that is fairly powerful in its own right, don't stand up for themselves when it comes to things like release dates."

    Is it stupid night or something ?

    Spiderman 3 is hot now, it's just had millions spent on marketing and is the current big thing. In 3 months time no-one will remember it and Activision will have lost 75% of their potential sales. You have to release film tie-ins at the same time the film releases, the same with other big tie-in franchises.

    The issue is with the film companies, their development time is significantly less than for games. 18 months from release - "ohh we've finalised the script and storyboard !", says the studio - "fuck" says the publisher and developer, "it'll take us 2.5 years to get this game produced around the lines of the film and polished to an acceptable state, ok - cut corners."

    "Another shit tie-in" says the consumer.

    I wonder why.
  • Khab #34 5 years ago

    I bought it today. :(

    From GAME. :)
  • Shrike #35 5 years ago

    It's fairly clear from this review that the reviewer didn't like Spiderman 2 - nonetheless, it would be handy (when reviewing sequels in general, really) to indicate whether the game is better or worse or more of the same. Because I'd actually like more of the same. Overall I found this quite unhelpful, and I have to wonder who it's aimed at.
  • Derblington #36 5 years ago

    Krudster gave Spider-man 2 a 7. Ultimate Spider-man got a 6.

    This is a clear improvement over Spider-man 2 (as was USM, imo) but, and i suspect this is the major problem, it hasn't really changed much from 2. It's very much teh same game but tweaked.
  • Nillsens #37 5 years ago

    A six?

    Seems a little harsh to me. I have been enjoying this for the past few days and my only real gripe is that there isn't more to do. Camera never really bothered me that much, the combat system is simple but fun and the swinging is quite precise in my opinion.
    Saying that Crackdown is so much better than this is a bit odd... Crackdown feels far more polished but after you eliminate all the gang leaders it's quite limited. Sure you can pile up cars and drive over buildings and whatnot, but I would much rather have some kind of goal. Besides that, I don't feel like the two games really have that much in common. One is a shooter and the other is a beat-em-up...
  • RobertFoster #38 5 years ago

    khab
    "I bought it today. :(

    From GAME. :)
    "

    The last few times I've been in GAME I've heard mothers and/or staff saying things along the lines of "you can return it, so long as you don't break the seal/open it" =/
  • Redeye #39 5 years ago

    Clive Dunn, +1. So, so true.
  • foamy #40 5 years ago

    smelly, I didn't like the other two, so I guess it was predictable that it would turn out more or less the same way. Besides, the videos that came out clearly showed that things like fighting would be the same button mashing as ever. Another chance wasted of taking advantage of the good name of the series and making a good game that would sell tons. And I like Spider Man :|
  • Sid-Nice #41 5 years ago

    Will there be a Wii review comming soon?

    The Wii version is actually even worse; the Game received a 5.7 from IGN the Xbox 360 and PS3 both got a 6. The Official Nintendo Magazine gave the game 41% out 100. This is a totally wasted opportunity in my opinion.
  • stoopidgreg #42 5 years ago

    2 pages for a 6/10 review?? why bother
  • smelly #43 5 years ago

    Meh.. well i liked the last one on the cube.
  • Bezzy #44 5 years ago

    "'m really getting tired of these QTE's being forced into every game these days too. I'm playing through God of War 2 right now, and despite it being a beautiful game I find myself needlessly repeating things over and over again, getting more and more frustrated. Not only can a badly placed QTE ruin the flow of a game, but it also results in you paying so much attention to the button prompts that you hardly get to see the beautiful visuals being triggered in the background. I'd honestly rather just sit there and watch the gorgeous cutscene thank you very much - I don't need some fake Simon Says style barrier being put in the way. It's such a lazy trend. "

    Woohoo! I'm not alone :D. It's all Jaffed up, I say! JAFFED UP!

    It's such a lazy disingenious practice. Total disconnect between interaction and consequence. A set of boring binary choices. It's weird, because it's the same basic mechanic as something like guitar hero, and I still love that. I guess it's just the presentation. You're being lead to believe that this incredible over the top move is part of your overall vocabulary in the game... but it's not. It's a one off, special case, unique thing which you can't use when you'd like it. It's exploring a very rigid interactive tree, rather than a wonderful indiscrete web of of a system.

    Normally I have no sympathy for it. However, Treyarch were up against it on this one, so I can understand them for going for some boring mechanic with lots of cinematic envy on the side, rather than like, giving spidey a full, deep rich world, which they'd never have time for. I really don't blame the devs. I imagine that on a project with this kind of budget, you've got cunts raining down on you every hour, determined to fuck up the game through sheer ignorance.
  • figaro7 #45 5 years ago

    Whatever the blame, you cant blame the movie company on these things. Activision purchased the rights to what is arguably, the greatest comic hero of all time. Then the movie makers give then access to what, 3d renders, actors and what not. Treyarch make the game, have obviously failed to complete it by deadline, but get millions for it because spider-man is the main character.

    If activision couldnt meet the deadline in the first place they should have never have purchased the rights to spiderman. However i dont think treyarch are too much to blame for this, but neither are the movie makers, ultimately i think publishers have more control over the game than we think.
  • drumbaby #46 5 years ago

    The game gets 3 points per page. Not a good average.
  • Kiigan #47 5 years ago

    I'm sick of all this QTE shit too. It really is a sign of developers being out of ideas. The misguided belief appears to be that any interactivity is better than no interactivity. The worst offender is probably Fahrenheit, they managed to base a whole game around it, but they were just as shit in Resi 4 and God of War 2 too.

    "Let's see, no one would actually want to pay attention to the story of our game, so we should force them into some simple-minded simon-says shit, thereby taking those boring bits of narrative exposition and making them INTERACTIVE! Yeah! Let's take an early lunch, we're so good at gaaames, we're so good at gaaames!"
  • t8yman #48 5 years ago

    my feeling about treyarch is that they are sloppy or unable to push back a deadline. cod3 is one of the most annoying games in the world to play, and this is going back to the shop today.

    I can name a hatful of games with far better gfx than this pish. it could have been soooooo good.

    I'm not a graphics whore, but come on.
  • Redeye #49 5 years ago

    Bezzy: "...you've got cunts raining down on you every hour, determined to fuck up the game through sheer ignorance."

    So, usual publisher-developer interaction, then. ;)
  • hyperkineticninja #50 5 years ago

    I don't see the big gripe, it is better than Spiderman 2 the game in almost every way, so if you liked that then get it.
  • dudefella #51 5 years ago

    I personally don't mind the QTE thing at all if done right, I loved them in Shenmue (where the buttons weren't random but, say, a kick was the actual button for kicking) and I also love them in God of War. Resident Evil 4 they're just... there, but I don't really mind. It's so much more visceral when you actually have to put some effort into ripping a boss' head off than just watching Kratos do it with zero input.
  • Hugundo #52 5 years ago

    It's shit. What a surprise
  • captainrentboy #53 5 years ago

    I've only played it for a few hours but I'm enjoying it quite a lot, it seems quite a bit better than number two, and the baloon/ pizza missions being missing can only be a good thing.
    Then again I must be quite the blinded Spider-Man fanboy, the film itself is getting slammed by the ole geeks over at AICN, whereas I actually thoroughly enjoyed the flick last night, there was a smattering of cheese dolloped on but it didn't totally ruin it for me.
  • ChocNut #54 5 years ago

    Yeah Im a Spiderman fan and I liked Spiderman 2 the game. This is better than 2 (someone was complaining about 720 jaggies - I dont think it looks jaggy at all on my vga.)

    Stick on the Spiderman Soundtrack (the games own music sucks) and whip around a very beautiful cityscape.

    Im enjoying myself anyway!

    Yeah the gameplay hasnt evolved a tonne and the missions do have one or two annoying bits but overall its a 7/8 in my book not a 6 by any means.
  • kangarootoo #55 5 years ago

    "And if the button-mashing, combat-heavy missions aren't underwhelming enough, or the under-use of web swinging doesn't deliver enough disappointment"

    Gaaaaahhhhh!! Its like the hey looked at SM2, kept the crap stuff and dropped the good stuff.

    Disappointed :)
  • kangarootoo #56 5 years ago

    Having read some comments about it being better than SM2. I feel a little better.

    /goes to rental list
  • SomaticSense #57 5 years ago

    After the brilliant Spider-Man 2 game, and the frankly jaw-dropping film the game's based on, this is a hugely massive disappointment. One of the single worst cameras in modern videogaming history, combined with one of the most unfair difficulty balances I can remember. Did they even bother playtesting it? Evidently not.

    Seriously though, if even ONE person ever moans about Ninja Gaiden's difficulty ever again, they'll get a slap and a copy of this game rammed in their gobs. Cheating AI? Put it this way, I'm almost certain that Ronaldo was given some sort of job as a playtester or something...

    edit: Have offically given up on the game now. Have just reached the end of the 3rd Apocalypse gang mission and YET ANOTHER ridiculously unfair boss. I'm currently contemplating how I'm going to get all my money back.
    Edited by 1 at 05/05/07 @ 20:18
  • Dizzy #58 5 years ago

    At least it is better than the movie.
  • baruch #59 5 years ago

  • Monkey_Puncher #60 5 years ago

    Treyarch shouldn't be aloud to make games anymore after what they did to the abysmal Call of Duty 3...
  • Derblington #61 5 years ago

    Have offically given up on the game now. Have just reached the end of the 3rd Apocalypse gang mission and YET ANOTHER ridiculously unfair boss. I'm currently contemplating how I'm going to get all my money back.

    That was the 3rd mission I did as I wanted to get used to the controls, etc, before I started on a proper storyline. It took me a few goes, getting better each time, and I did it in the end. You can't button bash. You have to work out the ammount of hits you can get in and when you have to use the counter attack. The bosses all have set pattern attacks.

    The more I play this the more I think that most of those who moan about the difficulty level just can't be bothered to play it properly and just want to mash your way through. It's really not that hard. The curve can be all over the place because you can always pick from a few different levels across a few different storylines which stops you playing levels from easy-hard. But, if you actually learn to play it, the game itself isn't that tough.
  • krudster #62 5 years ago

    Countering is crucial to most of the really tough missions, very true.
  • BBIAJ #63 5 years ago

    Also, ariel attacks are key, especially the third and final Apocalypse battle.

    I also found it best to just take them all on one at a time by leading them down the sides of the building to split them up.
  • Meho #64 5 years ago

    The review is quite fair and accurate by what I can tell, having played the PC version for the past few days. Unfortunately, on top of all the problems the 360 version has, the PC one is such a resource hog that my machine, quite happy to run Oblivion and S.T.A.L.K.E.R. at decent framerates, chugs and stutters like Forest Gump having a seizure.
  • TheSnotGoblin #65 5 years ago

    No sign of a review of the Wii version then?
  • GamingInstinct #66 5 years ago

    One step forward, 2 steps back for Spiderman 3 "The Game". Hopefully they will be able to get the bugs out of the system soon. Great Article. I linked it at my GamingInstinct-GamingInstinct Blogspot.

    GamingInstinct