Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Second Sight Review

Xbox PlayStation 2 GameCube Review by Kristan Reed

24 August, 2004

Mind games. John Lennon once sung winsomely about them. Women are past masters at the them. Now suddenly it's the game du jour, with every sod under the sun is making videogames about scary men with telekinetic powers. What's that all about? Did Midway and Free Radical get mullered one night at GDC two years ago and have a pissing contest about who could make the best one? How else do you explain the almost simultaneous arrival of two games that are almost identical in concept? Co-incidence? They don't get much bigger than this - or perhaps a psychic designer simply scanned the minds of rival teams until finally discovering the best-sounding idea. Perhaps it was theft? Goodness knows, but it's bizarre, anyway, that this reviewer suddenly finds himself chief TK gamer. [No it isn't. In both cases you hid the code so only you could write about it. -Ed]

But as much as we'd like to secretly believe that we're storing up some latent psychic ability that we'll unleash upon the ne'er-do-wells in later life, the truth is, we're just another bunch of ten-percenters that remain clueless, therefore defaulting to scepticism. Until we're proven hopelessly wrong, as usual, at which point we cough and mutter about psynaptic congestion. It's just easier to rubbish things you haven't experienced and just get on with talking smack instead, finishing each other's sentences, whistle the songs currently playing in someone else's head, or pass over the very item the person next to you was about to ask for.

Vattic Attacks

'Second Sight' Screenshot 1

Bespectacled Gordon Freeman-alike John Vattic didn't ask for any of this. Second Sight's lead character wakes up from coma with absolutely no clue as to who his is, why he's in a medical facility, or why everyone there seems to fear him. Much like Psi-Ops' Nick Scryer, Vattic's amnesia gives Free Radical the chance to tell the story in flashback as you find out just how he ended up in such a muddle. Predictably, your first task is simply to get the hell out of captivity and try and work out who's behind this injustice, and just why everyone you encounter shoots on sight. How could you be considered so dangerous?

Benefiting from a far more cohesive plot, and more believable cast of characters than Psi-Ops', Second Sight switches between past and present over the course of 17 missions, but it quickly transpires that your 'present' is merely a potential future - the consequence of failing your 'past' - and the real deal is to make sure that the things that could go wrong during a covert investigation into the activities of Russian scientist Grienko don't go wrong.

Accompanying the WinterICE team to Siberia, Vattic plays the reluctant hero as it transpires that Grienko and co. are experimenting in the harnessing of Psychic Powers. Naturally, Vattic doesn't believe such bunkum, that is, until he himself realises that he's blessed with all manner of Psychokinetic powers. In traditional fashion, your powers arrive via various awakenings. Telekinesis comes as standard in the 'present', which to begin with merely allows you to pick up and hurl objects, or remotely push switches and pull levers, while Heal grants you the phenomenally useful skill of being able to administer first aid, so long as you have psychic energy to draw upon.

Hide and sneak

'Second Sight' Screenshot 2

At this point Second Sight begins to rapidly differentiate itself away from Psi-Ops' traditional health pack system, while Psi energy rapidly recharges by default, with no need to draw it from others. Another key difference emerges when it's apparent that Second Sight plays much more to the rules of a traditional stealth game, complete with a homage to MGS including hiding in cupboards with peep holes, and the initially annoying respawning guards. Until you realise that you can't play Second Sight like a pure action game, you'll constantly face ludicrous battles against a sea of relentless drones. Rather than the confront and defeat tactics used in Psi-Ops, SS refuses to budge an inch once you've set off an alarm, and until you can find a suitable hiding place you're effectively under siege.

While this can seem both bizarre, unfair, unrealistic and an utterly old school gameplay mechanic that's effectively cheating, once you're blessed with a decent variety of abilities and weaponry and grudgingly accept the way the game wants you to play, the means of stealth and attack are engaging, with Free Radical's trademark grasp of superb control system making the process eventually as thrilling as you'd hope and expect from such a prestigious developer.

But for a while, the Vattic of the past has to go through basic stealth training, which is as tedious as you might fear. Even with firearms, the initial missions, including the tedious training displays of a curious lack of ambition. When you're faced with just the basic pistol/shotgun/assault rifle/machine gun/sniper rifle line-up (no grenades here, sir), and generic stealth mechanics, things don't look good. After the initially useless (and eventually devastating) Psi Attack get added to your skills, Second Sight feels utterly devoid of charm. When your next skill is, in fact, Charm, things slowly start to perk up - allowing Vattic to creep past patrols unseen, thus making it easier to avoid the attack of the clones that results from alerting enemies to your presence.

Insert Sean Connery gag here

'Second Sight' Screenshot 3

Around about the fourth mission, things improve at a pace, with Vattic able to get to grips with the stupendously excellent Sniper Rifle, which keeps you in third-person, but overlays an automatically zooming reticule in the lower right portion of the screen. Simply holding the left trigger roughly in the direction you need to aim in brings up the nearest target in full zoom from whatever distance they are away, with your job merely to make fine adjustments with the right stick before executing a succession of headshots with the right trigger. It's what Silent Scope should be about, and has to be one of the finest control innovations in a third-person action game for ages - although admittedly it does take a fair bit of the skill away from targeting them yourself, and has no toggle to turn it off. Indeed, every gun has an auto-aim, and merely hitting left trigger while armed guarantees that Vattic will instantly home in on the nearest aggressor without your say so. Armed combat, at least, quickly becomes no more taxing than rattling off combos of left and right trigger and keeping an eye on the health bar.

But, with so many enemies descending from all angles, Second Sight soon comes to your aid with some immensely useful skills. Projection soon becomes your stealthy double agent, allowing you to not only wander a ghost version of yourself around undetected (yet able to press switches and deactivate CCTV and force fields and the like), but also 'possess' other characters and, for example, use hand scans when yours clearly won't do the job. The upgrade to your Psi Blast, meanwhile, becomes the key tool in your arsenal, being a ranged attack capable of taking out an entire group of sentries, which, given their relentlessly respawning ways, is a godsend. Finally, the stupidly belated upgrade to your Telekinesis powers allows you to pick up humans, as opposed to just grabbing inanimate objects.

As glad as you are to have enhanced TK powers, they don't, it has to be said, feel as anywhere near as enjoyable or useful as Psi-Ops. Being able to juggle your foes and generally mess around with your entire environment just wasn't something Free Radical implemented as well, with less convincing physics that lack solidity, and a sometimes flaky targeting system that in the heat of a battle would rather lock on to a plethora of boxes and canisters than the Storm Solider busy raking you with his SMG on the gantry above you. It's not a deal breaker, but stood side by side, it's hard not to be more impressed with the overall feel and intuitiveness of Midway's effort. On an almost related note, Vattic's interaction with the environment, while generally authentic and believable while running, climbing and sneaking around walls, totally goes to pot the instant he walks down a flight of stairs. Like a demented Riverdance reject injected with pure Tartrazine, you jig your way in a blur of limbs, with tippy tappy sound effects to match machine-gunning their merry way down. It's hard to fathom how that slipped through, and it will have onlookers sniggering the moment they see it. It doesn't detract from the gameplay one iota, but try explaining that to casual observer who's already prejudging the quality.

Anomalous materials

'Second Sight' Screenshot 4

But, if you can find it in your heart to forgive this technical anomaly, the rest of the visuals have that trademark Free Radical look and feel that allows Second Sight to stand out from the crowd in an instant. The characters all have that exaggerated, rounded cartoon look, and the masterful animation that made the TimeSplitters games such a pleasure to witness. Each character also comes with the kind of quality voice acting that allows the story to develop in an interesting and measured way, never resorting to the kind of fingernails-down-blackboards cringe that most games (including Psi-Ops) always seem to default to. Indeed, audio-wise, layering on the aforementioned quality voiceovers, the incidental music is as unobtrusive as you'd hope, being neither particularly memorable nor at any stage annoying. It's what most of us want, to be fair.

Over the course of the ten or so hours, Second Sight's narrative poise stands head and shoulders above most games of this ilk, and helps create the sense of purpose and atmosphere that Midway's effort arguably lacked. All the way through you actually care what's going on. It starts to make sense, and the characters you're busy chasing down or rescuing mean something. It's incredibly rare that you can reflect on a game and say that with any conviction whatsoever, but, in Second Sight's case, it's without doubt one of its strong points.

However, its TimeSplitters-based, PS2-based technical origins are beginning to make certain elements of the engine look a little dated, with very little texturing evident, little effort made in the way of lighting, and alarming slowdown in sections that have no right to judder in this stage of the current generation of consoles. Three years into its lifespan, the Xbox really shouldn't have issues displaying smoke and snow particles, but yet at times you'll see the game slowing to a crawl. Even so, this happens very rarely, and combat sequences emerge Scott-free - so count this as a surprised complaint rather than any kind of gameplay hindrance, because it's not.

What does come as a surprise, though, is the exceptionally basic front-end and in game menu system that lacks the polish we'd expect, with blocky text, indistinct icons and the inability to do the most basic control remappings. For example, where the hell is the invert camera option? The game does give the choice of user controlled or the largely useless survival horror style dynamic camera, but those hardwired to invert their up and down view will have to go without. Sorry.

Shecond Short

It's worth noting that Second Sight isn't a long game. To some this might be a good thing, to others a bad thing. There's little in the way of replay value, with the 'Challenging' difficultly setting merely serving to make combat more deadly than usual from our experiences. A run through the entire 17 level game on Normal unlocks no more than the respective cut-scene that you're up to, and although you can admire your handiwork through Free Radical's extensive array of in-game stats, there's nowhere nears the incentive to go back and beat the game in less time. In TimeSplitters there were characters to unlock and entire game modes. Second Sight feels comparatively hollow in terms of extra content; even Psi-Ops had its array of bonuses.

But, in truth, Second Sight rises above many of the quibbles that you could justifiably level at it. A key ingredient in its success is its engaging concept, which comes layered with a satisfying narrative structure and credible characters. Factor in Free Radical's trademark attention to detail and instantly gratifying controls and it's a game you can't help but be drawn to. Although in pure in gameplay terms it doesn't reach match Psi-Ops' thrilling ambition, favouring old school stealth principles over riotous action, it almost makes up for it by being a far more stylish affair - although the occasional lack of signposting can be irritating on one or two notable occasions. The bottom line is both games fall short of being everything they could have been, and which one you choose will very much come down to personal taste. We admired both in very different ways. If story matters to you, go for Second Sight. If you can stand the cheese, opt for Psi-Ops. It's a tough call, but you don't have to be a psychic to make it.

8/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Second Sight on Xbox?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-40 of 40 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Decoded
24/08/04 @ 09:06
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Stealth you say?

/scratches off wanted list
MBar
24/08/04 @ 09:06
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
hmm, score as expected really. still undecided about this and psi-ops.
Dizzy
24/08/04 @ 09:16
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Respawning you say?

/scratches off wanted list

Decoded
24/08/04 @ 09:28
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Heh. Yeah, that too. I think it was the comparison to Metal Gear Solid that spelt the end of my interest in Second Sight. Tried to get into MGS recently and, well, it didn't work out shall we say.
Juninho
24/08/04 @ 09:30
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
both this and Psi-Ops have 18.99 at Play.com written all over them in a few weeks.

which means I'll end up buying them both
krudster [mod]
24/08/04 @ 09:33
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
When SS is prescribing a finite amount of baddies it's a great action game. But as soon as it goes into a respawning section it's effectively forcing you to stealth when you might not want to. That's the essential thing that I think let me down on reflection. The PR blurb talks about giving you the choice of using either/or. But from my experience it's one or the other, depending on what the level in question *wants* you to do. At least in Psi Ops you did feel there was more of a choice whether to stealth or shoot your way out.
Blerk
24/08/04 @ 09:34
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmm.... this one appeals to me more than Psi-Ops out and out 'gung-ho' action. A more considered approach is more my 'thing'....

That said... I shall try both first!
Vex
24/08/04 @ 09:42
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I like stealth, but I hate respawning bad guys with a passion. Absolutely pointless. Because of that, I shall probably leave this alone.

Think I will either wait for someone else to have a go at creating a psionics game (has to happen sooner or later), or buy one of them on the cheap later on.
gizmo
24/08/04 @ 09:43
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Stealth AND respawning did you say?

/scratches off wanted list

(Do these developers not PLAY games themselves?)
hoathenfold
24/08/04 @ 09:44
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No Invert camera option?????

/scrubs off want list
Stevas mkII
24/08/04 @ 09:58
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Stealth you -
Oh. Someone already did that.

Respawning you -
Shit.

No invert camera option you -
Bollocks.

Ah, nuts to it - there are clearly too many things here that would just plain annoy me. Have to say, not giving the user the option to tailor the joypad to something they are already kinda familiar with is one of the ten commandments of game creation (as far as I'm concerned, anyhow). YOU JUST DON'T DO THAT.

/removes from what is already a far too large wanted list
/underlines Psi Ops
Kenneth Anger
24/08/04 @ 10:06
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm going for Psi-Ops, as it looks like more of a short-term laugh to kill time before Burnout 3 comes out.
Blerk
24/08/04 @ 10:07
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Stealth is the new Anthea Turner.

Can we blow it up?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 24/08/04 @ 11:10
mash the x button
24/08/04 @ 10:42
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Maybe Psi-Ops when it comes down to £14.99.
Stealth? No thanks! Never finished MGS. I had my doubts from the beginning section at the helipad when after alerting the guard I just ran round and round the containers until he said something like"no one here"????????
beep
24/08/04 @ 10:50
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Stealth AND respawning AND alarming slowdown did you say?

/scratches off wanted list

I wonder if the PS2 version handles the slowdoen better seeing as how the PS2 is such a particle specialist.

It's like how the Xbox version of GTA3 slows down whenever you fire the cannon in the tank. Xbox doesn't like particle effects... much.
groovychainsaw
24/08/04 @ 11:04
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah, stealth kills it, rether have fun gameplay than a good story I'm afraid (of course, both would be nice... but that doesn't happen very often, does it?) ;-)
/Edit: Can't spell story, too many letters for me...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 24/08/04 @ 12:04
Hunam85
24/08/04 @ 12:02
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
yeah, i expected both to have simliar scores, ill just buy them both anyway....
tiddles
24/08/04 @ 12:11
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
To paraphase Bill Hicks...

"Any developers here working on games with stealth in them? Just kill yourselves now."

/realises he is working on a game with levels featuring stealth

/kills self
Blerk
24/08/04 @ 12:19
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Okay... so it seems that nobody on Earth likes stealth. So why are developers producing more and more games featuring it? Did anyone tell them?
jiroczech
24/08/04 @ 12:20
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Blerk: You don't have to play Psi-Ops gung-ho stylee. Being able to mind-control guards you can sneak about and get them to kill each other. Also, if you sneak up on someone you can suck much more juicy psi-energy from their brain, than if they've seen you. Haven't tried SS yet but seems worth a look.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 24/08/04 @ 13:21
tiddles
24/08/04 @ 12:20
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
^^^^^

Free Radical employees with too much time on their hands?

Get back to finishing Timesplitters FP, you loons!
pjmaybe
24/08/04 @ 12:23
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Developers are doing the "stealth" thing because it unnaturally prolongs th e shelf life of a game. How long would Splinter Cell last if you could just wander around shooting the fuck out of everyone? Probably not long at all.

There's two camps to stealth in games. The "annoying bastards who insist on the game being over the minute you raise the alarm" type games (See Commandos, Splinter Cell, some parts of Beyond Good and Evil, XIII etc) or the "See how long you can last once the alarm's raised but we'll let you keep playing" games, which I can't name one of right now but know I've played a few...

The latter camp is OK by me, I can just about cope with it. The former though, fuck that - fuck it in its eye socket with a black candle!

Peej
Blerk
24/08/04 @ 12:31
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Jiro: Aha... I've got demos of both games, but haven't played them yet. Will do. :-)

Peej: Funny you should mention BG&E. Quite a few people whinged about the stealth bits and how difficult/unfair they were, so I wasn't looking forward to them at all. Then I got to the end of the game and realised I must've played through them without realising.... I guess one man's 'difficult and unfair' is another man's 'er... what?'. :-)

Seriously... are you lot just trigger-happy, or what?
Decoded
24/08/04 @ 12:39
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Now that you mention it, I was fine with the stealth parts in Beyond Good and Evil. But that was a different type of game with a different pace and the stealth sections were fairly easy. I just prefer my third-person shooters more flowing and stylish - Max Payne, Freedom Fighters, Red Dead etc.
Bru-Man
24/08/04 @ 13:42
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"If story matters to you, go for Second Sight." Unless an online review happens to have blown the 'twist' ending in it's fourth paragraph. Thanks for that. Grr.
Master Cheif
24/08/04 @ 13:49
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Stealth??? Why does every games company love Stealth?? Go in guns blazing i say! I do that on my mates Splinter Cell, i just rush in and kill everyone in site LOL
Edited 1 times, most recently on 24/08/04 @ 14:49
Tweakmonkey
24/08/04 @ 15:07
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Err... I'm not that fussed on stealth either. Never finished Splinter Cell. However I like the look of Metal Gear Solid Snake Eater - the trailer is so cinematic and harks back to the original on PS which was pant wettingly good in it's day.
Master Cheif
24/08/04 @ 15:27
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i suppose its up to the person... for me i just like a good ol' gun fight like i still have UT GOTY edition just for some online fun
fellowbunnybaiter
24/08/04 @ 15:36
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I reckon SS looks better than PsiOps.....I rkon the animation looks much better in SS....I'm not too fond of bad mocap.
krudster [mod]
24/08/04 @ 17:42
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ahem. The 'twist' as you call it is pretty bloody obvious about an hour into the game. There is a twist at the end, and a pretty damned good one at that. Besides, until you know you're trying to correct the future, it's pretty generic.
tumbleweed
25/08/04 @ 08:40
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Xbox you say?

/scratches off wanted list
@ministrator
25/08/04 @ 14:54
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Invert Camera Option.

They should put this on the back cover.
If its not in there its not playable for me.
Luckily I read this article.
Blerk
31/08/04 @ 10:31
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Mmm-hmm. I'd gotten a bit worried about this one after the review and some of the comments, but I tried the demo and it's really quite entertaining. I shall probably pick this one up! \o/
IronGiant
31/08/04 @ 10:49
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
More stealth = less purchases from me. Patiently waits for Burnout3.
Monkeyboy
31/08/04 @ 20:07
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I can't believe there's no invert camera option. Even with all the good points that were mentioned in the review and the fact that I like stealth games AND was looking forward to playing a different, stylish-looking game from the Timesplitters team, I will not be be buying Second Sight. It would be just totally unplayable for me.

Surely an invert camera option in games is standard by now? I mean, seriously, how hard can they be to code?? Answer: not very.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 31/08/04 @ 21:08
Blerk
01/09/04 @ 08:47
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was worried about the lack of an invert camera option too, but as it turns out the controls are set up the way I like them anyway - i.e. up is up, down is down. Result! \o/

By contrast, I found the controls in Psi Ops to be far more fiddly. And I don't see how anyone can knock the graphics in Second Sight - Psi Ops looks terrible!
deathgibbon
01/09/04 @ 18:27
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've got to agree Blerk, the graphics in Psi-Ops are terrible and the controls are WAAAAAY too fiddly. "Press the right trigger for 1.7 seconds, release and press the X button 2.4 seconds after this. Congratulations, you've just learned how to move! Isn't it easy?" That's not to say I liked Second Sight either. Have to wait for the OXM demo to truly compare (OPS2 one times out after 2 minutes or near-abouts).

I know this is off-topic, but should I buy Burnout 3 next Friday or hang on for Fable? I'm currently edging Fable's way, but I need a bit of help. Thanks.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/09/04 @ 19:30
tiddles
03/09/04 @ 11:07
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
In contrast to the meh-sayers above, I'm about eight or nine missions in and I'm loving it. Which is not to say it's not without flaws.... Using the powers is fiddly, and some (eg telekinesis) don't feel as satisfying as they should, probably due a combination of controls and the slightly dodgy physics. The omission of the invert control option is weird, but to be honest it's not nearly as annoying as you might imagine - I am an "invert" through and through, but somehow it doesn't really bother me that much - perhaps because it's not a 1st person-style control setup, but rather that you're moving the camera... It's hard to explain.

So why am I enjoying it so much? The visual style and the story really work for me - well, the story itself isn't particularly original, but the characters are nicely realised, both visually and through what they say, and you care about what happens to them. Some may not like their stylisation, or the simple look of some of the textures (though it has to be said, the more open environments often look stunning), but if like me you were a fan of the Russian level of Timesplitters 2 you won't be disappointed.

Surprisingly, one of the things I'm enjoying most is the stealth. I think it's because you've always got a range of options at any one time - using the tranquilliser gun, causing a distraction or strangling them with telekinesis, or just simply making yourself invisible and walking past - you're never forced into finding a single "solution". The movement and camera work serviceably enough in these situations, and it's very satisfying to take out a string of guards with headshots from the tranq gun.

The main problem is the one that Krudster identifies - some sections are "meant" to be stealth, and some are meant to be action. Or rather, the boundaries between the two aren't sufficiently well telegraphed. So, it'll look like you're supposed to be able to shoot your way out after being discovered, but actually this just leads to frustration - alarms will keep starting up again, more guards will appear, you keep boosting your health and so on until somehow you get out of it.

But then, when you've got into the habit of shooting cameras, sneaking around and hiding if you're discovered, you'll find yourself in a section where there's no option to fight your way through (and magically, no alarms or respawning guards). The problem is that these sections aren't sufficiently well differentiated, so you have to do a lot of guessing.

Top quote from the game so far - mad bloke in the mental asylum who mumbles "Must... rescue... the princess" :)
Twisted
14/09/04 @ 21:37
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
grant: what help do you need? Just tell me your problem and maybe I can help.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/09/04 @ 22:43
Vex
17/09/04 @ 10:20
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well I ended up buying this game, and I am genuinely glad I did. I really enjoyed it.

You do have to be stealthy in it, so if you don't like stealth you won't like this. But that doesn't stop you from silently removing the guards as you go along. The only time I found where the enemies respawn infinately is when the alarm is going off or you have been seen, and to be honest I found I didn't mind that too much, you just have to find somewhere to hide quickly.

Coupled with a great story, this is a really good stealth game. Thats my 2 pence worth.

Comments: 1-40 of 40 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery