Battalion Wars Review

Cannon Fodder.

Version tested: GameCube

Turning one of the most beloved turn-based strategy games into a real-time, third-person action title was always asking for trouble, so Nintendo changed one word of its name and hoped fans wouldn't notice, or at least complain less bitterly. Good move.

But the belated re-branding of Advance Wars: Under Fire to Battalion Wars can't disguise the endless close similarities between the two games: the mission structure, the units, the cutesy cartoony style, the silly-yet-endearing briefings, the daft characters and even dafter rivalries, the changing allegiances, the grading system, you name it. In fact, just about the only that's nothing like Intelligent System's classic series is the actual gameplay itself; and it's evidently this point that forced Nintendo to see sense and divorce the association lest it get beaten about the face and neck by rabid fanboys and girls.

It's not even as if the gameplay's even remotely similar. Far from being a more exciting looking turn-based chess-like affair that takes place on a top-down map, Battalion Wars is a curious hybrid of third person shooter and real-time strategy, and - surprisingly - a pretty well-realised attempt at it, too; if a little undemanding, short and overtly 'young' for the most serious gamers' tastes.

Whether Kuju deliberately designed a 'my first RTS' for the kids isn't especially clear. Certainly, Advance Wars may have a similarly cute, kid-friendly approach on a basic level, but it's a wolf in sheep's clothing; a game that never shirks at providing one of the most hardcore challenges around. In Battalion Wars, though, it's largely a game that not only leads you by the hand, but is over and done with pretty quickly and nowhere near as challenging, either.

In the main, it's straightforward run and gun action: you take control of the most powerful unit, lead the others around with you, rescue PoWs, take out enemy gun towers, capture bases (or defend your own), wipe out stray soldiers, recon units, tanks, and eventually air units. But getting there requires more than a little forethought, and with so many different types of units to get your head around, it's a game filled with plenty of fast-paced trial and error. It's definitely a lot of fun, though, and so long as you've left your Advance Wars hang-ups at the door, it's a game that deserves a fair amount of recognition in its own right. Put it this way; you won't play too many games like Battalion Wars.

'Battalion Wars' Screenshot 1

Their funny legs and big boots only make it more fun to kill equally crazy looking foe.

Even so, you can�t help but recognise where the two titles overlap; but that's fine when you're borrowing good game design. In common with the AW titles, the first few levels are there purely to introduce you to the controls and game mechanics, and in this case you get direct control over any - or all - of your units, and get to be the one pulling the trigger on the enemy. In typical paper, scissors, stone fashion, each unit has its own set of specific strengths and weaknesses. So, for example, on the Infantry side you get basic Rifle Grunts, Assault, Frame, Bazooka, Missile and Mortar units, with each providing a vital role in the war effort, but each suffering from chinks in their armour which are up to you to brutally expose.

So, while Bazooka units are great at dealing with mid-range tanks, they're hopeless against other infantry as their projectiles are so easy to dodge. Meanwhile, ground Recon units are fast and ideal for scouting, they�re vulnerable to machine gun fire; Gunships are fast, nimble way to deal with tanks but susceptible to anti aircraft units like the Missile grunts. And so on.

But much of the time you don't really have to furrow your brow too hard to suss out a way through enemy lines; simply blitzing the most dangerous units first (tanks, gun towers, aircraft) and following the advice given to you will get you through the majority of the game in no time at all. It's only later in the game where you have to pay serious attention to the tactics - or if you're particularly concerned with getting a high rank for your efforts and unlocking each of the four campaign's bonus mission.

'Battalion Wars' Screenshot 2

Is it Father Christmas?

Part of the reason it's a simple game to get to grips with is due in part to a largely slick and intuitive control system that makes it a cinch to gain full command over them with the flick of the C stick. Once you've cycled through which unit you want direct command of, you hit the Z button and control them just as you would in any other third person action game, with the dpad also allowing you to zoom out for a broader view of the battlefield (while keeping you in full control over your unit). Targeting is reasonably effective, giving you the ability to lock onto any target near your cursor with the L button and fire with the A button. You can also go into a free aim mode with the R button, but the game seems rarely requires you - and besides, it's often less effective to do this in the heat of battle.

It can a bit of a pain to effectively get a lock-on on aerial units, though, especially when they're directly overhead, requiring you to move somewhere else to even get your cursor near them. Regardless of whether you're in a ground or air unit, you can always issue commands to specific units (or the whole lot if you want), instructing them where to move to, who to attack, or whether to remain in sentry mode and attack anyone who comes near - all via the X and Y buttons. On the whole, the system's fluid, reliable, instinctive and flexible, although there's one major flaw in not being able to instruct a specific unit to go somewhere. For example, if you have seven Rifle Grunts, you can't order three to go one way, and the other four to flank the enemy from another side - you simply have to tell the whole lot to go in one specific place, which - naturally - can be a risky business. Likewise, the inability to split up tank units is a major restriction placed upon you, with the only halfway house solution to go it alone and do your flanking solo while the others cause a fuss somewhere else.

It's certainly a lot of fun being a direct part of an ongoing war effort without being just the pointer and clicker. If there's one thing that's lacking from most RTSs, it's the satisfaction of knowing you're the one out there dishing out the punishment, and Battalion Wars definitely goes some way to addressing that - but it's a halfway house that introduces problems of its own. It's all very well giving making an RTS action hybrid, but you still need to give the player as much control over the units as a normal RTS or the whole thing has to be reduced to a bit of a tank rush - which is what Battalion Wars descends to for much of the time.

'Battalion Wars' Screenshot 3

Big assed tanks: always a plus.

Also, with such a simplified interface, the whole resource management side of the genre isn't explored at all, with new units and back-up introduced via means of simplistic rescue sorties and the occasional arrival of back-up via T-Copter. The in-game map, as well, is utterly redundant, using a crazy magnifying glass system over an unintelligible map that makes it especially hard to plan any kind of strategy. Why Kuju couldn't have just aped AW's top-down map, we have no idea.

Another area Kuju has completely cocked-up is the driving side of the game. With physics that have more in common with the Moon than anywhere else, you'll be exasperated by the crazed floaty behaviour of the Recon units, and driven to distraction when the camera decides to go completely mental trying to keep up with whatever bizarre back-flips the game tries to make you do every time you hit something. On the other hand, control over all the other units is generally fine; air units are a breeze, infantry are always a pleasure to command, it's just the odd occasion you'll find it a little inelegant; like trying to squeeze a tank through a crowded area, again, affected by camera issues and an overly wobbly steering system.

In technical terms it's by no means pushing the GameCube to any great degree, but still scores points with a cute, rounded, cartoon art style that makes light of a serious subject matter. In fact, we'd probably not have enjoyed the game anywhere near as much if it went for a straight, serious approach.

'Battalion Wars' Screenshot 4

A mighty army: soon to meet their doom�

What strikes us as particularly disappointing is just how little there actually is to the game. Once the 20 mission campaign is done and dusted, there's no War Room, and not even a hint of multiplayer, never mind secret modes and so on. For a game loosely based on something that's absolutely rammed with extras, it's a curious decision.

For the right price, Battalion Wars is still worth a look, though. Despite the odd camera and control niggle, it stands out an unpretentious and largely unique example of how to blend strategy and action in a relentlessly entertaining way. The fact that there's little more to it than a solid 10 hour single player campaign will be disappointing for some, but don't let that put you off what is one of the better GameCube exclusives around at the moment - a rare beast, as we're sure you realise�

7 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (35) Latest comment 6 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • jellyhead #1 6 years ago

    I thought this was going to be a disaster but it looks like they've done a good job and made a really quite playable game. The GamesTM review said pretty much the same thing.
    Might keep an eye out for this.
  • mad_caddy #2 6 years ago

    oooh!
    /adds to christmas list
  • Dant #3 6 years ago

    I thought it was going to be a disaster but judging by the reviews its turned out ok. Might pick it up if I find some spare cash lying around.
  • Blerk #4 6 years ago

    Despite the reasonable reviews, I'm still having trouble working up any enthusiasm at all about this title. :-/
  • Carrybagma #5 6 years ago

    /waits for January bargain bins
  • Roamer #6 6 years ago

    I thought it was going to be a disaster, but it seems it's pretty good if the reviews are anything to go by.

    Might buy this if I find it cheap.
  • Flightrisker #7 6 years ago

    For a free copy of this game please complete the following tiebreaker in 25 words or less.

    "I thought this was going to be a disaster but......."
  • jellyhead #8 6 years ago

    ... it's a lot of fun, enjoy?
    ;)
  • Rob #9 6 years ago

    I've played it extensively....and absolutely love it. They're right that you can go start to finish pretty quickly if you want to, but picking up S-ranks on all of the levels takes real hard work.

    Graphically I thought it was pretty good too - some of the battles get really intense at times and there isn't a hint of slowdown.

    I'd throughly recommend it as a genuinely different offering that's a lot of fun to boot.
  • jlaakso #10 6 years ago

    Ten missions does sound like little, but this is going to the shopping list regardless.
  • Pinchy #11 6 years ago

    It says 20 missions in the review, lasting about 10 hours. Its this or mario football for me.
  • tiddles #12 6 years ago

    I've played as far as the second island on the US version, and love it to bits. If you've ever wanted to play a 3D update of Cannon Fodder, this is as close as you're likely to get unless someone does an official version. Although the system for ordering troops around isn't perfect, the whole package is superbly executed - the terrains have a real sense of space, and the characters and vehicles are wonderfully detailed and full of personality.

    Regarding the difficulty, I haven't found it to be easy at all - after the first few training type missions, the enemies will rip you to pieces if your tactics and reactions aren't up to scratch - it feels pretty hardcore at times (maybe they've made the Euro version easier?). The bonus missions are a nice incentive to improve your scores (and the missions are varied and chunky, so you'll happy to play them again), although I can see that once you've done them there's not much else.

    One thing I disagree with in the review is the comment about the land vehicle handling - I think it's excellent. The buggies feel a lot like the Warthogs in Halo, while the tanks are suitably mean and hefty. If anything I was disappointed by the air vehicles - helicopters in particular tend to feel like you're trundling around the sky, without any real sense of speed or swooping flight.

    8/10 for me... It's even got a proper widescreen mode... in a Gamecube game, ffs!
  • Xerx3s #13 6 years ago

    Expected more of this. Will be picking this up thoughm, in a couple of months time....
  • Rob #14 6 years ago

    Pinchy said: Its this or mario football for me.

    This all the way IMO - it's waaay better than Mario Footy (which is really just Sega Soccer Slam in drag)
  • Pinchy #15 6 years ago

    mario in drag eh? its not that i find him attractive, its just confusing...

    \orders battalion wars
  • kenty #16 6 years ago

    "It's even got a proper widescreen mode... in a Gamecube game, ffs!"

    that makes it a 'BUY' for me then :)
  • tengu #17 6 years ago

    They could turn it into a first person shooter and call it Tom Clancy's Legend of Zelda I suppose Azmol, then it'd fit on there just perfectly ;)
    Edited by 1 at 09/12/05 @ 20:15
  • kentmonkey #18 6 years ago

    /rocks cronks boat...

    MAN OVERBOARD
  • ruckus #19 6 years ago

    I'll get this eventually but I only buy stuff from Amazon if it's 24 hour delivery but loads of Nintendo stuff is 1-2 weeks or more just now. Add to all that the greater than £29.99 price and I think I'll pick this up later...
  • Nikanoru #20 6 years ago

    It's even got a proper widescreen mode... in a Gamecube game, ffs!

    Eh? Soul Calibur 2, Starfox Adventures, Super Monkey Ball 1 and 2 are some of the games I own that have widescreen, and that's just off the top of my head (I don't own a widescreen telly).


    cronk: great that you came into this thread letting us all know you're twelve. You shouldn't have.
  • Malakhai #21 6 years ago

    Already on the xmas list...looking for a good one for the gc lately, and this seems like a sure bet. The relative drought of titles nowadays is rather disturbing, though...
  • tiddles #22 6 years ago

    Eh? Soul Calibur 2, Starfox Adventures, Super Monkey Ball 1 and 2 are some of the games I own that have widescreen, and that's just off the top of my head (I don't own a widescreen telly).

    yeeeerrss, I wasn't saying that ALL GC titles don't have widescreen... but loads don't. Especially anything developed by, er, Nintendo. (Pop quiz - can anyone name any Nintendo-developed games which DO have widescreen? Can't think of any off the top of my head. Retro's Metroid Prime games do allow you to "stretch" the screen, but infuriatingly not quite to widescreen dimensions...)

    Buy yourself a widescreen telly and you'll start noticing pretty quickly ;)
  • tiddles #23 6 years ago

    Whilst PS2 is storming along in the final straight before its successor arrives, Gamecube is sauntering in with crappy little games that wouldn't grace the xbox 360 launch.

    If Battalion Wars was an Xbox 360 launch title, it would most likely be gracing everyone's top 5 must-haves, if not higher.
  • CosmonautX #24 6 years ago

    funny how you say "like" Zelda as if there is anything else coming out "like zelda" AT ALL

    Well, apart from the titles in the GC back catalogue I've yet to pick up, I've got the following new & forthcoming titles on my buy list:

    Super Mario Strikers
    Odama
    Chibi Robo
    King Kong
    Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess
    Prince of Persia: The Two Thrones
    Naruto: Clash of Ninja
    Battalion Wars

    Not many, but all look to be good-to-great games & LoZ:TP is likely to be one of the GameCube's finest titles. Certainly not "crappy little games", IMO.
  • CosmonautX #25 6 years ago

    Which reviews are you reading? The PS2 reviews over the past month or so have been mainly 5s, 6s and 7s, with a couple of 8s and a 9 (and that was a port of a GC game ;-) )

    There's no doubt more games are being released for the PS2 - it's a platform with many times the userbase of the GC, or the Xbox for that matter - but I don't think the proportions of dross to gold are much different from the 'Cube.

    Personally, I don't see what the problem with a 7 or 8 is - I regard anything above 7 to be worth a look, unless it's in a genre I'm not fond of.
  • CosmonautX #26 6 years ago

    Should I get DS? Does it work with Gamecube like GBA?

    To answer your questions, yes & no. There's no DS-GC connectivity, but it's one of the most interesting & fun consoles I've played in a while. Plenty of great games, plenty more to come.
  • admir #27 6 years ago

    cronk

    get a psp much better then the ds
  • CosmonautX #28 6 years ago

    Better how? Yes, it's more powerful, can play UMDs and music, runs homebrew... but as far as I can see it still has no interesting games.


  • smelly #29 6 years ago

    How is it all nintendo game reviews end up with sony/microsoft fanboys slagging off nitnendo?

    Whats the problem? Dont have any decent fun games to play on your machines?
  • MightyPenguin #30 6 years ago

    I think the problem is that GC titles hit a bit of a dry patch about... this time last year (just off of the top of my head)? And haven't really picked up since. Reminds me of the N64's dying days; sod all for god knows how long and then one final, brilliant game to mark the end of the console.

    Maybe it's because Ninty are far more first-party orientated than the other two? They'll have switched just about every team they have to Rev development, I guess.
    Edited by 1 at 10/12/05 @ 23:10
  • Malakhai #31 6 years ago

    Good speculation there, MightyPenguin. I think the last (debatable) good title for the N64 was LoZ: Majoras Mask...so it seems to run in the same circle as the GC with the release of LoZ: Twilight Princess. Pray to God it doesn't get as much heat for that one. Oh, and my memories of the N64 are really really really fuzzy, so if anyone wants to correct me, feel free, because that was the last game I remember buying for the N64.
    Edited by 1 at 10/12/05 @ 23:40
  • Nikanoru #32 6 years ago

    Oh, and my memories of the N64 are really really really fuzzy,

    LOL

    (ok, I'm very pro-N64, but that was just great *cough*)

    so if anyone wants to correct me, feel free, because that was the last game I remember buying for the N64.

    Well, Perfect Dark came out just around the same time, and Conker's Bad Fur day some time after it, though whether CBFD was actually a good game is up for debate. Rare already had one foot in the grave by then.
  • CosmonautX #33 6 years ago

    Well, Perfect Dark came out just around the same time, and Conker's Bad Fur day some time after it, though whether CBFD was actually a good game is up for debate. Rare already had one foot in the grave by then

    Actually - checking my N64 library against release dates - the final couple of years of the N64's life looked like this:

    Mario Golf -- 14 November 1999
    Super Smash Bros -- 19 November 1999
    Perfect Dark -- 30 June 2000
    Pokemon Snap -- 15 September 2000
    Mario Tennis -- 3 November 2000
    LoZ: Majora's Mask -- 17 November 2000
    Conker's Bad Fur Day -- 6 April 2001
    Banjo Tooie - 12 April 2001
    Excitebike 64 -- 8 June 2001
    Paper Mario -- 5 October 2001

    That's obviously missing out plenty of other games released between 1999-2001, but I think it hits most of the major titles.

    You can see why the wait for the PAL GameCube so frustrating - it didn't launch until May 2002, so gamers waiting for fresh Nintendo titles had a 6-month gap between the last major N64 title and the first GC games.

    I'm in two minds about CBFD. It was certainly one of the most visually attractive games on the N64 and it was executed well enough, but it was painfully unfunny at points and lacked the charm of Paper Mario or Rare's own Banjo series. It certainly marked the beginning of the end of my appreciation of Rare. Banjo Tooie was a bit of a disappointment, Starfox Adventures was (surface glitz aside) a pretty duff Zelda-a-like, and the less said about Grabbed by the Ghoulies & Live & Reloaded the better.
  • Malakhai #34 6 years ago

    Whoa, thanks. How could I forget such a gem as Paper Mario? Perfect Dark was, in my opinion, the last great Rare game. At least I wasn't too far off on the decline of that system. I did love the N64 for all it's foibles, just...it seems so far away now.
  • Psi #35 6 years ago

    must finish advance wars 2.... dear god its a good game. get a ds and advance wars for the gba :) lots of fun