Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands

Once more unto the beach.

"It's not the game of the movie, the movie is the movie of the game." That's the official line about this latest Prince of Persia do-over's relationship to the upcoming Jake Gyllenhaal blockbuster. One look at the cover art, huge standees of which adorn the room I'm playing The Forgotten Sands in, proves this isn't exactly a total separation of console church and silver-screen state, however. Donnie Darko's face might be replaced by that of a handsome, swarthy stranger, but the hair, the clothes, the pose, the font are a spit for the movie's poster.

And why not? The movie is, after all, based loosely upon The Sands of Time, the last-generation title that spectacularly reinvented classic, big-trousered early-nineties platformer Prince of Persia. Curiously, The Forgotten Sands is a direct sequel to that, slotting into the Prince's narrative in a newly-created gap between Sands of Time and the unfortunate rawk stylings of The Warrior Within. This means bolshie royal-lady Farrah returns, as does the titular wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey rewind-o-sand.

And as does Sands of Time's fluid, elegant parkour-as-puzzle structure. There's plenty of combat - largely against armoured skeletony things - in The Forgotten Sands, but the focus is on navigating across environments filled with traps and ledges and dangling lights and giant levers. It's always a game about getting from A to B, but that involves mastering complex timing, controls and observation. In concept, it's finally giving The Sands of Time's many fans what they want after years of puzzling deviations from what was clearly a successful formula.

1

The big lads don't fall over easy - you'll need to knock 'em off their feet or activate your Earth power to get past those shields.

This means it's the polar opposite of 2008's Prince of Persia - a failed attempt to reboot the series again - whose style and story now seem abandoned. While the case for the defence was that it was aimed at non-traditional gamers, the general consensus was that it was too easy - you presses your buttons and the game does it all for you. Hoo boy, this one's not the same. While my limited playtime saw me plunged directly into the eighth level, and thus not pre-tutored in Forgotten Sands' intricate thinking and controls by hours of practice, the difficulty was still a shock.

I suspect we've been spoiled by the button-holding fluidity of Assassin's Creed, the neon-bright signposting of Uncharted 2, and the just-keep-going urgency of Mirror's Edge. The Forgotten Sands gives you a quick scan of each room when you enter it and tries to point the camera in roughly the direction you next need to head, but other than that you're on your own.

Its acrobatics-based puzzles are strictly square-peg-in-square-hole affairs, so you won't progress until you've sussed out the one and only way to reach the next ledge or pole or chandelier. Even then, getting there requires very quick button combos and reflex-jumping, else you'll fall to the floor, damned either to death or taking the lengthy manoeuvre from the top.

2

Wow, that looks a whole lot more colourful than it did in person. What curiously smooth edges, too.

It's possible The Forgotten Sands is going to be too frustrating for some players, as the muted art style means it seem occasionally tricky to gauge depth and distance, and at least twice I thought I'd accidentally looped back on myself because the latest room looked so similar to the last.

Meanwhile, the few-and-far between checkpoint system means you have to repeat a fair old stretch of wall-running, pole-vaulting and skeleton-smashing upon each all-too-regular death. Again, this is based on jumping directly into a late stage of the game, so hopefully it'll feel a lot more natural if you've come to it the normal way.

Plus, of course, the dual challenge of timing and observation should be relished in an age when many mainstream games are accused of excessive handholding. Even so, a bit more signposting and a more flexible camera may be necessary to keep a lot of people from regularly trekking to GameFAQs.

Key to both complexity and pleasing escalation is the Prince's beefy set of abilities. The emergency-rewind power from Sands of Time returns, albeit limited to auto-returning you to the last safe point rather than allowing any manual control, but the boy with the curtain hair-do is also blessed with control over the elements.

He'll unlock and upgrade these supernatural abilities as the game wears on, and is eventually able to dispatch multiple enemies into clattery bone-piles with a spectacularly destructive summoned tornado, or to temporarily freeze jets of water to create icy poles, walls and pillars he can use to reach otherwise inaccessible areas.

This is what I mean when I bang on about complexity. You'll need to master combos such as laterally wall-running, pressing jump at just the right moment to reach the next ledge before you fall, then jumping again while you've still got momentum, but simultaneously activating your freeze power to turn a horizontal stream of water into a pole, which you then need to swing round-and-round-and-round and then away from before it thaws. Even letting go of the right button at the wrong time will end the run and send you plummeting to earth. It's a real feat of memory, reflex and co-ordination, and I'm ashamed to admit I repeatedly mucked it up.

3

C'mon, Kratos can't do THAT.

The Elemental powers really sing in the combat - as well as the aforementioned Air tornado, there's Water's arc of icy spikes, Fire's impassable wall of flame, and Earth's offence and defence mega-buff. With limited energy at your disposal, you need to carefully choose which of these to activate and when. The swordfights aren't simple one-on-one affairs, but instead hectic brawls that see you surrounded by over a dozen murderous sand-demon thingies at once.

The sword-fighting itself, the bread-and-butter of the Prince's graceful combat, is faintly reminiscent of Arkham Asylum's excellent man-thumping. Rather than frenetic button-bashing or convoluted combos, it's about finding and maintaining a rhythm, deftly pinging away from near-fatal strikes before they land and using light attacks to keep the swarm of other bad guys at bay even as you land the killing blow on your current target.

So is Prince of Persia back on track? It's impossible to call it without seeing more and seeing it in context. It's an enormous relief to go back to the brainy environmental puzzles of The Sands of Time, especially with much-improved combat, but there's a concern the muted and repetitious aesthetics and the rather large roster of abilities might make for a less elegant game than its lucid dream of a forefather. Regardless, it's excellently reassuring to find old Princey-pants confidently revisiting his finest hour, and not just running down some corridors and wearing a crude approximation of Jake Gyllenhaal's face.

Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands is due out for DS, PC, PS3, PSP, Wii and Xbox 360 in May.

Comments (33) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Stompy #1 2 years ago

    Post deleted at 23:13:35 17-04-2012
  • Mudo #2 2 years ago

    wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey !
  • asphaltcowboy #3 2 years ago

    Sounds great! But then, I'm a sucker for any PoP game (yes, I even enjoyed 2008 - it was lovely)!
  • harhol #4 2 years ago

    Oh how the great have fallen.
  • the_mtfr #5 2 years ago

    What does he mean muted aesthetics, from these screenshots it looks artsy, diverse and of an impressive scale... I just hope it doesn't have ridiculous DRM!
  • matrim83 #6 2 years ago

    So its back to real platforming, actual puzzles and a challenging difficulty level? Fuck me, where do I sign up?
  • kinky_mong #7 2 years ago

    Sounds promising but the May release date means it will be competing with Red Dead Redemption and Alan Wake for my money, so it will probably be a "Wait for the price to fall in a few months" game for me.
  • SteveB #8 2 years ago

    "The emergency-rewind power from Sands of Time returns, albeit limited to auto-returning you to the last safe point rather than allowing any manual control"

    Why gimp one of the best features of the excellent original ?
  • khaz #9 2 years ago

    I hope this preview is a good sign of things to come. If this is another pseudo rhythm action game where everything happens automatically and you dont need to press a direction when platforming Ubisoft can fuck right off.

    /rages
  • Doctor_What #10 2 years ago

    @SteveB : I thought the same thing.

    Sounds great though - SoT is still one of my all time favourite games. If this is even a patch on that then count me in.

    Now, what I'd really love would be a GOW Collection style HD polish up of all the original trilogy. Please Ubisoft! Go on, you know you want to!
  • rarehobo #11 2 years ago

    Hopefully a return to form, PoP 2008 was an utter disgrace. Intrested to know which version was tested? As it is looking quite alright for the Wii.
    Edited by rarehobo at 24/03/10 @ 18:36
  • azwipe #12 2 years ago

    all i want is a next-gen remake of SoT (TR: Anniversary style)
  • Baranga #13 2 years ago

    I don't understand the hate for the 2008 PoP. It was all about the flow and the rhythm. It was peaceful and relaxing. The no-death mechanic added coherence and maintained the pace. And oddly enough, it had more references to Persian mythos than the previous games.
    Shame the combat was so mediocre.
  • sarcasmoidosis #14 2 years ago

    It's a shame they gave up on the style of the 2008 game. But the game itself sounds better.
  • jimboton #15 2 years ago

    Even so, a bit more signposting and a more flexible camera may be necessary to keep a lot of people from regularly trekking to GameFAQs

    No signposting. Please.

    We didn't need it 7 years ago and i don't think we need it now.
  • photoboy #16 2 years ago

    "wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey"

    No, NO, NO. I cannot stand that line and I hate it more and more every time I see it quoted. Smug quips like that are what make me hate the new Doctor Who, especially when everyone hails Moffat as some sort of writing genius, when his only genuinely good story was the weeping angels (which he is already recycling for the upcoming series).

    Also, how is the rewind button in this game any different from Elika in the last? The mechanic sounds identical to me.
    Edited by photoboy at 24/03/10 @ 20:14
  • laharl80 #17 2 years ago

    A return to sands of time style gameplay can only be a good thing.I enjoyed the last game but it was too easy.
  • Eighthours #18 2 years ago

    No need to manually rewind? For shame.
  • Eighthours #19 2 years ago

    No need to manually rewind? For shame.
  • JeroenZM #20 2 years ago

    The 3 PoP games on Gamecube were my favorite trilogy available on the last-gen consoles. The first one in particular paved the way for so many great titles you can play nowadays. After Sands of Time, I never ever wanted to go back to the old Tomb Raider games.
  • Ashcroft #21 2 years ago

    Can we also have Sands of Time on PSP please? Can't believe Wanker Within and 2 Thrones were ported, and the best game of the entire PS2 generation didn't make the cut.
  • UncleLou #22 2 years ago

    What's with the the graphics? All PoP games had a (different) nice style, this looks totally bland.
  • ZuluHero #23 2 years ago

    @Eighthours

    You have the power to rewind time yourself, it seems ;)
  • menage #24 2 years ago

    I can't believe I've been this unintereested in a PoP before.

    But I didn't care for SoT either, I really think the slow motion gimmick was just out of place (rewind button in a medieval platformer, pffff) and the combat sucked balls.

    Bring on a new game in the new universe.
  • dominalien #25 2 years ago

    So, this game plays like Sands of Time but looks like Warrior Within? Hmmm...
  • hiddenranbir #26 2 years ago

    They ruined Farah in TT... will they save her in this?
  • dingo75 #27 2 years ago

    PC version is delayed and will have the infamous "Ubisoft Starter" DRM.
    Waiting for the whining that the PC version didn't sell well in a couple of months.

    This one screams "Bargain Bin" for the PC.
  • reality_cheque #28 2 years ago

    Colour me interested.
  • Ashcroft #29 2 years ago

    Surely Farah should have no idea who the Prince is, and never meet the Prince during the game (unless the entire game didn't happen at the end again).
  • Zebula77 #30 2 years ago

    Hmm, I for one really enjoyed the last PoP game. It was easy, true, but also very relaxing and rewarding to play. The art style was beautiful and well, hunting down 1001 little light thingies was loads of fun.

    This one does look like it's going to be better, tho. Sands of Time was one of the best PS2 games and any direct sequel is most welcome. I hope they keep the Prince the same, tho. I have fond memories of him going "no, no - that's not how it happened" when you messed up. Class. :D
  • Sonic_D #31 2 years ago

    I enjoyed PoP 2008 for what it was, but if this really is a return to the SoT template and works, I'm well up for that.
  • andywilkie35 #32 2 years ago

    Shame, they should have made a direct followup to 2008's epic
  • Chupakun #33 2 years ago

    "The Forgotten Sands gives you a quick scan of each room when you enter it and tries to point the camera in roughly the direction you next need to head, but other than that you're on your own."

    I'd be happy even if it didn't do that. Here's hoping that this is the true progeny of Sands of Time :D. Let's also prry it doesn't try to change too many of the original features.
    Edited by Chupakun at 26/03/10 @ 03:30