Independent Games Festival Finalists Roundup

The spirits of independence.

The Independent Games Festival awards in 2008 made it seem like the sky was the limit for indie gaming, and so this year's IGF contenders face impossibly high expectations. They are competing with our rather recent recollections of Audiosurf, World of Goo, and Crayon Physics. All brilliant concepts that made fantastic games. How can they hope to match up to that?

Well, by being completely independent. If anything is missing in this latest Grand Prize line-up, it's the obvious contender for commercial success, like Audiosurf or World of Goo, but that doesn't matter. (And should not matter.) What we have here are brave, brilliant experiments. There's a couple of things in the wider IGF that we've already seen plenty of, such as PixelJunk Eden in the technical excellence and audio categories. But what is most intriguing are the five titles nominated for the Seumas McNally Grand Prize itself: Blueberry Garden, CarneyVale Showtime, Dyson, Night Game and Osmos. There is no clear winner, and these five games could not be more diverse. Let's take a look at each one.

We'll stroll into Blueberry Garden first. This is the weirdest and possibly the most wonderful of the five finalists. It's being developed for Xbox Live Arcade, and is a proper bastard to get working in its XNA form. Thankfully my tenacious fiddling brought it to life, and I was treated with a dreamlike, hand-drawn 2D world. The game is being developed by Erik Svendang, and he's been quite happy for it to speak for itself.

'Independent Games Festival Finalists Roundup' Screenshot 1

What is the fruit for? You might as well ask what the sky is for.

In it you control a flying birdman character, who must explore a side-scrolling world which appears to have been drawn by a talented, imaginative child. The game too seems to have an innocent, unexplained quality to it: you start exploring and find that things within the world have unexpected properties. As you explore the landscape you encounter giant random objects: books, pencils, pieces of cheese, and so on. Get close to them and they are teleported with you back to your starting point. These collected objects pile up, creating a tower off which you can jump, and then fly, allowing for further explorations of the weird terrain. What does it all mean? I've really no idea. Blueberry Garden, with its hand-drawn animals and bulbous fruits, is a mystifying experience. But perhaps that's kind of the point. Blueberry Garden could well be this year's winner.

The second game on the list is CarneyVale Showtime. This is a kind of ragdoll acrobatics-meets-Peggle versus pinball, in which you control a magical puppet who intends to be the world's greatest acrobat. The levels are a mixture of centrifugal devices and trampoline-like surfaces off which you can bounce. Performing tricks, hitting particular highs, and then completing the level pushes you forward, and opens up increasingly complex acrobatic puzzles.

While it appears straightforward to start off with, it rapidly becomes clear that it's a highly unusual game, blending action timing with some puzzle-solving elements. (Just how do you get through this level, or that? How do you maximise your points with a convoluted route to the final somersault?) The small amount of balance control you have over your tumbling puppet means the game rewards extended time spent with it, as it's possible to become increasingly skilled over many sessions, manipulating your charge through some serious split-second stunts. CarneyVale Studio is fantastically presented, and possibly the most polished-looking of the games on this Grand Prize list.

Then we have Dyson. This is my personal favourite, because I'm both a big strategy geek, and a lover of weird, procedural cleverness in game design. It's a fairly classic RTS in some ways: you build your units, then send them off to exploit resources on the rest of the map. That's about where the similarity ends, however, because your resources are flying seedling things that are half-plant, half-fly, and they are colonising a series of spherical "asteroids", which are spread out across a beige space. Once seedlings penetrate the heart of these and take root, they are able to grow into trees and generate more of your primary unit type - more seedlings. Planting tree types allows you to set up both resource-management, and defence.

As you spread across the abstract constellation you find yourself encountering enemy trees, and seedlings, and they must be destroyed, usually by sheer force of numbers. As the game escalates, so the numbers involved reach astronomical proportions. Timing and tactics soon come into play, and Dyson proves itself to be a very strange, but very beautiful and intriguing, work of strategy gaming. There's something enormously compelling about the huge swarms of seeds you send out to attack an enemy asteroid, and it seems tied into a theme that runs through this year's IGF: one of ambient visuals combined with very traditional game mechanisms to create entirely fresh experiences.

Fourth in our round up is Night Game. This is an astonishingly playable title from Nicklas "Nicalis" Nygren, who is also working on the WiiWare version of Japanese side-scolling action-adventure, Cave Story. Night Game is all visualised in silhouette, with the action taking place in the shadowy foreground, and the background providing the only colours - sombre night-time blues and purples. It's an action puzzle game where you must use the weird physics of a travelling ball to progress. While it moves realistically most of the time, it has a kind of anti-gravity "stickiness" to it, allowing you to pull off feats of inertia to find your way through the game. It's oddly reminiscent of old-school action-adventure Another World, with each single screen posing you with a particular puzzle. I don't expect this to win, but it will doubtless conjure up a cult following on its release later this year.

'Independent Games Festival Finalists Roundup' Screenshot 2

Do you lust for control over insect-like swarms? Then this game is for you.

Finally, we have the wonderful Osmos. This is a beautiful, organic idea for a game. You are a bubble of (possibly biological) matter on a floaty 2D plane. As such you can absorb blobs that are smaller than you, and increase your size. Bigger blobs will absorb you, and must be avoided. There's a fascinating trade-off, however: to propel yourself you must expel matter, meaning that the faster and harder you move in your viscous, ambient fluid surroundings, the smaller you get. Managing the amount of material you expel becomes absolutely crucial to surviving the tougher levels, because an ejection too far might mean you can't engulf your target, and will lead to your doom.

Osmos is possibly the most classically game-like of the five finalists in its design, but the way in which this is implemented - with pulsing visuals and a soothing ambient soundtrack - makes it the most strange and relaxing. It's probably the most chilled-out game you will play this year, and it would be ideal for falling asleep to, were it not so utterly engrossing.

So let's come back to where we started and stress that this is one of the most intriguing set of finalists in several years. Perhaps the indie gaming scene has been over-hyped in the past few months, and I'm certainly one of those writers responsible for talking up the talents of the independent few. But after 2008 I felt pretty well validated by our faith in the scene. Somehow I can't see any of the 2009 Grand Prize games having quite the impact of last year's finalists, but they're nevertheless enormously intelligent, creative game design projects that give me hope for the ongoing creativity of this basement-level of gaming. Look wider at the awards as a whole and we see PixelJunk Eden, Cortex Command, Zeno Clash and Machinarium - all startling, esoteric works of independent design. Indie gaming is here to stay.

Comments (28) Latest comment 3 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Notez #1 3 years ago

    Looks like many of them are worth a try. Interesting games.
  • [maven] #2 3 years ago

  • w00t #3 3 years ago

    Dyson was created by haowan (Teeth), wasn't int?
  • Wellytopp #4 3 years ago

  • UncleLou #5 3 years ago

  • merkdot #6 3 years ago

  • Sunyavadin #7 3 years ago

    "Over-hyped"? You cannot OVER hype the indie gaming scene.
  • Arganoid #8 3 years ago

    Tried Dyson about 6 months ago - was disappointed. There didn't seem to be any real strategy to it.
  • Eraysor #9 3 years ago

    Dyson was great fun.
  • haowan #10 3 years ago

    Thanks guys :) And thanks Jim!

    We'll be releasing a new build very soon with a bit more polish. The game will become more interesting over the next few months as we add features, we've got a few game design additions and tweaks to improve the strategy a bit. Keep an eye on the official site :)

    www.dyson-game.com
  • haowan #11 3 years ago

    btw I absolutely love Blueberry Garden. It's completely delightful. The world is slowly filling up with water, so you have to build up the tower to get to the tap to turn it off. I'm not sure what happens after that.
  • Spekingur #12 3 years ago

    I wonder, is the name of the game in any way related to Freeman Dyson?
  • haowan #13 3 years ago

    That's right, Dyson came up with the concept of Dyson Trees, which are genetically modified organisms that you plant on an asteroid and leave. They grow using the asteroid's resources as fuel, with the intent that later on, people can go and live inside the asteroid or inside the tree itself.

    http://en.wik ipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_tree
  • Spekingur #14 3 years ago

    Dyson's theories are superb :D

    We need more games with his theories.
  • Darkedge #15 3 years ago

    so screenshots for only two of the five, no video and where are the links to check these out? come on EG, help us out.
  • Ranger101 #16 3 years ago

    So how come Indie games featured in these places are never.... 'normal' games? Like you never hear about a badass FPS coming from an indie dev, or cool 2D fighter?

    Maybe I should just release my half-baked code as it is, give it an esoteric title, and some bland/childlike/pixellated graphics and some convoluted backstory/no backstory and people can talk about how revolution and amazing it is because its "so simplistic yet abstract" and "is a meta-commentry on gaming".

    Fuck off. It's a half-baked idea where the developer couldn't come up with a full gameplay progression mechanic, so they cobbled some bits together and have effectively produced a glorified semi-tech demo.

    /Jaded Dev ranting
  • haowan #17 3 years ago

    Part of the joy of indie game development is that you don't have to stick to the tropes. Frankly I find FPS games really fucking boring, so making one would just drive me nuts. Seriously why would you give up everything to get creative freedom... and then make an FPS?
  • Stoatboy #18 3 years ago

    re: "So how come Indie games featured in these places are never.... 'normal' games? Like you never hear about a badass FPS coming from an indie dev, or cool 2D fighter?"

    Because Indie devs make the games they want to make and play. Because there are already dozens of FPS and 2d fighting games. Because a FPS will be compared to the likes of Halo and almost certainly found lacking, a 2D fighter will be compared to StreetFighter similarly, whereas a game about blueberries can only really be compared to other blueberry games. Because far too many games are already "normal". Because innovation is good. Because creative people like being creative...

    I wish the games industry would make fewer FPS games and more games about blueberries and Dyson trees, personally.
  • Spekingur #19 3 years ago

    @Ranger101: You have obviously missed the point of the indie gaming scene.

    There are lots of indie developed FPS's and 2D fighter games out there. You never hear about them because the amount and because these don't generate enough attention to attract the bigger gaming sites.
    Edited by 1 at 04/02/09 @ 15:22
  • Ranger101 #20 3 years ago

    Yeah it was just a frustrated rant of two halves, most of it bullshit. Some of you know how it is.

    I still hold by this though:

    "...It's a half-baked idea where the developer couldn't come up with a full gameplay progression mechanic, so they cobbled some bits together and have effectively produced a glorified semi-tech demo. " A lot of indie games suffer from this. It's a focus of being 'different' over just having good fucking gameplay. That's bullshit.

    (Disclaimer: I am an Indie game dev/producer by night, Professional/Corporate Software Dev by day.... making a game that doesn't fit in with the norms but isn't a fucking glorified semi-tech demo).

    Oh yeah, I don't buy the idea that I have to understand or be part of a 'scene' or 'community'. Fuck that. I hold my production values to the same values of a published company - albeit on a shoestring budget. In otherwords when the game finally gets reviewed, it gets compared to a AAA title, and not excused / marked up because I didn't have a billion dollar budget. If it's a 3/10 game then its an actaul 3/10 game, if its 9/10 then it stands proudly next to Halolz or whatever. Not 9/10 "because its an indie game, you know".
    Edited by 3 at 04/02/09 @ 15:53
  • haowan #21 3 years ago

    I completely support the idea that you don't have to be 'in' indie games to make indie games. Just look at Mat Dickie, who made a living from indie games for 8 years without being part of any community at all.

    I also agree that you should make games to your own standards - if those standards are the polish and production values associated with so-called AAA game development, that is your cross to bear. Personally I do not pander to the press and I do not care whose games my work is compared to or how people rate it. I make my games to the best of my ability a fun and interesting experience, and this is how I would prefer to be recognised.

    For me, bucking game design and expectational trends of the hardcore isn't just a personal preference, it's also a business move. I can see that FPS games, and to a wider extent tech-based games, have a limited market both in terms of supported users and interested users. It is a common theme - one can hear people complaining about identikit shootan games and lack of innovation through communities and even in development and publishing circles, right to the top of EA. It has always been this way (look at video documentaries of the 80s industry to see how people were trying to innovate then due to people cloning game designs). Personally I don't want to compete with a 150-person team when I can find a niche market of like-minded players to myself whose size can amply support me through sales I can make to them, and who are not already being amply served by CryTek, iD, Epic, etc etc etc.

    These games may not be tech demos in your sense of the term, but they demonstrate interesting game design, or excellently applied game development in some way. Some are out (Showtime is available on Community Games as we speak), so I hardly think you can call that 'half-baked', 'semi-tech', or any of the other things you've called these games. Also the ones that aren't are still in development - the IGF rules allow entry for games that have alpha functionality, so by definition the games at IGF may be unfinished.
  • haowan #22 3 years ago

    I also don't agree that reviewers are rating indie games up because of their team size. I credit them with enough intelligence to actually find the fun in these games. You can't honestly think that everyone who reviewed World of Goo didn't find it fun, but rated it highly just because it wasn't a 3D shooter?
  • Ranger101 #23 3 years ago

    I haven't played World of Goo so I can't really comment. Weapon Of Choice, for example, 7/10 on EG.... really? There was an inference by the reviewer that it got that score because it was a Community game. Maybe I read into it too much.

    As for "semi-tech-demos" or "half-baked" ideas; I hold the much commended AudioSurf up to that. It was just Vib Ribbon with a poor version of Klax. Gameplay wise it sucked balls, but because it could render you fave mp3s into a track..... To me it was one step above a winamp visualiser plugin. But as a Game to get scores ranging from 7-9/10?

    I mean, its awesome shit to get tracks from 'tracks', but to slap a half-baked game on top of it that not only 'borrowed' from Klax, but actually took a step back.... there's no way if it was produced by EA would it have gotton such commendation.

    Anyway, thanks for your opinions dude, it was interesting to hear from you and you raise some very valid points. Just having a shitty design time with my producer.
    Edited by 2 at 04/02/09 @ 17:43
  • Spekingur #24 3 years ago

    The point of the indie gaming scene is making something the way you want with your own ideas of what should be in your game. At least that is the basic point of it that I can gather.

    But each to their own understanding. Basically, somewhere into 1990-something, everyone was kind of an indie developer - compared to what gaming is today.

    And I agree with you, Ranger101, an indie game will be compared to AAA titles in any case, mostly the gamers themselves if a review site doesn't.
  • haowan #25 3 years ago

    @Ranger101: Likewise dude, it is an interesting discussion and we are all in the same indie boat in a sense :)
  • Borsato #26 3 years ago

    Hey guys/gals, we released an updated version of Dyson (1.10) on our website, some of you may have grabbed the previous version already as this article was already up before we updated in which case I reccomend grabbing the game again :-)

    Details of the release are on the site :-)
    [link url=http://www.dyson-game.com/
    ]http://www.dyson-game.com/
    [/link]
  • madjack66 #27 3 years ago

    I'm an indie dev. I've produced a 3d FPS - ok, 3d tank combat - but it's pretty much the same thing. The game's available on Steam, has been getting good reviews and people seem to enjoy it. Which is great given how long it took to develop the damn thing.

    Still, didn't even get a look in at the IGF or Indiecade (ok, it made the finalists list for Indiecade).

    Ok, fair enough, there's probably good reasons for that, but if I was of a cynical mindset, I might look grumpy, wave my arms around and say something like 'perhaps I should have just made another 2d platformer with an odd gameplay mechanic, abstract graphics and a touch of emo and I'd have scooped the awards pool. After all, just how many 2d platformers do we really need? 2d? Bah! Step up to 3d you pussies. Hrummph."

    But that would just be if I was of a cynical mindset...
    (Perhaps Unity3d on Windows will see an explosion of 3d indie titles.)

    http://www.tankuniversa l.com
    Edited by 1 at 05/02/09 @ 07:15
  • Ranger101 #28 3 years ago

    Heh - kinda of what I was feeling a little yesterday madjack! Good luck with everything, and glad to hear your game is doing good stuff!

    Edit -- Wow that is one colourful game! Very Tron like - I like.
    Edited by 1 at 05/02/09 @ 10:28