Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Challenging everything Interview

PC PlayStation 2 GameCube Xbox GameBoy Advance PSP DS Xbox 360 Mobile PlayStation 3 Wii
Interview by Ellie Gibson

17 July, 2006

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

Last week, Electronic Arts held its annual games expo, this year titled Studio Showcase '06, at its Redwood Shores campus in San Francisco. Rather disappointingly, corporate communications VP Jeff Brown opened the event by announcing which games we weren't about to be shown - such as Command & Conquer 3, Crysis and next-gen FIFA.

However, we still got the chance to have a go at new instalments in the Tiger Woods and Need for Speed series, not to mention all manner of US sports titles, Warhammer Online, Superman Returns and the Xbox 360 version of the Godfather.

We also got the chance to sit down for a chat with Brown, and discuss how strong EA's line-up is looking, who's got the best chance of winning the next-gen console war, and whether it's fair to say that EA relies too much on sequels instead of producing more original IP... Read on to find out what he had to say.

Eurogamer: With regard to the product line-up you've presented today, what kind of feedback are you receiving so far?

Jeff Brown: I was just saying to somebody, the thing that worries me the most is that people are so enthusiastic about the NHL Hockey game, which is not considered one of our big games - but everybody thinks it looks absolutely fantastic. It's a mixed blessing; number one, they all like it, but number two, hockey - from a business perspective, you never know if you're going to sell that many NHL Hockey games.

That said, I think the line-up at Christmas this year is an embarrassment of riches. I think we're going into the holiday with a lot of good games on a lot of good systems, whether it's 360 or Wii or PlayStation 3 or the current generation stuff for the PC... [We've got] more games for those systems than anybody else, and in many cases before anybody else gets there. So, the business equation is looking very, very good, and if I was a gamer in the UK, a gamer in Europe, I'd say, yeah, it's worth buying one of these systems, because there's a lot of really great software coming out.

'Challenging everything' Screenshot crysis

Crysis.

Eurogamer: Would you say that EA is equally committed to all three next-gen platforms?

Jeff Brown: No. I don't want to be indiscreet, but the truth is EA is most committed to the platform with the biggest installed base. We've always been very practical and open about the fact that this is a business; if you do well in business, you get to keep making more games, and you can hire more people to make more different kinds of games - as long as you remember that this is a business first.

One of the things that we noticed after E3 is we thought, you know, we're going to support Nintendo, they've got an extraordinarily loyal base of consumers all over the world, and we had a number of games we planned to make for Nintendo Wii. That said, we were very surprised by the level of enthusiasm we saw at E3 and subsequently for the Wii.

This is not a business plan, but there are a lot of people at EA who are walking around whispering: "40 / 40 / 20 per cent." The last time out, it was 65-70 per cent PlayStation, and everybody else divided up the 30 per cent that was left. Microsoft obviously took a big piece. Now it looks like 40 / 40 / 20 - Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo - and that is good for us, and it's good for people who like games.

Here's another thing that I think trends well for both the business and for consumers: everybody's saying that the Nintendo Wii is so unique that it's going to be the second system people buy, meaning if you own a 360 or a PS3, you'll probably also buy a Nintendo Wii. The funny thing is, some people say that discursively, like it's some sort of dig at Nintendo - and what they don't get is that if you're second on everybody's system, you're first overall.

It is very possible that Nintendo is going to expand its market by being the second system, that people who are hardcore and own a 360 or a PlayStation 3 will also go and buy a Nintendo Wii because it is so unique and so different this time. Whereas they didn't also want a GameCube against an Xbox or against a PS2, they'll go out and buy it, because it's a different experience.

If you look at what EA's doing with the Wii... Today we showed off Madden NFL on the 360 and I've seen it on PlayStation 3, and there are some differences between the two but they're largely the same experience. The Wii is a totally different experience, and if you like Madden NFL on 360, you still don't know what it's like on the Wii - it's a completely different experience.

That just opens up so many possibilities. First for gamers, that there's different kinds of games, different kinds of experiences. And then second, as a business prospect, you look at what the motion picture business calls ancillary markets - you get people to come to the movie theatre, then you get them to buy a DVD, then you sell a package to cable television, and it cascades down again and again. Well, you get ancillary markets against an initial investment in the code with this thing. From both the consumer perspective and a business perspective, the Wii changes a lot of things.

But your question was are we favouring one or the other, and we favour the one that has the highest installed base, the one with the most consumers. If it's a choice - I'm guessing now - between seven million 360s around the world versus, first month, one million PlayStation 3s, well, guess which one we're going to favour. It's pretty simple. That said, keep an eye on the Wii - that is a very interesting dynamic.

'Challenging everything' Screenshot bf2142

Battlefield 2142.

Eurogamer: So perhaps it might not be 40 / 40 / 20 then?

Jeff Brown: Let me tell you, if they get up to 20 per cent worldwide, that is a momentous event right there. Look, I'm not predicting it's 40 / 40 / 20, and I hope you understand that is not EA's business model - I'm just telling you that the buzz going around is that rather than this huge, lopsided victory for one, and then a pretty good number two and a distant third, you can see some parity for the top two. You could even see 30 / 30 / 30, something like that.

Eurogamer: What do you think about the PlayStation 3's price point? Do you think that's going to damage its chances of being the market leader this time around?

Jeff Brown: Say what you will about the PlayStation 3, we know this as fact: Sony Computer Entertainment and Sony Corporation are very, very, very good at marketing consumer electronics. These guys aren't dumb. I wish it was cheap - look, at EA, we wish there was a $200 PlayStation 3 out there; we love big, big numbers on installed base.

But they have a business that they have to maintain, that's the price point they came to. Is it a little high? Perhaps it is, but I would never underestimate their ability to market consumer electronics. Again and again, they've really distinguished themselves. Does it hurt them? It certainly remains to be seen. I wouldn't say that yet.

Eurogamer: There seems to be a feeling amongst gamers that Sony's been very arrogant, not just with the price point, but by suggesting that it's cheap since consumers are getting a lot of hardware for their money - and that this is actually damaging Sony and the PlayStation brand. Do you think that kind of criticism is fair?

Jeff Brown: I don't think it's fair. And at the risk of sounding arrogant myself, I don't think it's relevant. I've been in this business for seven years, which is not a long time, but it's long enough to have seen a couple of cycles of hardware, and I know that there are always trips and stumbles at the start of these things.

Everybody writes these big stories like 'Oh my God, what will this mean? Will they stumble for the next for years, can they recover?' When Sony first put out the PlayStation 2 there were hardware shortages, and some manufacturing glitches, and everybody was like 'Can they recover?' If you watch that cycle, then certainly you know that whatever people are saying now - could it be a stumbling block - remains to be seen. I give Sony a lot of credit and would never ever underestimate them.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-47 of 47 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Thamuhacha
17/07/06 @ 12:10
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Great interview. Lots of good points. Although it's easy to be magnanimous when you're on top of the tree!

I await the stampede of people calling him satan
Furbs
17/07/06 @ 12:11
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/cue usual boring Anti-EA rants 5, 4, 3....
Johnson
17/07/06 @ 12:20
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
To sum up, EA has no direction, no intent to innovate, no commitment to anyone or anything.

Not a huge surprise.
Adam_T
17/07/06 @ 12:20
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
For me their delivery will be in Battlefield 2142. Fair enough, they messed up BF2, but they admit that, and that they have learned from their mistakes, and want to get much more involved with the community. We'll see if they live up to their promises.
Thamuhacha
17/07/06 @ 12:23
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
>To sum up, EA has no direction, no intent to innovate

Well that's just a silly statement

Their direction is very clear. And, as he states on page 2, they will look to introduce original IPs in the first part of a hardware lifecycle: Crysis, Army of Two, Spore ... all interesting and new.
Razzajazz
17/07/06 @ 12:25
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This guy seems pretty sensible, actually! No (or very little) hyperbole, no dectectable traces of fanboyism, really. He even (almost) justifies EA's notorious penchant for iterations! Good interview, EG!
skillian
17/07/06 @ 12:32
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Great interview.

Within this single piece you have the reasons why EA is the most successful publisher in the business, and why they are the most boring.

Amazing how these two accolades go hand-in-hand so e comfortably...
AusFreelancer
17/07/06 @ 12:33
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
He sure likes his FIFA....I think using the Burnout games as an example of improvement would of hit his point better, especially when compared to other racers. FIFA doesn't compare well to PES or Sensi 2006 for that matter.
spidermanalf
17/07/06 @ 12:33
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Very interesting interview, and kept reminding us that they are a BUSINESS and are there to make MONEY!

Interesting read about WII and its stance on that.

Furbs
17/07/06 @ 12:37
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
FIFA has made far more improvements and additions to its gameplay that PES has in the last few versions. Fair enough some/most prefer PES, but if you compare the differences between Pro Evo 2-5 vs FIFA 2002 to 06, as someone who enjoys both I think theres a massive difference.
DaM
17/07/06 @ 12:45
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If you look at Grand Theft Auto or something - do you even know anybody who played GTA 1 or remembers it? Or GTA 2? It was Grand Theft Auto III that blew the roof off the entire industry, and the culture for that matter.

Me! And a pile of people on here I imagine. Didn't like it much...
Xerx3s
17/07/06 @ 12:46
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If you look at Grand Theft Auto or something - do you even know anybody who played GTA 1 or remembers it? Or GTA 2? It was Grand Theft Auto III that blew the roof off the entire industry, and the culture for that matter.

Yeh. Me and a lot of others. GTA 1 was brilliant. It was downhill after that.

And besides, more of the same != better EA.

For the rest: a very politically correct interview with one real question that he fails to answer.
peterfll
17/07/06 @ 13:08
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The main reason EA make a new FIFA every year is because it's a cash-cow for them. Artistic and technical improvements are second to that. Trying to plead otherwise - yeah, well, cry me a river.
oneshotgame
17/07/06 @ 13:09
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Today:

'thinking strategically'

lecture by jeff brown

vegard
17/07/06 @ 13:14
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
it's really refreshing how Brown doesn't cover everything he says in...brown stuff!
Spiral
17/07/06 @ 13:15
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A couple of things are driving original IP at EA, and as always at EA, simple economics are at the root of this. If you start with the consideration that when new platforms launch, the first five million 360s, the first five million PS3s, for that matter even the first five million Wiis are going to be purchased by the hardest of the hardcore fans. They don't like James Bond, and most of them don't like Harry Potter and things like that. There are huge audiences for those games, but typically not within the universe of people who buy the first five million units of a new piece of technology.

Interesting statement. Is it true? I think that depends on whether he's talking about the games or the source material. Lots of people who like Bond or Potter may not like or even want to like the games that EA make based on those franchises. Games based on other things have a reputation for being shit, and that obviously doesn't go down well with the hardcore. What I like is the way EA seem to have already known this and that leads to
New IP is really easy to measure at EA, because a year ago, a little over 30 per cent of all of our games, all of our revenues, were based on wholly-owned intellectual property - things like The Sims, which we own and don't pay licensing fees for. Today it's a little over 40 per cent. The goal at EA is within the next year, maybe year and a half, the percentage of revenue and the percentage of games which are based on EA-owned, non-licensed properties goes over 50 per cent. So come back in a year and I'll tell you exactly where we are...
Nice dodge of the question there. EA are focusing on game IP for the next year at least. Does anyone know the same figures for the last hardware transition? I'm curious as to whether that percentage will drop again in two or three years.

Excellent interview. Really interesting from a business perspective.
neuroniky
17/07/06 @ 13:16
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
An interview like this explains a lot of things about EA... they are money centric, for sure, and they do know this, but they are very good at it. Kudos to EA, probably for the first and the last time in my life.
MrChuckles
17/07/06 @ 13:19
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I liked GTA 2 the best, all got a bit childish and uber violent after that.
Krun
17/07/06 @ 13:20
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
At least hes compleatly honest that they want make shed loads of cash and stay at the top.
Feanor
17/07/06 @ 13:22
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So they're like every other third-party game developer, only bigger.
smelly
17/07/06 @ 13:30
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
>no dectectable traces of fanboyism

I think you'll find that with most people in the industry.

No-one really cares which console "wins" or "loses" apart from the sad geeks who masturbate too much and post on forums.

The industry is only focused on money. So, in the last gen, the best selling machine (ps2) got the most games. Then (in terms of units) the xbox and cube were head-to-head, but it's cheaper to manufacture dvd's than those small discs.. etc etc etc

- so the second choice was obviously xbox.

No other reason.

Next gen it's all up in the air, totally depends on cost. Even if the wii gets just 20% of the market share, if it's 10 times cheaper to make/distribute/etc a wii title than a ps3 (For example, considering cost of blu ray duplication) title, you can gaurantee people will be making games for it.

But who knows? Or indeed cares?

I dont. As per usual, i'll buy the one(s) with the games i want to play in about a years time.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 17/07/06 @ 14:31
Razzajazz
17/07/06 @ 13:35
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Smelly, you're right, with most people in the industry, they're straight down the line. But having to listen recently to people like Mark Rein and Hideo Kojima recently, it's kinda refreshing that someone just wants to make games, not start wars.

EA are the good guys? Something's very wrong here....!
Mr_Whacker
17/07/06 @ 13:41
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So that's franchise games justified....what about those awful menus? The interviewer should have acted like an EA game at him:
Question 1
Would you like to hear the first question?
Are you sure? Warning - some crap about memory cards!
Please wait, loading question
Question loaded - Get Ready!
dr_faulk
17/07/06 @ 13:42
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Great interview. Nice work as usual from the guys and gals at Eurogamer.

Mr. Brown and all his talk doesn't sway my opinion from the fact that 90% of all games released in the last 3 years are only worth buying at half their initial launch price. I know it's off topic from what was discussed in the interview, but that's my general opinion of things.

And much of that 10% belongs to the DS titles.
Zuiyo
17/07/06 @ 13:55
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Everybody's saying that the Nintendo Wii is so unique that it's going to be the second system people buy, meaning if you own a 360 or a PS3, you'll probably also buy a Nintendo Wii. The funny thing is, some people say that discursively, like it's some sort of dig at Nintendo - and what they don't get is that if you're second on everybody's system, you're first overall."

I am sorry but this is like a tongue twister.

What this guy is actually saying is that Nintendo will be market leader with its Wii because EVERYBODY will buy a second console and that will ALWAYS be a Wii. Therefore what is going to be second option is going to be a PS3 or a 360. Because everybody will have a Wii.

dr_faulk
17/07/06 @ 14:07
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Zuiyo, yeah, I agree. I was wondering then why the market share could be 40/40/20 if everyone else was buying a Wii. His words are slighly paradoxical (meaning, he's confused, lol!)
The Bodybuilder
17/07/06 @ 14:17
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
>"30 / 30 / 30"

Erm, that makes 90%, not 100%.
Other than that, I say it was a really good interview.
I loved the whol "gaming sequels aren't movie sequels" answer, as I too get annoyed at people who moan that GTA is going to the 4th, and Halo to the 3rd. I would rather play an established great franchise than simply original tat.
Buying a game purely down to the fact that it's "different" is foolish IMO, and is very consistent and obvious on the EG board than in any other.

The bit about FIFA is true though, the FA aren't gonna stop with new seasons, so the games have to keep up.
Xerx3s
17/07/06 @ 14:19
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Maybe everybody will buy a wii as second console. That does not mean market share. I.e. the game to console ratio might be far lower as ppl will only buy it for a certain type of game.

I own all 3 current gen consoles, but the ps2 game to console ratio is far lower than others because it lacks the games that I'm after.

Console market share (can be) != game sales ratio.
dr_faulk
17/07/06 @ 14:27
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Console market share (can be) != game sales ratio."

True. Look at how many put Res 4 ito the charts when it was only on GC.
Triggerhappytel
17/07/06 @ 14:30
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You can't criticise their intent and strategies to make licenced games and inifinite sequels - and thus loadsa money, but it doesn't mean I have to like it, or them.

And I don't believe his comments about competition being good for EA in the industry. They would take an unprecedented monopoly in a second if they could. Unless ofcourse, they are looking for something new to copy...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 17/07/06 @ 15:31
Hog-lumps
17/07/06 @ 14:37
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I would rather play an established great franchise than simply original tat.

That doesn't make sense! - every franchise has to start somewhere. For instance how would you know whether the original halo was any good if you thought it was 'original tat' and thus not worth a chance of playing?


fawe3
17/07/06 @ 14:41
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"If you look at what EA's doing with the Wii... Today we showed off Madden NFL on the 360 and I've seen it on PlayStation 3, and there are some differences between the two but they're largely the same experience. The Wii is a totally different experience, and if you like Madden NFL on 360, you still don't know what it's like on the Wii - it's a completely different experience"

This guy is seriously hoping that people with ps, xb or px Madden will aslo buy Wii Madden becouse its 'a totally different experience'. ()()-hole.
gaselite
17/07/06 @ 14:54
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Excellent interview, very well questioned and equally well, and more importantly, honestly answered. The guy knows what he's talking about it seems and I agree with pretty much all his points.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 17/07/06 @ 15:56
albundy
17/07/06 @ 15:18
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I found his analysis that if everyone buys the Wii, it finishes first to be highly flawed. Yes, the minority of gamers who are hardcore and post on internet forums, maybe. But the majority of casual customers will just buy one. And the question is, which one will that usually be? Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 or Wii?
Eighthours
17/07/06 @ 16:23
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
FIFA has made far more improvements and additions to its gameplay that PES has in the last few versions.

Yet it's still NOWHERE NEAR as good as PES. There's something intrinsically wrong with the series. The ball physics are still abysmal, even now.
malteaserhead
17/07/06 @ 17:02
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Terrible interview. Crappy responses. Why the EG brown-nosing?
chupachups
17/07/06 @ 17:23
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"The main reason EA make a new FIFA every year is because it's a cash-cow for them. Artistic and technical improvements are second to that. Trying to plead otherwise - yeah, well, cry me a river."

If people buy new FIFAs every year, why should they stop making new ones? For artistic reasons?

Almost all artists need a boring cash cow of some sort, whether it's a part-time job, or a grant funded by the tax-payer, or work on commercial-but-dull projects. Virtually no artist lives off their best work.

Of course you could argue that EA just does the cash cow side and not the art side...
Rambaldi
17/07/06 @ 22:04
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Biggest publisher in the world predicts equal share between Sony and MS SHOCKER!!

/Sphincters tighten in Sonyland
Keimar
17/07/06 @ 22:11
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If only so-called innovative companies would release a steady stream of games people would actually want to buy like EA, rather than hyping up their 'innovation' so many of them wouldn't be complaining of high-dev costs.
bauhaus
17/07/06 @ 22:32
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Battlefield 2142!

Anyone here play Planetside?
The Bodybuilder
17/07/06 @ 23:37
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
>"That doesn't make sense! - every franchise has to start somewhere. For instance how would you know whether the original halo was any good if you thought it was 'original tat' and thus not worth a chance of playing?"

i'm talking about people who moan about great games having greater sequels purely on the fact that they want a new ip. but will buy an average game just because it's a mew IP
secombe
17/07/06 @ 23:39
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well, as much as I really struggled with most things he had to say, he was at least very honest, so it's hard to gripe!

When you look at it, if that many people actually thought FIFA was that bad, it wouldn't still be going today after 12+ years. Many many people must love it abnd buy it pretty much yearly.

I think it's easy to forget on a gaming forum that the sort of people you interact with make up maybe 5% of the gaming market, many people aren't interested in new brilliant and weird gaming concepts, they want what is familiar, and I guess many of them rarely even read reviews. EA have that market - the bulk of the market - tied up brilliantly.
dryden555
18/07/06 @ 03:24
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Crysis is the only game in this list worth looking forward t. Most of the rest are tired sequels and sports games.
smelly
18/07/06 @ 12:09
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Whats wrong with sequels?
TripleSeven
18/07/06 @ 12:24
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good interview.
gnarl
19/07/06 @ 10:22
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good interview. If you tally up his opinion that hardcore buy the first consoles, and therefore set the trend for buying for the future customers, and assume that hardcore are the most likely to buy a second console, then you can see where his Wii = second console = market leader theory arises from.

Assuming, of course, this hardcore buys it's second console early enough to effect later trends.
Pastici
21/07/06 @ 00:56
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good read, he seems a lil bit rude to me tho.

Comments: 1-47 of 47 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Get Games.  Download Great PC Games!

X View gallery