Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Living Legend Interview

PC PlayStation 2 GameCube Xbox GameBoy Advance PSP DS Xbox 360 Mobile PlayStation 3 Wii
Interview by Paul Loughrey

16 August, 2006

In part 1 of our interview, published yesterday, Ian Livingstone discussed Eidos' future plans and his thoughts on the next-gen console battle. Here, he reveals more about his work with the Edinburgh Interactive Entertainment Festival, plans for a third Tomb Raider movie and a 10th anniversary game, and why the evolution of E3 is good news for publishers.

Eurogamer: What's the extent of your involvement with the Edinburgh Interactive Entertainment Festival this year?

Ian Livingstone: Well, I'll be involved in some of the panel discussions, but my main focus this year is a screening called The Legend of Lara Croft. I'm giving a complete history of Lara, from the very early designs right through to Tomb Raider: Legend, and a little glimpse of what's happening in the future.

It'll be a gaming history, a cultural history - looking at the power of Lara Croft, the value of Lara as one of the most famous and iconic characters in gaming, and lots of things that have happened because of Lara Croft.

Expect lots of facts and figures, anecdotes, and a visual feast of all things Lara - from the game designs and early gameplay, to things like the adverts she's featured in, and how we've leveraged the IP to create merchandising and collectors items, details of the girls that have played Lara Croft over the years, the movies... Basically anything and everything about the IP. It's really a showcase of ten years of Croft history. A celebration of Lara, if you like.

Eurogamer: Do you think that Lara is still a relevant gaming icon? Isn't it time for a new gaming champion?

Ian Livingstone: I certainly do, yes. Just because it's ten years old doesn't mean it's not still significant. Tomb Raider: Legend was a fantastic success, following the poor performance of Angel of Darkness and it proved to me that she's still got her fans. They forgave her for Angel of Darkness and they loved her for Legend.

Similarly, if you look at cinema, James Bond has survived 40 years of cinema and become a true cinematic icon. In the same way, Lara Croft has become a true gaming icon, because she has survived the test of time.

Lots of other female characters have come along and disappeared, but Lara has always remained, and I think she's the most famous character in gaming. Unless you can think of someone more famous?

Eurogamer: Other than the likes of Mario, you mean?

Ian Livingstone: Well, Mario is still very much within the games niche, whereas Lara has gone beyond that thanks to two blockbuster films, for example. She's graced the covers of thousands of not just games journals, but lifestyle journals as well.

And she appeals to both men and women. Men like her because she's a strong, intelligent, sexy, independent, athletic wonder girl, and women like her for exactly the same reasons. In fact, she doesn't even need men, so she's perhaps even more appealing to women. She doesn't seem to offend anybody.

'Living Legend' Screenshot aod

Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Angel of Darkness.

Eurogamer: What do you think went wrong with Angel of Darkness, then?

Ian Livingstone: Well there are reasons, to my mind. Core had executed five games on PlayStation year-on-year, and they'd done that brilliantly within the time scale. You know, a new version each year is an amazing achievement, and they'd done brilliantly with it. But I guess, with the benefit of hindsight, they never really made the step up to PlayStation 2's requirements and perhaps they were a little tired - I was going to say burned out, but tired of working on that franchise. I think a sixth game on a new platform was perhaps a bridge too far.

So we ended up with a game that had moved away from its roots, where the camera was all over the place, the control was very difficult and she was wandering around environments that the fan didn't want to be in. The empty streets of Paris, for example. It wasn't the game it should have been, and yet despite that it sold over two million copies. So we knew the fan base was still there and they forgave her.

Obviously we had to figure out what to do next, and we made the bold decision to move her to Crystal Dynamics, because they had the technology and were looking at the franchise with fresh eyes. They'd done some wonderful graphic stuff with Legacy of Kain and some other games they've developed, and we thought they were the ideal studio to work on Lara Croft. That's proved very much to be the case.

Eurogamer: Tomb Raider: Legend was clearly a success. What's the next step for Lara? You've gone back the roots of the franchise with Legend, so where do you take it from here?

Ian Livingstone: The thing that people wanted, what our research highlighted, was that they wanted her to go back to environments that they knew. They wanted her to be almost acrobatic in flying through the environments, which I think she definitely is in Legend.

The control was great, the camera was great, the environments were great and you felt like you were making real progress by just flying through the environments - that's what the fans wanted. Obviously we're going to take that gameplay element and move it on a step more with Crystal Dynamics.

We've also made plans for an anniversary edition which will be coming out next year, based on Lara Croft, due to the fact that we've just gone past her 10th birthday, and there's another game in development too.

We're also talking to Paramount about a third movie, although nothing's been signed yet and we still need to hire a script writer. The film's not been green lit yet, so for me it'd be ideal to tie in a movie script with a game script at the same time, to have them both in harmony rather than out of kilter - which has happened in the past.

Of course, the film helps promote the game and the game helps promote the movie, so it's a win-win situation. It's quite significant as well because publishers tend to take a license from Hollywood, and go off to make a game based on a movie. I think this was the first time it's been done successfully, where a game company has licensed a game property to a film company to make a movie, and they did it very well. It grossed over US$450 million in box office receipts and a further US$100 million in DVD sales and rentals, so it was a significant success as a movie - and even more so in the fact that it was a game property.

'Living Legend' Screenshot lara

Lara Croft Tomb Raider: Legend.

Eurogamer: You could argue that Angelina Jolie might have played a helping hand in that success too...

Ian Livingstone: Absolutely! When we were thinking about the cast and someone said 'What about Angelina Jolie,' we all said, 'Yes, we'd definitely be happy with that.' I had the pleasure of meeting her a couple of times on the set at Pinewood, and I think I'm still recovering from it. She was amazing. She wanted to do most of the stunts herself, and she really is quite an extraordinary lady. She's very hard to fault.

Eurogamer: With regards to the 10th Anniversary game you mentioned - who's actually developing that? Crystal Dynamics are presumably working on the next instalment on next-gen systems, but there seemed to be a little confusion over the matter recently in terms of Core's potential involvement.

Ian Livingstone: There hasn't been an official announcement on that yet and I think you can expect to hear a little more on it at Edinburgh. But with regards to the recent confusion over it, I can say that Core are no longer involved with the franchise, and they're certainly not working on the game.

Eurogamer: Returning to the Lara Croft screening, what's led you to present this at Edinburgh rather than any of the other shows?

Ian Livingstone: I think it's a great venue and a terrific event to showcase some of the entertainment side of our industry. To be a part of the Edinburgh Festival is a very positive association. To be attached to other creative industries and entertainment industries like music, film et cetera - it's great to have games encompassed in that environment.

If I can help explain some of the fun and positive sides of gaming, rather than the natural perception of games being viewed negatively, that's a great thing. Lara Croft is a character that's known as much to the general public as the gaming public, and it's a terrific chance to put out some positive news into the world about gaming.

Eurogamer: How do you think the event is shaping up so far?

Ian Livingstone: I believe it's going very well. This will be my third year, and I've had a very good, very positive time in the past two years. I'm expecting this to be equally as positive, if not more. Of course, once the EIEF is over, we'll be hopping straight over to Leipzig too, so it's a fun and then a more serious week out of the office.

'Living Legend' Screenshot jolie

Angelina Jolie as Lara Croft.

Eurogamer: There's obviously been a lot of talk about the changes to the E3 convention. What's your opinion on how those changes will impact on shows like the EIEF and Leipzig?

Ian Livingstone: Well, it's obviously good news for them as far as they're concerned, because there's going to be a lot more regional boosting of exposure to games by both publishers and developers, so I'm sure they welcome it.

There will be an E3 in some shape or form, it's just that it had become almost out of control with the amount of money you had to spend just to make as much noise to increase the perception of what you're trying to do - rather than the actual business you were getting out of it.

We made the decision a couple of years ago to get off the show floor and just have meeting rooms. From a perception point of view it looked like we shrunk back. But from an operational point of view, we did much more real business than we ever did trying to fight the noise and the crowds, the freeloaders and the t-shirt and bag grabbers that were invading the stand all the time.

Eurogamer: So, do you think that the smaller, more focused format of shows like EIEF and Leipzig are a better way to deal with things? Is that what the industry needs, moving forwards?

Ian Livingstone: Well, you've got to get a bang for your buck really. You've got to be able to control costs and show a genuine return for your investment. E3 has pretty much got out of hand in most people's eyes, and it was unsustainable. Especially in these days of transition when there's a lot of pressure on the industry to perform.

There's always, when you go through a transition, a period of uncertainty - what platforms are going to be successful, et cetera - so there's a lot of high risk at this moment in time, and publishers in particular are nervous about spending too much money anyway. So if you can control those costs, it can only be a good thing.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Tomb Raider on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-34 of 34 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
JetSetWilly
16/08/06 @ 11:11
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well, Mario is still very much within the games niche, whereas Lara has gone beyond that thanks to two blockbuster films, for example.

Not forgetting Bob Hoskins in SMB the movie of course.
myiagros
16/08/06 @ 11:15
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
don't you dare mention SMB the movie that was absolute pap. It is probably the biggest blot on Bob Hoskins CV.

\ ahhh the pain ;-)
Hog-lumps
16/08/06 @ 11:53
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
biggest blot on Bob Hoskins CV.

What, other than those dreaded BT adverts you mean? :P

fletcherr
16/08/06 @ 12:07
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Whereas the Tomb Raider movies were like Citizen Kane, of course.
Pac
16/08/06 @ 12:30
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Isn't it time for a new gaming champion?"

God yes. Pretty sick of Lara, her lacklustre games, and low brow action films.

"perhaps even more appealing to women"

Pretty sure women don't find her that aspirational either.
Does anyone know any women that do?

Fatnick
16/08/06 @ 12:35
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Not forgetting Bob Hoskins in SMB the movie of course."

No, i really think we would all be better off if we forgot that ever happened.
Clive Dunn
16/08/06 @ 12:42
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Can we get rid of the Deathtrap Dungeon playing cards yet Ian ?
Pac
16/08/06 @ 12:54
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Can we get rid of the Deathtrap Dungeon playing cards yet Ian ? "

Yeah, and I'm still stuck on Warlock of Firetop Mountain, when is the strategy guide coming out eh?

Oh, and half the pages have fallen out.
riz23
16/08/06 @ 13:10
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Tomb Raider:Legend wasn't that brilliant. I wouldn't say the public loved it, I'd say we tolerated it. How about making the next one have even less guns like we've always said and make it last a bit longer than 5 hours?
smelly
16/08/06 @ 13:21
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
don't you dare mention SMB the movie that was absolute pap.

And the tomb raider films werent?
kangarootoo
16/08/06 @ 13:43
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Does anyone know any women that do?"

I know a couple that do.

I think its a common male misconception (born out of good intentions) that women never find "sexy" women characters in games appealing.

Of course its not the rule either way, there are some that do and some that don't. And then the definition of "sexy" is also open to opinion.
Feanor
16/08/06 @ 13:48
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Millions of people with no interest in video games have heard of Lara, but don't know who Mario is. So get off your high horse, Iwata-san.

I really want to hear more about this 10th Anniversary game.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 16/08/06 @ 14:50
smelly
16/08/06 @ 13:49
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Totally agree actually bengali.

Even my mom knows who mario is. Wouldnt have a clue about lara croft.

In fact i'm 90% sure that a vast majority of non-gaming people would recognise mario over lara.
kangarootoo
16/08/06 @ 14:03
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think it depends on the demographic you look at. Most Hollywood movie fans have heard of Lara Croft. Not so many will have heard of Mario. In gaming circles the opposite may be true. Using terms like "so far head in terms of popularity" when none of really know for sure is a bit risky.
TS2610
16/08/06 @ 14:14
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
She's only so famous because she had big tits. Nothing to do with how well written her character was or the quality of the games.
ecureuil
16/08/06 @ 14:31
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The games were decent, they just need to take out the shooting sections.
kangarootoo
16/08/06 @ 14:41
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@TS2610

Not sure that is true.

The first Tomb Raider was a landmark game, despite plenty of previously published games with charicatured female leads.

And there were plenty of games trying to cash in on the "flesh sells" aspect of TR after TR1, which then failed because that was all they had to sell.

Edit: My point being, which I didn't make very clear, is that if the games had bombed as so many others had done, the character would have never reached the eyes of the public at large.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 16/08/06 @ 15:43
Hog-lumps
16/08/06 @ 14:56
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
yep i agree with kanga, the boobs help the initial sell but the relative good quality of the games keep it in the public interest for the longer term. It's a two pronged attack; err, if you see what I mean.

Prob why TR on Ps2 failed as the quality wasn't there and all we were left with is the boobs.............

:)

(Edit spelling)
Edited 1 times, most recently on 16/08/06 @ 15:58
kangarootoo
16/08/06 @ 15:16
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@bengalibengali

I totally agree that within the eyes of gamers, regard for the TR series has fallen compared to Mario (which is still hugely popular).

Whether that equates to knowledge of the two characters (I use the term loosely, Mario isn't really a character so much as an icon) among the general public, I'm not sure.


Like so many of these interviews, people sometimes just express what they feel at the time in response to a question. We shouldn't expect their opinions to be 100% cast in fact all the time. They're just people like the rest of us.
yiannis
16/08/06 @ 15:20
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Unless you can think of someone more famous?

Eurogamer: Other than the likes of Mario, you mean?

Ian Livingstone: Well, Mario is still very much within the games niche, whereas Lara has gone beyond that thanks to two blockbuster films, for example. She's graced the covers of thousands of not just games journals, but lifestyle journals as well. "


mario is niche ... HAR HARDIE HAR HAR!!!!
an icon voted once "more well known" than "coca cola" logo and many times more known than mickey mouse :)

Lara is famous. agreed. But compared with Mario and Link (or "zelda" as most people out of the games loop recognize him).... i don't think she can take the comparison and still stand as tall and with her boobs proud as they usually look.

No game character has ever been more loved or hated than mario worldwide.

As for the TR movies... if Angelina Jolie was not impersonating the main character i very seriously doubt that people would ever pay a ticket to watch those movies.

Tomb raider series is a decent series and has stood up the test of time indeed.. but more well known than Mario.. pfffffffffft... show some respect duuude.
Feanor
16/08/06 @ 15:39
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"an icon voted once "more well known" than "coca cola" logo and many times more known than mickey mouse :)"

Voted by who? The population of the world, or just by game nerds who read websites like this?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 16/08/06 @ 16:40
alimokrane
16/08/06 @ 15:43
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Why are you taking the Mario Comment so seriously. I think what he meant to say is that the Lara Croft Character has gone beyond the world of gaming unlike Mario but just didtn quite explain it well within this context. I am sure he knows Mario is Way more known then Lara Croft. Besides the guy is getting old so forgive gran'pa.
Edited 3 times, most recently on 16/08/06 @ 17:30
Riggers
16/08/06 @ 16:32
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"perhaps even more appealing to women"

Pretty sure women don't find her that aspirational either.
Does anyone know any women that do?

Well, I can only speak for myself, but I always found Lara to be a bland, characterless bit of eye candy. Didn't like the character, but I did like the games.

Preferred Soul Reaver and LoK: Defiance though...
HIGHVOLTAGE
16/08/06 @ 17:13
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Off the die hard Nintendo fans go again. Yes lets compare sales of the recent Tomb Raider Legend to Mario 64 that came out how many years ago was it now, ooo and while we're at it make a thing about it been multi platform. Actually No lets compare Mario 64 sales to when Tombraider was at its peak, ooo and lets just make them from Playstation sales only, oh, oh whats that? Oh dear me thinks Mario 64 has got its ass whupped! And why's that? Well it's not because as the die hard Nintendo fan will tell you in a sudden u turn on his 1st opinion that sales=quality to now saying sales don't matter, thats just because the general public are stupid and they'll buy a crap game just for the boobies. No its because they could see Mario 64 was nowt more than a middle of the road cartoon platformer which had all been done before and wasn't anything like as good as the genuis 2d versions of the game whereas Tomb Raider was initially something a bit different and new before Core sequelled the game to death.

Please don't bother respond with any of the usual fanboy crap yadda yadda N64 had the analogue controller (yes, so did the PC, numerous arcade games and even ...the BBC micro all decades before Nintendo smacked us over the head with their corporate propoganda telling us otherwise) etc, I don't care. I'm just shoooting you down in flames cause I'm sick of this narrow minded fanboy twaddle. I otherwise agree; Ian Livingstone is a bit of a big headed pillock who doesn't know what he's on about. Go back to the adventure game books.
CitizenGeek
16/08/06 @ 18:53
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Madman, Lara Croft is more popular than Mario eh? What a loser. He's just clinging to SCi's only worthwhile asset......
junglist
16/08/06 @ 19:30
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ HIGHVOLTAGE

"Actually No lets compare Mario 64 sales to when Tombraider was at its peak, ooo and lets just make them from Playstation sales only, oh, oh whats that? Oh dear me thinks Mario 64 has got its ass whupped!"

Don't make a statement without the evidence to back it up, (all these figures taken from Wiki's "best selling computer games of all time")

Super Mario 64 (N64 - 11.89 million) Tomb Raider (PS1 - 4.45 million)

Not even close!!!!!!!!

And now lets compare all Mario & Tomb Raider titles across all platforms
Super Mario Bros. (NES - 40.24 million)
Super Mario Bros. 3 (NES - 18 million)
Super Mario World (SNES - 20.61 million)
Super Mario All-Stars (SNES - 10.55 million)
Super Mario 64 (N64 - 11.89 million)
Super Mario Sunshine (NGC - 5.56 million)
Super Mario Land (GB/GBC - 18.14 million)
Super Mario Land 2 (GB/GBC - 11.18 million)
Super Mario Bros. Deluxe (GB/GBC - 5.07 million)
Super Mario Advance 2: Super Mario World (GBA - 4.89 million)
Super Mario Advance (GBA - 4.55 million)
Super Mario Advance 4 (GBA - 4.41 million)
Super Mario Advance 3 (GBA - 2.35 million)
Classic NES Series: Super Mario Bros. (GBA - 2.12 million)
Super Mario 64 DS (DS - 3.76 million)

Total mario games sold 163.32 million

Tomb Raider II (PS1 - 4.94 million)
Tomb Raider (PS1 - 4.45 million)
Tomb Raider 4 (PS1 - 2.34 million)
Tomb Raider III (PS1 - 1.3 million)

Tomb Raider II (PC - 2.24 million)
Tomb Raider (PC - 1.89 million)
Tomb Raider III (PC - 1.49 million)
Tomb Raider: The Last Revelation (PC - 1.04 million)

Total Tomb Raider titles sold 19.69 million

Note lack of any Tomb Raider titles making into the top PS2 Games
Also these figures don't have New super mario bros. or Tomd Raider Legend included, but i'll put a wager on it that New super mario has sold over twice as many units despite only being available on the DS.

An interesting fact for all you Nintendo haters out there, 14 out of the 20 top selling games of all time are Nintendo exclusives
Edited 1 times, most recently on 16/08/06 @ 20:40
HIGHVOLTAGE
16/08/06 @ 20:25
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Allright *bugger* Mario wins! I stand corrected. And he's got better boobs.
Royal Fool
17/08/06 @ 00:21
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Funny coincidence that this article pops up the same day that I started playing Tomb Raider Legend.

Fine game, by the way.
Machetazo
17/08/06 @ 04:38
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Eurogamer: Other than the likes of Mario, you mean?

Ian Livingstone: Well, Mario is still very much within the games niche, whereas Lara has gone beyond that thanks to two blockbuster films, for example."

Just how is the above statement inaccurate...?!
Mario has rarely progressed, successfully from a mainstream perspective, beyond gaming, in which he's hugely successful. (The SMB movie is regularly held up as a prime example of how *not* to create a movie based on a video game) He's nowhere near as regularly been featured in magazines, as Lara (gaming related or otherwise.)
The Tomb Raider movie(s) have their fans, that number far more than would admit to liking SMB, I imagine.

First read what's on the page, without engaging the "fanboy" filter, next time.

*Hopes there'll be plenty of coverage of EIEF on EG* ;)
Edited 1 times, most recently on 17/08/06 @ 05:40
smelly
17/08/06 @ 10:10
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
LOL!

I think you guys underestimate how popular nintendo used to be.

In its hey day, 1/3rd of all american households owned a nintendo, Mario had his own cartoon series, etc etc.

I stand by my original belief that if i went up to strangers in the street, more people would recognise mario than lara if i showed them pictures. Actually i'd also say sonic is more recognisable than lara too!

Hmm.. Thinking about it.. I reacon it'd be something like (in order of how many people would recognise them) : Mario, sonic, spyro (or maybe crash), lara.

Netfreak
17/08/06 @ 10:28
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The cleavage saved the franchise. Nuff said.
Hughes.
17/08/06 @ 12:06
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ch3w84cc4
17/08/06 @ 20:36
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I have heard some very interesting points from both camps supporting Mario and Lara. I think there are a few things that need to be cleared up. If you put Mario up against Lara and purely sales, then yes of course Mario wins hands down, and Mario is probably the most important game character in the games industry, as he is the character that embodies the very best in platform gaming, and of course with the brand Nintendo. Sonic did push Mario for a while, but Mario has managed to evolve whilst remaining true to its roots, unlike Lara.

However Lara Croft should not be underestimated for her impact on the gaming industry. I view Lara very much like Sigourny Weaver in Alien. She is a trailblazer that brought a female character to the very forefront of the action genre. She was particularly embraced by the British public because of the timing. The Spice Girls had just hit the scene, and the girl power marketing tool was brought into the conscious of the British consumer. Lara fitted very well with that image and was able to ride on the crest of that wave.

The first two Tomb Raiders were great example of their genre, and was able to draw up on the likes of Prince of Persia and of course Cores classic Rick Dangerous. However Eidos made a huge mistake with the third and fourth titles. Due to the huge success of the first two titles, the wonderful marketing guys though the name of Lara would be enough to sell a game regardless of the quality, which lead to the disaster of four, where they overproduced the game, leading to a lot of unsold stock being left unsold, and caused the company to shed 20% of its work force, and I feel was a major factor in Eidos’s demise.

However Lara did something that Mario didn’t. The character became transcended the confines of the game. Mario even in the crap SMB film was still essentially a computer game character, where as Lara was sold as a post modern Indiana Jones for a new generation. Lara is promoted as a shining feminist icon, but also creates a parody, because she is a male fantasy figure as well.

Lara is a product of very careful marketing, as Eidos had very strict rules on what Lara can and can’t do. It is kind of ironic that Lara who nearly killed Eidos will also end up being its savior.

Mario is globally a bigger brand that Lara, but I think that culturally Lara has had a far bigger impact, because of her ability to break out of the confines of her computer game origins, people who have never played a game, will know Lara, as Lara, rather than the game Tomb Raider.
parisgirl
21/08/06 @ 04:10
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
tomb raider legend was great. it was a very good advancement from the old tomb raiders. the graphics, sound,gameplay,music, and even lara croft herself was perfect. i don't think lara croft should be compared with mario, lara is not within mario's class. lara croft is a far more advance character than mario.she is human like and he is not really human like.and the comment about lara meaning something to women and girls, it's true women can do things maybe not jump around and flick like her remember it's still a game, but women can be trained to fight, use guns, and be very skillful.take example women in the army. women can do things just as good as men. i hate it when people say things like the game only selling because of her big tits!! it is very wrong and disrespectful to lara croft and women as a matter of fact. when you say things like that you are saying women can only do one thing use their bodies! over all tomb raider legend was a great game the makers of the game really did a good job in updateing tomb raider. and she will be very popular for a long time.

Comments: 1-34 of 34 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Get Games.  Download Great PC Games!

X View gallery