F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin

It's rude to Point Man.

The last time we saw Project Origin was in Monolith's Seattle headquarters early last year. What was on display then was two scenes from very different levels. The first showed you fighting against Abominations - Armacham's failed attempts at creating a psychic army. They couldn't stand up straight, but what they lacked in spinal integrity they made up for in the ability to grease around the walls and pop up for a quick nibble on your face. They could flip themselves up the walls like over-perky pancakes, and fold over themselves in a slightly nauseating and undignified display. It was righteously grim.

The other scene we played through was from a level in which you control a mech. It was perfectly justifiable in terms of storyline and canon - Armacham is one of the megacorporations from Monolith's well-loved mech fighter Shogo - but thundering around like an invulnerable clockwork bastard is the mathematical opposite of terrifying. More on that later, though.

Since then, the buyback of the F.E.A.R. name from Blivendivision has relegated the fan-suggested name of Project Origin to a subtitle, and those two isolated patches of action have been stitched together into a series of complete levels on display at a central London location. A location, it turns out, that is more known for its high-end sex parties, so out of Victorian prudishness we decline to rub our open-mouthed face against the walls and carpet.

This action in FEAR 2 starts, as you already know, half an hour before the end of the first game. Over by Alma's vault, Point Man (the first game's hero) is about to set off the apocalyptic explosion that frees her. This time you're playing Michael Beckett, a man who has - slightly unshockingly - latent psychic powers. The opening sequence is his hallucinatory and interactive flash-forward to the blood skies and unnaturally fast clouds of Alma's enraged release. In good time, and in keeping with the story's internal logic, we're assured, Beckett will develop his own time-bending skills to match Point Man's bullet time. The sky, the music box, and the lonely recurring image of a swing hanging from a tree is a re-introduction to the themes of lost innocence and fury that make up Alma's existence.

'F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin' Screenshot 1

I'm the king of the castle this time.

You'll still be fighting the Replica - Paxton Fettel may have eaten his last brain, and controlled his last drone soldier, but the psychic explosion of Alma's release activated the remaining sleeper units, who've reverted to their basic tactical military training. They're left without a psychic commander. We ask Dave Matthews, the game's Primary Art Lead, whether Alma might eventually fill that role, and he declines to answer. Matthews is well aware that the little-girl schtick was never original, and with eerie wee ladies popping up everywhere, he knows it was time to move on. Alma is physically there, now - so you'll see her as she is.

"In FEAR we explored the little girl, and how she interacted with Point Man. She was always at a distance, she led him through, and established the mood in a way that dovetailed with Japanese horror. Now she's out, after 16, 17 years in that vault, with her psyche still dreaming and hating, she's now completely toxic. To the point where she'll melt the flesh off of people. We couldn't just keep that child-like feel; she's getting closer to you, and it's never a good thing when she's touching you, or other people." The fleshing out of Alma as a character - if done well - could make Project Origin very satisfying to returning fans.

Monolith is selling the fact that this is a different style of game, with homages to different kinds of horror. Nightwatch and Daywatch are bigger influences now, as is the more personal slasher High Tension. Even cringe-porn flick Saw is an influence - and this is an example Matthews confesses to using too often, and he's keen to point out which element he's cherry-picking. "It's that response that happens in your body when you realise you're going to have to do something horrible, or something much worse is going to happen".

Japanese horror will still be a mainstay, but the iconic nature of Alma may have inflated this aspect of the original in our memories. They're the unique moments of horror in what was otherwise a bunch of great combat set-pieces in a fairly boring set of office environments - who wouldn't remember them most clearly? Playing it again, the first game was always half action movie - and that percentage has swollen here, to the point where you're in an adventure that often feels... sassy.

Speaking of the dull environments, Monolith has certainly responded to these complaints. The office levels are more interesting, whole swathes of action take place in the broken streets, and you'll be fighting through laboratories, post-Blitz streets and an elementary school in the game's much fuller, varied and impressive world.

Amongst the gun-fodder, and in addition to the long-declared Abominations, we're introduced to the Spectre - a creature that has had its body completely corroded, leaving only a soul. A soul that's fuelled entirely by Alma's peevishness. These translucent creatures can gain form enough to attack you, but they're also bait. They'll lead you into areas where they can manifest and attack you.

More interesting are the Remnants - until you disturb them, they're meaty ghosts, repeating the last actions of their lives. In the elementary school, the music teacher thumps out a discordant melody on a piano. Out in the street, a businessman is stuck hailing a taxi. They seem harmless enough - you can even take your first shot for free. But once you've disturbed them - which the level design will clearly force you to - they'll become puppetmasters over the corpses around them. Red strings of psychic energy slink across the room like an infuriated strawberry shoelace, and the Remnant hides while you have to deal with its army of... well, let's call them zombies, because zombies are proper fashionable. Destroy them, flush him out, and kill him - it's not a short or easy battle.

'F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin' Screenshot 2

And he's the dirty rascal.

The standout level - not in terms of quality, but more in terms of eyebrow-raising from people unfamiliar to the series - is stomping through the warehouses and streets in the EPA suit. You really feel invincible. For long periods of time, when you're slicing soldiers in half with bullets, or simply reducing the soldiers to a cloud of blood, it's difficult to remember there's a damaged woman fingering your brain throughout the game. In the normal sections, you'll be kicking over tables to provide yourself with soft cover (something only the enemies could do in the first game), but in the EPA sections you'll be shooting through brick walls and bringing buildings down.

Matthews explains the evolution of the EPA suits. "The community were crying out for it. They wanted to be able to jump into the power armour. We tried it, and we liked the idea, but it didn't have everything we wanted. So we created the big brother version of it, so you could rip up the environments. In FEAR, the AI own the space - you have to conquer every inch of the space to continue. In the EPA, that situation reverses, and you're forcing the AI to respond to you."

It's the opposite of scary, we suggest. "Sure, and you won't be doing this all the time - this is just one of the things we've got on our palette. This is just tossing you a bone, after you've worked hard for a while. We're letting you be a badass." If you're completely against all forms of badassery, you'll be pleased to hear that using the EPA suit is optional.

We leave this central London location as visitors to another very different kind of party are arriving. A lot of our earlier concerns about the game are resolved. The mech combat is optional, the script and the banter are excellent, the combination of medkits and health that only partly regenerates is a compromise that leaves you needing to worry about taking damage. But some new concerns arise - the pace of the game feels slightly slower, and at times it felt a little like a combat slog. It's important to remember we weren't playing through the finished game, though - and that kind of talk needs to wait for a review. At the very least, Project Origin is looking set to be interesting, and judging by the direction its taking, any review will receive a fair bunch of "oh this is so wrong actually" comments, which is no bad thing.

F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin is due out for Xbox 360, PS3 and PC on 13th February 2009.

Comments (31) Latest comment 3 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Hunam #1 3 years ago

    Lets just hope they don't cock it up like they did with the Condemned sequel eh?
  • Bangaioh #2 3 years ago

    Yes, looking forward to this even if I'm not sure I'll be through Fallout 3 by then :)
  • dryden555 #3 3 years ago

    its nice to see EG brings up the super boring level design in the first one. FEAR 2 must fix that problem before I consider buying.
  • YourMessageHere #4 3 years ago

    Anyone still whining about level design in the first one needs to stop looking at the architecture and focus on actually playing the game. I've played it through three times, and I've never gotten bored of the levels (with the obvious exception of the turrets levels) - they may not look eyepoppingly beautiful, offices after all do not, but they are very well designed as settings for gunfights while still seeming realistic places. That is what FEAR was for. Want pretty? Play a game without a shotgun in.

    Now it's influenced by Saw? Fuck. The actual story and attempts to be scary in the first one were good tries, especially towards the beginning, but became the most boring part of the game. I can see where this is headed - now we're going to be faced with a necessity to do something the designers think is nasty but actually isn't, and have to put up with NPCs whinging about it for ages afterwards, aren't we?

    Also, Monolith, if you're reading this, feel free to reset the story and rubbish the expansion storylines all you like, but make sure you retain the laser from the expansions. That is the single greatest ranged energy weapon in a game to date.
  • Bangaioh #5 3 years ago

    "Anyone still whining about level design in the first one needs to stop looking at the architecture and focus on actually playing the game. I've played it through three times, and I've never gotten bored of the levels (with the obvious exception of the turrets levels) - they may not look eyepoppingly beautiful, offices after all do not, but they are very well designed as settings for gunfights while still seeming realistic places."

    Totally agree.
    Edited by 1 at 02/01/09 @ 09:08
  • Raz76 #6 3 years ago

    "In FEAR we explored the little girl"

    What?
  • rhubarbandcustard #7 3 years ago

    I play Fear 1 every few weeks. Not because it is a great game. Quite the opposite.

    I always finish my FPS games but this one really is so lacklustre. I probably started this game over a year ago, and hopefully when I can stir myself to play it again the end will start to come in sight and I can trade it in for something that was designed with a bit more creative thought.
  • litote #8 3 years ago

    i am disappointed to see that the change of the "point man" ( you) is never commented. in the first one it was SPOILER [ the son of Alma] END SPOILER...

    it seems now that we have a unknown guinea pig instead with no close connection whatsoever with alma.

    a big change, or is it not? i really would like to know what happened to the first point man, if he died or what.

    they just can let this tie loose.

    next time you speak to them , euroG.....
  • Yossarian #9 3 years ago

    Yeah, as YourMessageHere said, the reason the original was so good was because of the gunplay, and the excellent design of the levels, which only look boring. It's one of the very shooters (Halo/2/3, Left 4 Dead, Crysis/Warhead, Far Cry/2 spring to mind) that tries to be more dynamic than the rollercoaster-cum-shooting-galleries which usually receive higher marks (Call of Duty games and their ilk) by focusing on the second to second combat, and more importantly on AI (and in the case of F.E.A.R., level design which complements the AI). Which is why it's one of the very few shooters (see same list above) that is worth playing more than once.
  • UncleLou #10 3 years ago

    Anyone still whining about level design in the first one needs to stop looking at the architecture and focus on actually playing the game.

    Exactly. FEAR's level design was awesome. It just wasn't very attractive or had a lot of variety visually, which is what people mean. Couldn't care less, myself - if the AI and guns are as terrific as in the first one, it can take place between texture-less grey objects for all I care.
  • Yossarian #11 3 years ago

    But frankblack, the combat is its own reward.

    Someday I'm going to write a lengthy rant about what I see as an ideological war between dynamic and scripted shooters, and how the latter are winning, and how that's a disaster.
  • ChthonicEcho #12 3 years ago

    The office levels are more interesting, whole swathes of action take place in the broken streets, and you'll be fighting through laboratories, post-Blitz streets and an elementary school in the game's much fuller, varied and impressive world.

    Expect more school shoot outs in the land of idiots after this game is released.
    Edited by 1 at 02/01/09 @ 11:32
  • polaris70 #13 3 years ago

    The important thing for me is has it got a true ironsight view on the left trigger? You've had a look at the game so can you tell us? If an FPS hasn't got a true ironsight view then a can't be bothered with it, the first game didn't have one.
  • Nithron #14 3 years ago

    So we're a new guy instead of the old Pointman? Well, that's fine, but we were yet another guy with slow-mo matrix powers in the expansions, too. So what happened to that guy?

    And is there anyone in this gameworld that hasn't been cloned from Neo?
  • Apologie #15 3 years ago

    The point in FEAR 1 wasn't about level desing, it was all about dark atmosphere and incredible enemy A.I... every battle felt fresh because the enemy could flank you, take cover and change stance to passive/agressive in a very realistic way, i loved the gameplay because of that, and loved the tense atmosphere... thouse empty corridors where pretty much essencial to give you the sense of constant danger, the pace was really good, well balanced between scary moments, gun battles and suspence.

    Ill buy FEAR 2 for sure... i really enjoyed the 1st one, and the story is pretty good too.
    Edited by 1 at 02/01/09 @ 13:42
  • schachmatt #16 3 years ago

    Point-man, Alma, Vettel, ending, ... , the story was a foul-tasting hotch-potch of scenes and images from movies and other games.
    I doubt there is a way of correcting that and fear it will get worse in the sequel.

    The gameplay was great, though, and I hope the sequel's will be as intense.
    However, in contrast to Apologie, I found the pacing got very see-throughable with its pause-action-pause-action design and it was very clear when and where the enemies will attack.
    Let's see.
  • drumbaby #17 3 years ago

    Monolith, king of the scripted, king of the contrived...king shit of turd hill...meh.
  • Snooz #18 3 years ago

    I play Fear 1 every few weeks. Not because it is a great game. Quite the opposite.

    I always finish my FPS games but this one really is so lacklustre. I probably started this game over a year ago, and hopefully when I can stir myself to play it again the end will start to come in sight and I can trade it in for something that was designed with a bit more creative thought.


    Just what I do too.

    I wanted to love this game and really don't mind the level design too much, but the gameplay is not impressing, still all right. I also always play single-player games on hardest, and this one on everything maxed with widescreen fix. The beginning was promising, but now I just jump into some action to finish it... I can barely remember any amazing AI, they pop predictably in and out from corners and also chat to each other what they are going to do... some of the guns were fun though, the first ones were quickly useless. The bullettime-stuff got boring and I missed the ability fling my self sideways like in max payne... close combat was allright but felt cooler in Chronicles of riddick. also HATED the 30sek self-cleaning rooms, I also had a weird feeling of everything being a bit out of proportion, cups and a few other small things that could be moved in game looked so big and blocky... probably just me.

    Still an allright game, but for me a 6/10 or something.
  • Snooz #19 3 years ago

    People obviously had different expectations, but the original for me ended up to be closer to games like painkiller than a horrorFPS. Although having played the game only in short sessions over a long time span probably makes me miss a bit of the whole picture and the game isn't getting any younger, I guess it was close to a year old when I started playing it.
  • Ryuken #20 3 years ago

    The addons weren't that shabby either imo (not what Monolith thinks, even though they helped Timegate with it), especially the ability to kick doors in is a must-have in every shooter now. And pls, can someone tell me if they removed slow-mo from multiplayer or not because that was easily one of the best things about the mp. Still having some doubts about this game.
  • E-Raz0r #21 3 years ago

    I loved the combat in FEAR. The AI is unmatched until today, imo.

    I hope they don't focus too much on supernatural enemies in the sequel.
  • FogHeart #22 3 years ago

    It's the opposite of scary, we suggest. "Sure, and you won't be doing this all the time - this is just one of the things we've got on our palette. This is just tossing you a bone, after you've worked hard for a while. We're letting you be a badass." If you're completely against all forms of badassery, you'll be pleased to hear that using the EPA suit is optional.

    Silly boys - they evidently know how to scare us, so how comes they've got this wrong? Here's whatshould happen: You use the EPA once in the game and yes, you feel like a badass. Later on in the game you get the opportunity to use it again, but you're faced with enemies against whom the EPA is worse than useless, and you end up trapped inside, lying on your side, tricked by your own lust for firepower, while they prise the suit open...
  • subtlesnake #23 3 years ago

    "The reward is the fun and richness of combat itself, just like in Halo: CE which also had awfully repetitive levels. "

    But I think the difference is that in Halo the outdoor sections *did* feel epic, and really cultivated a sense of exploration. For example, Assault on the Control Room remains (IMO) one of the most iconic levels the series has ever produced, as does the second level, Halo. These sections at least served to cleanse your palette after the endless corridor crawling.

    While F.E.A.R on the other hand alternates between combat and exploration without any change of scenery: you simply move through the same office buildings and ventilation systems, only without enemies to fight.

    Independently of the greatness of F.E.A.R's combat, I wish moving through the world had been more satisfying, because part of the fun of playing a video game is being able to explore a fictional universe.
  • dryden555 #24 3 years ago

    Sorry guys but it is utterly reasonable to expect something better than the truly _boring_ level design that was in the first FEAR. Set your standards a little higher perhaps?
  • Snooz #25 3 years ago

    Fear and Halo had nice repetitive combat, halo somehow got the flow of the game more right than FEAR imo
  • subtlesnake #26 3 years ago

    "Oh dear... Someone citing Halo as an example of good level design. "

    Good OUTDOOR level design, yes.
  • Gearskin #27 3 years ago

    FEAR was amazing. The expansions less so. But the footage of FEAR 2 looks amazing. Killzone what?
  • bodypopper #28 3 years ago

    Fingers crossed for even more realistically modelled binbags this time.
  • litote #29 3 years ago

    To answer to STKD, no i don't wish them to spoil everything, but some hints about how the two connect to each other would be appreciated.

    frankly, right now i don't expect too much from the story, and the fact that they seem to have dumped the first point man for an other with exact same powers encourages me to think so.

    let me sum it up: you have your self, the good guy , then there is the corpo, who wants to cover her ass, then the girl who wants to destroy everything...

    in the end: action movie, short dialogues.

    but i guess i can trust them for ambiance, fear factor etc. i just F.E.A.R that the story wont have much of a point.

    at least the first let you discover the whole mystery. here it is already laid bare.

    that said, if their main influence source is japenese horror, then any exigence for a coherent story....you know what i mean.
    ( still love them though)


  • bratmandu #30 3 years ago

    Was looking forward to FEAR 1 on the 360 - and was let down a bagfull by poor controls,

    WHO THE HELL thought it'd be a good idea to have the button for melee, to double as the button for holster weapon (and why did that not get caught in playtesting)?

    Anytime i held the melee button a little too long after a dropkick I came out of the jump with no weapon. Useless.

    I would be less angry if there was any part of the game that required you to holster your weapon, but as far as I know, there wasn't (never bothered finishing FEAR1 on 360 cos of this control issue).
  • shotgun44 #31 3 years ago

    Just played the PS3 demo and it is WICKED AWESOME!