Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Defender Review

Xbox 360 Review by Kristan Reed

25 November, 2006

In the crazy unreality that games reviewers generally live in, one minute you're up to your ankles, wading through beautiful rippling water, gazing up at a vast, beautiful stone architecture reaching up into the sky, the next you're recoiling in horror as a roaring chainsaw cleaves your skull in one fluid, sickening motion. The next minute, the miracle of electricity ensure that you live to fight another day - this time asking your frazzled synapses to journey back in time to 1980 to pilot a space craft in a last ditch attempt to save mankind from a determined alien invasion. To the sounds of Baggy Trousers.

Lazy days

In late November 2006 (to the sounds of, I dunno, Wolfmother), some of the very same people that will be busy drowning in their own blood in Gears of War will flick back to the 360 dashboard, decide to fire up Defender and try and convince themselves that it really was better the way things used to be when The Beano cost 6p and your phone number had four digits. Oddly enough, both games were released on Microsoft's system within two days of one another, and the technical contrast between the two could hardly be more difficult to comprehend. From little pixels do mighty digital entertainment industries grow.

'Defender' Screenshot 1

Red swarmers: Ahhhhhhhh!!!!!!

And you, young whipper-snapper at the back, you can wipe that smirk off your pre-pubescent, blackhead-ridden face. Defender was one of the biggest grossing arcade videogames in coin-op history, netting a cool $1 billion for Williams during the famous golden era of arcade gaming when people actually had to leave their house and mix it with under-age smokers in order to play cutting edge games. Is my soul purer than yours? I'll let God figure that one out...

Nowadays (I've never been convinced that's a real word, but hey), the average workshy home-based Internet journo fop can go through an entire day without leaving the house, proving again that mother was right that playing videogames would get me nowhere. Literally. Home deliveries from Sainsbury's for the bloody win, Play.com and CDWow for those all important low-priced entertainment purchases, and Xbox Live Arcade for nostalgic, frivolous, pocket-money priced retro thrills. How sad, lonely and pointless is my life sounding? Very? Good. Then onwards with the review.

If you've never had the good fortune to play the original Defender arcade machine, then, as a gamer you haven't really experienced the true definition of pain. We're talking thumbscrews pain. Mount Everest pain. The pain of instant death. Of psychic pixels homing in at superhuman velocities on your roaring spacecraft and destroying it in one hit before you can possibly react. Of Game Over screens in under three minutes. That's, as Paul Weller wrote at the time of Defender's release (possibly related), Entertainment. Devised around a control system that even insiders at Williams thought was 'ridiculously hard', it somehow managed to seduce a game hungry audience into throwing a ridiculous amount of money into the machine in the misguided belief that they could eventually tame its inner workings.

Some obsessed, superhuman individuals with more hair than can be healthy managed it. Most of us, of course, never had the sort of money (or the hair) required to get good at it and quickly moved onto more forgiving, cuter looking games like Pac-Man, Mr Do and Donkey Kong. Jeff Minter was good at it, but then, thinking about it, he also had the hair. Unsurprisingly, he did a remake for the Atari Jaguar in 1995 and probably played this on Xbox Live Arcade last night. Anyone know his gamertag so we can check?

Control freak

'Defender' Screenshot 2

Peeeew, Kpow, Ehehhehhheh. Sorry, Speccy flashback.

Anyway, yes. The control system. It was designed around more buttons than your average Street Fighter II cabinet, and most people found it to be utterly unforgiving. Well, most people who were a bit rubbish like me. The real hardcore loons that actually preferred being tied up in dexterous knots will take one look at this largely spot-on conversion and spit bile and venom (in that order) that the Xbox 360 pad could never accurately replicate what it was like to control. But let's agree to disagree and admit that few old arcade ports lend themselves to the limitations of the otherwise pretty excellent 360 pad. If you're not some bitter old man with hang-ups, Defender works as well on the 360 as you could reasonably expect.

Of course, like all of Digital Eclipse's ports so far for Midway (the rights holders and publisher), the graphics have been pointlessly 'enhanced', but in a manner which is reasonably subtle and unlikely to send retrophiles into a frothing rage too much. It's easy enough to switch off, though, and in no time you can get to grips with saving little men from getting abducted by the Lander aliens that teleport (cunning) into the level and swoop down mercilessly. The idea is to fly from left to right (or vice versa, of course) around the wraparound scrolling landscape and attempt to wipe out the alien threat as quickly as you can. If you dilly-dally too long, the Landers will capture the humans and turn into annoying Mutants that buzz around and spit bullets around at a faster rate and become harder to hit. And if you're really tardy, you'll eventually encounter the supremely fast Baiters that can fly faster than you and hit you with unerring accuracy.

Progress onto the subsequent stages introduces the evil Bombers, Pods and Swarmers, which, to be frank make life incredibly difficult for the average player very quickly. Armed with only three lives (plus a bonus after 10000 points) and three smart bombs, the odds of you surviving beyond round two are pretty minimal unless you have supreme reserves of patience and skill. It's by no means impossible, but stacked up next to practically any game on Xbox Live Arcade, Defender is by some distance the most challenging.

Friends reunited

Xbox Live Arcade introduces the very welcome co-op challenge, which ought to be of major interest to the real hardcore players schooled in early '80s gaming lore, but - as with so many Live Arcade games, finding casual gamers waiting to play you online is relatively unlikely. Hook up with a mate, though, and you're away, and you can unlock a few achievement points for your pains as well.

'Defender' Screenshot 3

Hyperspace or Smart bomb: it's the eternal Defender conundrum.

The rest of the achievement points are relatively tough nuts to crack - particularly the one that tasks you with not firing a bullet, a smart bomb or teleporting for 75 full seconds. I tried this relentlessly for over two hours, and nearly managed it about 5 times, only to get nailed by the dreaded Baiter at about 73 seconds. Seriously, once the planet explodes and you've got the entire mutant invasion tailing you, a second or two feels like a lifetime.

But aside from such frivolities, there's no major compulsion to keep playing unless you've got some score grudge thing going on with some mates. On its own, the game simply feels a little too old school for my liking, with so many punishing characteristics that it stops being a fun curiosity quite quickly, and more like an example of how routinely punishing exercises games were back in those innocent days.

If you're a long-term fan and haven't already bought it on one of innumerable compilations out there, then 400 points is just about tolerable for a game of this importance and stature - just be aware that unless you have some sort of emotional attachment to it that it'll feel like you've just bought some kind of gaming endurance test, rather than a piece of actual entertainment. After that, you can get back to chainsawing people in half and do the whole time travel thing in reverse.

6/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Defender on Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-20 of 20 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
krokomkiller
25/11/06 @ 08:43
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
nah:)
prettyboytim
25/11/06 @ 09:17
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Is there some other scoring scale that gets used for retro remakes? Sure, it may have been good when it first came out (although I was never a big fan), but does it really deserve a 6/10 now? Just Cause got a 6/10. Sure, not a great game but I probably got more fun out of the demo than I ever did from Defender...
Dizzy
25/11/06 @ 09:37
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Uber defender players can play this game virtually forever.... I always wondered how they did it. I usually get blasted to bits around level 3-4
Edited 1 times, most recently on 25/11/06 @ 09:37
kentmonkey
25/11/06 @ 09:58
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
prettyboytim, I think the score takes a number of things into account. if it's a retro title they're probably reviewing it as such as people generally know to make a difference between retro and full price new games. Retro titles are more about how they stand up today and whether they trigger some sort of boyhood/girlhood emotion in you all over again, or whether they should have been left to memory.

Also retro titles are usually incredibly cheap compared to new games, like Defender being about £5 and Just Cause being £30 plus, so it's fair that they get a different mark. You might get 6/10 money's worth out of Defender at £5 and 6/10 value out of £30/40 for Just Cause.
GrandpaUlrira
25/11/06 @ 10:00
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"That's, as Paul Weller wrote at the time of Defender's release (possibly related) Entertainment."

I waited for a long time for the comma that closed the parenthetic expression. I'm still waiting.
krudster [mod]
25/11/06 @ 10:33
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Your wish is granted.


Yes, retro titles are rated within their own context, no don't compare the scores with full-priced titles.
Rev. Stuart Campbell
25/11/06 @ 10:44
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Possibly important things not mentioned:

1. The "updated" graphics are probably the nicest yet seen on an XBLA retro game, and certainly the best ever in a Defender update.

2. You can control the game either with the d-pad directly, or using the shoulder buttons to replicate the arcade's Thrust and Reverse buttons. Both options are available all the time, you don't need to switch them with a menu or anything. It's effective and thoughtful.
El_MUERkO
25/11/06 @ 10:52
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
you should have given it a nine
MasterControlProgram
25/11/06 @ 11:19
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I remember a wonderful Defender port by Atari for the Texas TI99. One afternoon, in summer, I made 600000 points. Probably my longest single session on a game (who ever talked about saving games, back then).

As for score, I would prefer a different judging scale for retrogaming, to better differenciate: something like 1 to 5 stars. Boring, I know :)
chupachups
25/11/06 @ 11:37
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"you should have given it a nine"

Turn your monitor upside down?
krokomkiller
25/11/06 @ 11:53
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Turn your monitor upside down?"

Hey thats genius!
pinkio
25/11/06 @ 11:57
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Best ever Defender version?..... Planetoid on the BBC micro...... needed 6 fingers on each hand really ..... but satisfying when you eventially nailed it!
CyRUS-
25/11/06 @ 13:05
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
These games might be tempting for a £1 but do many people actually pay £4-5 for these? They might actually increase their revenue selling them at £1-2... unless the plan is to start discounting the older retro releases ;/

I would love to see sales figures on the xbla games but i guess they aren't released...
spadge
25/11/06 @ 15:16
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
XBL prices:

400 points = £3.40 or thereabouts ($5) (Retro, simpler stuff inc. Geometry Wars)
800 points = £6.80 or thereabouts ($10) (Majority of titles)
1200 points = £10.20 or thereabouts ($15) (Lumines, Billiards)

Personally, I think the retro stuff should probably be 200-300 points, but some of the stuff at 800 is pretty good value. I don't think there's been too much success for the titles at 1200 pricepoints.

Defender's ok but tons better without the (imho) un-nessessary visual "enhancement" which is removed by the in-game menu, not the front-end btw. It's still very difficult - although I was crap at it when it was new at Wakefield Tech' in 1980...!
LightSleeper
25/11/06 @ 16:45
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Never mind Xbox Live Arcade, I remember playing many a co-op session down the arcade with a mate, which was summed up beautifully BTW by the Beastie Boys song Body Movin' (Hello Nasty, 1988) :

"And if you play defender I could be your hyper space"

..wait, wait, hang on...NOW! Ah for fuck's sake!

I pressed it! The button's sticky!

You owe me 10p!



savant
26/11/06 @ 00:47
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So you proceed from left to right do you? You do realise that you can reverse direction don't you? You haven't been playing this just going in one direction have you? No wonder you've found it a mite bit difficult.

I adore this game and I've played it a lot (not on the 360, but on the Midway classics disc for the Xbox). Both this and Robotron are Eugene Jarvis's masterworks. If you find them too hard, then you're missing the point - they are supposed to be challenging; they're supposed to reward you for getting in 'the zone'; they are supposed to kick you off the machine after a few seconds, but keep you entertained enough to want to put another 10p piece in ;)

I used to play Defender using the radar screen almost exclusively (this lets you keep track of off-screen nasties easily). I'd recommend that if you're finding yourself getting killed 'unfairly'.

Anyway, I'd give this classic more than 6 points, especially as it seems as if you haven't really played it at any length.
Wabe
26/11/06 @ 16:26
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I happen to know Jeff Minter's gamertag and no, he's not played defender.

He's still bashing away at Geometry Wars though and Gears of War playing on 'casual' !
krudster [mod]
27/11/06 @ 07:02
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Not played it at any length? I tried for 2 hours solidly just to snag the 75 seconds acheivement, mentalist that I am....
bloke
27/11/06 @ 11:54
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Come on krudster - Defender isn't *that* hard. And at least when you do die, you know it's your own fault and not some random dodgy programmming :-)

Controls - on the coin-op.

Left Hand: 1 Joystick that goes up/down only. 1 Button (operated by thumb) for reversing direction.

Right Hand: Thrust, Fire, Smart Bomb.

Head: Hyperspace

I mean - what's difficult about that layout :-)



BremXJones
29/11/06 @ 11:35
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bloke, you're being ironic, yeah?

I love Defender to death. But it really was the old-coin-op's equivalent of Ninja Gaiden or something. A brilliant game, but with a difficulty curve that you're going to bash straight against. And - whisper it - the elitism of its controls are part of its appeal.

(Defender and Robotron bash up against each other as my favourite old-skool arcade game, with Robotron currently in the lead. Just as a random factlet.)

KG

Comments: 1-20 of 20 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Get Games.  Download Great PC Games!

X View gallery