Civilization IV: Colonization Review

In Sid We Trust.

Version tested: PC

Uncross those fingers, unfurrow that brow and breathe a big, candle-snuffing sigh of relief: Firaxis hasn't mucked up. The ball has not been dropped, the pooch has not been screwed, the baby's bathwater has been disposed of carefully and without any grievous consequence. Yes, it's my happy duty to report that one of strategy gaming's most sacred relics has been brought kicking and screaming into the 21st Century with minimal loss of brilliance.

But first: time for an obligatory history lesson. It was in The Year Of Our Lord Nineteen Hundred and Ninety Four that Messrs Sidney Meier and Brian Reynolds unveiled their near-perfect Civ semi-sequel. Turn-based, tile-mapped, and as lovable as a chipmunk in a Pilgrim Father costume, Colonization was all about dispossessing American Indians. Starting mid-Atlantic with a shipload of supplies and emigrants, players scrambled to grab and grow New World colonies. Independence from an increasingly greedy motherland was the ultimate goal.

En route, resources had to be reaped and processed, goods traded, indigenous tribes befriended or butchered, European rivals outstripped. Where Civ was a surreal history-mangling marathon, Colonization was a tech-tree-free 3000m steeplechase. The shorter span and tighter focus gave it a more rooted, more realistic feel. Some connoisseurs even dared to claim it was the better game.

For those familiar with the original, the news that Firaxis was readying a new version was cause for both celebration and consternation. More than a decade on, could it capture the same magic and subtlety? Would the fact that it was being built with Civ 4 code lead to compromises? Were we going to wind-up with an awkward Beyond the Sword-style mod? Nerves jangled.

'Civilization IV: Colonization' Screenshot 1

The Civ IV connection is obvious. They really didn't need to mention it in the title.

Happily, it turns out we were all worrying for nothing. One of the first things that hits you about the reassuringly magnetic Civ IV: Colonization ('Colonization II' would have been so much neater) is just how similar it is to its ancestor. There's the lone ship surrounded by sea and darkness. There's the beige settlement screen with its unshowy building illustrations. There's the eager emigrants waiting on the resolutely 2D dockside. Wisely, Firaxis has resisted the urge to meddle. There are no pointless graphical embellishments, no new, nailed-on concepts. Yes, there are changes - a sleeker interface, Civ IV-quality visuals, multiplayer, borders, unit promotions... - but none of them upset or over-burden the expertly stacked Colonization applecart.

Not that the Colonizations are humble applecarts. Groaning fruit-and-veg stalls is what they are, veritable Covent Gardens of choice, colour, and succulence. Every turn is chock-a-block with the kind of dilemmas and opportunities that make sleep, food and friends seem desperately unimportant. Take a look at my current game for evidence.

'Civilization IV: Colonization' Screenshot 2

If Colonization was a perfume it would combine hints of tobacco, pine needles and pilgrim sweat.

It's 1551 and I'm playing as Dutch coloniser/fag brand Peter Stuyvesant (English, Spanish and French personages are also playable). Things are going swimmingly, but there's still plenty to ponder and lots to do. Issues currently stacked in my mental in-tray include a warehouse bursting with furs in New Amsterdam, an idle settler in Dontgiveadam, and an imminent starvation situation in Claudevandam (Yes, you can name your own settlements).

The overflowing warehouse situation is easily sorted. All I have to do is check a couple of export/import checkboxes and my automated fleet of cargo vessels will swing by regularly to pick up surplus pelts. Rather than ship the skins direct to the Old World, I'm going to drop them off at Tarmacadam where an expert furrier will transform them into valuable coats. The good people of Holland love their mink cagoules and beaver parkas.

The idle settler situation requires a bit more thought. Right now I'm torn between employing him in a cigar factory (cheroot prices in Europe are sky-high at the moment) and turning him into a missionary and packing him off to a nearby Indian village to convert braves. Actually, scratch that. I think I'm going to send him north to mine silver in Rightlittlemadam. There's a lot of money buried in those hills.

And what's to be done about the food shortages in Claudevandam? Grub can be brought in by wagon train, but that won't solve the underlying problem. The reason folk are going hungry is the Spanish cancer to the south. The spreading borders of San Salvador have recently deprived my youngest town of three of its most fertile terrain squares. I see three possible solutions: I can ramp up my Liberty Bell generation (a resource that swells borders and hastens independence), I can abandon the place to the wolves and the deer, or - and this is the one I'm instinctively drawn to - I can storm across the border with a shock-force of dragoons, cannons, and infantry, reducing San Salvador to a heap of glowing embers. It's about time my troops got some battle experience. As someone - possibly Sun Tzu - once said "You can't make a Spanish omelette without killing conquistadors".

And that's just a snapshot. Every turn there's another clutch of engrossing dilemmas waiting to be resolved. If I could just achieve X, then Y and Z would be within my grasp. Just one more settler here, a new building there, an extra Founding Father (recruitable personalities that function a bit like Civ's Wonders) in my Continental Congress... The complexity is perfectly pitched. You can always see solutions, it's finding the money and the men to implement them that's the problem.

Just dealing with the Indians is a game in itself. Colonization's roaming aborigines are far more interesting than Civ's bellicose barbs. Tribes like the Sioux, Apaches and Tupi will fight beside you, trade with you, give you gifts, teach your settlers valuable skills, and provide you with manpower, if you treat them decently. Treating them decently means paying them for settlement plots, and massacring them culturally rather than physically. There's a moral choice here, but it's only, 'Do you want to be a bastard, or an utter bastard?'

Perhaps the most fascinating relationship within Civ IV: Colonization is the one between player and mother country. In most games about colonialism, distant homelands are straightforward markets and recruiting grounds. Here they fulfil those functions but there's also a darker side. Your monarch regards colonies as personal piggy banks and plunders them accordingly. The larger you grow, the more cash he'll try to squeeze out of you in import duties and 'voluntary' contributions. You start out resenting the blue-blooded bloodsucker and end-up despising him. Slowly but steadily independence turns from a dry, abstract victory condition into a burning emotional need. Sid & co. make you actively crave freedom. It's genius.

'Civilization IV: Colonization' Screenshot 3

Who can resist the 'Swamp Fox' promotion?

Where Civ relies on luck and alchemy to produce exciting game endings, Civ IV: Colonization shamelessly stacks the deck to ensure bloodbaths. Soon after declaring independence - something that requires the generation of a lot of Liberty Bells - an angry expeditionary force will hit your beaches like a pack of irrate... sea... err... otters. Irrate sea otters with muskets. Suddenly the loathsome king is right there in front of you in the shape of cavalry, cannons and infantry. It's another incredibly inspired touch, delicately harnessing history to inject drama and tension right at the close.

One quality Civ IV: Colonization does share with its step-sibling is its ludicrous replayability. Numerous difficulty levels, tons of game options, a random map generator, and the sheer wealth of tactics available mean this isn't one of those purchases you're going to weary of in a week or two. I played solidly for a couple of days before grinding out my first narrow victory. If the games hadn't been so thoroughly absorbing, this lack of success might have been disheartening. Perhaps Firaxis should have a provided a selection of smaller scenarios with easier goals to help people find their feet and build confidence. A few historically-inspired shorts - wipe out the Incas, rid the Caribbean of pirates, build a transcontinental road, that sort of thing - would have been most welcome.

'Civilization IV: Colonization' Screenshot 4

War against the English? Great idea! You assault their impregnable capital, I'll attack their wagon trains.

That's about as vicious as the criticism is going to get in this review. Apart from mild annoyance at some automation hiccups (occasionally pioneers, ships, and wagon trains, seem to forget what they're supposed to be doing) and slight disappointment at the unit art (more could have been done to distinguish the four civs) I've been horribly content these last few days.

Could Firaxis have included a few more playable factions - the Brazil-bagsying Portuguese for instance? Yes. Could the devs have added some extra fibre to the combat - more stats, some representation of supply, a tactical mini-game a la Conquest of the New World or Imperialism II? They could. They could have done a lot of things, but deep changes would have risked disrupting Colonization's amazing chemistry, its exquisite equilibrium.

Cherished heirlooms need a bit of dusting and restoration now and again. What they don't need is to be 'expanded', 'improved', or 're-imagined'. Civilization IV: Colonization is great because Colonization was great. It sweeps you along in the same birchbark-canoe-on-a-raging-river manner. It keeps you away from mattress and mates just as effectively. If only more remakes were this sensitive.

8 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (31) Latest comment 3 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • coastal #1 3 years ago

    sweet monday morning. now i really don't want to go to work.
  • Ginger #2 3 years ago

    surprised at the 8 following a glowing review. Still, looks like a must buy now.
  • tomkuryakin #3 3 years ago

    Call me pedantic, but "irrate" should be irate. Some people get irate about journalists not being able to spell or even not being able to use a spellchecker. There's no excuse.
  • Krelle #4 3 years ago

    THERE IS NO EXCUSE!

    Go to hell (ignoreland) tomkuryakin.

    You come from Russia or something, lol?
  • groovychainsaw #5 3 years ago

    Purchased - all I needed to know was is it like the original. It is, and therefore a classic has been updated perfectly...
  • Gnort #6 3 years ago

    I loved the original Colonization (even more than Civ, in fact), but was worried they'd try and make it more like a Civ mod than the original game, so this review has revived my interest in this game.

    As my PC is a bit prehistoric, does anyone know how system intensive this game is? It looks fairly manageable.
  • ConsoleCowboy #7 3 years ago

    Yet another Firaxis Remake... I love Civ 4 and I sure will like Colonization 2 but please, Sid, could you do something new? And could you please stop recycling that old Pirates! graphics engine (Pirates!, Civ4, Railroad Tycoon, Colonization2)? I always liked Sid Meyer - his games were my favorites, but I would love to see him do something fresh.

    ...but an Alpha Centauri remake would ease my pain too.
  • siro #8 3 years ago

    So this is basically Colonization revamped? You know, screenshots really do help for this kind of game.
  • orakio #9 3 years ago

    First time I heard about this :-o
    must-buy!
  • faux_carnation #10 3 years ago

    Good stuff.

    Roll on Thursday.
  • chrisy #11 3 years ago

    Please can we have a Wii version of this? It would more than make up for the abandonment of Civ Rev Wii :-)

    (otherwise I might have to buy a game for my PC, which I really don't want to do as it is old and probably not good enough to run this anyway - or I could just play the old Amiga version)
    Edited by 2 at 22/09/08 @ 10:36
  • StarchildHypocrethes #12 3 years ago

    Excellent. Sounds good.

    Consider this purchased.
  • michaelius #13 3 years ago

    100% sure buy for me :)
  • hiddenranbir #14 3 years ago

    AC is owned by EA. Firaxis haven't neglected it, they can't touch it.

    Focus on the Planetfall Mod.
    Edited by 1 at 22/09/08 @ 11:03
  • TheJuriel #15 3 years ago

    Looks too much like a Civ4 mod for me to be excited over this. The game even uses the same sounds!

    However, I'll check it out. My enthusiasm is just killed by the exact same look, down to the boring city menus.
  • Wendelius #16 3 years ago

    I had forgotten this was coming out so soon. Nice review. I just placed my order!
  • ChrisTop #17 3 years ago

  • MrChuckles #18 3 years ago

    Master of Magic 2 wanted....

    Nuff said.....
  • Gnort #19 3 years ago

    Well, don't look at Firaxis for a Master of Magic sequel, as they didn't make the first game, that was Simtex Software, and apparently Atari now own the rights to all of their games, in the same way that EA has the rights to Alpha Centauri.
  • konnsky #20 3 years ago

    well what a surprise on a monday morning! i didn't have a scooby they were making this game. paint me interested then. i'm definetly looking forward to playing this after payday. the original colonization an the first civ were the games that i spend so much time playing back in the days.

    oh happy days.

    Gnort: i know how you feel brother. those are the official system requirements for the game:

    MINIMUM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
    Operating System: Windows(r) 2000/XP/Vista
    Processor: 1.2 GHz Intel Pentium 4 or AMD Athlon processor or equivalent
    Memory: 512 MB RAM
    Hard Disk Space: 900 Megs Free
    Video: DirectX 9.0c-compatible 64 MB video card with Shader 1.1 Support
    or better

    RECOMMENDED SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
    Operating System: Windows(r) 2000/XP/Vista
    Processor: 1.8 GHz Intel Pentium 4 or AMD Athlon processor or equivalent
    Memory: 1 GB RAM
    Hard Disk Space: 900 Megs Free
    Video: 128 MB Video Card w/ DirectX 9 support (pixel & vertex shaders)
    Edited by 1 at 22/09/08 @ 13:35
  • Faldrath #21 3 years ago

    I assume it still doesn't have slavery of any kind? That's what ruined the original Colonization for me... you can't really hope to simulate the colonial enterprise without slavery, unfortunately. If you want to pretend to be a jolly European colonialist, own up to it. It wasn't pretty.
  • TheJuriel #22 3 years ago

    "Erm, it looks pretty much like the original colonization city screen, with the "drag people around buildings" and everything."

    Not that, the smaller menus that pop up when you researched stuff / a city waited orders on what to build next. Just recycling Civ4 puts me off the feel of this.
  • WJF #23 3 years ago

    But the Civ 4 interface was much nicer than Colonization's....

    What about the endgame, Mr Clare? I heard that you no longer get allied forces come to your aid against the King's forces. Does that mean that the ending of a multiplayer game is when someone declares independance and EVERYONE declares war on the poor sod, leaving the King to trundle over what's left?
    Edited by 1 at 22/09/08 @ 19:10
  • ekko #24 3 years ago

    The review reads like a 9 or even a 10, was surprised by the big blue 8. Been keep a eye on this, for my sins I missed out on the orginal, but after watching the John Adams HBO mini-series I'm all for some colony/revolution gaming.
  • stooeh #25 3 years ago

    Aha! But does it have Bonny Morn ?
  • Masarin #26 3 years ago

  • Skywise #27 3 years ago

    Does this game have the great music of the original? And the "Kiss the pinky ring"?

    Also Master of Magic 2 would be my most wanted game if it ever was announced.
    I recently replayed Alpha Centauri and it was just as fun as I remembered.
    MoM was even better than AC though imo :-)
    Edited by 1 at 23/09/08 @ 23:55
  • MrTulip #28 3 years ago

    "Does this game have the great music of the original? And the "Kiss the pinky ring"?"

    sadly, no. the music is the one thing i'm really missing. other than that it feels more like a civ4 mod than a game of its own and the graphics aren't as endearing as in the original. but it's fun nonetheless.
  • IronCladChicken #29 3 years ago

    Its a game Faldrath not an accurate historical simulation - Relax man
  • sfc1971 #30 3 years ago

    Another bad review. The reviewer doesn't comment on the fact that your cities don't actually grow. The borders increase but you are stuck with the same 3x3 square of land. This means you can't build agri-cultural towns and end up with lots of small towns.

    The original game did not have this, as cities increased you got to use more tiles to put your colonists on allowing you to build some massive cities.

    There are other areas where the game is less then the original.

    Equally damning, it ain't improved anywhere. It is as if somebody made a bad copy, slightly increased the graphics and then thought that could be called a sequel.

    For instance, food. The best production towns often have difficulty getting food. Not to worry, you can set up transport routes, even 'automate' them to some degree. So you end up with two cities, one producing food one producing furs. Setup up transport rule, export food from Food Town (but keep at least 50 to keep it from starving) and an import rule for Fur Town.

    What happens then? Well, it goes alright for a while UNTILthe food in Fur Town reaches the 200 limit. Then it spawns a new colonist, uses up all the food and the town starves until the next transport arrives.

    This is a common problem in games of these types as anyone who played these games 10 years ago knows. But that is the point. This is 2008, we expect more from your games now. Better AI, less micro-management, better in game tools.

    If you want to play this game, download freecol. It is the better game, just doesn't have the graphics. If you must have the commercial game, get the original, that too is superior. I can't help but feel this game has been consolefied, they added nothing and removed depth from the original.
  • EvilTroll #31 3 years ago

    Cities were always 3x3 in the original colonization, they never grew. (actually it was a design change very late on, the original manual had them growing, just like civ)

    As far as I can see from the first game I've played there have only been a few fundamental changes to the basic game structure from the original. The first one is pretty major, each town provides 1 hammer per turn, so you can get stuff built early game without actually employing a carpenter. Secondly to breed horses you need to employ a rancher, rather than just let them get on with it. Thirdly there is education, instead of putting a specialist in the school you actually put the free colonist or servant in (not quite sure how well this works yet, as I'm on my first game). Oh and the founding fathers thing has changed significantly, as they are like wonders in civ, the first nation to get one gets to keep it.

    Other things to note is that there are defensive pacts and whatnot to be had with the indians (don't remember these previously), it now shows you on the main screen what specialist each indian camp will give you (after you have visited once), and I think you can train more than on specialist in each indian camp (rather than getting the popup saying that you have already trained this specialization)

    I'm sure the game has got more tweaks to it than that, but I've not got round to declaring independence yet.
    Edited by 1 at 28/09/08 @ 22:31