Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Blizzard's Mike Morhaime Interview

MMO PC Interview by Oli Welsh

2 July, 2008

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

Mike Morhaime is the chief executive of Blizzard Entertainment, co-founded with his college buddies Allen Adham and Frank Pearce under the name Silicon & Synapse in 1991. Over the next 17 years it built a formidable name for itself in real-time strategy (Warcraft and StarCraft), action RPG (Diablo), and more recently massively multiplayer gaming, with World of Warcraft, the proverbial golden egg that has brought in 10 million subscribers. Blizzard is known for its perfectionism, its lengthy, iterative development process, its early embrace of online multiplayer gaming, and its staunch support of the PC and even Mac as gaming platforms.

Morhaime - small, quiet, thoughtful, cautious - is the man who has held Blizzard together through multiple changes of ownership (culminating in the current merger between Vivendi and Activision) : according to his operations chief Paul Sams, Morhaime has had eight bosses, but Blizzard's internal culture has remained unchanged throughout. We sat down with him at last weekend's Worldwide Invitational convention in Paris to talk about WOW, StarCraft II, the just-announced Diablo III, where the company stands on consoles, and what, if anything, gets him worried.

Eurogamer: World of Warcraft expanded Blizzard's audience hugely by moving into a new area for the company - MMOs. But with StarCraft II and Diablo III you've got games that seem made very much for your core fans. Do you see yourselves experimenting with other genres again?

Mike Morhaime: You mean taking a franchise into a new genre, kind of like we were going to do with StarCraft Ghost?

I think with each game that we create, we try to figure out what type of game we want to make, and then we think about what's the most appropriate franchise, the most appropriate setting for that game. We do it on a case by case basis.

For instance, World of Warcraft - I think the foundation for that idea probably dates back to after we released Warcraft II. We thought, wow, this would be such a great game to create a virtual world around, where you're a character inside the game and you can explore this fantastic universe. Technology finally advanced to the point where it was feasible to make the game. So, genre first, then franchise.

'Blizzard's Mike Morhaime' Screenshot 1

Although it's years into development, Morhaime thinks StarCraft II is still "not there yet".

Eurogamer: You continually support your games, you're famous for it, as long as there are still people out there playing them - Diablo II and StarCraft are still getting patched. But World of Warcraft demands another level of support.

Mike Morhaime: It does.

Eurogamer: Do you think you can sustain it the same way, or do you think there comes a point where you'll have to draw a line and shut it down?

Mike Morhaime: Well, I think we have a tremendous amount of players out there that we need to support. As long as people are wanting to play the game, I think we need to continue to support the game and evolve it.

Eurogamer: How long do you think it can last like that?

Mike Morhaime: I don't know. I don't know if anybody knows. But we look around, and we see that the gaming market is continuing to grow, the number of people that have broadband access and PCs capable of playing 3D games around the world is growing, and I don't see that slowing down any time soon.

'Blizzard's Mike Morhaime' Screenshot 2

Morhaime says World of Warcraft was first conceived of nearly 10 years before its release.

Eurogamer: It's an odd thing to ask, considering how big a success World of Warcraft is, but are there any decisions you made about it that you regret, or things you wish you'd done differently?

Mike Morhaime: Initially when we launched the game, there were certain bottlenecks in the server infrastructure that we did not recognise at first. It's very difficult to test for this sort of thing without getting the entire population that's going to play. Some things just don't appear until you have enough people on the system. It would have been great had we used our current platform back at launch.

Eurogamer: With World of Warcraft, you've had the luxury of a captive audience with little strong competition, and you've been able to develop the expansions and patches at your own pace. Now that you're coming under more external pressure, from the release of games with big budgets and licences like Age of Conan and Warhammer Online, do you feel you're going to need to speed up the delivery of fresh content to keep players in WOW?

Mike Morhaime: I think the thing that's changed more than anything is just that the games have gotten bigger, so it takes more people, more time, more resources to generate content. There's always been pressure to release things quickly, it just takes more people to do that now. The other thing that's changed is - one of our goals at Blizzard is to be a global company, to be thinking about our player base around the world, and so when you add in all these other languages that we're trying to support, that also increases the amount of time that it takes to put out content.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about StarCraft II: Protoss - Legacy of the Void on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-12 of 12 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
seasidebaz
02/07/08 @ 16:23
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Diablo on PSOne was ace :)
patchbox360
02/07/08 @ 17:29
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
that would be gears of war 2 - obviously
Krelle
02/07/08 @ 17:47
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i like shirts with pink
bdc
02/07/08 @ 19:08
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
'that would be gears of war 2 - obviously'

What even makes you think Blizzard has any idea or notion that GoW2 is competition to their PC games which have a completely difference audience, and a far bigger one at that?

Fool.
Crofto
02/07/08 @ 20:05
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've not played Diablo before, but from what I've seen it gives off the impression that Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance 1 & 2 did on the X-Box/PS2. If the game is similar then I don't see why Blizzard can't release a version of Diablo III on consoles including same-console co-op and what not. I loved playing Baldur's Gate in co-op with a friend and would probably enjoy Diablo too.
Darkjinxter
02/07/08 @ 21:41
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
An object lesson on making a little sound like a lot, good ol' Mike Morhaime.
Blizzard under this guy can't put a foot wrong, indeed if his passing reference to Starcraft Ghost is actually a hint that the game is alive and well, then Blizzard will be dominating another genre on the PC, the 3rd person shooter. Move aside Samus.
Alithian
03/07/08 @ 03:16
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Darkjinxter: Uhm.. note that his 'passing reference' was past tense; 'we were going to do [with StarCraft Ghost]. Seems to be more of a eulogy than a hint.
anomagnus
03/07/08 @ 07:52
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
kinda bland interview, really
Agent_Orange
03/07/08 @ 08:53
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nah its different from BG:Dark alliance games - you click to more rather than give directions with the d pad and well you dont attack or block with "buttons". You click on an enemy to attack it.
Krelle
03/07/08 @ 14:25
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Could swear ive killed this guy in Scarlet M years ago.
penhalion
03/07/08 @ 14:37
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Can we have a bloody release date for diablo 3. I am not waiting until 2009 for something that frankly looks like D2 on steroids. Don't get me wrong, I think it'll be a good enough game. I just don't have all that much interest in it and the longer I wait, the less interest I have.
craziii
03/07/08 @ 21:27
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
SC2 is 09 for sure, D3 will have to be 2010, unless blizzard wants to release both games in the same year.

Comments: 1-12 of 12 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery