Advance Wars: Dark Conflict Review

They're smiling inside.

Version tested: DS

So, Nintendo spends years making bright and bouncy games, and as soon as the bright and bouncy approach starts to rule the world again, Advance Wars - among the most inexplicably bright and bouncy, given that it's about nasty old war - decides to toss out the catchy music, surfer dude dialogue and cuddly accoutrements in favour of crunchy guitar and meditations on the futility of war in the aftermath of an apocalyptic meteor strike. Signature colours: brown and grey. Typical.

Still, it's not all bad. In fact, there's very little bad at all. Intelligent Systems has rolled back a few of the features that made the first DS game, Dual Strike, a bit too complicated, and then rolled forward again with some sensible new units and a few of the things Advance Wars fans have been aching for, like online play. Gone are the tag-team CO (Commanding Officer) powers, multiple-front battles, black bombs, pipe-runners and stealth fighters, for instance, but in come things like a motorbike gang that can move vast distances and play the city-capture role previously reserved for infantry and mech units, which speeds up that side of the game considerably. There's also an indirect-fire anti-tank unit that can - gasp - counter-attack when fired upon, and the battleship can now move and then fire from a distance in the same turn.

But before we get bogged down in the detail, let's give our friends the newcomers (hi there!) the benefit of a pleasant refresher. Advance Wars - terrific in two instalments on the GBA, mostly terrific on the DS and rather popular for rather longer if you trace it back to the original Japanese versions on old-days consoles - is a simple turn-based strategy game where you move a collection of units (which still bob up and down, happily) around a playing grid square by square, trying to dispatch an opposing force comprised of a similar assortment. It appeals because defeating your enemy is about carefully weighing each unit's strengths, weaknesses and potential exposure once it's performed an attack against the strengths, weaknesses and exposure of your enemy's units. Tanks are good against recon units, but poor against aerial bombardment, but then choppers and planes are toast if there's an anti-aircraft unit on the prowl. Subs are great for sinking battleships, but cruisers can smash them to bits in a jiffy. And so on. It's very easy to grasp, and the satisfaction of being good at it is considerable.

'Advance Wars: Dark Conflict' Screenshot 2

It's all gone Mad Max, and Mel Gibson seems to have been rubbish at menus.

As with previous instalments, Dark Conflict features a story-driven single-player Campaign mode with main missions that unlock one by one. Between (and sometimes during) these, your characters chat to one another and so the story progresses. Our tie-wearing fancy-haired hero begins the game by surviving a world-ending meteor strike, and then quickly joins up with the noble Captain Brenner. There's also a girl with amnesia, a virus that kills you with shrubbery, and lots of sinister, self-involved or pantomime bad-guys plotting against you.

Unlike past games, however, this particular crew is rather achingly sincere, and more than a little bit like the ones found in Intelligent Systems' other turn-based strategy series, Fire Emblem. They're not particularly likable, but worst of all they have finally decided that killing is rotten and war is horrible. Yes it is and yes it is, but nobody's saying anything we haven't heard before, and they're not saying it over and over again across far too many dialogue screens. You can press Start to skip these exchanges, but Advance Wars fans have come to enjoy the silly banter and daft characters like Jugger and Lash, so it seems a shame for them to have to do that because someone at Intelligent Systems has decided that bouncy tank commanders ought to have a conscience.

The missions themselves, though, are well worth experiencing. Right from the start, it's obvious the rules have changed a bit. Status-affecting CO powers are ignored almost completely (and only make themselves apparent a good few hours into the game - and in a diminished role that won't turn the tide of battle so simply), with a stronger focus on the basic rules of engagement; that one thing is stronger at this, while another is stronger at that, and that you must use things in combination to dispatch the enemy without running out of units yourself. Deployment maps where you can manufacture reinforcements obviously return, but now you can set up temporary bases and ports to re-supply and patch up your troops (the latter stepping in for the banished black boats with their repair abilities). The fog of war, which shrouds enemy movements from you and yours from them on certain maps, also returns, but now there are more ways to puncture it than sending vehicles blindly into the gloom or positioning infantry on a mountain: you can also use a special truck to fire a flare, while fires burn in certain areas, illuminating the immediate vicinity.

These additions - along with some new planes, different terrain types that mask or inhibit movement, and sensible refinements like a War Tank to replace the similar Neo and Mega Tanks - couple well to mainstays like basic tanks, artillery, APCs (now known as Rigs) and aerial units like the bomber. A typical encounter is no longer quite so tank-friendly, and many of the factory-deprived maps are set up nicely for balanced encounters that call upon your restraint as well as your knowledge of which unit is best at what and over what distance. CO powers are reduced in scope, as we mentioned, but the COs themselves can eventually take to the battlefield, influencing troops around them in a manner that adds another layer of strategy to the higher end of the game, without forcing new players to struggle with years of complicated legacy features. Another new element helping to make up for the reductions there is a single-level experience system that ranks up individual units based on the amount of kills they accumulate, which gives you slightly more pause before sending them off to cheap deaths to facilitate an easier next move.

The Campaign mode also integrates a number of "Trial" maps, which are like the War Room maps of old, and pop up away from the general flow of the story missions. These provide a sterner test of your abilities, meaning that existing fans can get into the trickier stuff earlier on, while first-timers can return to them later once their skills have developed - aided by some well-illustrated in-game tutorial screens, too. There is also a Free Battle mode, where you can play on the game's maps right from the start, and a Design Room for creating your own battlefields, even setting up the enemy AI.

Then of course there is the wireless multiplayer. Locally it supports up to four players, and over the Internet you can go one on one with your friends. There's even voice communication using the microphone, which actually works quite well. Not many of our friends were online when we played through the game (it only launched in the US, where it's known as Advance Wars: Days of Ruin, on Monday, and isn't out here until Friday, 25th January), but the games we did manage to engage in didn't appear to suffer from any debilitating lag.

'Advance Wars: Dark Conflict' Screenshot 3

The in-game tutorials are quick, and quickly skipped if you know what you're doing.

However, for all the positive changes and additions, the decision to redesign the game in greys, browns and other grumpy colours and put the story in the hands of a jarringly earnest and slightly depressive goth blogger is bound to cause consternation in some quarters. It's not just the tone of the writing: the graphics are a bit Command & Conquer: Red Alert (with a fairly useless 'zoom' element that reduces your range of vision too much for my liking); the bits where the COs chat are illustrated with forgettable, Fire Emblem-style character drawings that brighten up when someone speaks; the soundtrack (main menu music aside, perhaps) is pretty generic; and the menus, for that matter (thanks, brackets), appear to have been an afterthought.

That makes a big difference, too - the important statistics and visual explanations of which unit-types your current charge is effective or ineffective against are harder to read at a glance, and this can be fatal. It's genuinely bizarre to find ourselves berating Intelligent Systems for a lack of attention to detail, but there we go. You may also run out of game to play quicker than you did before, thanks to a relative lack of unlockables, and the loss of the shop where you could buy new toys.

All of which adds up to an Advance Wars game that we had just as much, if not more fun playing than ever, but one that proves a bit too grimy and unfriendly for our bright and bouncy taste. Fortunately though, Dark Conflict remains hospitable in most of the areas that really matter to its fans and the people finally tempted to give it a go, and the result is probably the better of the two DS versions. It may have lost some of its soul and style, as Oli put it after a few hours in its company last week, but the gameplay has lost very little of its charm, and the result is one of the first really good new DS games of 2008. Cheer up next time though, eh?

8 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (36) Latest comment 4 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Cloudane #1 4 years ago

    I loved the original on the GBA but from there onwards, I didn't enjoy them anymore especially the DS version.

    It seems to be more of the same but with a dark edge to the presentation.
  • orakio #2 4 years ago

    decisions decisions...
  • udat #3 4 years ago

    I hope Nell comes back for the next one. :(
  • JohnnyWashnGo #4 4 years ago

    Whats the best price for this online, either UK or US version?
    Edited by 1 at 23/01/08 @ 11:47
  • WillyWanka #5 4 years ago

    May be my first Ds purchase for a LONG time. Also glad to see developers have grown out of the craze of trying to have subtitles with words starting in D and S
  • spadge #6 4 years ago

    ...developers don't invent subtitles, publishing marketing types do :*)
  • Weezer #7 4 years ago

    Buying it anyway. Best. Handheld. Game. Ever.
  • Lexx87 #8 4 years ago

    Sounds great...i'm a sucker for gritty emo shit :p
  • Lukree #9 4 years ago

    My second DS game after...


    ...Advance Wars: DS


    :D
  • NewYork #10 4 years ago

    90% of the world is dead.

    Could you forgive a little emo-ness? ;_;
  • MightyPenguin #11 4 years ago

    Dear Intelligent Systems,

    For the love of God. For the love of all that is good and holy and pure in this world, when you sit down to script your next strategy title, would you please- please- write a cast of characters that are competant, disciplined, calm and above all else not compelled to break out the onions of MELODRAMA AND DOOM every five seconds in order to tell the player that WAR IS HELL. We know war is hell. Many, many things have told us that war is hell, and many more seem to take glee in pointedly reminding us of the fact whenever possible. But we come to your products because we want escapism. Because we want to hone our minds against a determined and cunning enemy. Because, let's face it, blowing shit up is fun.

    Stopping the action every few turns in order to have some overdressed twazzock labouring under a ridiculous hairstyle ponce across the screen and deliver their best rendition of, "Alas, poor Yorick," puts a bit of a damper on things.

    Please?

    Yours Sincerely,
    MightyPenguin

    P.S. I would recommend lowering the number of mandatory screenings of "Full Metal Jacket" from three daily to two, and perhaps tighter lids on milk containers would be in order?
  • hoof #12 4 years ago

    After really loving AW 1 & 2 on the GBA, I found Dual Strike to be overly complicated (the 2 fronts, the CO tag powers, etc). Also thought Jake was one of the most hateful videogame characters I have ever encountered. For these reasons, I welcome our more focused, more serious Advance Wars overlords.

  • FabricatedLunatic #13 4 years ago

    Whats the best price for this online, either UK or US version?

    The US version is £16.99 at Movietyme. But they can be a bit slow sometimes.
  • thedaveeyres #14 4 years ago

    They've fucked it.

    I can't believe they've fucked it.
  • thedaveeyres #15 4 years ago







    I'm still buying it :p
  • SlackMaster #16 4 years ago

    Got my copy this morning and looking forward to playing it. Still towards the end of AW2 and halfway through AW DS. Not sure I can wait until I complete these though.
  • hiddenranbir #17 4 years ago

    I don't want a cartoon wargame to lecture me on war.
  • HyperShadow #18 4 years ago

    Its funny, people usually berate a game for going cartoony from life like, not the other way round.

    If this dilutes your view of the game though, you're a bit daft as this is perhaps the best Advance Wars that I have experienced.Without broken units and broken CO powers, the game feels like it has more strategy to it rather than spamming Neo Tanks and hitting your CO power every few turns.

    After all, who doesn't believe that Dual Strike was as far as that chapter could go? Adding more over powered units and 'street talking' main characters would have made the game truly awful.

    And besides, it has online play, awesome.
  • Rev.StuartCampbell #19 4 years ago

    Did everyone else miss the jokes, then? Heck, it's been funny enough for me to not skip the cutscenes, and I ALWAYS skip cutscenes.

    New colour scheme is horrible, though.
  • Ceatlan #20 4 years ago

    I never liked any of the characters or story of any of the previous ones anyway, so not liking this one either won't be a problem. So long as the gameplay remains in tact and there aren't any levels where you get stuck because its more like a puzzle game with only one real way to win, then I'll be buying it.
    Edited by 1 at 23/01/08 @ 13:11
  • BadBoyBonner #21 4 years ago

    Just to add my two pence to the review on a tiny point I feel was missed - Scoring.

    Completion of the missions - the rating system has been given an overhaul, where you can now over achieve (i.e. get more than 100) for the different ratings of Speed, Power and Technique. While this does not add anything to the game per se, it does allow those seeking all round "S" grades a little more latitude in how they seek to be rewarded for skillful play.

    On a side note - I find it most annoying that clicking the stylus to the side of an out of play area does not take the order back - having to click on the "b" icon in the bottom right is most annoying. In addition (only played for about 7 hours) still taking some getting used to moving the units - while the new addition of double clicking on the enemy to attack sounds like a good idea - clearly you forgo the ability to precisely place your units (like attacking while forming a line of defense).

    The lack of shop is a glaring oversight - and surely something very easy to implement - shame.
  • brainbird #22 4 years ago

    I welcome a slight change in the Advance Wars formula. While I still loved the game, I felt a little bit tired of AW DS in terms of presentation. It's ok to show us a different art style, even though I'll miss the old style next summer already.

    And: Panzer Tactics DS is out soon. I hope there will be a review of it soon, too, because I wonder how it compares to this.
  • systems #23 4 years ago

  • Lexx87 #24 4 years ago

    Why do we need a shop? It didn't really add anything...we get the extra maps anyway.
  • Murbal #25 4 years ago

  • CheapSheep #26 4 years ago

    Thank god someone else noticed that the cutscenes are actually quite amusing. I thoguht I was going mad.
  • Nithron #27 4 years ago

    Days of Ruin was a much better, less generic sounding title.
  • kenbrilliant #28 4 years ago

    You have singularly failed to mention the excellent addition of voice chat to the multiplayer - now I can trash talk my opponents while I wait for them to take their turn.

    Have to agree with the pants change in tone though - all greys and browns does not a pretty game make. And the lack of amusing CO banter (although I always used to skip it anyway) is a minor loss. But anyway - new Advance Wars - WOOT!
  • lemonfist #29 4 years ago

    It's much better balanced than both AW2 & AW: DS. At its core, it may very well be the best in the series yet. But true enough, it's lost the charm and wealth of game modes from its predecessors.
  • BadBoyBonner #30 4 years ago

    KenBrilliant - go back and read again - "There's even voice communication using the microphone, which actually works quite well."
  • Chrono-Kun #31 4 years ago

    +1 if you like emo type games, though
  • Lexx87 #32 4 years ago

  • jonsaan #33 4 years ago

    I love Advance wars but always hated CO powers. Good to hear they are less of a factor in this one!!!
  • Chonk #34 4 years ago

    Loving it so far... gonna try an online match later :D
  • peak_performance #35 4 years ago

    Will definitely pick it up, but don't care much for the new style of it. "War is hell" speak mentioned in this review also makes me cry, as I don't think it will be done at a level that will match the care free dialogues of previous games :/
  • NegativeZero #36 4 years ago

    Speaking of Fire Emblem, how come that franchise hasn't hit the DS yet?