Pixeljunk Shooter 2 Review

Spouting lava, lava, lava.

Version tested: PlayStation 3

An update to a PixelJunk game is nothing new, but while all previous titles in the series received free downloadable tweaks Shooter is the first to get a proper sequel that costs actual money. Perhaps that's understandable; the first game's brevity was its only serious problem, while its gentle puzzling and exploration seemingly offered plenty of room for expansion. This follow-up sees former Nintendo alumnus Dylan Cuthbert and his team at Q-Games attempt to address both issues, with mixed results.

The storytelling remains refreshingly economical. At the game's outset your small yellow craft is swallowed by a giant underground worm straight out of horror-comedy classic Tremors. The beast is hardly the fussiest of eaters, chomping through huge chunks of the surrounding mines, and thus trapping those workers in haz-mat suits who again require rescue via your ship's grappling hook.

From the outset, it's clear that you're in more hazardous territory than in the first game, and not just because your ship is inside a monster's stomach. Enemies are more plentiful and seem to require more shots to dispatch, while the environment itself presents unique dangers. Brush against the undulating fleshy walls and you can temporarily stick, poisoned by a purple substance that dissolves your vessel if you don't submerge in water to wash it off in time. Stalling peristalsis with a well-aimed bomb may provide a route to a new area, but the terrible roar that accompanies it often precipitates a race against reflux; poison or lava will rapidly pour in, forcing a swift exit.

1

This light source can be dragged around to reveal hidden survivors, but any contact with the walls will shrink it, narrowing its coverage.

If the first game referenced Eighties classic Thrust, Shooter 2 feels more game-literate, with a wider range of influences. The increased enemy count and organic environs of the first third invite association with the Mutant Storm games, while the bullet-hell second boss in particular suggests someone at Q-Games has been playing a few Cave shooters recently. Meanwhile, a new 'hungry suit', which attaches metal jaws to the front of your craft, temporarily turns the game into Mr. Driller, restricting your movement as you munch vertically or horizontally through bone to reach trapped miners and drop square rocks onto enemy heads.

The latter is the first of a series of new power-ups which imbue your ship with fresh abilities, from one which illuminates the gloom of the darkened caves in the latter stages, to another which allows your ship to travel through lava; water and ice, rather than heat, suddenly becoming your new enemies. More productive use is made of the grapple hook, too; there's a pleasing resistance to the levers you pull, while tugging apart crusty obstructions in the monster's body has the same gruesome satisfaction as picking a scab. The claw can also anchor your ship to swing points, providing control through passageways of disorientating gas bubbles. Meanwhile, some enemies require you to negotiate a spray of projectiles so you can get close enough to incapacitate them with the grapple before your bullets finally take them down.

2

Playing co-operatively eases some of the frustration – it's not often you'll both die at the hand of enemies spawning in the immediate vicinity.

While the majority of the puzzles still involve one type of fluid colliding with another, the suits make them a little more malleable. Magnetised oil can be guided to fill containers to activate mechanisms or push survivors through narrow tubes, while spraying water onto flat ice provides a handy grip point to pull aside the obstruction.

Even so, there's a strong feeling of familiarity – at least until you reach the pitch-black caves of the later stages, where light plays a key role. Spraying lava over giant alien plants gives them the power to illuminate the inky gloom, which hides limpet-like creatures that swarm your ship should you remain in the black too long. They can be shaken off by dragging them into the light and rapidly spinning, and add a pleasingly different kind of threat to the regular bullet-spitting foes.

As with the first game, you need to rescue all the survivors on each screen to move onto the next, with the fifth screen of each stage holding the exit. You're allowed five deaths, though collecting 100 stars from defeated enemies reduces the body count by one. Because there are more critters to kill, it's easier to rack up the combo count and hoover up plenty of stars, compensating for the noticeable increase in difficulty.

Unfortunately, the same can't be said of the gem-hunting. The fifth stage of each level requires a certain number of diamonds to unlock, and while the first game's shorter and easier stages encouraged more thorough exploration to locate them all, it can be a real grind here. Some you'll only get a single opportunity to grab before they're buried under a sea of lava, or hidden forever from a moving light that might have advanced past their location before you even realised they were there. As collected gems don't count towards your tally until you've completed all five screens of a stage, it can take upwards of 15 minutes to snare just a couple of gems to gradually work your way towards the total required to open up the final stage of the third chapter.

(As a side note, it really is infuriating to be killed by an enemy that appears from nowhere just as you collect the final survivor on a screen, especially when that enemy is gittish enough to hide behind a gas bubble during a hurried escape from a rising lava tide.)

3

These magma-spewing nasties take quite a few shots before exploding – do you plug away, or risk overheating by using your missiles to defeat them?

The change of pace from its more sedate predecessor – Shooter now makes much more sense as a name - is one that will win some new fans but alienate others, especially as it invites more direct association with other twin-stick arcade blasters. Given that most of the threats – especially in the early stages – come from simple re-skins of the turrets, bats and burrowing baddies of the first, it's not a comparison that does Shooter 2 any favours. The boss battles are inventive, but otherwise enemies merely represent an annoyance, an obstruction to progress rather than an engaging foe to fight.

Fortunately, the new two-player mode is a saving grace. Each different arena houses seven workers, with the object being to rescue more than your rival. The twist is that you can only save them on your turn, with your enemy simply tasked with hunting you down before roles are reversed. The caverns have their own unique environmental features, from one with severe tectonic tremors to another where showers of hot magma can be triggered to cascade onto your opponent. There's a decent selection of power-ups that can be purchased to improve your ship's offensive capabilities or chances of evading detection.

4

The dark levels are some of the most enjoyable on the first run; conversely, their diamonds are among the trickiest to locate on a repeat visit.

It's perhaps a little unbalanced, with beginners at a distinct disadvantage until they've earned enough money to buy a few new powers, while most players will simply camp outside their opponent's base, waiting to greet their triumphant return with a hail of missiles. But even when losing seven games on the trot to an outrageously skilled Spanish opponent – and I'm definitely speaking hypothetically here – it's a lot of fun. Another nice touch allows you to collect credits in your ship while waiting to be matched up; a great idea when you're just a few 'Q dollars' short of that handy sonar.

But while this multiplayer mode is one of the game's most successful additions, it's curious that a series known for rejecting convention seems to be embracing the 'bigger, better, more' mentality here. The name PixelJunk suggests something throwaway, and it's perhaps telling that, in striving for substance, Q-Games has come slightly unstuck. Some will undoubtedly relish the tougher challenge, most will welcome its greater longevity, but there's no denying that this quirky series has lost a little of its unique charm.

7 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (31) Latest comment 1 year ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • JayScott #1 1 year ago

    Absolutely loved the first game. As soon as my PS3 returns from being repaired I'll give this a whirl. Only concern out of the review is the supposed increase in gem hunt grinding - I liked the balance in the first one.
  • DavidBoring #2 1 year ago

    it is correct that previous pixeljunk titles "received free downloadable tweaks" but those were mainly adjusting difficult levels. the expansions or DLC had to be paid for
    Edited by DavidBoring at 01/03/11 @ 08:28
  • GreatBlackthorn #3 1 year ago

    Good review, last paragraph is weakly argued though.

    Is the suggestion here that difficult games are out of Pixeljunk's character? Because I doubt this'll be as tough as the brutally hard Eden and Monsters. Shooter was more untypical in terms of difficulty, so 2 would seem to be more a (welcome or unwelcome, depending) return to their usual punishing nature. Also was that conclusion reached by what is suggested by the studio's name? Because that really has no critical context. I could be called DEATHEXPLODE and still make a cute puzzle game.

    Shame to hear about the ramping up if gem hunting. I enjoy tend to enjoy collecting, but there are a couple of bastard gems in the first game that I still can't find and have given up on.
  • JayScott #4 1 year ago

    @GreatBlackthorn

    I have 1 - ONE!! - left to find but bugger me if I can. I must have scoured that darn level top to tail six times but no luck. :(
  • PixelPirate #5 1 year ago

    I cant shake the feeling I get when I read this review, that the reviewer would rather be playing some bland FPS game than doing this review and is keeping him from it.

    7/10 seems harsh. Buying anyway!
  • rudderless #6 1 year ago

    PixelPirate - I loved the first game, and couldn't imagine anything worse than a bland FPS as a replacement. I just didn't enjoy it as much as Shooter, though I'm sure some will (as the final para suggests).

    GreatBlackthorn - I'm certainly not suggesting that a higher difficulty level is out of character for PixelJunk, merely that its increased pace invites closer comparison with other twin-stick shooters, whereas the first was a little more about puzzle-solving and rescuing. The enemies represented an occasional hazard rather than a near-constant threat, with the environment more of a danger. That's not the case here.
    Edited by rudderless at 01/03/11 @ 09:04
  • Buztafen #7 1 year ago

    Nice Underworld reference. :)
  • PixelPirate #8 1 year ago

    PixelPirate - I loved the first game, and couldn't imagine anything worse than a bland FPS as a replacement. I just didn't enjoy it as much as Shooter, though I'm sure some will (as the final para suggests).

    Thats great to hear, i can appreciate that viewpoint :-)
  • V #9 1 year ago

    If only there was a tip jar for the sub-heads!
    Edited by V at 01/03/11 @ 09:24
  • frunk #10 1 year ago

    Hmmmm... I can appreciaite the reviewers points. By making it more a "game" rather than a pleasant ride it will have lost some of its charm.

    But its Pixeljunk... and therefor will be bought.

    Even their hardest games (Eden) and their most disappointing (Racers) are still worth the cash.


    Edited - Brain-spasm... not typos just entire words missed out!
    Edited by frunk at 01/03/11 @ 11:08
  • levitate #11 1 year ago

    @JayScott:

    Considering Shooter 2 can be a frustration fest you might as well buy a spare PS3 to smash up if you're gonna play this..
  • monkman76 #12 1 year ago

    Mega mega red thing! Nice tagline :-)
  • apoc_reg #13 1 year ago

    Love shooter, lkove PixelJunk but year id also like a Monsters sequel (with a whimps mode that i might be able to actually finish!)

    ALso, MOVE support? would work great with this
  • kinky_mong #14 1 year ago

    Great sub-heading! :D
  • Zebula77 #15 1 year ago

    First game was (is) an absolute gem, but I'm worried part of the enjoynment was due to the sedate pace. A little worried that the increased difficulty/frustration will ruin this a little. A purchase is certain in any case.
  • figgis #16 1 year ago

    What ever happened to Pixeljunk Dungeon?
  • tiny_Eggy #17 1 year ago

    Sony should get all this stuff on steam. Yeah one can dream.
  • captain_Carl #18 1 year ago

    Classy embargo break, EG.

    I'll buy this anyway, despite your moaning
  • TonyHarrison #19 1 year ago

    So this is out tomorrow then? Nice.
  • menage #20 1 year ago

    Loved Shooter, will probably pick this up sometimes. Enough to play at the moment though.
  • jamhead #21 1 year ago

    "The change of pace from its more sedate predecessor.."

    This is a dissapointment to me. I really enjoyed the first one, and felt the balance between puzzles and shooting just right.

    I will still get it though.
  • McLovin85 #22 1 year ago

    'PixelJunk Shooter 2 is out now on PlayStation 3.'

    Ummm... no it isn't. If it is I can't find it.
  • Oli Verified Reviews Editor, Eurogamer.net #23 1 year ago

    @captain_Carl - Sony set the embargo for today, and specified that we could run at any time, so we haven't broken it. Today is when the game launches on the US PSN. (This probably explains the error with its release date in our database - sorry about that.)
  • Oli Verified Reviews Editor, Eurogamer.net #24 1 year ago

    @captain_Carl - Sony set the embargo for today, and specified that we could run at any time, so we haven't broken it. Today is when the game launches on the US PSN. (This probably explains the error with its release date in our database - sorry about that.)
  • elhozzo #25 1 year ago

    cost will have an impact here... if its the same (or less) than the first, I'll get it this week... if its higher, I might leave it till its in the sales ... anyone heard yet what it does cost?
  • Acrid #26 1 year ago

    I haven't read the review, I didn't need to glance at the score. This has always been an insta-buy after the joys of the first game
  • rprince #27 1 year ago

    In Europe it's out tomorrow (2nd March). Despite having digital distribution, we still have to follow the ridiculous notion of releasing things on a certain day, rather than as soon as they're available.
  • zedzee #28 1 year ago

    Hmm. Looks like Thrust without collision detection.
  • suhawk75 #29 1 year ago

    @Zedzee

    Yes you've said that already. And you're still incorrect.

    Thrust and PJS play differently.

    Thrust's gameplay is about mastering the ships controls and battling inertia (made worse by the pendulum problem once you pick up your objective). PJS is nothing to do with mastering the ship (it's a doddle to fly) it's about exploration and playing around in the environment ("what happens when I blast through here", " can I grab this guy from here", "can I use this water bomb to get this gem";)

    Thurst had no puzzle elements to it while PJS has a very light puzzle element (more so if you want to 100% the game) and the pace in PJS (certainly PJS 1) is much more relaxed than Thrust.

    I can see why you might think the two games play out in a similar fashion but they really don't (I guess from your post that you've not actually played PJS). Having played Thrust and PJS the latter is miles more fun (but not as challenging/ frustrating and probably not as sweat inducing as Thrust).


    PS - C64 >>> BBC Micro (check out the version of Elite on C64 vs BBC original for confirmation of this).
  • Zebula77 #30 1 year ago

    K, guys. Been playing it for a while now I can definitely see where the critique is coming from. The game has me swearing at every turn and is in no way sedate. The difficulty levels have been bumped up considerably, which in itself is not necessarily a bad thing. However, when you die all the time and have to go through entire chunks of game play again and again, it pushed you dangerously close to saying "sod this, I'm playing something else". I did that with the second "bullet hell" boss. Not because it was so bloody hard but beating it meant you had to learn routines through trial and errol. Hence a lot of dying, and a lot of replaying sections you've already mastered.

    So far PJShooter 1 is the better choice by far, I'm disappointed to say.
  • Architect_z #31 1 year ago

    I actually love this game. I loved the first pixeljunk shooter to death, and all they needed to do to make a good sequel (in my eyes) was just add new levels. But in PJ shooter 2, the controls have been refined so they work better than before, theres more enemies that pop up which is great, because there wasnt that much to shoot at in the first game (considering the title of the game). The bosses are more epic and the layout of the levels are more challenging. I'm so happy that this game has kept the great concept of the first game, and made it more fun by a few small changes.

    I can't understand why this only has 7/10 on this review, but for people who loved the first game, this is a must have. I love it