WRC FIA World Rally Championship Review

A bit Räikkönen.

Version tested: Xbox 360

Critics of WRC ace Sebastien Loeb – who has just won his seventh consecutive world title – will point out that the Frenchman has dominated an era that has seen the sport regress, with a competitive field somewhat lacking in the greatness of the past: no Vatanens, Mikkolas, Kankkunens, Sainzs or Mäkinens, say.

Those silly enough to doubt Loeb's genius will presumably also assume that an official WRC game arriving half a decade after the last one will find itself similarly able to impress with less effort.

The reality is very different, of course. You don't become a seven-time world champion of anything without an abundance of talent, unless you're somehow involved in an international Big Brother competition. The same applies to any rally game these days, regardless of licence.

First impressions aren't encouraging. Even before you're faced with the available play options – The Road to the WRC, WRC Academy, Single Player (with Single Stage, Single Rally, Championship, Time Attack), Hot Seat (Single Stage, Single Rally, Championship for up to four players) or Xbox Live – the welcome screen leaves little doubt that the general level of presentation is going to be functional. In reality, it's worse than functional, given that some of the menu progression is irritatingly awkward.

1

It's not just WRC cars – all of the support categories are available.

That functionality carries over to the visuals, because WRC is by no means DiRT 2 pretty. The 13 international locations are suitably representative of their real-life equivalents but, by today's standards, every visual element within the game – be it roadside furniture, track surface detail or car models – is little more than passable. You'd ask WRC to dance, sure, but only because all the cute games in the room had already been spoken for.

The soundtrack to your uneasy union won't help the romance blossom, either. While different vehicles – you'll find all supporting car categories of the 2010 season included, namely J-WRC, P-WRC, S-WRC and WRC (cheekily, historic Group B beasts are available via premium DLC) – offer varying engine notes, you might need an audio engineering diploma to tell them apart. A lack of refinement is also evident in the external sound effects library, which, while adequate (excepting a few elements such as the risible tyre screech), is a long way from the game-enhancing gloriousness of Colin McRae Rally 3's surround sound.

And all the time you're putting up with your co-driver's pace notes which, while decently comprehensive, are delivered with the conviction of a manic depressive robot who's realised existence is futile – only to comically burst into emotion the moment you fall off the side of a cliff or plough your bonnet into a boulder.

2

Now you feel it... Proper rumble implementation is sadly lacking.

You'll be doing plenty of both. Off-road excursions are a way of life in WRC. The game may lack DiRT 2's splendour, but then it's not in the least interested in appealing to that game's demographic. The handling is demanding, even with driving assists, requiring constant concentration and the kind of precision most players rarely have time for these days. Take that time, and you'll find much reward beneath the game's apparent mediocrity.

And that's when you begin to appreciate WRC's inner beauty.

True, the mechanics at work here are a class or two beneath those of console rally sim favourite Richard Burns Rally, lacking that game's impressive meticulousness. Conversely, the drive is nowhere near as intimidating; after a short period of acclimatisation you can, for instance, easily play WRC via joypad.

The driving model isn't uncommonly refined, and the illusion is further hampered by an absurd and inexplicable misuse of rumble feedback. But when you're squeezing through the anorexic streets of quaint Catalunyan villages, skimming Sweden's ice walls or blasting along the treacherous, tree-lined tarmac of Alsace, the in-car experience is more than enough to fully engage the senses.

Embark on the career mode – preferably after graduating from the WRC Academy tutorial stages – and you'll undoubtedly find the early 'junior' cars nervous, skittish and, being front-wheel-driven, difficult to powerslide. There's not much joy in fumbling around with an underpowered Citroën C2 after you've already gone out with its vastly more experienced and fitter 320bhp C4 WRC sister.

The game tries to keep your interest throughout its many competition tiers via objective-based financial rewards, unlockable liveries, paint schemes, cars and further competitions (wisely available through partial, rather than full, completion of previous events) but much of what it does is rudimentary and nothing you won't have seen elsewhere. There are missed opportunities, such as the decision to forgo some GRID-style strategic sponsor decisions due to the uniformity of the choices available (in WRC, the sponsor selection effectively boils down to an aesthetic choice).

The basic presentation and text-based communication with your team also dents much of the atmosphere when out of the car, but there are positives. Get to the service area (a menu screen, of course) in between stages and you're shown your damage and the amount of time required for individual repairs to be performed within your 60-minute allocation. However, within a system that will be familiar to Colin McRae Rally players, Milestone has increased the detail so that you can, for example, elect to repair the convergence loss of your wheels but not bother with hammering out any rim deformation, or prioritise the fixing the major coolant leak and cracked radiator over a damaged fan.

3

The behaviour of some of the roadside elements can be erratic.

You'll get an idea of the service area sacrifices you're likely to have to make via the game's decent damage system, which although seemingly unable to accommodate full retirements (it appears impossible to rip off a wheel, for instance) will progressively hinder your car's performance enough to render the distinction academic.

Elsewhere, you'll note other encouraging touches, such as a comprehensively tweakable HUD, the ability to determine the timing of your co-driver's instructions, a generous, well-paced Achievements structure, competent rally stage design (even if you'll spot the odd shared or even reversed section) and, not least, a promising online experience. Although difficult to adequately judge prior to the game's release, it appears sufficiently focused to provide consistently enjoyable 16-player (ghost) competition.

Conversely, this level of attention is at odds with a inconsistencies such as a six-stage limit to full WRC events, the absence of Super Special Stages and – most galling for rally fans looking to get their hands dirty – a car set-up system that is both generic and disappointingly elementary given the game's sim aspirations.

4

WRC's challenging stages are purposefully designed to catch you out.

A lot of WRC 2010 is as predictable and inevitable as Loeb's seemingly unstoppable run of championships, then. It may let down the sport it depicts with an overall deficiency in polish, general lack of cohesiveness and a few silly design flaws, but a little more time spent in the service area fine-tuning its various elements and next year's edition could be spraying the bubbly while standing on the bonnet of its achievement.

For now, those prepared to invest the necessary commitment, ignore the blandness and live with the game's failings will find that – once on the dirt, gravel, snow or asphalt – WRC FIA World Rally Championship delivers moments that are indisputably thrilling.

7 / 10

WRC is released today for PC, PS3 and Xbox 360.

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (46) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Chris1810 #1 2 years ago

    Not surprised by the score. I was disappointed in the demo.
    Edited by Chris1810 at 08/10/10 @ 10:16
  • ERG1008 #2 2 years ago

    I quite enjoyed the demo but, at a time when Fifa, PES & Fallout:NV are coming out, may wait until later when it's cheaper to pick it up.
  • karooo #3 2 years ago

    7/10 is too high, the demo just made me realize how good Dirt 2 is.
  • metalangel #4 2 years ago

    Will look forward to getting this, Milestone make racing games as I loved them on the PSX. But with New Vegas soon and Dead Rising 2 still unopened, I need more free time, dammit! I hate the big rush of games in the fall after the long and mostly hungry summer.

    Remember to tweak some car and codriver settings in the demo, the defaults aren't great.
    Edited by metalangel at 08/10/10 @ 10:24
  • bad09 #5 2 years ago

    Might still checkout the demo despite the bad feedback but doubt I'll get it now. FIFA is eating up time and still haven't even dented F1 with Black Ops and MOH looming. All before the winter sales on the DD sites.

    Anyone else feel like gaming is almost a full time job now? :)
    Edited by bad09 at 08/10/10 @ 10:24
  • Der_tolle_Emil #6 2 years ago

    I tried the demo but wasn't really convinced. But I guess I just am not looking for a rally game at the moment because I was having a hard time pointing out the flaws in the demo - it just did not grab me at all.
    Edited by Der_tolle_Emil at 08/10/10 @ 10:25
  • rojjer #7 2 years ago

    Yep, 7 is way too high for this gen of consoles, last gen this would've been a 7 or 8 - too much competition to be this drab now I'm afraid. I know this is a proper rally sim and all that, but it looks and plays like last gen (even felt a little CMR 1!)
  • BillMurray #8 2 years ago

    I was expecting a 5 at the highest after the demo.
  • Mackero #9 2 years ago

    I agree with Karooo, 7/10 is way too generous for this game.
    The Demo was terrible, if this game had been released in 2005 it would have only been the 3rd best Rally game released that year.
    WRC seems to have the smooth wide tracks from Gran Turismo, the centre pivot steering from McRae 2, and the environment from Richard Burns.The only thing it does have is licensed cars *YAWN*
    As a PS2 game it might scrape a 7, as a current gen title 4/10 is being generous.
  • linea #10 2 years ago

    Well, given that a copy of RBR and a wireless adapter for my xbox wheel comes to about half the price of this, I think I know where I'll be going.

    Shame, the xbox really could do with a proper, bells 'n' whistles rally game.

    Come on Codies!
  • Spekingur #11 2 years ago

    The reviewer played the full game and not the demo like the rest of you guys. Play the full game and then dispute the review (and the score).
  • dpb135 #12 2 years ago

    So people are comparing the score to the demo ...... nice one!!! May as well give Medal of Honour a 2/10 next week based on the crap beta

    Will get this when it hits £9.99
    Edited by dpb135 at 08/10/10 @ 10:44
  • Rodster #13 2 years ago

    I have the PC version and it looks and plays like a 6/10. Not bad but could be a lot better.
  • schnide #14 2 years ago

    Fair point about reviewing the full game and not the demo, but I found the latter to be flat and dull. Nothing technically wrong with it, just nothing inspiring either. Bearing in mind the demo is meant to sell the full game, that's not particularly encouraging and will put people off despite the review.
  • Spooke #15 2 years ago

    I played the demo on 360 and I thought it was embarrassing, handling was spongy and tame, the environment was unrealistic in look and responsiveness and overall polish was poor, based on what I played I would have given it 4/10.

    Why don't they just give the god damn licence to codies, let them make their weird bonkers Dirt game but also use the engine to make a straight WRC game?
  • levitate #16 2 years ago

    I think I'll rally myself away from this title for now.
  • CHACK #17 2 years ago

    I think 7's pretty fair to be honest, by comparison if F1 2010 got an 8 for such a bug ridden game that was supposed to be an official license then WTF.

    I didn't find the WRC demo as nearly as awful as some people but then again I'm not an F1 fan.
  • solidSnake04 #18 2 years ago

  • Darren #19 2 years ago

    WRC would have had more chance of doing well and looking more graphically impressive had it come out in 2006. In late 2010 though there's just too many other games demanding my (and everyone else's for that matter) attention that it would have had to have been outstanding to have stood any chance of being noticed.

    One for the post-Christmas bargain bins I think when it'll be cheaper and worth the asking price on the consoles. On the PC the game is only £18 anyway so is better value IMO. Still not buying it though. I'd rather wait for DiRT 3 next year.
  • Deckard1 #20 2 years ago

    Does it have any zombies in it?
  • DrStrangelove #21 2 years ago

    It's far from perfect, but it's great to have a nice fun rally game again, after so many barren years of arcade rubbish like Sega Rally and Dirt.

    Prices will go to the ground like a big heavy rock, so I might wait a bit before buying. Also, GT5 is only four weeks away, and that will have decent off-road racing.
  • DAN.E.B #22 2 years ago

    its not graphics or sound that makes or breaks a rally game
    its the handling! if handlings there the rest is forgiveable.
    however it fails there too!
    so all this game does really is remind me how good CR games really were and how much I miss them.
  • MiniAmin #23 2 years ago

    Does it have any zombies in it?

    I think so:

    "you're putting up with your co-driver's pace notes which, while decently comprehensive, are delivered with the conviction of a manic depressive robot who's realised existence is futile"
  • sonicyoda #24 2 years ago

    Zombie co-driver!?!? SOLD.
  • sharky_ob #25 2 years ago

    I really like it, but I can look past the dodgy presentation and graphics no problem. Once you get the car set up for your driving style there really is a decent handling model there. It takes a little effort to find, it's a shame peoples attention spans are so short!

    I was looking back at forum posts from when the supposed holy grail of rally games, Richard Burns Rally (which I love by the way), was released and that took a right battering from some people. Just give this game some time and it will pay you back.
  • northside #26 2 years ago

    I haven't tried the demo yet, but it sounds like they should have pushed the sim-aspect a bit further. They obviously can't compete with the presentation and thrils of Dirt 2 however i'd buy a spiritual successor to Richard Burns Rally in an instant.
    Edited by northside at 08/10/10 @ 12:44
  • MKorkia #27 2 years ago

    I got this game yesterday and I think the review is very much on point.

    Game looks bad, handling isn't quite right, but you get it after a while. Actually this game both feels and looks a lot like WRC 4 from 2004.

    The whole game feels like work in progress, developer probably had limited time and resources and made best of those. WRC 2011 will probably be just a lots of refinements.

    Neither very bad nor very good, I'd give it 6/10, I expect more from today's games.
  • sharky_ob #28 2 years ago

    I just hope they manage reasonable sales at least, so they actually get to make WRC 2011!

    I think this is a decent first effort. At least the single player side of it works, unlike another companies first attempt at a particular motorsport license I can think of from this year.
  • Mackero #29 2 years ago

    Spekingur wrote:
    "The reviewer played the full game and not the demo like the rest of you guys. Play the full game and then dispute the review (and the score)."

    Fair enough, but aren't demos suposed to let us consumers make an informed decision about a game? Whats the point of putting them out there, if they don't represent what were going to get when we hand over our cash in the shops.

    I 'll give this game another go, if and when I can get hold of a free copy; but based on the demo, I'm not even going to part with a tenner for this. So many more better games to play, and not enough time to play them all.

  • andromeda #30 2 years ago

    yes ! gone from dissapointment to joy again! the driving is GOOD..sold
  • JensonJet #31 2 years ago

    Currently working my way through tuning the car for every country. I agree with the review that the tuning isn't as detailed as Forza say, but then most people don't understand or care to spend the time tuning so it's probably been dumbed down for the modern racing gamer. Speaking of which I doubt it'll suit the arcade racing fan or anyone who thinks Dirt's a good game. Fortunately I won't have to race with this type online.

    With driver aids off it's a tough but pleasantly difficult racer. I love it, but then I don't need the best graphics in a game to appreciate it. If I did I'd buy a PC instead of using a five year old console.
  • Miths #32 2 years ago

    The PC demo made for a fairly enjoyable ride with my G25 wheel, however when I tried the PS3 demo with a DS3 (couldn't be bothered to move my wheel stand at the time) I was sorely disappointed - not just because of the obvious huge downgrade from wheel to pad, but because of the terrible rumble implementation on the pad (conversely force feedback on the wheel was quite decent).

    It was one ugly demo though, and running the PC version at 1920x1200 didn't do much to make it a whole lot prettier than the console version - and it still ran at a lower framerate than the vastly prettier DiRT2.

    I think I'll just wait and see how the rally implementation in GT5 turns out before I decide whether or not it might be worth getting this WRC game, but I rather doubt it.
  • Cadence #33 2 years ago

    The demo wasn't rally very good.

    Sorry.
  • gjgjg #34 2 years ago

    hmm, wanted this to be great, but with GT5 around the courner this might have to wait until next year... shame
  • BigDaddy82 #35 2 years ago

    I doubt the rally in GT5 is even going to be much cop to be honest, though it might be better than this. I'll probably just wait for Dirt 3, enjoyed number 2.
  • tachometer #36 2 years ago

    I've played the full game and have to say that the demo did not show the game at it's best, the full game reminds me of the early Colin McRae games and at least the commentator isn't American!
  • sharky_ob #37 2 years ago

  • Nephirion #38 2 years ago

    Better than Mafia 2, come on really??????????
    Edited by Nephirion at 08/10/10 @ 15:58
  • pac666 #39 2 years ago

    Demo was a bit rubbish. Looked a bit PS2 at times.
  • spotter5 #40 2 years ago

    I played the demo and I enjoyed it, reminded me of Rally Evolved from my childhood.

    Saying that I am a big rally fan.

    Go Petter go Kimi!!!
  • UKGN_Zoidberg #41 2 years ago

    "after a short period of acclimatisation you can, for instance, easily play WRC via joypad."

    Playing a console game with a joypad? Getouttatown!!!
  • Hexcaliber #42 2 years ago

    I think perhaps you should review the pc version and try playing with a half decent wheel, it is absolutely bloody dire, the worst motorsport title I have ever purchased since starting gaming back in the eighties with a zx80. No way this game scores 7/10 on the pc, no way in hell.

    Spekingur I have the pc version it came yesterday, it is no different in any way shape or form to the demo.
  • Luxorz #43 2 years ago

    The stage design alone kills this game completely. A rally game with no ditches? Lolz, is the appropriate response! Plus, at least in the demo, you could cut corners big time since there was nothing to hit outside the road. And even if you did screw up, you'd lose about 0.4 seconds because of the awesome reset mechanism.

    And then there's obviously the sounds and the graphics from 2004 (Richard Burns Rally actually looks BETTER than this game, as ridiculous as that might be).

    And the handling, which has little to do with how any real car moves. I do love how in certain corners, the car turns automatically so you can do this huge, cool slide without actually controlling the car.

    Just a poor effort.
  • andromeda #44 2 years ago

    Very strange that the game also has no copy protection. (allegedly)

  • Case_ #45 2 years ago

    Sim aspirations? Oh, come on... No WRC game in which I can just turn off every assist, set everything "realism" related to max, run through a stage I've never even seen before (let alone played) using just a keyboard ('cause the game doesn't let me calibrate my wheel properly so it's unplayable with it), make it safely to the end and still finish more or less competitively (while constantly wondering how bad and unusable the pacenotes actually are - ie. "hairpin" can be anything from real hairpin to something closer to "three";) is even close to having "sim aspirations". Try something like that in Richard Burns Rally - you'll most likely end up wrapped around a tree in the first few corners or being hopelessly last (if you make it to the finish line).

    The Dirt series games are fun to play, at least, even if they're nowhere close to being a sim (nor they pretend to be). WRC, though, is just boring, ugly and weird :( 5/10 and that's pushing it.
  • JensonJet #46 2 years ago

    Stick to Richard Burns rally then Case. This game is clearly not for you. And by the sounds of it, it's far too easy for you. You sound like the best rally gamer I've ever heard of! Competitive while playing with a keyboard, whilst also being distracted, as well as ignoring the innaccurate pacenotes. Amazing. If the pacenotes had been up to your standard you probably could have won a race with your eyes closed.