If you click on a link and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. Read our editorial policy.

Face-Off: Everybody's Gone to the Rapture on PC

The Chinese Room's technological showcase gets a hardware upgrade.

A PS4 exclusive until now, Everybody's Gone to the Rapture's PC release is unusual - not least for Sony Santa Monica's hand in publishing and funding the project. However, the shift in platform means developer The Chinese Room can bolster the game's already impressive visuals with even higher-grade visual fidelity. But in pushing CryEngine 3 to greater heights on PC, is this really the best way to play the game, and what do PlayStation 4 users actually miss?

Everybody's Gone to the Rapture relies on the same physically-based lighting on PC to achieve a gorgeous, almost photorealistic take on a Shropshire-inspired village. It's among the best uses of this rendering method we've seen to date; materials for frosted glass, brickwork and woodwork across its Tudor-style pub fall eerily close to the genuine article. But to augment the experience, PC adds quality settings for textures, shadows and object detail - which go from low to very high, in some respects enhancing visual aspects over PS4.

Viewed up-close, PS4's geometry, foliage, and core texture-work are identical to PC's best. However Sony's machine falls visibly short in its use of texture filtering across roads, with signs of a trilinear approach causing a blur on the ground. PC uses a higher-grade 16x anisotropic filtering at the very high texture preset, and it's surprising to see filtering on the low preset is still ahead of PS4 in overall clarity. Viewed dead-on, assets actually show little change in switching between each setting, but the grade of filtering is certainly in flux as we move between each.

PlayStation 4 is on the back foot in this sense, though it has one peculiar advantage in another. A bizarre shortfall on PC is the apparent absence of parallax occlusion mapping (POM). On PS4, normal maps for certain floors and walls are given a subtle 3D effect, remaining flat even on PC's top setting. Even in switching to its lowest texture setting, we can't initiate the effect on PC at all in its current build. It's a neat addition to the game's presentation on console, one that adds a fuller look to some surfaces, and we hope it's brought to PC via an update.

Everybody's Gone to the Rapture is a beautiful example of physically-based rendering in use to achieve almost photorealistic results. Compared to PC, PlayStation 4 does compromise a few settings however.

The work The Chinese Room puts into detailing Yaughton village remains tremendous, regardless. Sony's machine cuts its own corners in certain areas too, where shadow quality is notably pared back. Here, PS4 uses a shadow setting on par with PC's high preset, and the end result is softer and less defined silhouettes in direct sunlight. Even factoring in the cloud simulation - which can muddy the waters in these comparisons, due to the way it dynamically diffuses light - there's a clear difference in quality between PS4 and PC's top setting.

The last of the three settings is the most demanding: object detail. According to the developer this is the biggest leech on PC performance, and the main cause for frame-rate drops. Even on our top-end Skylake i7 rig, paired with a GTX Titan X, we could not sustain 1080p resolution at a locked 60fps. It's advised to drop one level below very high if you want to reach the 60fps target, though the visible changes are thankfully few in practice. Essentially it broadens the draw distance on objects across the village, like ornamental details on the central pub when viewed from the game's opening vista shot.

In PS4's case we get a match for PC's low preset in object detail. As well as a reining in the game's draw distances, it has the curious side-effect of making trees appear fuller than PC's superior object detail settings. Foliage is visibly thinned out on the very high preset by comparison, and with each step down on the quality setting here, they start filling out again. We're not convinced it looks any better for it at these higher settings, though the broadened object LODs do go in PC's favour.

While settings are dropped in these spots on PS4, the end results still look terrific at its native 1080p. In terms of image quality, PC offers the same motion blur and temporal AA modes seen on the console edition, available here as toggles alongside a v-sync switch. We also have an option to cap performance at 30fps, 60fps or run unbounded - and we wish PS4 would offer something similar to the former, to mitigate its wavering 20-40fps performance levels. It's good news for PC users though, especially as it takes a powerful PC to get anywhere close to a full 60fps.

PlayStation 4
PC Low
PC Medium
PC High
PC Very High
Everybody's Gone to the Rapture is enhanced on PC with improved draw distances, via its top object detail setting. PS4 runs at equivalent to the low preset - notably on the pub to the right. Meanwhile, PC's top setting creates a thinner, finer look on foliage on the horizon.
PlayStation 4
PS4 runs at the equivalent to PC's high shadow setting - where the max setting better defines object outlines in direct sunlight. Curiously the very high setting on PC doesn't show parallax occlusion mapping on this texture, despite it being deployed on PS4 to add 'pop' to the surface.
PlayStation 4
PC uses a higher-grade anisotropic filtering on the ground, while PS4's filtering method falls in line with trilinear. As a result, details on the road are blurred on the mid-to-far distance on Sony's machine.
PlayStation 4
Putting aside the variable lighting - causing slight differences in hue between the two - world detail is ultimately the same between PC and PS4 when viewed close.
PlayStation 4
Another shot illustrating the unusual omission of POM on nearby textures at very high setting. Texture resolution is identical to PS4, but the presentation is much flatter on PC with this effect disabled.
PlayStation 4
The physically-based lighting is beautifully implemented, and creates almost photorealistic results. PC's advantages in texture filtering and shadow quality are clear to see across the road and pub walls.
PlayStation 4
Materials such as frosted glass are convincing, where shader precision is a match on PC's top setting and PS4.

The popular Nvidia GTX 970 and AMD R9 390 are again in the limelight for our performance tests. To give each a firm workout we're running at very high settings at 1080p, and the divide in performance between each defies our expectations, where AMD has shown an advantage in CryEngine games like Ryse. On average the GTX 970 turns in 52.6fps after a stroll through the village's main streets, while the R9 390 gets us to a 47.7fps average in matching tests.

The advantage for Nvidia's card is clear, but sadly neither can nail a perfect 60fps at this top setting. Instead we're left with lurches to almost 30fps on broad overviews of the central park, which suggests some settings need pruning back. The object detail preset is a great way to start, but even on its bottom-most setting it's hard to get a perfect lock on that target performance. Even dropping all presets to low on the GTX 970 can't help the sub-60fps output of the card, when really pushed. Fortunately an uncapped frame-rate reading shows there's usually enough head-room (up to 90fps on low settings) to run the game mostly at a 60fps when capped - but it'll involve many sacrifices to get there.

There is a workaround of course. A 30fps cap lets us play entirely maxed-out on these two cards, and avoids the uneven refresh we'd get when performance is left to run the 30-60fps gamut. The one snag is that this built-in 30fps cap has frame-pacing issues; a stuttering sensation due to an incorrect ordering of frames. It's a running trend for PC games to have problems with this feature and suggests developers need access to the driver level to implement it properly. Right now, the best way to reliably enforce a smooth 30fps cap is the half-rate adaptive v-sync option in Nvidia's control panel, or else try the Nvidia Inspector tool, with a 30fps cap and triple-buffering engaged.

Pitting GTX 970 against the R9 390 highlights an Nvidia lead by around 5fps. Tom and Rich discuss the scalability of CryEngine 3 on PC, with performance across all presets (from low to very high) tested.

Everybody's Gone to the Rapture on PC - the Digital Foundry verdict

The Chinese Room again makes a case for its superb use of physically-based rendering - a mesmerising, post-apocalyptic stroll through a quaint English village that translates well to PC. Despite missing the POM technique seen on PS4's textures, the PC experience is otherwise enhanced at top settings. Texture filtering and shadow details are clearer, and on the right hardware, geometry across Yaughton also renders in at greater range. Each is a welcome embellishment, and we're getting a solid conversion on PC overall - and it's a game that already shone brightly in the visual stakes on PS4.

Given its glacial pace, it's surprising how much of a strain is put on the GPUs we tested, even bringing almighty GTX Titan X to sub-60fps dips. For Nvidia set-ups, our advice is to simply lean on the GPU-level 30fps cap to smooth out the experience, and run at the highest presets possible. It's a trade-off that makes sense in this case; a rapid 60fps response is difficult to achieve, and a low priority for such a game in the first place. We'd rather have it all on PC, but if push comes to shove, Everybody's Gone to the Rapture deserves to be seen at its peak graphics settings.

For PS4, the good news is that while the PC's benefits are clear, the core visual hook of the game is common to both platforms. Both the lighting and exceptional detail across the village are outstanding and Sony's machine produces results that still impress. One lasting bugbear with the console version is its wavering frame-rate; our original analysis shows a range between 20-40fps overall that could benefit to some extent from a 30fps cap seen on PC.

Left unlocked, it's not an ideal state of affairs for the PS4 edition. On the plus side, a boost in this game's performance on the proposed PS4K (or Neo) should be much easier to highlight without a cap, provided it's permitted to access its extra GPU resources. Obviously, it's a subject we're eager to cover, but our sub-60fps returns on GTX 970 and R9 390 puts question marks over what gains we can truly expect from this game once Sony's upgraded hardware launches.

From Assassin's Creed to Zoo Tycoon, we welcome all gamers

Eurogamer welcomes videogamers of all types, so sign in and join our community!

In this article
Follow a topic and we'll email you when we write an article about it.
Related topics
About the Author
Thomas Morgan avatar

Thomas Morgan

Senior Staff Writer, Digital Foundry

32-bit era nostalgic and gadget enthusiast Tom has been writing for Eurogamer and Digital Foundry since 2011. His favourite games include Gitaroo Man, F-Zero GX and StarCraft 2.