360 port forced inferior Two Worlds

Published 18 January, 2011 Duration 3:48

Dev: sequel realises our initial vision.

Comments (0) Latest comment 1 year ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • inutaihanyou #1 1 year ago

    Blaming the console for your game? That's as bad as IW and the ps3 claim about hacking..

    If you want to make a good game,you specify it for the system's requirements, it should have nothing to do with what console its on if you do it right -_-;

    *EDIT*

    Got the vid to work, now i feel like a daft, commence to thumbs down.
    Edited by inutaihanyou at 18/01/11 @ 09:54

  • Krawftwerk #2 1 year ago

    What a silly beard. In seriousness, this looks interesting but I will have to wait for reviews before I purchase, the last game was hilariously awful.

  • DUFFMAN5 #3 1 year ago

    I loved the first and while enjoying the 2nd so far, 16 hours in (both on 360) I would still lean towards the original game at the moment...watch this space ;)

  • bell_801 #4 1 year ago

    "Blaming the console for your game? That's as bad as IW and the ps3 claim about hacking.."

    misunderstood much? even saw the video? They simply said the fact they tried to do a console version as a after release port was lack of vision from their part. Now they made full dedicated sequels in each platform, nothing of porting from platform to platform, each made at the same time.

  • Keivz #5 1 year ago

    Fair enough. You've got a second change now. No more excuses--time to deliver.

  • inutaihanyou #6 1 year ago

    Ah, thank you for the information,the video link is not working for me.

    Well then, atleast they learned something in the process of making the first game.

  • WinterSnowblind #7 1 year ago

    I would have liked to see them come right out and say the first game was a failure, rather than jumping to excuses. Personally, I didn't think the first game was all that bad, the core gameplay was pretty good if you looked past the terrible writing, voice acting and animation.. Things that I don't see how a console port could have affected.

    The second very much looks like more of the same, just far better presented.

  • djed #8 1 year ago

    Game looks ok, too bad their creative director sounds like a pr-dude going through the motions. Seriously, the 95% bullshit, 5% conjunctions-spiel has been done better (bigger and more badass) before you; F for effort. God, who wrote this guy's script? Why start by trash-talking your previous efforts and start everything off on a sour note?

    Edit: Heh, seems he didn't even work on the first game (LinkedIn. What a guy.
    Edited by djed at 18/01/11 @ 10:36

  • chrisno21 #9 1 year ago

    I'm quite excited about this - it's got to be better than Gothic4.

  • TheTrueSpin #10 1 year ago

    OOOH, marketing hype!

  • MoodyB #11 1 year ago

    Never believe a man that's wearing makeup & lipstick...o_0

  • gmmonkey #12 1 year ago

    Heard the new game is pretty good. The moaners over at neogaf have been giving it the thumbs up:

    http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.p...

    I predict and 8/10 or 9/10 from the english-language eurogamer, even though the german site gave it a 9. I'm leaning slightly towards an 8.

  • Quak #13 1 year ago

    Ok had to turn that off about half way through. There's a limit to how much marketing hyperbole I can take in any 24-hour period.

    Also, the guy needs to lay off the lipstick.