Comments (6) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Death-Jester #1 2 years ago

    Oh damn :(
    I just went from super-excited about this game, to kind of hesitant.
    It looks really bad from the video, almost worse than the original FO3 (I know it uses the same engine). I can only hope they turned the settings down for the sake of framerate in an early build.

    Check out the last few seconds of video - there are no shadows on anything, which makes it look terrible!
  • Tomo #2 2 years ago

    It'll be a 9/10. Perfect for those who want more, with some worthy additions but nothing too revolutionary.
  • Moribundman #3 2 years ago

    @Tomo I'd say a 7 or an 8 unless the plot and/or additional gameplay mechanics are exceptional.

    Given Obsidian's recent track record with Alpha Protocol I really hope this is a return to form for them, and not another Eurogamer 4/10 ;-)

    ps. I like the "This is Vegas E3 Trailer" in the associated videos - made me chuckle.
    Edited by Moribundman at 08/10/10 @ 13:18
  • Moribundman #4 2 years ago

    Having said what I just said, Dead Rising 2 is pretty similar graphically, and has many of the shortcomings of its predecessor left in tact, and EG (and everyone else TBH) gave it an 8/10. Thoroughly enjoyable. Suspect the same may be true here.
  • Sunworship #5 2 years ago

    I loved Fallout 3 but this 2006esque shit just wont fly post Mass Effect 2.