Exclusive: BioShock comparison video

Published 4 November, 2008 Duration 1:43

It's not like BioShock has been the centre of enough controversy, what with all the 'greatest story ever written' camp clashing with the 'overrated FPS' fellows. The PS3 release of the Irrational classic is bound to fuel those fires for some time, so we thought we'd fan the flames a little.

Comments (17) Latest comment 3 years ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • cpreston5 #1 4 years ago

    Was it just me , or was the 360 better?

  • mattyboii08 #2 4 years ago

    360 looks better:o and i own a ps3:(

  • MastaLoWG #3 4 years ago

    yea ps3 has better hardware and stuff like cell processors and if you want to c an accurate video you kinda gotta c it side by side this vidoe still has some bad quality my opinion i like my ps3 better ...

  • MastaLoWG #4 4 years ago

    yea ps3 has better hardware and stuff like cell processors and if you want to c an accurate video you kinda gotta c it side by side this vidoe still has some bad quality my opinion i like my ps3 better ... and remeber guys this game was ported to 360 to ps3 and thats hard to do because the proccessors are different its easier to proccess a ps3 game to a 360 to a 360 to ps3 if you dont remeber game developers stated last year that they will start ported game from ps3 to 360 so they will look almost the same basically the same ...

  • solidSnake04 #5 4 years ago

    why is the ps3 version so blurred ?

  • Grunk #6 4 years ago

    so what you are saying is the 360 version is better?

  • m0thr4 #7 4 years ago

    why is the ps3 version so blurred ?

    It looks as if they've applied some sort of post-processing filter to it. Funny thing is, I can't decide which looks better - the sharper-but-obviously-a-videogame Xbox 360 version, or the burrier-but-more-natural-looking PS3 version.

    Either way, the demo of this game left me stone cold and bored, so I'm going to ignore it on PS3 just as I did on Xbox 360.

  • DFawkes #8 4 years ago

    I actually prefer the PS3 one, but that's a personal preference thing - the 360 version is undeniably crisper and better overall.

    Still great on both machines, no excuse not to have it now :)

  • Killer66250 #9 4 years ago

    360 Version is slightly sharper.

  • trixta1992 #10 4 years ago

    my picture is better on my tv than an xbox, maybe it cos i got a sony bravia

  • guernican #11 4 years ago

    Given that the comparison won't make me buy an Xbox, I'm still perfectly happy with the PS3 version. Cracking game, if you like that sort of thing.

  • monster597 #12 4 years ago

    I am pretty sure that the videos are switched. The 360 video should be where the PS3 is and vice versa. Bacause I have the PS3 version of Bioshock and definately looks sharper and has higher res textures than the 360.

    the 360 part of this video seems to be more juggy than the PS3 part. In the PS3 part of this video everything looks more blurry and smother, this is proof that the videos have been switched.

    For thi game, normally the Xbox should have the less juggies due to the use of AA, and should be a lil smothier and blurry where as the Ps3 version normally has higher res textures that are more sharper but also has more juggies.

    So I am pretty sure that the videos have been switched, this maybe an accidental hickup by eurogamer (like GT did with the GRID video comparisson) or it may have been done deliverately, im not sure wich

  • Michformer #13 3 years ago

    Eurogamer blurs ps3.
    PS3 version looks WAY better. textures are crisper