Call of Duty: World at War - Co-op trailer

Awesome

man!!! i hate ww2 weaponry

I seriously had zero interest in playing this while watching the video. It looked like any other WW2 game. The flame thrower added nothing at all and I couldn't make out friend from foe.

Wasn't this video released on EG TV already?

This does nothing for me seems like a step back rather than forward

If i could choose a voice, i would definately choose the voice of Kiefer Sutherland!

Game seems pretty ok. flamethrower is nice. But it does seem like a very generic shooter. Hopefully there will be memorable scenes, hellish gunfights and so forth

Toasty!

This is not at all what I had hoped for. It looked like a multiplayer free for all rather than WWII. Hell, it even lacked the cinematic feel of COD4!

Was that Jack Bauer? Sold!

No red dot sight = no sale!!!

It looks worse than COD4!

Awful. It actually looks like it'll even fail to meet my expectation of it being an average, formulaic carbon-copy shooter. It just looks plain shit.

Wake me up when they announce the REAL sequel.

This is an old video, saw it months ago.

Lets just skip to COD 6 shall we!!!!!

Looks more than a little unimpressive

Classic zombie enemies, as always in Call of Duty games.

Flippin eck..... The effects of jack bauer and i suddenly want to play this game. COD4 casting was strong signing up eastenders but this is an impressive move.

I don't care if they only release a new COD game every 4 years. Just leave COD to Infinity Ward and let Treyarch carry on with their shitty movie tie-ins.

Kiefer God damn Sutherland! Your voice rocks!

Wow, looks like the player is a statue floating over the ground. Is it really so hard to at least implement some kind of head bob effect?

This looks... retro in a non-good way.

Despite everything you've gotta love flamethrowers.

Kiefer Sutherland and possibly Seth Green! \o/

Typical CoD, great at simulating the battlefield but ultimately brown and boring

since we are playing as the 'invinsible' yanks I wonder if the finale will keep true to history and we'll see the Americans running away leaving the other allies to fight on their own?

I love the way everyones already dissing this because it's not infinity ward, and 'another WW2 shooter.' It sells, people will buy it, so they keep making them - and you never know, it may actually be fun. If the multi-player borrows from COD4, im buying it.

You people really are determined to be negative aren't you?

everyon actually wants this to be shit for some reason.

And it won't be shit, just like CoD 3 wasn't. Yeah, not as good as CoD 1 (but neither was CoD 2 or CoD 4), but still much, much better than the vast majority of WWII shooters.

Well, DuffKing, CoD4 has set it up for a fall, really....

at least it has co-op. how many fps games have co-op these days?

Aye, co-op makes up for many short-comings in my eyes.

loved cod 2 n still think its the best of the cods but this looks like it can beat it !! LOOKS AWSOME !

It looks good to me. I like the environments, especially the jungle.

Really old video EG.

Jack Bauer may save Americas ass every day, but he aint saving this game.

What is this shite?

respawning bad guys makes a game series

aww and they said they would do something special nothing new here, did COD4 never happen?

I think the online co-op alone will be enough to sell this game even to people fed up of WWII shooters. Looks decent enough although it's not exactly a genre that has me jumping up and down with excitement. Better than I expected although EG's poor video quality leaves a lot to be desired compared with other sites like Gamersyde and GameTrailers. High quality video is effectively a low-res one!!!

Looked pretty cookie cutter... I just have no interest in the WW2 theme now. I think i've probably been saying that for years. The co-op might be good, but the game just looked like a random shoot fest instead of the honed experience Cod4 was. Might pick up when cheap depending on reviews.

Looks great.

To all the detractors:

1.Of course the enemy would just run at you like that - that was the Japanese tactic, to swarm over everything. Or hide in foxholes/trees, as is ALSO shown in the video. Pretty accurate, if you ask me. Try harder guys.

2. It uses the CoD4 engine, so any criticism you level at the player 'floating' should also be levelled at CoD4, because the player moves in exactly the same way. But you didn't temper your comment with "shit, just like CoD4", leading me to believe you are nitpicking because you WANT to nitpick.

3. It has what looks to be at least one nicely wide and open level, even more wide and open than any of CoD4's.

4. Red dot sight? Red dot sight?!? Might as well say "no frikkin laser beams = fail". Moron.

5. CoD4 was an ultra-scripted single player experience - infinitely respawning enemies, useless AI. Play it on the hardest difficulty setting and it's a very broken game. Lower settings and first playthroughs, it's fantastically cinematic. That first scene in the movie of CoD5 looked very similar to CoD4's methods, so again, seems like people are nitpicking CoD5 but glossing over CoD4, just because they *want* to find fault.

6. Has co-op, so instantly becomes more interesting to me.

If you're going to find fault with the game, find fault WITH THE GAME and also make intelligent comments. Funny how when RARE announce new games people always comment "yeah, but all the good people from RARE left to set up FRD", but no-one seems to think that the supposedly shit people from Treyarch would have moved on or been fired.

innit

cod4s lack of co op was a big dissapointment for me
i will buy this if the reveiws are positive.

Good to see so many gobshites arent getting it...we might get a return to the CoD3 community spirit, rather than the Halo-esque pantomime that CoD4 became.

I love how all the journalists are acting optimistic about this game, when it looks average at best, with the tired and over done return to WW2. No matter what you show us, it is never going to be interesting. They messed up big time.

No British = Automatic Fail for me.

I would like it more if it was in the modern era

i will buy this simply because its CALL OF FUCKING DUTY.
wait, actualy there wont be any cpt. price or mcgregor. shit.
not buying this then.

I couldn't say "meh" any louder if I wanted to. Although I think that this game will sell on brand-name alone.

im not just saying this to be a dick but it does look like call of duty 3 again

That looks pretty cool.

So setting fire to stuff is the new volumetric smoke?

Why is this on the front page? This video is almost a month old now. Anyway it looks sort of fun.