wingzerosys Comments

Page 1 of 4

  • Eurogamer's Top 50 Games of 2008: 10-1

  • wingzerosys 30/12/2008

    Wasn't NMH released last year (07)?

    Its funny how things have turned out, instead PS3 fanboys crying, it's the opposite, I say it's about time the PS3 got praised, afterall EG seemed to have been 360 biased.


    I agree, how can MGS 4 be beaten by games such as Singstar, Pure, Tomb Raider:Underworld and whatever other tripe beat it, imo MGS 4, 3, 1, 2.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 30/12/2008

    Damn right and 09 is looking better. Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 30/12/2008

    @Farzlepot.

    AITD didn't deserve to be on that list, if Dead Space didn't, what chance were there for that pos.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 30/12/2008

    Where the F are Valkyria and Dead Space? DS is one of the (if not) best survival horrors this year, Valkyria is pretty original compared to a lot of these games on the list and imo it's better than Condemmed 2.

    Nice to see LBP become no.1, after playing the MGS pack and using the paintinator, its made the game even more fun and there will be endless hours of fun on it.

    Why shouldn't LBP be no.1? Other than 360 fanboys complaining, it's original compared to a lot of the games on that list and I'd say it's twice-three times longer than any of those too.

    Unless you haven't got broadband or a psn account then the game would seem quite short, but to the one's who have, we can create and share levels, play multiplayer, try out user creators levels and play story mode.

    There's plenty of things to do and you can even customise your sackboy and even download costumes for it like the MGS one's and Street Fighter, new downloadable levels are being added, like the awsome MGS pack which gives you the paintinator.

    Reply 0
  • PlayStation Home

  • wingzerosys 14/12/2008

    The same pricks who buy skins/costumes etc for games. Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 14/12/2008

    I`m not being snotty, I`m just saying I own all 3 so I don`t get accused of being loyal/a fanboy to a certain console, a lot of the people who are writing in this comment page are loyal 360 fanboys who have nothing better to do than slag off the ps3 every way they can, I bet half the people who have wrote in haven`t even been on Home and try to find as many faults for the ps3 as they can.



    I`m sick of all these negative comments about the ps3, I`ve heard things like "it has no games" "it sucks" "Sony suck" etc and now Sony finally release a Beta for Home and people still aren`t satisfied, atleast they`re trying something new other than MS releasing the shit NXE update which imo has ruined the 360 with its rip off mii like avatars.



    I`m not loyal to any of the companies I just mainy use the consoles to play games or watch dvd`s/blu ray`s, there is no need for any of this fanboyish nonsense, where does it get you? MS, Sony etc are`nt going to congratulate you or give you free products, they only care about getting money off you.



    Now if you had to pay for Home then I wouldn`t be happy, but seeing as its free, what`s there to complain about? Atleast its a big gaming community where you can chat, have fun and play games etc, where as with Xbox live you have to pay £40 a year just to play online and play demo`s early.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 14/12/2008

    @Danodynamo.



    Wow nice comment, so people who enjoy Home are nobs huh? Why don`t you go back to your 360 and mess around with the Avatars idiot.



    So what if people want to buy virtual club houses, clothes etc does it hurt you that much? Idiots pay out £40 for xbox live which imo is a waste of money and proves that Microsoft are greedy, I have to pay to be able to play demo`s and some content, fuck you MS.



    Before I get accused of being a fanboy, I am not in the slightest (even if I do sound like an hypocrite), I`m just sick of people finding faults with a pacific (sp) console they have no intention of even buying, just stick to your console of choice an STFU.





    I on the other hand own all 3 and switch between them regulary (360 an ps3 more than the wii) and hardly have faults with any of them (the only one is xbox live), Home is free afterall (unless you want to pay for dlc, which even the 360 charges for) and is there for a certain person to mess around with, but to some idiots that`s not good enough.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 14/12/2008

    Typical fanboys flooding the comments again, Home isn`t too bad and it`s free, some people complain about anything these days.



    Look Home ain`t for everyone so stop complaining, so what if you don`t like it other people might, some people are into virtual worlds/catrooms/mmo`s, so to them it`s somewhere to hang out.



    I have been on it a few times and my opinion (sp) on it so far is that it`s pretty bare but what do you expect for a Beta?



    I also tried the US version which has the Uncharted and Far Cry 2 themes, the Uncharted theme is pretty cool, you start off in Sully`s bar and there are doors which you input codes to gain access to new rooms, I just hope Sony add more/better spaces in the near future.



    I`ll probably keep using it in the near future as it ain`t too bad.
    Reply 0
  • Sony promises better LBP moderation

  • wingzerosys 04/12/2008

    Well if were not getting the Disney dlc why mention it? Sony/Mm said we coud be getting all this dlc based on tv/film/whatever and then they say were not actually getting it, they talk bollocks in just about every interview they release.



    They say they`re fixing the controls, they`re releasing dlc, gonna add things like disney, use the psp, play tv etc and we still haven`t got shit, well we got costumes but that`s about it.



    I`m just sick of all the news articles we get from them, with them promising this and that and only releasing costumes to tie us over, instead of giving us updates on what they`re doing/gonna do, why not just get on with it and release it already.



    Azure Palace is the level everyone was moaning about on gfaqs, people complaining and saying they`re going to trade the game in and that, yes it was kinda blown out of proportion.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 03/12/2008

    @DrDamn.



    Well lucky you, I only managed to get a Kratos code from OPM and would like the Nariko costume aswell.



    That is the problem, you have to play every single player level to unlock the stuff for the creation tool, that means you have to ace them aswell as play with other people, who could sometimes ruin it for you by dying all the time.



    The search tool kinda works, sometimes I`ve found the levels with no trouble and other times it hasn`t found them, the categories (sp) on the other hand, needs fixing, I suggest no one should use it, in the cool section you`ve got all the trophy whore levels and shit levels, so I usually have to search or look on Gfaqs to find out which levels are worth playing.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 03/12/2008

    I`m begining to wonder why Sony/Mm released a Beta for this, surely a lot of the things wrong with this game would`ve been adressed due to Beta testers giving their feedback.



    They release all this info about the game before it was released and they have done nothing about it, they said they would fix the controls, online etc and they still haven`t.



    Now they say were not gettin the Disney DLC , what other lies are they going to come out with?



    Are they going to release the Kratos and Nariko costumes to those who were unlucky to get them? I bet they don`t, instead they charge us for other costumes.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 03/12/2008

    It`s a decent platformer/creation game, but I think sony did overhype it, it has not done too bad sales wise but it could`ve done better.



    Over on the gfaqs message board, people were complaining about sony modding levels for no aparent reason and I even think some of them were thinking of giving up on the game.



    Who else is expecting cones of this next year? I have a feeling that both Nintendo and MS are going to release their own version, along with third party devs getting into the action, jus like they did with all the wii minigames.



    Also, I`m still waiting for sony/mm to fix the controls for the sackboy, I`d like them to change the jump button so instead of holding down X to jump you press it twice to double jump, I`ve made mistakes a lot due to the jump button, I`m expecting people to say I suck but why do I? For your information I`ve finished quite a lot of games, from adventure, RPG`s, fps`s etc, so I`m pretty good at gaming.



    They could also do with fixing another thing, where the sackboy keeps moving in and out of the background, it`s annoying when you have to keep reposioning (sp) him due to moving in and out of the background and likely getting yourself killed and having to replay leves due to these problems.
    Reply 0
  • Sonic Unleashed

  • wingzerosys 01/12/2008

    Sorry for the triple post.



    The last sentence was about sonic unleashed and not sonic rivals, I kinda messed up there.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 01/12/2008

    SATSR wasn`t too bad, I think sonic team tried to get it right with that game, the problem with it was the controls, you could only use the wiimote and had to do motion controls, atleast the camera was ok in it, better than it is in the 360 version of unleashed.



    I`m not holding my breath for SATBK, hopefully sega/sonic team have learnt there lesson, but so far they haven`t.



    Now if only sonic rivals was a 2.5d platformer instead of it being a racing game, they could`ve finally got it right, afterall that is what a lot of us are wanting, but no, they keep the lame 3d camera and add a stupid gimmick like the werehog.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 01/12/2008

    The sonic stages look like they play a lot better in this version, I have the 360 version and its full of bug/glitches (aswell as framerate trouble), I`ve died numerous times due to the crappy camera in sonic`s stages, aswell as dieing trying to home attack an enemy an the camera goes skitzy.



    I`m sick of collecting and finding the sun/moon medals in the 360 version that I`ve given up, its ruined the fun of the game and has become boring, I have no idea where the medals are and I`ve got 9 to collect to move on to the next stage, sod that.



    What`s happened to the good old days where you do 3 acts and then take on eggman, sonic team have ruined sonic and atleast I`ve got the Rush series to take me back to sonic`s old days.



    It`s strange that the only decent 3d sonic games are the adventure one`s and even those weren`t perfect, whoever says this is decent and one of sonic`s best games then they either aren`t fully there in the head or they don`t know what a decent game is if it hgit himon the head.
    Reply 0
  • Sonic Unleashed

  • wingzerosys 29/11/2008

    Ok I`m starting to see why it got a 4, the 3d sections in the daytime stages suck, I`ve died over and over due to the camera and other bugs/glitches, Sega could`nt have tested this game before it was released as it plays like crap in places. The Werehog stages aren`t too bad, they play a lot better than the 3d parts in sonic`s stages, if only Sega would scrap the 3d camera view and for the next game use 2.5d platforming, similar to Sonic Rivals on the psp.



    Now for the idiot who said I`ve got bad tastes because I think L4D sucks is plain wrong, there is not that many games I haven`t played this year and I know what is good and bad, L4D is only good for co-op, the story (lack of), the level design, characters and weapons suck and to me it plays like some pc geek created it using the HL2 mod.



    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 28/11/2008

    Sorry 4 double post.

    I'd probably give this a 7 at the moment, it's not perfect but it ain't no where near as bad as 06 and it's a bit better than Secret Rings (which imo was decent), so a 4 is definitely too low. There's no lame ass side quests for humans, no Shadow levels or vehicles, definitely no guns and the only other character you play as is Werehog, who isn't too bad.

    They've removed the lame treasure hunting stages, shooting stages and what not, so far it's got a better story and I haven't seen the Sonic gang yet (other than tails).
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 28/11/2008

    Wtf EG? This is a step in the right direction for Sonic, the day time levels rock, then again you gave L4D a 9 or 10, that game is an overated PoS. Reply -1
  • Left 4 Dead

  • wingzerosys 21/11/2008

    Fanboy remark again, lol.

    What does being a fanboy have to do with this game anyway? Just because I don't like this game doesn't make me one, it's funny how I'm supposed to hate this game because it's not on the PS3, for your information I would've gotten the 360 version, nice try though.

    So I'm immature because I said the reviewers got paid off for this review, why else would they give it a 9? They overated Fable II (wait can't say that, II'll be labelled a fanboy again), they overated Halo 3, GTA IV, all better than Left 4 Shit (Dead).

    I've said why it's shit, you go back to masterbating over this precious game, well you can't give reasons why it's good can you.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 21/11/2008

    No cos I don't play co-op or take any notice, Halo 3 has co-op though, that's better than this.

    Defend this POS all you like, I'm (nor you) not gonna change my mind, it looks/plays like a Half Life 2 mod.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 21/11/2008

    So cos I think this is a generic POS I'm labelled as a PS3 fanboy? Lol.

    I actually own all 3 current gen systems, no fanboyism about it, I just think it sucks and its overated, that's my opinion, I gave the demo ago after hearing people's praises and I Rofl'd after playing it.

    It may be good for co-op but it doesn't change the fact that its shit, I'm into different genres, mainly action adventures, FPS, RPG's and a lot of original IP's, this ain't original, its all been done before, better infact.

    Actually I believe the reviewers (IGN, Eurogamer) have been paid to give it a high score, if they give sequels or "seen it all before" games shit scores, why not this? I'd say this played like a cross between Half Life and Serious Sam but with zombies.

    I'll stick to CoD:WaW's zombie mode, more fun.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 20/11/2008

    Actually he's right, what's original about this?

    It`s a generic fps with co-op, big fucking deal, the enemies suck, AI sucks, it's been done before (and better) and the sad thing is, it would probably end up being GOTY.

    Tell me, what's so good about this? I'm intrigued, afterall its had rave reviews.

    I'd probably rather play Resident Evil:Outbreak f1&2 than this POS, even they're not that good.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 20/11/2008

    Plays like a 6/10, overated POS.

    I expect being flamed but who cares, tried the demo and it plays like a generic fps with zombies.

    Graphics suck, gameplay is straight from HL2 and outdated (same makers of this), lame clichéd characters, boring level design.
    Reply 0
  • EA unveils Army of Two film

  • wingzerosys 26/10/2008

    Cast:

    Well we need a bigish bald guy, maybe Vin Diesel or the bloke who played Ben Grimm in Fantastic 4.

    A young good looking bloke who's cocky and funny, I have no idea.


    I'm Expecting a Kane & Lynch movie in the near future, just like I did with Hitman and Max Payne.

    Now where the hell is the MGS film.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 26/10/2008

    I'm expecting EA announcing a Dead Space movie, the game is fucking awsome (one of the best Sci Fi/survival horror's out, it's better than Res 4 and Bioshock) but the film would be kinda like Event Horizon cross Aliens.

    AoT was pretty good, ok it may have been short but the chemistry between Salem and Rios was awsome, they worked well together, they took down terrorists and they were even double crossed, but they got the job done and got paid handsomely (sp) for it.

    The game featured real life stories like 9/11 and I think that's what the film will focus on, stuff like Afganistan and Iraq.

    The new Street Fighter movie is just based on Chun Li, yes she's hot but it'll suck, it will probably be about her past and about how M. Bison killed her father, they'll never beat the awsome SFII animated movie, that kicked ass.
    Reply 0
  • Super Hind

  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    Correction, an Airwolf type game for the PSP/next gen consoles would be most welcome. Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    A Hind? Colonel, what's a russian gunship doing out here? Reply 0
  • Schappert would love to see MGS4 on 360

  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    Lol. Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    Why do I? Is it because the PS3 is failing due to MS? MGS 4 should stay PS3 exclusive, that's all. Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    Nope, my shoulders are chip free. Lol. Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    I think they removed that protoype xbox.

    Miiguel you talk shite.

    Snake lives, Meryl gets married, Big Boss dies, Ocelot dies, there was no Liquid, Eva is Snake/Liquids mother, she also dies, Naomi dies, Zero dies, Patriots get erased, Vamp dies, Raiden's got a son (john), everyone else lives.

    There, no need to play it. Lol.


    This should shut them up, there no need for a 360 port, let the PS3 have atleast one decent exclusive.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    Ok lets turn it around, say the 360 had MGS 4 exclusively and it had MS products in it.

    MS would soon sue if it was ported to the PS3.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    I've given up caring, this gen is nothing but a joke.

    PS3: Hardly any games/loses just about every game.

    360: Steals games/not happy with the exclusives its got/greedy.

    Wii: A gimmicky kids product/lacking decent games.

    I regrettably own all 3.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    "Fantard," lol.

    Yes there is, look up MGS 2 Substance on xbox.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    Let them port it, let's see it get slagged off and get poor review scores due to it being butchered.

    It'll suck, just like the xbox version of substance, I'll stick to the superior version thanks.

    Disk swap or Install? Decisions, decisions.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    Both Sony and Apple compete against Microsoft, their products are advertised in MGS 4.

    Kojima couldn't put MGS:TTS stuff in it due to it being on a Nintendo console.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    In-game PSP & PS3 consoles, PS1 references, Apple Ipod/Laptop, they'd all have to be removed along with MGS 1 stuff. Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    @jack_klugman.

    If you call Rose on the codec, you can jiggle her tits with the Sixaxis, it would have to be removed along with shaking it to change the Octocamo back to its default camo.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    Ffs, it doesn't matter if the 360 can run it or not, the 360 version would be butchered.

    Alot of things would have to be removed or they'd get sued by Sony and Apple.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    It doesn't just come down to power or storage, what about Sony's references/products and Apple's products?

    What about the controls? No more jiggling Rose's boobies or shaking the sixaxis.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    Exactly, *predicts PS3's doom next year.* Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    Wouldn't Sony and Apple sue Konami?

    Or would they butcher the game by taking out Apple and Sony products.

    Port it Konami, the 360 version would be a butchered mess, they'd have to remove a certain little minigame and cutscenes.
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    I take back my "Is the PS3 the new Dreamcast thread?" Atleast the DC had exclusives. Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    Look if it'll shut the Xbots up, fucking port it, it'll suck though and serve them right. Reply 0
  • EA to take over Trafalgar Square again

  • wingzerosys 16/10/2008

    Her tits aren't real, she's not bad looking but nothing special. Reply 0
  • Konami "looking into" MGS4 for Xbox 360

  • wingzerosys 15/10/2008

    Oh yeah if it does get ported, get ready for another 360 victory with the MGS 4 PS3 vs 360, Face off. Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 15/10/2008

    I'm sorry but this gen is becoming nothing more than a joke.

    If every console gets the same games, why bother with more than one? Exclusives are becoming the thing of the past.

    Then again you don't hear the likes of Bungie, Epic games and the other companies who release exclusives on the 360, talking about PS3 ports (Bioshock wow), it's always the 360.

    Sony may aswell pack up and let MS have it all, they already seem to be.

    I loved having exclusives, the games felt more polished and that, they didn't feel rushed or anything, you had none of this "which version is better?" or "what should I get it for?" or fanboys saying "this version is better because it's on so & so."

    If it keeps up I may quit gaming and I doubt I'd be the only one, game companies are getting greedy and they repay us by releasing nothing but multiplats and unfinished tat.
    Reply 0
  • Tekken 6 announced for Xbox 360

  • wingzerosys 09/10/2008

    Tekken (aswell as Ace Combat and Armoured Core) started life on the playstation, why start making them multiplat now?

    The Xbox never got any of those games, now its just about stolen every Playstation exclusive.

    MGS is the only one left, get ready for either an MGS 4 port, MGS 5 360 exclusive or MGS goes multi.

    Why couldn't NAMCO let the PS3 have one exclusive? They've already given the 360 a Tales game, besides what if another DOA is announced, will that be 360 exclusive?

    I'm sorry if I sound like a 360 fanboy (trust me I'm not) but at this rate the PS3 would be lucky to last through next year, its going the way the Dreamcast did.

    You say the 360 won't get LBP, what's stopping MS from copying it and releasing their own version, you do know MS will be laughing their asses off at Sony, they're one big joke this gen.

    But are Sony to blame?
    Reply 0
  • wingzerosys 09/10/2008

    Another nail in the PS3's coffin. Reply 0
  • Healey wants LBP to work with PlayTV

  • wingzerosys 09/10/2008

    Stacey *The Slut* Slater. lol.

    Hollyoaks -/- Eastenders.

    Anyway it could be a good concept but it wouldn't take off, LBP is getting over hyped.
    Reply 0