rotmm Comments

Page 1 of 41

  • The madness of Gran Turismo Sport

  • rotmm 25/05/2016

    @captainT "I think not.. there going to have a hard time shifting this one i think."

    It's a newgen Gran Turismo game. It will sell bucketloads!
    Reply +2
  • Uncharted 4 UK sales up 66% on Uncharted 3

  • rotmm 16/05/2016

    Uncharted 4 - It's a beautiful looking game and I'm enjoying it quite a lot. Happy it's done well so far. Reply +17
  • PlayStation Plus May games include Tropico 5 and Table Top Racing

  • rotmm 27/04/2016

    Awesome month! Reply +21
  • Cliff Bleszinski's return to video games

  • rotmm 27/04/2016

    @nottorp "Actually, YOUR games have been about dudebros for so long. There are plenty that aren't."

    Great comment, but completely fucking clueless.

    And wrong.

    Well done.
    Reply -12
  • The Gears of War 4 season pass costs 40

  • rotmm 26/04/2016

    @Master09 "First they were $10 online passes..."

    While I agree with much of what you said, the Online Pass that companies such as Sony implemented were a different beast.

    The only people who had to pay for those were gamers who bought 2nd hand and wanted to play online, effectively supporting the developers to maintain those services when they didn't see anything from that 2nd hand sale.
    Reply +2
  • Revealed: Sony's plan for PlayStation 4K - codename Neo

  • rotmm 20/04/2016

    @StooMonster "Why would they do that when margins are terrible on TVs, whereas PS4 makes them loads of money?"

    Sell both newer higher end (and therefore more profitable) TV's & full priced PS4's again.

    The very definition of win-win.
    Reply +2
  • rotmm 20/04/2016

    @Zerobob "So after investing in a PS4, waiting for the generation's 'sweet spot' of lovingly crafted, optimised games to arrive (as they always do) I'm now being told there won't be any, and if I want to see anything resembling a lovingly crafted, optimised game I'll have to buy a new console"

    Of course, there won't be any lovingly crafted sweet-spot games on PS4 Neo until 3-4 years after released. Which will be about the same time as devs are moving onto PS5 (or PS4 Trinity)
    Reply +1
  • Hardcore Henry review

  • rotmm 07/04/2016

    "...directed by Hideo Kojima..."

    So ponderous, overly wordy, opaquely plotted but lots of nice arse shots then.

    Shame, as otherwise looked interesting.
    Reply +5
  • PlayStation 4.5 to be announced before October - report

  • rotmm 28/03/2016

    Hope it's powerful enough to handle a PSN gamertag change. If so I'm all in! Reply +27
  • EA apologises for giving Muslim fighter a Christian victory gesture in UFC 2

  • rotmm 25/03/2016

    @OliverH "Easing up in one's persecution is hardly "bringing back"."

    As you said, it's important to read history. I have. It's an area that has greatly interested me. I recommend you now actually do the same. In 1943 Stalin essentially re-instituted the Russian Orthodox Church, reopened hundreds of churches and utilised the all too willing clergy to convince the larger Russian population, with a special focus on the lower classes, to willingly go to war on behalf of Russia, the Church and God.

    So again, take your own advice and read your history. More importantly, don't make an assumption that the other person hasn't when you haven't actually read it yourself. It's how you lose any respect.

    "If only. Instead you suggested a responsibility"

    Well of course there's a responsibility. When a Church works to press the faithful into fighting with the message "God is on your side" then they are complicit in those battles and wars.
    Reply 0
  • rotmm 25/03/2016

    @OliverH "Yeah, particularly in the Soviet Union in WW2."

    It's true that Stalin brought back the Orthodox Church in Russia to cheerleader for war and enhance the patriotic belief that God was on the side of the Russians and the Motherland.

    " would be a wee bit hard for anyone to be a "cheerleader" for all sides."

    As you correctly pointed out, there isn't "One Church" or "One God". The German churches motivated their masses to believe that God was on their side, while in Russia the religious leaders pushed the message that God was on the side of the Russians. Likewise the British, Americans, etc.

    God in terms of politics is very much a moveable feast.

    "It's hilarious when you bitch and moan about religion..."

    I didn't bitch and moan about religion. I just pointed out the historical truth that various churches throughout the ages have been utilised to mobilise the faithful in times of war, even when those wars weren't specifically designated "Faith Wars"
    Reply 0
  • rotmm 23/03/2016

    @Rens11 "If that's the case then why does America (still the richest country) have such a high rate of religious people"

    Because they have cleverly adapted the religion to condone, even promote, avarice and intolerance which allows them to take a moralistic standpoint they may not hold where it not for having "Jesus on their side".

    American religious institutions, in bed with various rightest governments over the years, have somehow managed to convince American Christians that Jesus would support the death penalty, that he would be pro-gun, that he would be all for invading other sovereign nations and that the poor and needy should stay just that, without access to proper education and healthcare should only be for those that can afford it, not those who need it.

    That's the Christianity America can buy in to, even though it pretty much goes against ALL the teachings of Christ.
    Reply +13
  • rotmm 23/03/2016

    @ImpericalLegion "Yep the world wars were caused by religion right? Uh nope, they were secular wars."

    I do so dislike this argument that is so often trotted out. In many ways I'd say that no wars were caused by religion, but rather by men (and occasionally women) with a desire for power.

    Where religion comes in to it is in the mobilisation of the masses and as a moral justification for the murder, slaughter and taking of lands of others.

    In this, the 2 world wars were no different. Those in power used religious leaders to help convince the masses that "God was on their side" (whichever side that was). In both of those wars, and in conflicts/wars previous to and since then Churches both helped to build the case for war and supported it by tying God to country to continue to justify it.

    God in no way can wash his hands of these atrocities in which millions died. He was a cheerleader, but a cheerleader for all sides.
    Reply +1
  • Sony announces new mobile studio ForwardWorks

  • rotmm 24/03/2016

    If only Sony had a handheld platform where they could invest development resource in leveraging their valuable IP.

    If only.....
    Reply +68
  • EA Sports UFC 2 review

  • rotmm 23/03/2016

    "EA crafts one of the finest MMA games to date, although it's let down by a lacklustre ground game."

    For me that pretty much describes MMA in a sentence.
    Reply -7
  • rotmm 23/03/2016

    @Master09 "So the game doesn't get a Rousing applause."

    You should get sent Holm for terrible jokes like that
    Reply +26
  • Sony closes Driveclub developer Evolution

  • rotmm 22/03/2016

    Best of luck to all the staff there. Sad times Reply +38
  • Xbox survey asks if you'd sell back your digital games

  • rotmm 21/03/2016

    @Cheeky-Girl-Gamer "10% back is a complete joke."

    85% after "a few days" even more so ;)
    Reply 0
  • rotmm 21/03/2016

    @TheMadScot "Let's look at Quantum Break: 44.99 to preorder via the Xbox storefront, 39.99 for the same from Amazon."

    Not on topic, but I think it's pretty decent of Microsoft to use the 44.99 price point for MS published AAA games.

    Pre-PS4 launch & Sony promised to not increase 1st party games over PS3 prices, yet their go-to digital (and RRP) price is 49.99. MS made no such promise yet kept the lower price point.

    Anyway, to your point. I am in no way saying digital pricing is correct. However, if you are willing to hunt a little for cheaper MS points cards you can get digital games cheaper than retail (without ability to trade in after of course).

    EG, I bought 50 points card from CD keys for $41.37. Even now it's 44.50 with FB discount. That's your fiver right there. I also get 6% back as part of a XB Rewards programme, meaning 2.70. So that digital purchase for Quantum Break is now around 37.

    If I could get back 10% on the 45 it cose then in real terms I have paid just over 32 for the game.

    Yes, it's not as simple as just buying the game cheaper, but we all hunt for cheaper deals for physical product, this is no different.
    Reply +3
  • $1200 Assassin's Creed movie ticket includes a crossbow

  • rotmm 10/03/2016


    Has no one yet commented that this is the first major movie that has essentially what the games industry has been doing for ages.... Special Editions?

    I'm probably wrong and this has been done somewhere before, but the whole idea of "Buy a movie ticket and a limited edition statue" has me both strangely excited and slightly disappointed at the same time.
    Reply +1
  • April PlayStation Plus game leaked already

  • rotmm 09/03/2016

    @FallingStickman "Another indie shooter"

    I hope the other game is a platformer.
    Reply +4
  • Epic boss accuses Microsoft of trying to "monopolise game development on PC"

  • rotmm 04/03/2016

    @MattaClark "Wrong. I can go to Steam buy Volgarr the viking or the Witcher 3, install the games, uninstall Steam and play the games. Valve gives the choice to the developers."

    Here's what I said:

    "Non-Valve games purchased through Steam have to have Steam installed"

    What part of that isn't true?
    Reply -1
  • rotmm 04/03/2016

    @HunsonAbadeer "Steam client might be but it has always been closed anyway."

    That's ok then.
    Reply -1
  • rotmm 04/03/2016

    @jamyskis1981 "They've been doing cuntish things ever since the mid-1990s - remember the Netscape/Internet Explorer scenario?"

    Funny you mention that as it came to mind when reading this story. It's one of the earliest examples of Microsoft doing the same as a competitor by while the competitor is lauded for it, Microsoft is accused of anti-competitive practices.

    For those that don't know, back in the early days of the internet the browsers were treated like any other piece of software and cost money to the end user. Indeed, browsers were sold as boxed products.

    Netscape (now Firefox) was one of the largest (I think around 80% market share) and generally regarded as one of the best, if not THE best. Internet Explorer from Microsoft also cost money but few used it because it was feature poor. Still, the guys making Netscape saw Microsoft as a serious competitor as they put significant resources into IE.

    As IE became close to parity to Netscape the business model of the latter changed and they made it free to download and use to maintain and increase their market share. They still made money of business users, but it was free for home use.

    Microsoft responded and within months made IE free too, later going to bundle it with Windows itself.

    While it was Netscape that made the first move to going "free" to maintain and grow market share, Microsoft ended up looking like the bad boys by trying to compete.
    Reply +8
  • rotmm 04/03/2016

    I have to admit, I'm really confused by some of the statements from Tim Sweeney. I have a huge amount of respect for him and have to admit I don't truly understand what the whole UWP situation means, but some of the examples he gives of what "open" looks like are just weird.

    "Valve's Steam distribution service is booming with over 100m users, and publishers like Adobe, Autodesk, Blizzard, Riot Games and EA are operating highly successful businesses selling their games and content directly to consumers."

    Valve is essentially a closed system where you can only buy Valve games through Steam. Non-Valve games purchased through Steam have to have Steam installed. This isn't "open", it's the very definition of the opposite.

    The other examples are different direct delivery platforms that will in no way be negatively impacted by having a completely separate (that they are not using) Windows store. He uses the example of Photoshop not being in the Windows store as an example of it being an embarrassment to Microsoft. Why? You can't buy Photoshop in ANY store now. It's a subscription based service.

    It just sounds like a rant to me from someone who heads up a company that has released not one, not 2 but 3 Infinity Blade games that can only be purchased via the Apple App Store.

    [Edited for typo]
    Reply +46
  • "I was slightly confused by the reaction"

  • rotmm 04/03/2016

    @IcemanAFC "Errr.....can we also have it on PS4 as well then? Remember, adding another option is all positive."

    God, please no. Do you remember the nuclear fallout all over the net when Squeenix announced that Final Fantasy was coming to Xbox?

    I don't think I can live through another meltdown of that level, where fanboys were threatening suicide, harm on developers and eternal hatred of any and all they felt were responsible for that heinous act of betrayal.
    Reply -1
  • Face-Off: Heavy Rain on PS4

  • rotmm 01/03/2016

    @ncBadrock "I wonder if there are people out there this console generation, that don't hook up their PS4/XBO with the internet."

    What about all of those gamers on submarines? Why don't developers think of them before releasing games with show-stopping bugs?
    Reply -26
  • Superhot review

  • rotmm 25/02/2016

    @UncleLou Then again, maybe his post wasn't an attempt at a joke? Reply +1
  • rotmm 25/02/2016

    @UncleLou Sadly mine was a joke post back that missed even harder. I considered putting a ;) at the end, but probably it needed the words to all be different to have a chance at hitting ;) Reply +2
  • rotmm 25/02/2016

    @SuperShinobi "I'd like to point out though that this is basically a game where the frame rate constantly fluctuates between 60 and 0 fps, so why is it not considered a problem? "

    Huh? I don't see any fps fluctuations from the video? Not saying there isn't one, but if there is it's not obvious from that playthrough.
    Reply 0
  • rotmm 25/02/2016

    @Agermemnon Weird. Can find it in the store our even Coming Soon Reply -1
  • What Street Fighter 5 will - and won't - have at launch

  • rotmm 12/02/2016

    It looks like most of the missing parts are due in a month.... so why not just delay the release for a month? Reply +9
  • EGX 2016 tickets go on sale

  • rotmm 11/02/2016

    @rauper Thanks for the response. It was half (excluding EG sessions) as I did the maths when sending feedback ;) Good news about parking, could be helpful. Overall I thought EGX15 was great, was just disappointed by the value reduction of early entry and especially on the paucity of dev sessions. Glad to see there is some effort to rectify that. Reply 0
  • rotmm 11/02/2016

    @rauper Any thoughts about Early Access passes? Paid for them every year but it felt like you increased the number of early access tickets by 3-fold, reducing the value of getting in that extra hour significantly.

    Also, I see no mention of the Dev sessions. In 2015 there were half of the number vs 2014. As it's something I find particularly interesting, I was sad to see this huge downgrade in focus.

    65 for a 4-day pass isn't a huge amount, but when you add in food, travel, accommodation, etc it's a sizeable investment and increasing revenue for early access at the same time as reducing consumer benefit, as well as putting far less investment into the historically excellent dev sessions is giving me pause about whether to jump in again this year.
    Reply 0
  • Digital Foundry: Hands-on with Yakuza 6

  • rotmm 09/02/2016

    @UncleLou To be fair, it's made very clear that Ark is in Alpha and not necessarily representative of the final product, paid or not. And you could also make the argument that this is a paid demo as the only way you can get it is via a purchase ;) Reply +5
  • Lego Star Wars: The Force Awakens reveal leaked, due in June

  • rotmm 02/02/2016

    Fair play to Sony for moneyhatting exclusive content in a kids game Reply +3
  • The Witcher 2 headlines Xbox One January back-compatibility games

  • rotmm 21/01/2016

    "It's... an okay list, but Xbox owners will likely be looking at the most-requested games on Microsoft's Xbox Feedback site and wondering if any of them are ever going to see light of day - such as all of the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare series, plus all the Grand Theft Auto titles and Red Dead Redemption."

    When Rockstar can sell PS2 versions of their games again on PS4 for $15, why would they allow 360 versions of their games to be playable on XB1?
    Reply +7
  • Why the internet is in a flap about Nintendo's NX console

  • rotmm 20/01/2016

    It's becoming more and more apparent to me that "gamers" who focus on P's over and above all else are cunts.

    I don't like that word and don't use it lightly.

    But cunts are what they are.

    A stain on the industry.
    Reply +29
  • Here's everything in Xbox One's February system update

  • rotmm 20/01/2016

    @jabberwocky True. Not something I ever cared about because I'm normal & don't play inverted ;)

    However the fact you could change global settings day 1 on 360 and about day 700 on XB1 is ridiculous. If nothing else it was a key benefit for disabled gamers.
    Reply +1
  • rotmm 20/01/2016

    @jabberwocky Sorry, made a few posts in this thread so not sure what you are referring to? Reply -1
  • rotmm 20/01/2016

    @BigPrimeNumbers Not updated mine yet, but like most preview updates not all features will go live at once.
    Reply 0
  • rotmm 20/01/2016

    @bladdard "...PS4 doesn't have an Ethernet port."

    I must be the lucky one then as they made a PS4 with an Ethernet port just for me ;)
    Reply +3
  • rotmm 19/01/2016

    @lostmuppet You're welcome. It was part of the November update but with all of the other "new stuff" it was somewhat overlooked. Reply 0
  • rotmm 19/01/2016

    @domoslaf Go to the Apps store and download "Xbox Accessories"

    Run it and then you get global invert (and other) settings.

    Reply +6
  • rotmm 19/01/2016

    @McGooch "Another update?!!!"

    Yes, and not just for "stability" either.

    "Any chance of some decent exclusive games instead?!"

    Shall we call you Episode14?
    Reply +8
  • rotmm 19/01/2016

    @TheMightyEthan Just made this quick vid for you
    Reply +26
  • rotmm 19/01/2016

    Never understood why pins had to be offline, annoyed me on Xbox 360 also. To me this is fantastic news. Reply +5
  • Naughty Dog's Neil Druckmann on why Uncharted has to end

  • rotmm 20/01/2016

    @DX12 Naughty Dog are a Sony owned developer you spunkstick Reply +17
  • The Witness costs 29.99, pre-orders now live

  • rotmm 19/01/2016

    Loved Braid and interested in this. The difference is that prior to buying Braid I had something of an idea of what the game was about. This, 2.5 years after the reveal, I still don't have a clue.

    Also the pricing thing is interesting. I'm not going to say if I think 30 is too much or too little (though a little too high for me personally to "take a punt" on the game) but it was over the price of Braid that Jonathan Blow publicly criticised Microsoft.

    They believed in the game and wanted to sell it at the 1200ms price point. Mr Blow came out in the press and repeatedly stated forcefully that he wanted to sell it to "his fans" at the 800ms price point (circa $15 vs $10)

    When the game was later released on Steam at an even higher price I emailed Mr Blow and asked him why the price was so high on PC when he wanted to sell it lower on Xbox360. To his credit he did respond but essentially said that Microsoft were correct to charge that price and he just went on the offensive to try and stave any negative feedback from impacting on him.

    I thought what was a touch disingenuous, but I suppose business is business.
    Reply +10
  • Digital Foundry: Hands-on with Ark: Survival Evolved on Xbox One

  • rotmm 19/01/2016

    Thought about downloading this but hear it's quite a demanding and time consuming game and I really don't have the time.

    Heard about the poor performance, but what I didn't expect is for it to look so shit. From the vid it's a blur-fest and only some of that can come down to the resolution.

    It seems it's also poorly optimised on PC, with mostly terrible performance.

    Not sure if that's something that can really be rectified in the 6 months or so before the proper release.
    Reply +1