"don't give the consumer the fair value of their game", she told me. "When you have traded a game with a high street retailer, they then sell that game on for a large profit, which shows the game is worth more than what they give to the consumer who has traded the game in."
This quote only illustrates that she doesn't understand the concept of value. The reason a retailer like GAME can charge such a discrepancy between purchase price and re-sale price of used games is that they provide a service, by lowering transactions costs, for both sellers and buyers of used games and the discrepancy in price is what they charge for that service.
The service they provide to sellers is that they decrease the time looking for a customer, you'll get your money, or store credit, straight away without a need to find a buyer on ebay or similar. They also remove the risk of having a potential buyer not transfering payment after recieving a game or removing the cost of insuring against such fradulent behaviour.
The service they provide to the buyer is quality control. A person buying a used game from a high street retailer generally has a much easier time ensuring that the game they buy is in acceptable condition and, unlike when you buy online from another consumer there is very little risk that you will be stuck with an unusable copy that you paid good money for. This means a buyer who buys his game from say GAME will be prepared to pay more for the same game when buing at GAME compared to buying from some stranger online. So the potential profit margin for someone who sells their games privately will not be comparable to what GAME can charge.
In short, Ratcliffe doesn't understand that value isn't objective or at least pretends to, to promote her business concept. Reply+10
UL: It's hard to judge the changes without actually playing the new game, something I eagerly look forward to, however even if the camera can be moved a fair bit in DA:O it is still locked and can't be moved completely freely. Personally I never felt that it was to much of an issue. It almost never prevented me from taking a planned action, but I guess others found it to be more of an issue. Reply0
I didn't really understand this paragraph - the camera wasn't locked to your character in the original was it? And stamina (presumably you meant health here) and mana potions didn't take up a number slot, you could put them anywhere you wanted.
The camera was locked to the character you were currently controlling in DA:O. I assume that what the potion thing means they will have a separate dedicated slot, outside of the quickbar. Reply0
Are you saying that South Korea, a rich prosperous west friendly democracy suddenly becomes an militaristic expansionist power after uniting with their dirt poor northern neighbour, for no reason?
Well, it was fun for a while, but could the Darkfall fanboys please go back to pissing in bottles in front of PCs in their parent's basments now, please? Reply0
I reaqd that list, Silver. It's just some bulletpoints with things theat particular fanboy disagreed with. It doesn't specify in which way the review is actually factually incorrect.
The points about how the combat system is bad are just matters of opinions, for instance. There is no objective measure to determine wether or not a control system is floaty. That is just an opinion. Reply0
So far no one has managed to point out any factual errors in the review, besides some possible misunderstandings regarding running and performing actions at the same time. Reply0
A quick check in Alexa shows EG's traffic rank to be 5533. out of all websites in the world. In the gaming category it ranks as 120. In that category the only review sites above it are Gamespot, Gamespy, 1UP and IGN. I'd say that's fairly profilic.
Most other sites on the top 100 list for gaming related sites are WoW related. Reply0
Well, sweatshop78, balanced comments on the review. Sadly I suspect those will be drowned out by the fanboy shitstorm we'll start seeing coming in now.
Now personally the "hardcore" playstyle Darkfall does't appeal to me in the slightest. However if the main portion of the games fanbase had been reasonable, like you, it would have been sad to see reviews like this of a dedicated niche title. However, since the majority of the fanbase seems to consist of raving douchebags I find it merely amusing. Reply0
I'd imagine proper hit detection and fluid controls are rather essential parts of a good PvP game. What else is there to discuss in that regard? Reply0
UK Resistance: The War is Over
Why? Reply -100
Black Ops is best selling game ever in US
Are pre-owned sales killing gaming?
This quote only illustrates that she doesn't understand the concept of value. The reason a retailer like GAME can charge such a discrepancy between purchase price and re-sale price of used games is that they provide a service, by lowering transactions costs, for both sellers and buyers of used games and the discrepancy in price is what they charge for that service.
The service they provide to sellers is that they decrease the time looking for a customer, you'll get your money, or store credit, straight away without a need to find a buyer on ebay or similar. They also remove the risk of having a potential buyer not transfering payment after recieving a game or removing the cost of insuring against such fradulent behaviour.
The service they provide to the buyer is quality control. A person buying a used game from a high street retailer generally has a much easier time ensuring that the game they buy is in acceptable condition and, unlike when you buy online from another consumer there is very little risk that you will be stuck with an unusable copy that you paid good money for. This means a buyer who buys his game from say GAME will be prepared to pay more for the same game when buing at GAME compared to buying from some stranger online. So the potential profit margin for someone who sells their games privately will not be comparable to what GAME can charge.
In short, Ratcliffe doesn't understand that value isn't objective or at least pretends to, to promote her business concept. Reply +10
Dragon Age 2
The camera was locked to the character you were currently controlling in DA:O. I assume that what the potion thing means they will have a separate dedicated slot, outside of the quickbar. Reply 0
Kane & Lynch 2: Dog Days
But then Mafia II is just around the corner, so I'll save my money for that instead. Reply 0
Homefront
Mmmkay. That sure sounds more plausible. Reply 0
Eurogamer expands into Sweden
Dragon Age: Origins
E3: James Cameron's Avatar: The Game
Editor's blog: Darkfall aftermath
The points about how the combat system is bad are just matters of opinions, for instance. There is no objective measure to determine wether or not a control system is floaty. That is just an opinion. Reply 0
Actually, so far, it is. Reply 0
True hardcore gamers only use online casinos that steal your identity. Reply 0
Most other sites on the top 100 list for gaming related sites are WoW related. Reply 0
Darkfall Online
Worse than Halo.
Better than Killzone 2 though. Reply 0
No shit, Wally. I hadn't figured that out by the game's fanbase already. Reply 0
People who don't like unpolished garbage are the enemies of truth now?
Good one. Reply 0
So, who to believe, the raving loons, or the game's detractors? Reply 0
Now personally the "hardcore" playstyle Darkfall does't appeal to me in the slightest. However if the main portion of the games fanbase had been reasonable, like you, it would have been sad to see reviews like this of a dedicated niche title. However, since the majority of the fanbase seems to consist of raving douchebags I find it merely amusing. Reply 0