Mr-Writer Comments

Page 1 of 30

  • Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare not coming to Wii U

  • Mr-Writer 21/08/2014

    @A_FAN

    I'd say all gaming platforms, I'm sure PC has a % as well.
    Reply +7
  • Mr-Writer 21/08/2014

    @smelly

    Don't talk rubbish, all platforms have there stupid and immature fanboys.

    You are living proof, trying to pass off the WiiU as a console for the sophisticated adults.

    I suppose you all go on Nintendoland and discuss how best to bring about world peace and solve hunger in Africa do you?
    Reply +8
  • Mr-Writer 21/08/2014

    A next gen console with no next gen games? Reply -1
  • Performance Analysis: Diablo 3 at 1080p on Xbox One

  • Mr-Writer 19/08/2014

    A little off topic but... Does any one know if you start a local co-op game on this that you can then carry on that game online? Reply +2
  • Mr-Writer 19/08/2014

    @grassyknoll

    But it's not impossible if they have done it?
    Reply 0
  • Xbox boss Phil Spencer makes case for Tomb Raider exclusivity deal

  • Mr-Writer 19/08/2014

    @frazzl

    No, but I don't agree with it either.
    Reply 0
  • Mr-Writer 19/08/2014

    @frazzl

    Exactly mate, it's just MS turn to be the bad guy, it's no big deal really.

    I don't think they are all Sony fanboys, I think they are fanboys of which ever is seen as the best.

    Do you think we'd see this many "pro Sony" comments if the X1 got all the good PR?

    Of course both sides do have fanboys, and it's quite sad really, but the way it looks is that there is this huge cluster of "on the fence" fanboys who wait until certain factors are met before choosing a side.

    As a 360 owner I never noticed it, tbf I didn't even go on sites like this, but when I was a PS3 owner I noticed Sony was blasted (and rightly so for there actions).

    For years all I'd see was "live shits all over PSN", "the 360 controller is better" but now you see less and less.

    I admit to having a few dogs at MS, mainly because I need to justify NOT buying an X1 (with a PS4 and a Man Utd season ticket as well as a house wife and kid to pay for) I can't afford to be too easy otherwise I'd cave in and buy one.

    I may never buy one, I don't really want one ATM as I'm happy with my PS4 but that could change just like it did when I bought a 360 and refused to buy a PS3.

    Anyway I've actually forgotten what my point was meant to be now! And I can't scroll up on my phone to see!

    Anyway I agree fanboys are annoying, but we just have to ignore them.
    Reply +2
  • Mr-Writer 19/08/2014

    @frazzl

    I know the qoute very well. He has worded it strangely but what's wrong with saying.

    "We want to make a console so great that people will want it".

    Paraphrasing I know, but it's nearer to the "get a second job".

    So in the interest of not being a fanboy dear sir I suggest you call out the person who said it and tell them how wrong they are.
    Reply +2
  • Mr-Writer 19/08/2014

    @frazzl

    IUE isn't an exclusive it isn't even a timed one.

    You can't say there is a deal as there is no evidence, even if there was the differences are to many to make a fair comparison.

    Your next best example Heavy Rain is a better example.

    But the only one that can be compared like for like is ironically TR 2.

    Back in 1996, proving everyone who raged over TROTR didn't rage over that is nearly impossible.

    However I do think anyone who defends these actions, and berates MS is being hypocritcal.

    As whilst not identical they are very very close.

    That I 100% agree with you on.

    The same way I 100% agree with you on what MS are doing now is common practice of all of the system makers.

    But one question? If you are so impartial and have no loyality to any brand.

    Why does it bother you if people are hating on MS?
    Reply +2
  • Mr-Writer 19/08/2014

    @ludodown

    Link to Sony telling people "get a second job" please.
    Reply +2
  • Mr-Writer 19/08/2014

    @frazzl

    No really too many differences. I shall bullet point them to make it clear

    - Injustice UE is a GOTY esuque edition of a game

    - TROTR is a sequel to a reboot

    - IUE is multiplatform it launched on PS3, PS4, PC and Xbox 360 on the same date.

    - TR so far is an Xbox brand timed exclusive.

    - This means it could go to PC but it won't launch at the same time.

    - There is a deal for TR, it's been spoken about publicly.

    - There is no evidence other than speculation that a deal is in place that stopped the release of IUE on X1 and WiiU

    - There is evidence that a X1 and WiiU version of IUE were being developed.

    - There is no such evidence that TR is being developed for PS3 & PS4.

    - From that quote you posted MS are in fact publishing TR it seems.

    - Sony did not publish IUE


    To many differences to make a fair comparison.

    And you are still to admit that IUE was never announced for X1 and WiiU.

    Is that because it would mean admitting to making stuff up? Something you said you didn't do?
    Reply +2
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @Swooper_D

    Tomb Raider was released on PS1 and Satarn at the same time? Unless you meant had the first? Edit: ahhh I see it came our on the Satarn first my mistake.

    Bloodborne is a Sony IP how many times must people be told?

    They OWN the IP

    MS don't OWN TR

    If you are gonna compare at least find a comparison that doesn't have a huge massive difference.
    Reply +2
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @electrolite

    He means the ultimate edition.
    Reply 0
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    One question if they are publishing it why is it only a timed exclusive?

    You would of thought that it being on PC at the same time wouldn't be that big a deal, and why not just publish that version as well?

    It can't just be to get X1 sales up as it's on 360 as well.
    Reply 0
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @grassyknoll

    I mean you could argue, but I'm sure your not in the habit of making stuff up and then not being man enough to admit it :)
    Reply +7
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @grassyknoll

    The qoutes seem that way. I can't say 100% but reading between the lines it looks it.
    Reply +5
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @grassyknoll

    Sorry dude but Frazzl right they are not just paying to have exclusivity.

    So you can't knock them for publishing the game.

    Be the bigger man and just accept that MS are just doing what Sony would do if they could/ have done in the past.

    It sucks you can't play TR on PS4 but it's business.

    We both know Frazzl isn't man enough to admit the things I've called him out on.

    ;)
    Reply +3
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @frazzl

    What am I avoiding? That I won't admit you didn't say Injustice was announced for X1 and WiiU?

    Or that you never said Injustice and TR are identical?

    Yes I have avoid those arguments.

    As for Heavy Rain at the time it was a poor example as the publishing evidence only came to light today.

    So now yes you could say they are similar.

    Are you going to admit that Injustice was not announced for X1 and WiiU?

    Or that Injustice and TR are not identical?
    Reply +4
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @frazzl

    Well there proof that an X1 and WiiU version of Injustice was being made.

    There is no proof of a PS4 version of TR as yet.

    That and Injustice was released on none Sony platforms as well.

    That's a pretty big difference, other than that.
    Reply +2
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @frazzl

    I think you need to chill lad, this whole making stuff up thing is making you look silly.

    Claiming games were announced when they weren't.

    Saying Injustice being on PS3, PS4, PC and 360 is identical to TR just being on 360 and X1.

    Trying to pretend that I am raging over TR when I have said countless times I think MS have don't nothing wrong.

    Think you may need to see a Dr mate.
    Reply +4
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @frazzl

    They are not identical like you claimed are they.

    And as you pointed out a PS4 version was never announced so there is nothing to say a version is in deveolpment.

    Where as the X1 and WiiU Injustice was classified so whilst canned at some point they would of had some work no?

    But still I don't get how they are identical.
    Reply +3
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @frazzl

    Try again at what? How does any of that prove Injustice was announced for X1 and WiiU?
    Reply +2
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @frazzl
    "So what we have here is an identical situation. Or do you still deny that?"

    Well no as Injustice Ultimate edition is also on 360 and PS3 and PC so isn't an exclusive.

    And was also released on those other systems at the same time so wasn't timed either.

    :)
    Reply +1
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @frazzl

    I'm not defending Sony at all why do you keep making stuff up?

    All I'm doing is pointing out that you are wrong that Injustice was announced on X1 and Wiiu, they were classified, but that's not the same as announcing is it?

    On the announcement they did not get a mention so they were not announced.
    Reply +3
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @frazzl

    hahaha I never said they didn't pay of it to be exclusive (I wouldn't know) but I do know they were never announced like you claimed.

    I didn't even deny they were in development.

    You are making stuff again.
    Reply +5
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @frazzl

    That't not an announcement though is it?

    http://www.injustice.com/en/news/injustice-gods-among-us-ultimate-edition-coming-november-12th
    Reply +6
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @frazzl

    Link to the announment of Injustice on X1 and WiiU?
    Reply +2
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @bad09

    Just watch the "end" P.T trailer, not one Sony splash screen. If they were involved it would have one.

    Also Sony only announced that PT was exclusive, they never said the game it was teasing was exclusive.

    MS fanboys tried to say it was exclusive to justify TR.

    Sony fanboys assumed SCEJ involvement as they published PT.
    Reply +5
  • Mr-Writer 18/08/2014

    @Radamel

    Silent Hills isn't an exclusive.

    Bloodborne isn't a souls games.

    HTH
    Reply +9
  • PS4 leads US console sales for seventh month running

  • Mr-Writer 17/08/2014

    @frazzl

    "Now, there is evidence that an X1 and WiiU version was in the pipeline but they are not in the offical announment"
    Reply 0
  • Mr-Writer 17/08/2014

    @frazzl

    No mention of Injustice on X1 or WiiU here, and that is the first announcement is it not?

    Now, there is evidence that an X1 and WiiU version was in the pipeline but they are not in the offical announment.

    http://www.injustice.com/en/news/injustice-gods-among-us-ultimate-edition-coming-november-12th

    I said you had to prove there is a deal, I assume the TR deal involves money since Phil goes on about it, so you prove there is a deal on a game Sony have as an exclusive I will assume the same.

    How did I stealth edit when I fully admitted to changing the comments to better reflect my point? Hahahaha

    You are trying to kid yourself that I am wrong and a fanboy, but you know I am right otherwise you would of stopped going on.

    But that fact I am right and you are wrong and you know it burns you up inside.

    Having to go back to pervious debates just to try and get a foothold is something women do when they are losing an argument.

    Either that or cry, so please don't try that one.

    If it makes you feel better i'l admit right here that at some point, Sony will of had made a deal to take a 3rd party game exclusive.

    I don't know what that game was (it's not any of your examples mind) and there will of been some Sony fans who didn't bat an eyelid.

    Who then raged at MS for TR, those people are dicks.

    I don't doubt that there are some Sony fans who will have been hypocrites, but I just wanted to make the point that not everyone who was angry about TR was, you can't prove that everyone who raged didn't over a Sony game.

    Anyway the debate is getting tired and old and since you have resorted to having to go back to the past to make yourself feel better I'm afraid it's time to end it before you start with the proper insults.

    I do have another comment of yours to read but I won't even bother opening it.

    So once again


    Bigger man


    Bye
    Reply +2
  • Mr-Writer 16/08/2014

    @frazzl

    "Not that Mr-Writer will admit to Sony paying for a 3rd party exclusives"

    Hmmmmm.

    2 days earlier..


    "I'm not saying Sony have never done this. However every example used so far is not the same."

    There is a good chance they have, however once you have to prove that they money hatted a game from releasing on other platforms, just to be picky I'm gonna rule out Injustice as that was available on 360 and PS3 and PC so it's not an exclusive. (Which if you remember our past debate if it's on another platform it's not an exclusive) it was also released at the same time.

    So here is how the game has to be the same.

    It was going to be on PC and X1/ 360 when first announced.

    Have a first game that was not exclusive, not even timed.

    Then announced that a deal had been struck to make it an exclusive.

    The deal didn't include Sony publishing/ co-developing or buying the IP

    And then that every person you accuse of being a hypocrite didn't mind this because it was Sony who announced this.

    As for the fanboy dig, we have established many times I don't disagree what MS have done, if I was a fanboy wouldn't I be raging at them as well?

    I am merely calling into question the label of hypocrites, as I don't believe this can be proven, surely to be a hypocrite you would of had to turned a blind eye to the exact same situation just a different company?

    However every situation used has some vary degree of difference, so therefore they can't be hypocrites.

    You do this and I will call out anyone you want.

    Now until then goodbye.
    Reply +1
  • Mr-Writer 16/08/2014

    @frazzl

    So why use the word bought?

    No one has actually said there is a deal in place, if you can prove there is, which I can prove there is a deal in place for TR, then we will talk.
    Reply 0
  • Mr-Writer 16/08/2014

    @frazzl

    "I haven't bought the franchise"

    So what has Phil bought?

    Why use the word bought?
    Reply +1
  • Mr-Writer 16/08/2014

    @frazzl

    No I cannot, just like you cannot provide proof that they did :)

    As said last time if it's an exclusive deal why not just say?

    We both know how Sony like there PR, would this not be something to brag about?
    Reply -1
  • Mr-Writer 16/08/2014

    @CynicalMe3

    No don't you know MS NEVER pay for exclusives.

    Developers just fall over themselves to develop for the X1.

    Sony have to pay money for them all as no one likes Sony.

    No wonder they are in financial trouble.
    Reply 0
  • Mr-Writer 15/08/2014

    @dogmanstaruk

    It's unfair to call hypocrisy when the situations are not the same.

    BUT again MS haven't done anything wrong IMO, but I can see why people are upset.

    And tbf the reason Sony most probably haven't done the same is because they can't afford to, rather than them thinking its bad practice.
    Reply -1
  • Mr-Writer 15/08/2014

    @cloudskipa

    Most PS4 owners are ex 360 owners.

    You only need to look at this very page, the US 360 numbers where always stronger than PS3.

    Now the PS4 numbers are higher than the X1.

    Logic says people have moved from 360 to PS4

    HTH
    Reply +12
  • Mr-Writer 15/08/2014

    @dogmanstaruk

    Injustice was never officially announced for XO

    http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-10-07-injustice-gods-among-us-confirmed-for-ps4-but-not-xbox-one

    It also says another studio handled the port, when asked why no X1 port he didn't mention an exclusive deal.

    MOTWYW

    Also arnt those other examples Sony publishing a developers game.

    Very different from paying a publisher for exclusivity.

    I'd just like to point out that I agree with you, just not with your examples.

    In fact after much debate on the other, we are still to find a situation where Sony have paid a publisher for exclusivity.
    Reply +13
  • Mr-Writer 15/08/2014

    @Widge

    I know my good man, but he likes to use tired cliches so I thought my response should also be one.
    Reply +2
  • Microsoft confirms Rise of the Tomb Raider Xbox exclusivity deal "has a duration"

  • Mr-Writer 16/08/2014

    @frazzl

    "I haven't bought the franchise"

    So what has he bought?
    Reply +1
  • Mr-Writer 16/08/2014

    @frazzl

    Also haven't you speculated that TR WONT becoming to PS4 at all?

    But now I take it you think it will?

    As if you didn't now think this, that would make it a console exclusive yes?

    But you clearly think Hellblade and Ethan Carter have been made timed exclusives?

    So then you are comparing timed exclusives to a full consoles exclusive.

    So they are not the same.

    Again.
    Reply +3
  • Mr-Writer 16/08/2014

    @frazzl

    But neither have said there is a deal in place.

    If there was a deal again, why not just say. "We have a deal with Sony"

    We KNOW there is a deal in place for TR.

    And there is more evidence to show money has changed hands then not by the fact Phil goes on about how he didn't buy the franchise.

    Or is it a case of Sony have money hatted those games because you say so.

    But MS haven't money hatted TR also because you say so to suite your argument?
    Reply +1
  • Mr-Writer 15/08/2014

    @DaveSimonH

    Sony own the IP just like the own the demon souls IP.

    They are paying From to develop this IP.

    So you clearly don't get it.

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Computer_Entertainment#Owned_franchises_and_properties

    See all those games there? Sony owns them, and a lot of the time they hire a studio they don't own, to make that game.

    Or a studio will go to Sony with an idea and Sony will buy that idea off them, then pay them to make that game.
    Reply +2
  • Mr-Writer 15/08/2014

    @Gunnerholic

    But its their IP to do as they will no?

    Also they approved the game to be made, they could of said make it full exclusive, or no you are not making it at all.

    Do MS own TR? No?

    Oh... So remind me again how is this the same?
    Reply 0
  • Mr-Writer 15/08/2014

    @Gunnerholic

    The one published by Sony? As you do know Sony own the rights to Ghostbsuters?

    They released it on 360 at the same time in the U.S there was only a "time" on the EU version.

    But again.. Sony both own the GB IP and published the game.
    Reply 0
  • PlayStation 4's Share Play feature limited to 60-minute sessions

  • Mr-Writer 16/08/2014

    @cloudskipa

    Plus is a subscription service not a rental.

    PSNow is a rental service.

    HTH
    Reply 0
  • Mr-Writer 15/08/2014

    @afrogeez

    Yes it you can. I'm buying Diablo day one but my friend can't till after Christmas with this we can co-op until he buys the game and we can co-op online after once he has a copy. Though I doubt our saved game will carry over :(
    Reply +3
  • Mr-Writer 15/08/2014

    @cloudskipa

    Let me guess, unless it's X1 cloud then it's super amazing?
    Reply +11
  • Mr-Writer 15/08/2014

    @Rooster41 If it takes your friend an hour to beat a boss maybe he is not the best friend to ask. Reply +7